flash-kernel_2.22_armel.changes ACCEPTED

2009-07-29 Thread Archive Administrator
Accepted: flash-kernel-installer_2.22_armel.udeb to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel-installer_2.22_armel.udeb flash-kernel_2.22.dsc to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_2.22.dsc flash-kernel_2.22.tar.gz to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_2.22.tar.gz flash-kernel_2.22_armel.de

Processing of flash-kernel_2.22_armel.changes

2009-07-29 Thread Archive Administrator
flash-kernel_2.22_armel.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: flash-kernel_2.22.dsc flash-kernel_2.22.tar.gz flash-kernel_2.22_armel.deb flash-kernel-installer_2.22_armel.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot

Processed: Re: Bug#539228: partman freezes with encrypted partitions

2009-07-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 539228 important Bug #539228 [debian-installer] partman freezes with encrypted partitions Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#539228: partman freezes with encrypted partitions

2009-07-29 Thread Max Vozeler
severity 539228 important thanks Hello, On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:43:04AM +0200, da jedall wrote: > When i try to install debian squeeze on usb key (netinstall) > and when i try to create installation over encrypted fs in partman,partman > reload and freeze at 52% of loading. > The installation

Bug#539228: partman freezes with encrypted partitions

2009-07-29 Thread da jedall
Package: debian-installer Version: squeeze Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Tags: partman,luks,cryptsetup,encrypted The bug does not occur on the system where bugreport is installed,because this bug prevent me from installing debian When i try to install debian squeeze on u

Re: Kernel BoF, 29th July

2009-07-29 Thread Max Vozeler
Maks, On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:51:04PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > even more if it is loop-aes which show a long history of > hostily of the module owner versus linux-2.6 upstream. That's not true. There are several reasons why loop-AES has not been merged upstream, and has very little

Re: Kernel BoF, 29th July

2009-07-29 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 29 July 2009, Frans Pop wrote: > On Wednesday 29 July 2009, you wrote: > > > Just for the record, the following is NOT correct: > > > 10:09 otavio: only linux-modules-extra > > > 10:09 nothing d-i uses and nothing one should really have to > > > care. > > > > > > D-I uses the loop-ae

Re: Kernel BoF, 29th July

2009-07-29 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:50:58PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Wednesday 29 July 2009, maximilian attems wrote: > > > Are there logs of the two meetings? > > > > well the second meeting got shortcut by recent events, > > first meeting yes: > > http://charm.itp.tuwien.ac.at/~mattems/%23debian-kerne

Re: Kernel BoF, 29th July

2009-07-29 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 29 July 2009, you wrote: > > Just for the record, the following is NOT correct: > > 10:09 otavio: only linux-modules-extra > > 10:09 nothing d-i uses and nothing one should really have to > > care. > > > > D-I uses the loop-aes modules (for encrypted partitioning) and that > > is exa

Re: Kernel BoF, 29th July

2009-07-29 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 29 July 2009, maximilian attems wrote: > > Are there logs of the two meetings? > > well the second meeting got shortcut by recent events, > first meeting yes: > http://charm.itp.tuwien.ac.at/~mattems/%23debian-kernel.2009-07-25.log Thx. Just for the record, the following is NOT corre

Re: Kernel BoF, 29th July

2009-07-29 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:08:11PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Tuesday 28 July 2009, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > There will be a second kernel BoF/meeting tomorrow (29th July) at > > 16:00-18:00 local time (14:00-16:00 UTC). > > > > I would like to discuss a possible lenny-and-1/2 kernel release. Th

Re: Kernel BoF, 29th July

2009-07-29 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 28 July 2009, Ben Hutchings wrote: > There will be a second kernel BoF/meeting tomorrow (29th July) at > 16:00-18:00 local time (14:00-16:00 UTC). > > I would like to discuss a possible lenny-and-1/2 kernel release. There > should be time to discuss several other issues. Are there logs

Re: [PATCH] Basic Openmoko GTA02 support

2009-07-29 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
CCing anibal as he is going to take care of the openmoko kernel. On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:48:15AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Gaudenz Steinlin [2009-07-26 20:35]: > > I agree about the name change. We want to use the same name the > > Debian kernel package will use for the architecture.

