Finally got a moment to boot the image. it found the drive so I
guess thats good.
On 3 May 2007, at 19:57, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#417895: installation-reports: Can't install with USB-CD drive,
which was filed
* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070509 20:24]:
I'm not sure what's totally stupid about this, but any stupidity seems
limited to this script, /etc/init.d/lvm2, and not to the lsb init script
interface.
While that script might be a especialy bad example, the fallacy is in
believing something
--- Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
On Saturday 05 May 2007 19:26, harry gaillac wrote:
I agree you the fairly little memory is a problem
so
I would like to use the Sarge installer instead of
the
Etch . But either scsi module is different from
the
kernel revision loaded (esp)
On Thursday 10 May 2007 10:51, Alister Winfield wrote:
Finally got a moment to boot the image. it found the drive so I
guess thats good.
Great! Thanks for confirming that.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 10 May 2007 11:35, harry gaillac wrote:
The fairly little memory was probably a problem !!
Good, that was my guess too.
As I said, hopefully the issues with the sparc installer will be solved
after the next point release, but ATM we don't know when that will be
released.
Cheers,
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 09 May 2007 09:58:55 -0300, Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Well, I respect your opinion while I continue to disagree. We ought to
attract the user and look-and-feel makes difference.
Why? Why should we try to be the
Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070509 15:03]:
And by the way, showing the user how many useless things start at
install time can only be a good indication for them to think about
deinstalling most of them. Hiding how many unneded daemons
Hi
Yesterday Luca Suriano managed to rebuild directfb-0.9.25 applying
Ville's patch for linux_input module on his power mac and reported a
preliminary success by copying on the fly the new input driver in the
g-i environment.
Luca is now trying to building a custom gtk-miniiso including the
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 03:00:15PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
Package: grub-installer
Severity: important
As of 1.95+20070505-1, grub2 supports GPT on PC/BIOS systems [1]. When user
is installing a GPT disk, grub-installer should automaticaly
Attilio Fiandrotti [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The gtk-miniiso seems to be anyway broken [1] because of the libc
dependancy, so i guess he has to defer building until that's fixed, is
this correct?
Looks like it was fixed on yestarday dak's pulse on a Bastian's mklibs
upload.
--
O T A
On Wednesday 09 May 2007 15:52, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Don't you think that admins should know how to do a:
#: apt-get remove --purge usplash
Same goes for 'aptitude install usplash'. That is not an argument.
pgpUVejnBVGZF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Otavio Salvador ha scritto:
Attilio Fiandrotti [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The gtk-miniiso seems to be anyway broken [1] because of the libc
dependancy, so i guess he has to defer building until that's fixed, is
this correct?
Looks like it was fixed on yestarday dak's pulse on a Bastian's
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wednesday 09 May 2007 15:52, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Don't you think that admins should know how to do a:
#: apt-get remove --purge usplash
Same goes for 'aptitude install usplash'. That is not an argument.
Sure, but only for admins and not regular
On Wednesday 09 May 2007 22:21, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I like the patch and would like to commit it (anyone against it?). I'm
wondering if xfs works on grub2. Have you ever tested it? I didn't.
Yes. See my reply from yesterday.
pgpRs8EZgh44T.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wednesday 09 May 2007 22:21, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I like the patch and would like to commit it (anyone against it?). I'm
wondering if xfs works on grub2. Have you ever tested it? I didn't.
Yes. See my reply from yesterday.
Ok, I'll see if I have time
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 05:21:07PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 03:00:15PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
Package: grub-installer
Severity: important
As of 1.95+20070505-1, grub2 supports GPT on PC/BIOS systems [1]. When
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 10:34:49PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
tags 422370 - patch
thanks
On Wednesday 09 May 2007 22:02, Robert Millan wrote:
Here it is. I tested it with grub-installer from trunk, but only in
combination with an etch installer because of current
mklibs/gcc/binutils
* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070509 20:14]:
as humans are better at coping with errors than humans are.
?
sorry, meant to write than computers are.
I'd like to ask you too, to not argue about usplash until you have
actually tried it. I know that you haven't, since the above statement is
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have recently wanted a simple utility that would return the partition
type of a certain partition, and now it seems we want a simple utility
that returns the type of partition table used.
I guess someone will have to write those. using libparted for
Package:debian-archive-keyring
Version: 2007.02.19
Severity: important
Tags: d-i etch
Please upload an update of debian-archive-keyring for the first point
release of Etch to include the Etch Stable Release Key (ADB11277).
