Your message dated Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:55:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#394413: fixed in installation-guide 20070115
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:55:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#388138: fixed in installation-guide 20070115
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:55:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#367861: fixed in installation-guide 20070115
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:55:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#395910: fixed in installation-guide 20070115
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:55:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#397974: fixed in installation-guide 20070115
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:55:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#402439: fixed in installation-guide 20070115
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:55:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#400263: fixed in installation-guide 20070115
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:55:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#389516: fixed in installation-guide 20070115
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Mathew Binkley wrote:
I have been downloading cd images from:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/powerpc/
because that's where the Debian website says to get them. None of the
images have worked for me because the installer has not been fixed.
As I have already said in
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
ok. in functions.sh, changing the test in is_system_user () to
return 0 instead of 1 if $ROOT/etc/passwd fails fixes the problem.
Only because it's causing the system to _always_ think that a system
user already exists, even if there's no password file,
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:55:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#370484: fixed in installation-guide 20070115
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Rick Thomas wrote:
The result is that now there's a very subtle release critical bug
(#404876) and no time to fix it.
Well, the release of etch is currently delayed due to the currently 95
open release critical bugs, of which #404876 is one. I don't see any
indication that the bug's not being
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:55:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#403035: fixed in installation-guide 20070115
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:55:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#402857: fixed in installation-guide 20070115
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:55:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#384321: fixed in installation-guide 20070115
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:55:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#394929: fixed in installation-guide 20070115
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:55:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#394471: fixed in installation-guide 20070115
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:55:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#386591: fixed in installation-guide 20070115
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:55:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#397790: fixed in installation-guide 20070115
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:55:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#381657: fixed in installation-guide 20070115
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:55:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#402437: fixed in installation-guide 20070115
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:55:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#305977: fixed in installation-guide 20070115
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:55:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#370425: fixed in installation-guide 20070115
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:55:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#248067: fixed in installation-guide 20070115
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:55:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#378651: fixed in installation-guide 20070115
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:55:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#397923: fixed in installation-guide 20070115
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:55:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#402492: fixed in installation-guide 20070115
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:55:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#305977: fixed in installation-guide 20070115
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:55:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#342076: fixed in installation-guide 20070115
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:55:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#380588: fixed in installation-guide 20070115
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Samuel Thibault wrote:
After installing Debian for a desktop use, numlock is not set by
default, this is a pain for people who have to remember to set it each
time they log in, and they will eventually say GNU/Linux sucks just
because of this irritating behavior :) (real story).
For
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
reassign 407035 cdebconf-gtk-udeb
Bug#407035: graphical installer crashes
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `cdebconf-gtk-udeb'.
End of message, stopping
Robert Millan wrote:
How about adding wine to desktop task?
Why? We seem to have a perfectly usable desktop without wine, and if you
want to install some windows software, you can apt-get install wine as
part of the process of installing it.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
frans,
why is functions.sh returning '1' if the file $ROOT/etc/passwd exists,
in both the is_system_user and root_password functions?
surely this should be 0 in both instances?
Er, it's not:
if ! [ -e $ROOT/etc/passwd ]; then
Your message dated Mon, 15 Jan 2007 23:19:03 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#406912: tasksel-data: Should add numlockx to desktop
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Joey Hess, le Mon 15 Jan 2007 23:19:03 -0500, a écrit :
Samuel Thibault wrote:
But there's a laptop task, isn't there a way to have it somehow
conflict with numlockx?
You think the laptop task is installed on all laptops? I'm sure this is
not the case, for various reasons.
This point
Samuel Thibault wrote:
My point is that very _few_ people know that installing numlockx is just
sufficient for having numlock set at bootup, while I guess (maybe that's
only a guess, but neither of us can answer, only polling can) that most
people would prefer numlock set. Or rather: it's
Le mardi 16 janvier 2007 à 10:16 -0500, Joey Hess a écrit :
Josselin Mouette wrote:
Apparently, the situation has gotten worse: with the latest daily build
(which, I have to say, kicks ass for all other things that matter - full
install in 12 minutes), only firefox is installed, not
Josselin Mouette wrote:
Apparently, the situation has gotten worse: with the latest daily build
(which, I have to say, kicks ass for all other things that matter - full
install in 12 minutes), only firefox is installed, not epiphany nor
galeon. Which means there is no GNOME browser installed
Package: debian-installer
Using the etch RC1 release of Debian installer.
