Hello, On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Frans Pop<elen...@planet.nl> wrote: > I guess changing it to "Graphical desktop environment" would be OK, but > that does not make "Standard (non-graphical) environment" any less wrong!
I think it would make clear that it is indeed a graphical system and it makes sense for me. > If you want to replace "Standard system" with anything, then it should IMO > be something like "Standard system utilities". Yes; I second this one. It makes clear that it is a set of system utilities after all. > But even better would be to bring back some pre-sarge tasksel > functionality that allows users to get an extended description of the > tasks. Maybe the new help functionality in cdebconf could help there, but > that would require either backporting it to debconf, or switching to > cdebconf for installed systems. That would indeed be nice however I think we could wait until cdebconf is capable to replace debconf in installed systems to support it. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org