I am not blind, but I would like the installer to beep each time it needs input. The monitor that is
used when I am installing Debian is located left of the monitor I normally use just outside my
sight. When I am trying to do other work during an install I would like the beep to tell me to look
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 411943 + patch
Bug#411943: partman-lvm: size of new LVs must be given in multiple of 1024
instead of 1000
There were no tags set.
Bug#437016: Uses different value to GB then rest of partman
Bug#471764: partman-lvm: cannot set a size to lvm partiti
tags 411943 + patch
thanks
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 06:09:33AM -0400, Avery Fay wrote:
> I think this bug is quite high priority and should definitely be fixed
> for Lenny. I recently installed from a debian installer snapshot and
> manually partitioning LVM was nearly impossible. It may not make
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 07:48:37PM +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> If you are in favor of it, I think it would make more sense (at least to
> me) to spend time testing and working on automatic activation of LVM
> devices than to spend many hours debugging a new patch with different
> assumptions.
At
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.29~bpo40+1
reassign 255397 partman-md
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.29~bpo40+1
> reassign 255397 partman-md
Bug#255397: partitioner: Show md devices from first start
Bug reassigned from package `mdcfg' to `partman-md'.
>
End of message, stopping processi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.29~bpo40+1
> retitle 411943 partman-lvm: size of new LVs must be given in multiple of 1024
> instead of 1000
Bug#411943: partman-lvm: inconsistent usage of unit symbols for decimal and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.29~bpo40+1
> forcemerge 391474 255397
Bug#391474: partman: Detecting raid devices when starting the partitioner.
Bug#255397: partitioner: Show md devices from first start
Forcibly Merged
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.29~bpo40+1
> merge 417937 490578
Bug#417937: debian-installer does not support raid10 for partitioning
Bug#490578: partman: Please provide RAID10 support
Merged 417937 490578.
>
End of m
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.29~bpo40+1
> forcemerge 411943 437016 471764
Bug#411943: partman-lvm: inconsistent usage of unit symbols for decimal and
binary multiples
Bug#437016: Uses different value to GB then rest
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 12:21:07PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Saturday 19 July 2008, I wrote:
> > My current feeling is that that bit should be dropped from your current
> > patchset and that we should consider that question separately for both
> > RAID and LVM afterwards, and we should at least
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 12:16:07PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Saturday 19 July 2008, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> > > Regarding your patch: my last thoughts on it were that I'm still not
> > > sure whether it is a good idea to switch to automatic detection of
> > > RAID during init.d at this point, esp
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 01:13:04PM +0200, Veselin Mijuskovic wrote:
> I'm pleased to announce that I'm starting D-I translations for Serbian
> (sr_RS) language.
Welcome onboard!
Let's hope that you will manage to get the localization ready for Lenny.
:)
Cheers,
--
Jérémy Bobbio
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 12:19:08AM +0200, Max Vozeler wrote:
I wonder how we should best handle this difference. We
could try to offer the valid key sizes only after the user
has chosen the iv-algorithm, but that is more involved
because users may currently change parameters in any order.
Perh
Hi Daniel,
Have you had a chance to test this new image yet?
Cheers,
FJP
On Wednesday 16 July 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> Great. I've now updated the patch to also show an appropriate message
> in the progress bar and to automatically set the rootdelay=10 parameter
> for the target system.
>
> Plea
Hi
Please have a look at the following packages with solved RC bugs to see
if it's ok to unblock them:
* busybox
* gnumach
* live-installer
* mdadm
* qcontrol
* rootskel-gtk
* udev
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 491446 pending
Bug#491446: win32-loader: [INTL:ru] Russian program translation update
Tags were: l10n patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Plea
Package: win32-loader
Version: 0.6.7
Severity: wishlist
Tags: l10n patch
Russian program translation update is attached.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU c
On Friday 18 July 2008, Ryan Niebur wrote:
> I split the patch up like Jérémy said to.
In the first patch the MISSING_DEVICES variable should be initialized to
empty in the main code line, not inside some conditional statement based
on the RAID level. That goes for _all_ variables used in the ge
Mark Thommyppillai wrote:
Is there anything else I could try?
You could solder on a serial port so you can watch the boot process and
see where it fails.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please allow pango1.0 1.20.5-1 and glib2.0 2.16.4-2 migrate to testing.
> Both have important bugfixes.