*When the hostname defined contains '-' (the dash character), like
lsn-prc-z1-01
* Automatic partionning using a single partition with LVM is selected
The partitioner fails with the following error:
Could not stat
Joey Hess, le Tue 16 Jan 2007 10:18:59 -0500, a écrit :
I still don't understand why most people will want to configure their
computer to use something different from the bios default. If I want
numlock on, I set it in the bios, then it's always on, even during early
bootup. A program that
tasksel_2.64_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
tasksel_2.64.dsc
tasksel_2.64.tar.gz
tasksel_2.64_all.deb
tasksel-data_2.64_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Joey Hess, le Tue 16 Jan 2007 11:26:01 -0500, a écrit :
Samuel Thibault wrote:
The problem is that both Linux and the X server _clear_ numlock,
whatever the BIOS configuration.
Eh, that certianly didn't used to be true on x86 hardware.
I've been noticing this behavior on x86 hardware at
Josselin Mouette wrote:
I think this is because gnome-desktop-environment depends on
epiphany-browser | gnome-www-browser, and gnome-www-browser is provided
by firefox-gnome-support (or iceweasel-gnome-support), which is part of
the gnome-desktop task.
I wonder when this changed from whatever
Accepted:
tasksel-data_2.64_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel-data_2.64_all.deb
tasksel_2.64.dsc
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.64.dsc
tasksel_2.64.tar.gz
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.64.tar.gz
tasksel_2.64_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.64_all.deb
Override entries
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:29:58 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#407164: Logical volume name is wrong when the hostname
contains the dash character
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 16:18, Joey Hess wrote:
I still don't understand why most people will want to configure their
computer to use something different from the bios default. If I want
numlock on, I set it in the bios, then it's always on, even during
early bootup. A program that turns it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
severity 370098 serious
Bug#370098: epiphany isn't installed by the default installation
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Samuel Thibault wrote:
The problem is that both Linux and the X server _clear_ numlock,
whatever the BIOS configuration.
Eh, that certianly didn't used to be true on x86 hardware. I don't have
any to check right now..
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Monday 15 January 2007 16:08, Philipp Hübner @ SLZ wrote:
I installed the 686-kernel afterwards, rebooted with the 686-kernel,
and now it's running.
That is weird. You are basically contradicting your original report here
as you are now saying that the identical (?) 2.6.18 686 kernel _is_
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:08:35 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#407017: installation-report: SUN Ultra 10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jan 2007 16:32:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#370098: fixed in tasksel 2.64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hello!
NB, if you keep d-d as to: or cc:, please don't cc: me, I read the
list.
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:11:36 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mardi 16 janvier 2007 à 02:46 +0100, Luca Capello a écrit :
6) gnome-panel gives an .xsession-errors because Unable to open
desktop file
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version: Etch installer RC1
Date: January 15th 2006
Machine: Self-made PC (i386 32Bit)
Processor: AthlonXP 2600+
Memory: 512MB
Partitions:
Dateisystem Typ1K-Blöcke Benutzt Verfügbar Ben% Eingehängt auf
/dev/hda7 ext310286016
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 08:55:02PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
frans,
why is functions.sh returning '1' if the file $ROOT/etc/passwd exists,
in both the is_system_user and root_password functions?
surely this should be 0 in both instances?
Er, it's
Off-list posting
Op 13-01-2007 om 23:29 schreef Geert Stappers:
Op 12-01-2007 om 01:19 schreef Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton:
oh btw i hacked oem-config from ubuntu onto debian, and it works.
really i should do languagechooser-data as well.
anyone interested let me know.
What
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 09:03:31PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
ok. in functions.sh, changing the test in is_system_user () to
return 0 instead of 1 if $ROOT/etc/passwd fails fixes the problem.
Only because it's causing the system to _always_ think that a
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jan 2007 18:55:05 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#406911: user-setup: last set of bugfixes stops
passwd/make-user=false from working
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Type : Fondue à chocolat
Yikes, chocolate fondue...*now* here's a spam I want to answer
to...:-)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jan 2007 19:20:45 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#407169: installation-reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Loïc Minier wrote:
There's a small thread on the subject which initiated this discussion
on debian-devel@:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/01/threads.html#00448
The current situation is problematic for two reasons:
- a lot of people think that epiphany should be installed
It's never been the intention not to install epiphany. If this is
broken, it will be fixed ASAP. And gnome should use its standard browser
as the default in Debian.
