Bug#757165: installation-reports: jessie on Acer C710: guided partitioning creates too small root partition

Package: installation-reports Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, the installation was successful (great job!), I used LVM with encryption (I performed an installation on a different machine from the same USB stick with LVM and no encryption with the same result) and separate partitions for root, h

Re: kernel abiname transition and security updates status

On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 04:58:10PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > I uploaded new 2.6.8 kernel-images for m68k a week ago, but I did not make > > it > > urgent...: Too young, only 7 of 10 days old > > For 2.4.27 I am waiting for the latest k

Re: kernel abiname transition and security updates status

On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 04:13:17PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > Update for current status, 10 days after my first mail: > > m68k > No abiname; not updated. ? > > [This is another arch that I'd consider releasing d-i rc3 without > it being updated for the kernel security fixes.]

Re: Daily Netinst bootable?

On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 08:21:42AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp> ls -l > /home/bubulle/iso/sid_d-i/sarge-i386-netinst.iso > -rw-r--r-- 1 bubulle vmware 136386560 2005-01-08 23:08 > /home/bubulle/iso/sid_d-i/sarge-i386-netinst.iso > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp> md5sum

Bug#246877: about your Debian installation report

On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 04:54:17PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > If you can, please go to and > download the latest release of the installer. Try another install and see > if the problem you reported is still present. If you're able to test this, > plea

PXE install on Sony Vaio V505

Hi, I finally upgraded my notebook it now has a new harddisk, but unfortunately the slimline DVD drive I bought is too high. If anybody knows where I can get a super slimline DVD/CD-RW combo or better, that is 9mm high instead of 12.5mm, please let me know. With no working CD-drive and no floppy dr

Re: installing on ASUS K8N-E Deluxe

On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 05:02:10PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > The i386 install had one major obstacle, the onboard network was not > > detected, it might have loaded the nic module, but DHCP and manual network > > config did not work. I think th

Re: installing on ASUS K8N-E Deluxe

On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 07:18:32PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > There was nothing hooked up to the firewire, but the NIC was connected to a > > switch. So I guess it is a bug in the link detection code. Could there be > > anyhting in the install

Re: installing on ASUS K8N-E Deluxe

On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 05:02:10PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > The i386 install had one major obstacle, the onboard network was not > > detected, it might have loaded the nic module, but DHCP and manual network > > config did not work. I think th

installing on ASUS K8N-E Deluxe

Hi, we got another AMD64 machine at work, nearly identical to the one I installed in late august, only difference, this one has an ASUS K8N-E Deluxe mainboard. I set it up for Debian sarge/i386 and sid/amd64 with netinstall isos I downloaded on oct 26 (i386) and today (amd64). I used linux26 for th

Bug#265912: installation report

On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 08:47:19AM +0100, Joey Hess wrote: > Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > I have an IDE and a SCSI harddisk in my system. I wiped out the SCSI disk and > > installed Debian there. When the boot loader was installed, it wrote the > > boot block on the IDE di

Bug#265912: installation report

Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: 20040814 uname -a: Linux gleep 2.4.26-1-386 #1 Thu Jul 22 12:46:23 JST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: Sun Aug 15 18:47:13 CEST 2004 Method: cdrom install with netinst image downloaded today (points to 20040814 ) from http://gluck.d

Bug#252177: Cannot boot m68k d-i, due to the lack of pm2fb driver

On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 06:15:04PM -0300, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > reassign 252177 kernel-image-2.4.25-amiga > retitle 252177 please include pm2fb driver > severity 252177 normal > thanks > > * Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-01 17:47]: > > Package: installation-reports > > Sever

Bug#246877: successfull installation on m68k/amiga

On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 03:31:47PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 10:42:17PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > > - Is partman too slow to be used on m68k? > > No, at least not on the 040's and better. It was slow, but compared to the rest of the installer, it was not incread

installation on m68k/amiga

Hi, I tried the installation again on an amiga with the daily builds from Stephen's page. Files (nativehd) where downloaded on april 25. I didn't get very far, I can select langauge and keyboard, then some hardware detection is done (lots of messages about missing ide modules flash by), and I see