The file /usr/share/keyrings/debian-archive-keyring.gpg is used during
On Thursday 10 May 2007 15:30, Robert Millan wrote:
grub-probe -t partmap does exactly that, with 104 KiB (-O2) and no
other dependencies. Do you want an udeb that includes grub-probe?
Can you give an example of its output?
Alternatively, could partman write partition table information to
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alternatively, could partman write partition table information to
debconf so that grub-installer can grab it?
No, that would be extremely fragile.
Can you elaborate it, please?
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 03:48:49PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 10 May 2007 15:30, Robert Millan wrote:
grub-probe -t partmap does exactly that, with 104 KiB (-O2) and no
other dependencies. Do you want an udeb that includes grub-probe?
Can you give an example of its output?
$
On Thursday 10 May 2007 17:26, Robert Millan wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 03:48:49PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 10 May 2007 15:30, Robert Millan wrote:
grub-probe -t partmap does exactly that, with 104 KiB (-O2) and
no other dependencies. Do you want an udeb that includes
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 02:44:10PM +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Hi
Yesterday Luca Suriano managed to rebuild directfb-0.9.25 applying
Ville's patch for linux_input module on his power mac and reported a
preliminary success by copying on the fly the new input driver in the
g-i
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://people.debian.org/~fjp/d-i_manual/log/en.log
===
It is possible to
On Tue, 08 May 2007 09:58:06 -0300
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only killer app for me with usplash is user input during boot - I
know usplash (and cryptsetup using usplash) supports it out-of-the-box,
does splashy?
I added support for input in splashy already some time
Tim Dijkstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 08 May 2007 09:58:06 -0300
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only killer app for me with usplash is user input during boot - I
know usplash (and cryptsetup using usplash) supports it out-of-the-box,
does splashy?
I added
Package: mklibs-copy
Version: 0.1.20
Severity: normal
Basically, there's not enough docs to differentiate this package from
mklibs. Problems include:
Description: Shared library reduction script
mklibs-copy produces a minimal set of shared libraries that contain
only the libs which are
Hi,
On Thursday 10 May 2007 18:40, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
I suspect it would be a good idea if we managed to install the default
debian laptop task automatically on laptops as well as our own laptop
task, to avoid having to duplicate the information available there.
Not sure how to do
On Thursday 10 May 2007 22:30, Holger Levsen wrote:
How does d-i do that?
laptop-detect called from /usr/lib/tasksel/tests/laptop.
pgpOIumeuueTa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
[Holger Levsen]
How does d-i do that?
It does not try to override the tasksel tasks, and leave it all to
tasksel to do as it normally do. We on the other hand set the tasks
to install based on the profile choosen, and thus override tasksel
quite a bit.
Friendly,
--
Petter Reinholdtsen
--
When the installation freezes, are you able to change to VT2? (Alt+F2,
followed by enter), and if so, what is the last few lines from ps ax
and dmesg?
--
David Härdeman
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 10:30:39PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Thursday 10 May 2007 18:40, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
I suspect it would be a good idea if we managed to install the default
debian laptop task automatically on laptops as well as our own laptop
task, to avoid having to
Your message dated Thu, 10 May 2007 17:07:58 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Your message dated Thu, 10 May 2007 17:06:48 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Your message dated Thu, 10 May 2007 17:10:20 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Hello,
I have tried installing via netinstall CD (daily build - few days old,
although it was the latest build as of yesterday), but if
I select LVM2 with Encryption (LUKS), I receive the following error on the
Partition section:
Partition disks
Configuration of encrypted volumes failed
An
one of the guys on the Debian mailing list suggested that I respond to
the post on this mailing list and report my results.
The thread I had linked to in my earlier post suggested installing
Linux with the pci=noapci boot option. I read the help documentation
for the Debian installer and it just
On Thursday 10 May 2007 23:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have tried installing via netinstall CD (daily build - few days old,
although it was the latest build as of yesterday), but if
I select LVM2 with Encryption (LUKS), I receive the following error on
the Partition section:
In vt2, dmesg
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 422255 linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-11
Bug#422255: Installing 4.0r0 etch with guided LVM encryption install and JFS
fails (EXT3 is ok) in OS-X virtual machine
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `linux-2.6'.
retitle 422255
reassign 422255 linux-2.6 2.6.18.dfsg.1-11
retitle 422255 [etch] Installing with root on JFS in LVM fails
severity 422255 important
thanks
On Friday 04 May 2007 16:27, Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen wrote:
Guided LVM encryption where I change ext3 root filesystem to jfs.