Both need ack from debian-boot
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 02:10:30PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Saturday 19 July 2008, Robert Millan wrote:
> > This patch adds a recipe for creating a BIOS boot partition when
> > installing on GPT. Note the amd64 directory is not included with the
> > patch, as I would suggest just using a symli
Luk Claes wrote:
> Andrew Pollock wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Can you please let dhcp3 3.1.1-3 into testing?
>
> unblocked
Though need ack from debian-boot first...
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
* Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-17 10:24:10 +]:
> As the system should be supported well with current daily builds of the
> installer I'm closing this report.
Sadly I must ask to reopen this bug.
Daily installer builds still immediately reboot after uncompressin
On Saturday 19 July 2008, Robert Millan wrote:
> This patch adds a recipe for creating a BIOS boot partition when
> installing on GPT. Note the amd64 directory is not included with the
> patch, as I would suggest just using a symlink for that (or otherwise
> copying it).
I assume that you did an
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jul 2008 13:53:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#490840: installation-reports: Succesful install on
QNAP ts-109
has caused the Debian Bug report #490840,
regarding installation-reports: Succesful install on QNAP ts-109
to be marked as
On Thursday 10 July 2008, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.0.rc14-2
> of my package "dmraid".
I see that someone else has already picked it up. I looked at it earlier,
but could not connect to mentors.d.n then.
Cheers,
FJP
signature.asc
Description:
Quoting Veselin Mijuskovic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi,
>
> I'm pleased to announce that I'm starting D-I translations for Serbian
> (sr_RS) language.
>
> I'm currently the project leader and lead core maintainter of cp6Linux
> distribution which is based on Ubuntu/Debian and is a project to crea
On Wednesday 16 July 2008, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> > However, I do see that this implementation is simpler and there were
> > issues with the tabs, so post-Lenny for that is fine.
>
> The tabs should, IMHO, come with a wider redesign of the current
> interface. Debian is going to be installed on mo
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jul 2008 11:17:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#491263: fixed in debian-installer 20070308etch3
has caused the Debian Bug report #491263,
regarding network-console, etch netinst, openssh
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Mapping stable to proposed-updates.
Accepted:
debian-installer-images_20070308etch3_s390.tar.gz byhand
debian-installer_20070308etch3.dsc
to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer_20070308etch3.dsc
debian-installer_20070308etch3.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer_20
Hi,
I'm pleased to announce that I'm starting D-I translations for Serbian
(sr_RS) language.
I'm currently the project leader and lead core maintainter of cp6Linux
distribution which is based on Ubuntu/Debian and is a project to create
a Linux distribution that is fully localized for Serbian
debian-installer_20070308etch3_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer_20070308etch3.dsc
debian-installer_20070308etch3.tar.gz
debian-installer_20070308etch3_s390.deb
debian-installer-images_20070308etch3_s390.tar.gz
Greetings,
Your D
On Saturday 19 July 2008, I wrote:
> My current feeling is that that bit should be dropped from your current
> patchset and that we should consider that question separately for both
> RAID and LVM afterwards, and we should at least consider crypto as
> well.
One thing that should be part of that c
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 06:42:45PM +0300, Shachar Or wrote:
> I am setting up an automatic installation using preseed. I'm using the
> 'd-i preseed/late_command string'
> option to make it wget a script and run it.
>
> My challenge is to make this script run in foreground because it is
> interac
On Saturday 19 July 2008, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> > Regarding your patch: my last thoughts on it were that I'm still not
> > sure whether it is a good idea to switch to automatic detection of
> > RAID during init.d at this point, especially if we don't do the same
> > for LVM at the same time.
>
> A
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > The letter is the arrangement of the copies:
> >n - near copies : Multiple copies of one data block are at similar
> > offsets in different devices.
> >f - far copies : Multiple copies have very different offsets
> >o
Hi!
Just for the record, Ryan's patch would close (at least) #417937.
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 01:41:02PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 18 July 2008, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> > I agree that it would be a suitable inclusion for Lenny, from this
> > first look. But I also want to see the bug fi
On Saturday 19 July 2008, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Well, so far I don't see any translator using anything but "RAIDx" to
> translate "RAIDx".
It would also be more consistent with templates where we show the current
RAID configuration I think as there it is not translatable.
> So, I'd actually
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Index: mdcfg/debian/mdcfg-utils.templates
> ===
> --- mdcfg/debian/mdcfg-utils.templates(revision 54408)
> +++ mdcfg/debian/mdcfg-utils.templates(working copy)
> @@ -107,6 +107,
40 matches
Mail list logo