[patch][parted] debian/rules: Enable device-mapper only on Linux

2009-07-29 Thread Luca Favatella
Hello, Otavio. Please consider applying this patch to Debian parted. Feel free to change variable name. I tested this on GNU/kFreeBSD with success. This could affect GNU/Linux (but it shouldn't). Cheers, Luca Favatella From 50216d2c337a4e02649479058978ff0010d68583 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From

Bug#399840: Do we want an ssh-server task?

2009-07-29 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br): > Hello, > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Frans Pop wrote: > > Most systems really only want ssh, not any of the rest. The real problem > > with ssh server is that almost everybody wants it, but we only want it > > installed deliberately becau

Bug#452388: Back on "'standard system' is confusing" bug report

2009-07-29 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl): > > does not make it clear that standard+desktop will end up in a GUI. > > Correct. > > > If we go back to "Standard environment", I guess it does not make > > things clearer enough. > > The current short description is "Standard *system*", not "Standa

Bug#539074: marked as done ([INTL:sv] Swedish strings for cdebconf debconf)

2009-07-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:16:34 +0200 with message-id <4a7059c2.8040...@bsnet.se> and subject line Re: Bug#539074: [INTL:sv] Swedish strings for cdebconf debconf has caused the Debian Bug report #539074, regarding [INTL:sv] Swedish strings for cdebconf debconf to be marked as done. T

Bug#452388: Back on "'standard system' is confusing" bug report

2009-07-29 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello, On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Frans Pop wrote: > I guess changing it to "Graphical desktop environment" would be OK, but > that does not make "Standard (non-graphical) environment" any less wrong! I think it would make clear that it is indeed a graphical system and it makes sense for me

Bug#399840: Do we want an ssh-server task?

2009-07-29 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello, On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Frans Pop wrote: > Most systems really only want ssh, not any of the rest. The real problem > with ssh server is that almost everybody wants it, but we only want it > installed deliberately because of the open port. Probably a separate task > for it is the o

Bug#539074: [INTL:sv] Swedish strings for cdebconf debconf

2009-07-29 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Martin Bagge (brot...@bsnet.se): > > package: cdebconf > severity: wishlist > tags: patch l10n > > Please consider to add this file to translation of debconf. cdebconf messages are handled along with D-I translations. Indeed, the D-I Swedish translation already includes the complete tran

Bug#452388: Back on "'standard system' is confusing" bug report

2009-07-29 Thread Ferenc Wagner
Christian Perrier writes: > My understanding of your point is that having this: > > [ ] Desktop environment > [ ] Foo > [ ] Bar > [ ] Standard (non-graphical) environment > > does not make it clear that standard+desktop will end up in a GUI. > > If we go back to "Standard environment", I

Complex preseeded partitioning

2009-07-29 Thread Matthew Johnson
Back in 2007 I sent some emails to this list about preseeding with complex partitioning schemes (lvm on raid, lvm on encrypted raid, etc). I don't know how much this has improved since then, but having chatted to a -boot member at debconf, he suggested this could still be useful. The original mail

Bug#452388: Back on "'standard system' is confusing" bug report

2009-07-29 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 29 July 2009, Christian Perrier wrote: > My understanding of your point is that having this: > > [ ] Desktop environment > [ ] Foo > [ ] Bar > [ ] Standard (non-graphical) environment > > does not make it clear that standard+desktop will end up in a GUI. Correct. > If we go b

Bug#399840: Do we want an ssh-server task?