The entire disk (5GB) is
kernel-wedge_2.35_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-wedge_2.35.dsc
kernel-wedge_2.35.tar.gz
kernel-wedge_2.35_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.25_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.25.dsc
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.25.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.20-1-amd64-di_1.25_amd64.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.20-1-amd64-di_1.25_amd64.udeb
linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.48_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.48.dsc
linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.48.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.20-1-486-di_1.48_i386.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.20-1-486-di_1.48_i386.udeb
Accepted:
kernel-wedge_2.35.dsc
to pool/main/k/kernel-wedge/kernel-wedge_2.35.dsc
kernel-wedge_2.35.tar.gz
to pool/main/k/kernel-wedge/kernel-wedge_2.35.tar.gz
kernel-wedge_2.35_all.deb
to pool/main/k/kernel-wedge/kernel-wedge_2.35_all.deb
Override entries for your package:
Accepted:
acpi-modules-2.6.20-1-amd64-di_1.25_amd64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.20-1-amd64-di_1.25_amd64.udeb
ata-modules-2.6.20-1-amd64-di_1.25_amd64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/ata-modules-2.6.20-1-amd64-di_1.25_amd64.udeb
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 00:17:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#421352: fixed in kernel-wedge 2.35
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Accepted:
acpi-modules-2.6.20-1-486-di_1.48_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.20-1-486-di_1.48_i386.udeb
ata-modules-2.6.20-1-486-di_1.48_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/ata-modules-2.6.20-1-486-di_1.48_i386.udeb
linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6_1.12_arm.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6_1.12.dsc
linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6_1.12.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.20-1-footbridge-di_1.12_arm.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.20-1-footbridge-di_1.12_arm.udeb
linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6_1.20_ia64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6_1.20.dsc
linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6_1.20.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.20-1-itanium-di_1.20_ia64.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.20-1-itanium-di_1.20_ia64.udeb
Accepted:
ata-modules-2.6.20-1-ixp4xx-di_1.12_arm.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6/ata-modules-2.6.20-1-ixp4xx-di_1.12_arm.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.20-1-footbridge-di_1.12_arm.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.20-1-footbridge-di_1.12_arm.udeb
Package: debian-installer
The KEYRING variable currently has two functions:
1) the keyring to use while retrieving udebs for the image
2) the keyring to include in the initrd
Because including a keyring in a boot floppy is useless (and there is not
enough space for it anyway), KEYRING is
linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6_0.15_mips.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6_0.15.dsc
linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6_0.15.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.20-1-r4k-ip22-di_0.15_mips.udeb
ppp-modules-2.6.20-1-r4k-ip22-di_0.15_mips.udeb
linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6_0.15_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6_0.15.dsc
linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6_0.15.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.20-1-s390-di_0.15_s390.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.20-1-s390-di_0.15_s390.udeb
Accepted:
acpi-modules-2.6.20-1-itanium-di_1.20_ia64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.20-1-itanium-di_1.20_ia64.udeb
ata-modules-2.6.20-1-itanium-di_1.20_ia64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6/ata-modules-2.6.20-1-itanium-di_1.20_ia64.udeb
Accepted:
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.20-1-sb1-bcm91250a-di_0.15_mips.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.20-1-sb1-bcm91250a-di_0.15_mips.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.20-1-sb1a-bcm91480b-di_0.15_mips.udeb
to
linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_1.22_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_1.22.dsc
linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_1.22.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.20-1-sparc64-di_1.22_sparc.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.20-1-sparc64-di_1.22_sparc.udeb
Accepted:
ata-modules-2.6.20-1-sparc64-di_1.22_sparc.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6/ata-modules-2.6.20-1-sparc64-di_1.22_sparc.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.20-1-sparc32-di_1.22_sparc.udeb
to
Accepted:
crypto-modules-2.6.20-1-s390-di_0.15_s390.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6/crypto-modules-2.6.20-1-s390-di_0.15_s390.udeb
dasd-modules-2.6.20-1-s390-di_0.15_s390.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6/dasd-modules-2.6.20-1-s390-di_0.15_s390.udeb
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6_0.15.dsc
linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6_0.15.tar.gz
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within
61 matches
Mail list logo
