Bug#511334: debian-installer: S390 boot fails on Flex-ES machine

2009-01-09 Thread Adam Thornton
Package: debian-installer Severity: important S390 boot fails (sometimes just after detecting memory, sometimes after detecting devices) on z/VM 5.2 and a Flex-ES machine. Since there are reports of d-i working on z9 boxes, I suspect the issue is that the kernel is built to exploit later System

Bug#415388: installation-report: Debian on NSLU2 with RC2 with firmware

2007-03-22 Thread Adam Thornton
On Mar 22, 2007, at 1:09 PM, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, Martin Michlmayr wrote: You can simply start a 2nd connection via SSH and then open a terminal. Perhaps I'm mistaken. I did try this as installer with password install but I seem to recall that I was logged out.

Is broken Etch current on S/390 a known problem?

2006-11-03 Thread Adam Thornton
I tried a few days ago to install Etch on an s390 system, and failed to partition my DASD because kernel modules appropriate to the installer kernel level weren't found. I presume this is a known issue that will be resolved when RC1 rolls out and is just version skew between testing and

Bug#396228: debian-installer: s390 can no longer install using Hipersockets interface

2006-10-30 Thread Adam Thornton
Package: debian-installer Severity: important In earlier versions of the Sarge installer, when you selected a qeth device which was a HiperSockets transport (Layer 3 only) coupled to a VM guest LAN (or, probably, to a real HiperSockets trans-LPAR connector, but I don't have any way to test that),

Bug#360815: netinst: S/390 with virtual QDIO device fails to start network device on boot

2006-04-04 Thread Adam Thornton
Package: netinst Version: base-network Severity: important Using etch Beta 2: installation goes OK, but network device is not picked up on reboot. This seems to be because alias eth0 qeth is commented out in /etc/modules.conf, and although qeth is present in /etc/modules, it is not loaded at

Bug#285124: debian-installer: Hipersocket spelled incorrectly

2004-12-10 Thread Adam Thornton
Package: debian-installer Severity: minor Tags: l10n If you do an S/390 installation (I'm reporting this from an ix86 machine, but the problem only occurs with a Hipersocket installation, which means S/390), and you have a Hipersocket device, that's incorrectly spelled Hypersocket in the

Bug#281530: [s390] Installation successful, some issues

2004-11-17 Thread Adam Thornton
On Nov 17, 2004, at 12:25 PM, Joey Hess wrote: Frans Pop wrote: There is a very nice workaround for this. If 'debian-installer/locale=C' is added in parmfile.debian, all problems in the current prebaseconfig of countrychooser will be avoided. I would suggest including in the Release Notes and

Bug#281556: s390 installation report, installed system does not boot

2004-11-16 Thread Adam Thornton
On Nov 16, 2004, at 10:57 AM, Eugeniy Meshcheryakov wrote: After using google.com I found that I need to pass dasd=0120 to zipl in order to boot. That worked. It is posible that dasd parameter is missing because I did not use d-i for formating dasd and partitioning. I believe this is the case. A

Bug#281394: env2debconf doesn't work on s390

2004-11-15 Thread Adam Thornton
the Linux/390 list, something that might help: Adam Thornton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This just in from d-i. Anyone here know anything about why the kernel doesn't set environment variables from the command line? Begin forwarded message: PPID='167' Command line environment variables are only passed

Bug#281394: env2debconf doesn't work on s390

2004-11-15 Thread Adam Thornton
On Nov 14, 2004, at 4:48 PM, Joey Hess wrote: Apparently the s390 kernel does not parse the kernel command line for environment variables. Here I'm in hercules and I've put foo=bar in parmfile.debian, which adds it to the kernel command line: I've forwarded this to the Marist Linux/390 list, which

Bug#281407: loops forever

2004-11-15 Thread Adam Thornton
On Nov 15, 2004, at 11:09 AM, Joey Hess wrote: Package: s390-dasd Severity: normal I see a loop in s390-dasd, it asks me if I want to format device 0120, I say yet, it formats it and asks me again. Over and over. If I say no, it just asks me again. The back button has no effect. I've tried to run