Seconded.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I'd appreciate a careful review of this patch as it is late in the game
and not all parts of the code are easy to test. I'd hate to see
regressions because of some stupid mistake.
Although the existing code is not necessarily wrong, it does do a few
things in a way that, AFAIK, are not really in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 407039 -1
Bug#407039: LVM Volume deleted from graphical installer
Bug 407039 cloned as bug 407205.
reassign 407039 partman-lvm
Bug#407039: LVM Volume deleted from graphical installer
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to
clone 407039 -1
reassign 407039 partman-lvm
tags 407039 + pending
reassign -1 cdebconf-gtk-udeb
retitle -1 Changes value of question when GoBack is selected
thanks
On Monday 15 January 2007 20:16, Joel Johnson wrote:
When using the graphical installer (either installgui or expertgui) the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 407063 moreinfo
Bug#407063: wine in desktop task?
Tags were: patch
Tags added: moreinfo
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.63
Severity: wishlist
I wish I could install a minimal system during install, without using
the Netinst CD.
I use the netboot methode, with an apt-proxy for the sources.
At the tasksel phase during install, even if I deselect
everything, it install 540 packages,
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 21:27, Frans Pop wrote:
The second problem _is_ in the graphical frontend. It turns out that
the value of a question is changed even if GoBack is selected. In
this respect it behaves different from the regular frontend.
Cloning your report to cdebconf-gtk-udeb for
Charles Plessy wrote:
How about releasing a RC1.5, then, with a 2.6.18 as similar as possible
as the one forecasted in testing ?
Etch d-i installs etch; without forcing such a release to install
unstable, it would not be possible to use the 2.6.18 kernel currently in
unstable. If we point d-i
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: How did you boot the installer? CD (15 CD's )
Image version: Debian 3.1r4 from OSDisc.com on 1/4/2007
Date: Date and time of the install 1/15/2007 AM
Machine: Description of machine Samsung M-1500 (used) can't
Le Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 10:35:52AM -0500, Joey Hess a écrit :
Charles Plessy wrote:
How about releasing a RC1.5, then, with a 2.6.18 as similar as possible
as the one forecasted in testing ?
There are of course all kinds of ways to hack around this, but all of
them are suboptimal. For
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 407103 installation-reports
Bug#407103: installation-report: Issues installing on Toshiba laptop (A105)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `installation-reports'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
reassign 407103 installation-reports
thanks
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 11:17:43PM -0800, David Shaver wrote:
Subject: Issues installing on Toshiba laptop (A105)
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-3-686 other
Version: 2.6.18-7
Severity: normal (!?)
Not necessarily 'bugs', but...
This is really an
i agree on wine to stand in the desktop task.
Desktop task should cover user's possible activities and it's normal
that any user (mostly new users) to try to run a certain windows
application.
The question is ... Why not?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Hi,
Sk, 2007 01 14 23:40 +0200, roktas rašė:
Package: kbd-chooser
Severity: normal
Tags: l10n d-i patch
- Hebrew, Lithuanian and Latvian keyboards may have been adversely affected
as well ...
I have tested this. Yes, for the Lithuanian keyboard this workaround
must be removed also.
Your message dated Wed, 17 Jan 2007 02:14:33 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#407222: Install problem
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
reassign 407103 discover-data
retitle 407103 Does not detect Intel 950 ('945GM/GMS/940GML') correctly
thanks
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 08:17, David Shaver wrote:
Subject: Issues installing on Toshiba laptop (A105)
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-3-686 other
Version: 2.6.18-7
Severity: normal
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 407103 discover-data
Bug#407103: installation-report: Issues installing on Toshiba laptop (A105)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `discover-data'.
retitle 407103 Does not detect Intel 950 ('945GM/GMS/940GML') correctly
On Saturday 13 January 2007 13:50, Frans Pop wrote:
It looks like sorting with a specific delimiter set is completely
broken. Tests were done inside Debian Installer.
I've tested the final patch by Goswin and can find no more issues or
differences with GNU sort.
In some cases the use of -s is
Your message dated Wed, 17 Jan 2007 02:46:57 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#406770: Installation Report on Acer Aspire 2003 WLMI
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Wed, 17 Jan 2007 02:33:42 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#406813: installation-report: Installation mostly went
well. Mostly.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
From: Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and certainly can't expect to have everything run like a charm,
especially with very special hardware like the one you described in
the mail that started this thread.