2009-07-29 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 29 July 2009, Christian Perrier wrote: > An interesting proposal that Colin made was to converge towards a task > named "Login server" or something similar, that would include > openssh-server, along with other packages such as denyhosts (or > sshguard), rssh (Restricted shell allowing

Re: mmc-modules should be loaded by default on ARM Kirkwood

2009-07-29 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Frans Pop [2009-05-25 23:05]: > I disagree. The function of hw-detect, and in this case more > particular disk-detect, is to ensure any hardware needed for > partitioning gets made available. IMO this fits that definition > perfectly. > > > How about I simply include the udeb in the netboot ini

Bug#399840: Do we want an ssh-server task?

2009-07-29 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Christian Perrier (bubu...@debian.org): > That bug didn't progress that much since it was reported. > > My main concern about it is that it would probably open the gates for > too many similar requests for "please-add-my-pet-server" tasks. > > I'd very much appreciate to have more input a

Bug#452388: Back on "'standard system' is confusing" bug report

2009-07-29 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl): > On Tuesday 28 July 2009, Christian Perrier wrote: > > What about something like: > > > > Description: Standard (non-graphical) system > >  This task installs a reasonably small character-mode system, > >  that provides the most commonly used tools in non-gra

Our stable release

2009-07-29 Thread J.A. Bezemer
Hi all, We haven't had a properly installable stable release for a full month now, #536312. Applies to both CD/DVD and network installs. I don't see much activity to resolve this. Are we so busy with squeeze and sid, that we don't care about lenny any more? Best regards, Anne Bezemer P.S. Ju

Re: Custom dialog during install?

2009-07-29 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 29 July 2009, Samuli Järvinen wrote: > What would be the best place to look for examples to create this kind > of simple dialog from the script run as late_command? Both links below contain examples of what you're looking for. It's not quite trivial though. http://hands.com/d-i/ htt

Processed: tagging 487908

2009-07-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny3 > tags 487908 pending Bug #487908 [debootstrap] debootstrap: can't --include packages involving non-required Pre-Depends Added tag(s) pending. > End of message, stopping p

Re: please allow cpuburn 0.82-1 into testing

2009-07-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, July 28, 2009 19:28, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Hi, > > cpuburn 0.82-1 is blocked from migration into testing to an udeb. > It has been in unstable for more than 70 days without problems! > Could you please hint it? Unblocked. Cheers, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@

Re: please allow usbutils 0.82-1 into testing

2009-07-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, July 28, 2009 19:29, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Hi, > > usbutils 0.82-1 is blocked from migration into testing to an udeb. > It has been in unstable for more than 70 days without problems! > Could you please hint it? Unblocked. Cheers, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...

Custom dialog during install?

2009-07-29 Thread Samuli Järvinen
Hi, I have a need to prompt user for input during the installation using d-i. I have done quite a bit of searching but I don't seem to find the right words to actually find a solution. I came across this thread: http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2008/09/msg01078.html Which suggest I would need t

Re: netbase: Fails to install if ifupdown is not available

2009-07-29 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 06:37:52AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Package: netbase > Version: 4.36 > Severity: serious > Tags: patch > Justification: fails to install > User: initscripts-ng-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org > Usertags: incorrect-dependency > > Hi Marco, > > in 4.33 you demoted ifupdow

Re: [PATCH] Basic Openmoko GTA02 support

2009-07-29 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Gaudenz Steinlin [2009-07-26 20:35]: > I agree about the name change. We want to use the same name the > Debian kernel package will use for the architecture. I propose to name > it s3c24xx, are you fine with that name? I guess either s3c24xx or (possibly) s3c should work. Vince knows a lot abo

Bug#539108: bdf2psf does not handle empty bitmaps

2009-07-29 Thread Tim Allen
Package: bdf2psf Version: 1.44 Severity: important In the BDF font format, each glyph's shape is defined in terms of a bitmap of certain dimensions, located at a certain offset from the origin. For example, in a font that uses a 12x24 pixel character cell, the apostrophe glyph (') might only c