Bug#276708: Debian-installer: S/390 wrongly attempts to install s390x kernel

2004-10-15 Thread Adam Thornton
Package: Debian-installer Version: RC1 card decks, whatever's on ftp.debian.org on 20041015 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable If you try to install, using the Debian-installer RC1 boot card decks, from ftp.us.debian.org (on 15 Oct 2004), d-i tries to install the s390x

Bug#270607: Can't install on IBM Netfinity 3500

2004-09-08 Thread Adam Thornton
On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 03:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are SCSI controller from adaptec - module AIC7xxx. During detecting hardware I aic7xxx loading very long time. On 2% detecting hardware fails with message Cnat find debian installer cd Woody installer pass this stage successfully.

Re: [coLinux-devel] Re: debian (sarge rc1) installer and colinux (snapshot 20040710)

2004-08-26 Thread Adam Thornton
On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 16:16, Sam Liddicott wrote: I guess these means the debian installer would have to be content to see some block devices on which to build a file system and not insist so intently on there being a partition table available This would be the right answer for FBA under

Re: Manuals on S/390

2004-08-09 Thread Adam Thornton
On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 11:01, Joey Hess wrote: John Summerfield wrote: Some of these may apply to otherr arches too. eg kernel version. Floppies on ? [...] We're well aware that the installation manual is not accurate for many arches other than i386. The only way to get it fixed is for

Lowmem broken on S/390

2004-07-30 Thread Adam Thornton
Using one of today's svn builds, trying to install S/390 in a low memory configuration (32M) fails: control characters that don't make sense to the 3270 terminal are spewed across the screen, effectively obscuring whatever it's trying to tell me, and the installation appears to hang. I don't have

Re: Lowmem broken on S/390

2004-07-30 Thread Adam Thornton
On Fri, 2004-07-30 at 14:43, Joey Hess wrote: Adam Thornton wrote: Using one of today's svn builds, trying to install S/390 in a low memory configuration (32M) fails How realistic is that? I thought s390 were big iron? Yeah, but if you're running under VM, your virtual machine can

Partman/partconf and S/390; is this a wishlist bug for partman?

2004-07-26 Thread Adam Thornton
As near as I can tell, S/390 still uses partconf, and it and m68k are the only architectures to do so. Something I think we should think about--although not for the d-i or sarge releases, probably--is to get S/390 moved over to partman (if I understand correctly that partman's functionality is a

Bug#261451: S/390 Installation Report

2004-07-25 Thread Adam Thornton
Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: Built from svn 25 July 2004 1900:00 (or so) -0500 uname -a: Linux di 2.4.26-1-s390 #1 SMP Sun Apr 25 16:48:39 CEST 2004 s390 GNU/Linux Date: 25 July 2004 21:15 -0500 Method: IPL from virtual reader. Installed unstable from

S/390 and whatever the don't-really-reboot flag is

2004-07-23 Thread Adam Thornton
As I understand it, the run /sbin/reboot or not flag in d-i is kind of in flux. It was put there for embedded devices, because reboot repeats the last boot you did, which will, in those devices, boot from the wrong thing. This is also the case in the S/390 install: you will have booted (IPLed,

Bug#261087: network-console: Should tell user not to continue with install on real console

2004-07-23 Thread Adam Thornton
Package: network-console Version: 0.03 Severity: wishlist This is just a minor usability issue: after network-console generates its host keys and tells you that it's ready for you to SSH into the install system, the user is then told Press Any Key to Continue, and you're taken, on the console,

/etc/fstab problem on S/390: which package? Userdevfs?

2004-07-23 Thread Adam Thornton
The /etc/fstab written for S/390 assumes old-style, static /dev entries: /dev/dasda1, /dev/dasdb1, and so on. Unfortunately, the installed system does not have those device nodes, but instead has devfs: /dev/dasd/address/part1, etc. The first device (/dev/dasda) works in /etc/fstab and in the

Re: /etc/fstab problem on S/390: which package? Userdevfs?

2004-07-23 Thread Adam Thornton
On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 12:23, Thiemo Seufer wrote: AFAICS the installed system shouldn't mount devfs. It also should have static /dev entries, managed by makedev. In that case where in the debian-installer build do I need to put the script to generate the static /dev entries that the parmfile

Re: /etc/fstab problem on S/390: which package? Userdevfs?