It's not very special hardware. It's a bunch of IBM JS20 blades
configured as a
I am still unable to start the graphics part of my installation. My computer
will only boot to the command prompt to logon. Startx does nothing (no such
file or directory). When I run aptitude it shows the same packages in the
installed list and the not installed list. When I followed you
On Jan 16, 2007, at 8:46 PM, Mathew Binkley wrote:
As I said earlier, there shouldn't be an arbitrary line between the
installer and the packages. People aren't installing Etch the
installer or Etch the packages, they're installing Etch the
release. Test both parts simultaneously, as a
Mat has an important point here. Too often, I've seen: I'm sorry
about the bugs you've encountered post-install. It sounds like the
install itself went fine. I'm closing this report. Usually, the
person making the report doesn't have a clue about the fine points of
which package
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 05:31:09PM +0100, Martin Lambers wrote:
On Sun, 07. Jan 2007, 03:08:30 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
A netinst CD image.
Please give the jigdo image at
http://people.debian.org/~vorlon/tgatest/debian-40-alpha-NETINST-1.{jigdo,template}
a try and let me know if it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
reassign 407080 installation-reports
Bug#407080: problem
Warning: Unknown package 'instalation'
Bug reassigned from package `instalation' to `installation-reports'.
End of message,
Le Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 07:14:22AM +0100, Christian Perrier a écrit :
Actually, it's equally frustrating for all of us that we *can't*
release a new D-I despite the team plan to release RC2 a few weeks
after RC1.
We can't do this because the 2.6.18 kernel is not in testing.
Hi all,
How
Le mardi 16 janvier 2007 à 02:46 +0100, Luca Capello a écrit :
Is there a practical reason for requesting xpm icons? No need to
explain if an answer already exists, but I cannot find it.
This is because some menu systems don't understand other formats.
4) evince doesn't appear by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josselin Mouette wrote:
6) gnome-panel gives an .xsession-errors because Unable to open
desktop file epiphany.desktop for panel launcher. This is normal
as epiphany isn't installed by default, but I'd suggest to install
the
Le mardi 16 janvier 2007 à 11:22 +0200, Eddy Petrișor a écrit :
Epiphany is not installed by default? If this is the case, I consider it
a very important bug in debian-installer.
Hmm, AFAIR, it wasn't two weeks ago, and I thought *this* was intentional and
was happy about it.
On our
Joel Johnson wrote:
Package: installation-reports
Severity: important
Justification: after crashing, installer hangs starting partitioning task
Boot method: CD
Image version: installer build 20070109-03:51
Processor: AMD Athlon XP 2200+
Memory: 1GB
Partitions:
Disk /dev/sda: 500.1 GB,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
#
tags 378651 pending
Bug#378651: Manual section 7.2.1 needs update for loop-AES
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
tags 395910 pending
Bug#395910: debian-installer-manual: add auto mode
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 370098 tasksel
Bug#370098: epiphany isn't installed by the default installation
Bug reassigned from package `gnome-desktop-environment' to `tasksel'.
stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
reassign 370098 tasksel
stop
Hi,
I'm reassigning #370098 to tasksel for discussion of the default
browser in the default desktop task (GNOME).
#370098 has some small discussions on the topic, but the problems in
gnome-desktop-environment have been addressed (the package depends on
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 12:20:09PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
I don't know who and how we will decide what the default browser will
be
I would assume the GNOME team to decide on the defaut GNOME browser and
the KDE team to decide on the default KDE browser; and maybe somebody
else on some
hello all
I tried compiling libtasn1-2 package.
but when gave dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc -sa got the following error
make[5]: Leaving directory `/root/libtasn/libtasn1-2-0.2.17/doc'
make Makefile
make[5]: Entering directory `/root/libtasn/libtasn1-2-0.2.17/doc'
cd .. /bin/sh
Fount some information on the vi thing :
http://www.vim.org/tips/tip.php?tip_id=550 ; not sure why
I should have to add arrow key mappings myself, but it's working now.
Bored stiff? Loosen up...
Download and
Subject: Issues installing on Toshiba laptop (A105)
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-3-686 other
Version: 2.6.18-7
Severity: normal (!?)
Not necessarily 'bugs', but...
1) Multimedia card reader support modules apparently not available
and/or turned on in kernel:
07:06.2 Mass storage controller:
Well ... in one word: epiphany.
Why?
- integrated with gnome.
- faster
- simple
- People will use it like they use firefox, because it's behavior is
the same.
- users who wish firefox/iceweasel can install it also.
- the patch available (from the BR) seems to make sense.
firefox/iceweasel
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