2004-07-23 Thread Adam Thornton
On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 13:23, Thiemo Seufer wrote: Are you sure this doesn't simply hide the static entries by mounting devfs over it? Well, no, I'm not. In fact, it probably does, and that's why the very first /dev/dasda works. So it looks like the right answer is to rebuild the kernel so as

Re: ssh

2004-07-16 Thread Adam Thornton
On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 01:11, Kenshi Muto wrote: At 16 Jul 04 05:00:22 GMT, John Summerfield wrote: Is there any good reason ssh is _not_ installed? ssh is standard priority. If you don't skip tasksel, ssh will be installed as default. Does not selecting anything in tasksel count as

Re: ssh

2004-07-16 Thread Adam Thornton
On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 05:25, John Summerfield wrote: The problem I had was after the first boot. I regard what happens _before_ then a separate problem. What do folk on zSeries do? Well, I understand that work is progressing on migrating the ssh key and server from the network-console

Bug#259747: netcfg: Problems when several interfaces are available

2004-07-16 Thread Adam Thornton
On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 09:17, Josselin Mouette wrote: This could be solved by identifying adapters by their MAC address; And won't work in the general case for guest LANs under z/VM on S/390: virtual QDIO devices do not, prior to z/VM 4.4, have unique MAC addresses, as they're purely Layer 3. In

Bug#259604: Subject: s390-netdevice: CTC default protocol incorrect

2004-07-15 Thread Adam Thornton
Package: s390-netdevice Version: 0.06 Severity: important Tags: patch Protocol 1 (Linux) is currently chosen as the default CTC protocol, and the debconf priority is medium. This means that CTC installation under VM (usually--if the CTC is defined as vCTCs typically are) would fail, and CTC

Bug#259420: partconf-mkfstab: S/390 creates /dev/dasdX fstab, but uses devfs-named devices

2004-07-14 Thread Adam Thornton
Package: partconf-mkfstab Version: 0.31 Severity: important When installing S/390 with debian-installer, I have swap on Partion 1 of device 0151. The fstab is written to use /dev/dasdb1, but when I IPL, I get a devfs-style device, /dev/dasd/0151/part1, and there is no /dev/dasdb1 device node.

Bug#258430: s390-netdevice: IUCV support broken again: wrong device name

2004-07-09 Thread Adam Thornton
Package: s390-netdevice Version: 0.0.6 Severity: important Tags: patch type_text (==iucv) is not the right identifier for doing a modprobe if the device is IUCV. The iucv module provides the IUCV base functions, but the netiucv module provides an interface suitable for treating like a NIC.

Re: Minutes of #debian-boot meeting of 20040706 (was: Debian Installer IRC meeting on Tuesday 07/06 20:00 UTC)

2004-07-08 Thread Adam Thornton
On Thu, 2004-07-08 at 16:51, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: s390 Missing for release of s390: some fixes in zipl-installer, uploads of the other s390 specific packages. I have patches, but I don't know if I'm deriving the disk information the right way. Adam ---

Bug#258109: netcfg-static: IUCV not detected as a point-to-point connection

2004-07-07 Thread Adam Thornton
Package: netcfg-static Version: 0.72 Severity: important Tags: patch IUCV is a point-to-point connection type, but netcfg-static was not detecting it as such. I have included a patch that fixes this. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy:

Bug#258108: s390-netdevice: IUCV not implemented

2004-07-07 Thread Adam Thornton
Package: s390-netdevice Version: 0.05 Severity: important Tags: patch I've implemented IUCV support for S/390. It seems to work--I'm doing an installation with it now. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (700, 'testing') Architecture: s390

Bug#258133: base-installer: syntax error in postinst

2004-07-07 Thread Adam Thornton
Package: base-installer Version: 0.090 Severity: important line 680 of base-installer.postinst should be if [ $subarch != none ]; then (the ; then is missing in the downloaded file). This is the version that is getting downloaded for an unstable build on S/390 at about 3:00 PM CDT on

Bug#258136: Allow reboot action to halt instead

2004-07-07 Thread Adam Thornton
On Wed, 2004-07-07 at 15:44, Matt Zimmerman wrote: Package: di-utils-reboot Severity: wishlist Tags: patch I find it convenient sometimes (especially when using UML) to have d-i halt the system as its final step, rather than rebooting it. This will also be very useful for S/390, for the

Bug#258108: Acknowledgement (s390-netdevice: IUCV not implemented)

2004-07-07 Thread Adam Thornton
Yet another tweak to the patch: this one writes module option information to /etc/modutils/options. I really don't know where the line option iucv0 iucv=peer should go, or how that's going to get automatically moved from the installer system to the installer system. What's the right answer for

Bug#257301: d-i: default kernel choice on s390 is wrong

2004-07-02 Thread Adam Thornton
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 02:32:03PM -0400, Martin Michlmayr wrote: * Adam J. Thornton [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-02 13:12]: That is, if you want an s390x install, use a kernel/initrd set for s390x, and otherwise, use s390. /proc/cpuinfo will tell you the CPU OK. What about the s390-tape

Bug#257174: d-i installation report

2004-07-01 Thread Adam Thornton
Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: svn-up run just before install, and network-console built at that point; network-console put into localudebs. uname -a: Linux di 2.4.26-1-s390 #1 SMP Sun Apr 25 16:48:39 CEST 2004 s390 GNU/Linux Date: Thursday,

S390 builds broken

2004-06-30 Thread Adam Thornton
After doing an svn up a couple days ago, I can't build images anymore. I'm using ftp.us.debian.org as my udeb source. If I have the following in sources.list.udeb.local, I can't retrieve network-console: deb ftp://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ testing main/debian-installer deb

Bug#256258--better fix

2004-06-28 Thread Adam Thornton
The first patch I submitted for this did not maintain the order in which you had attached your DASD, which could lead to problems if you didn't attach your disks in device address order. This patch maintains the order in which the DASD was attached. It does assume four-digit device addresses.

s390 d-i report

2004-06-28 Thread Adam Thornton
It still doesn't work, but with the new zipl-installer.postinst it comes a lot closer. netcfg (actually netcfg-static) still doesn't work the first time. What you have to do is to select IUCV, which generates an error, and then go back in from the main menu, select option #3 (network config),

Bug#256258: zipl-installer: Parmline and symlink written incorrectly in d-i

2004-06-25 Thread Adam Thornton
Package: zipl-installer Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Tags: sid patch zipl-installer does not work from d-i installation: /vmlinuz symlink does not exist, and written parmfile is incorrect. I have included a patch which addresses these. However, I suspect there are

Re: symlinks in /boot vs. symlinks in /

2004-06-18 Thread Adam Thornton
On Fri, 2004-06-18 at 15:43, martin f krafft wrote: Fellow Debianistas, Why does Debian drop symlinks to vmlinuz and initrd.gz into the root directory? The FHS does allow it (after all), but it's butt-ugly, if you ask me. Because /vmunix is the traditional location of the kernel on Unix and

Bug#253404: debian-installer: The default locale should be seted to POSIX after installation

2004-06-09 Thread Adam Thornton
On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 07:26, Kenshi Muto wrote: Generally, I believe users will use X Window System or remote shell, won't use raw console. This may be true in general; it is definitely not true for S390; almost everyone will use the console, although that will generally be a tn3270 connection

RE: [waldi@debian.org: Re: [tsec-gf] Re: will s390 have a working installer for sarge?]

2004-06-02 Thread Adam Thornton
On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 14:45, David Boyes wrote: Okay, so the remaining problems are: - zipl-installer, not available(?) OK, so this needs to be written/done. What does this entail? It seems as if it should be a matter of putting zipl on the base image and just feeding it the right

Re: s390 installation support in Debian 'sarge'

2004-02-04 Thread Adam Thornton
OK, I've cleared it with management. There is only one slight wrinkle: I need to get anyone who will have access to our H70 for doing installer development to sign an NDA. Before you freak out, let me explain that a little further: it has nothing whatsoever to do with the Debian work--we'd love