Bug#238459: Sarge m68k installation-reports

On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 12:10:40AM -0500, Hank wrote: > Also, I would like to see ext3 support added for the 2.2.25 installation > kernel on the m68k distro. It'sbeen tested for around 3 years. I've had no > problems. Why not at least allow it in the install process as or New> with a caution. Ha

Re: m68k debian-installer call for testers

On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 01:38:06PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > IIRC kernel was the only subdirectory in /lib/modules/2.4.24 and that was > > empty. I will have a look again though. > > Are you sure it is named 2.4.24, and not 2.4.24-amiga or something such ? Yes, because I introduced the

Re: m68k debian-installer call for testers

On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 01:23:29PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 04:35:22AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 01:46:04PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > Debian-installer has gotten to the point on m68k that it's rea

Re: m68k debian-installer call for testers

On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 01:46:04PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > Debian-installer has gotten to the point on m68k that it's ready for a > few more people than me to try to break it. Ideally, we'd like d-i to > work before beta 3 gets released in a few weeks. I tried this last night on my Amiga

Re: [powermac] installation report gluck image from october 31

On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 02:59:38PM +, Richard Hirst wrote: > On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 02:18:45AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > > Hi all! > > > > Many progress! Many thanks for the good job. > > > > Now the problems I faced: > > > > - debootstrap stopped with error code 127. I read the >

Re: Preparation of Debian GNU/Linux 3.0r2

On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 06:41:21PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 06:42:27PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > > This list intends to help the ftp-masters releasing 3.0r2. They have > > the final power to accept a package or not. If you want to comment on > > this list, please

Bug#207011: busybox-cvs: (m68k/unstable) FTBFS: ./configure: Permission denied

Package: busybox-cvs Version: 0.60.99.cvs20030819-1 Severity: serious Automatic build of busybox-cvs_0.60.99.cvs20030819-1 on aahz by sbuild/m68k 1.170 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0) /usr/bin/make distclean make[1]: Entering directory `/b

Re: New d-i debcamp in a few months?

On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 12:40:00AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > I've created a web page with the information I got at the moment. It > is in d-i CVS, > http://people.debian.org/~pere/debian-installer/di-debcamp-2003-1.html>. > > 12 people have expressed their interest in going to a d-i

Re: cvs commit to extract by cts

On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 09:29:42PM -0600, Debian Boot CVS Master wrote: > Repository: extract > who:cts > time: Mon Jun 23 21:29:42 MDT 2003 > Log Message: > merged JOULE and CUSP extract version yikes, sorry about that... I removed that again, I don't think you're interested in my

Re: m68k, debian-installer, and DevFS

On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 12:16:09AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Wouter Verhelst] > > As some of you are already aware, there's a problem wrt m68k in that > > there's no decent 2.4 kernel for m68k yet. As such, creating an m68k > > debian-installer image that actually works is a bit problema

Bug#181739: how to fix?!

On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 01:06:04PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: > And what is your idea about the possible solution for #181739? Another kernel? > Feasible without breaking other things? There is no kernel support for this model. I tried to build an 060 kernel for atari, but it failed. 2.4.x kernels

Re: m68k 3.0.24 boot-floppies

On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 10:28:13AM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: > #include > * Christian T. Steigies [Sun, Jan 19 2003, 12:47:22AM]: > > > I've (re)built boot-floppies for m68k a few days ago and finally managed to > > test them on my Amiga. Installation went fine

m68k 3.0.24 boot-floppies

Hi, I've (re)built boot-floppies for m68k a few days ago and finally managed to test them on my Amiga. Installation went fine. One thing I noticed, the installer downloaded mac-fdisk, on an Amiga, is this necessary? Another problem I noticed today is with amiga-fdisk: According to Policy Section

Re: debian-installer-utils_0.06_i386.changes ACCEPTED

On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 08:17:20PM -0500, Debian Installer wrote: > > Accepted: > debian-installer-utils_0.06.dsc The changes file created by this looks funny: Changes: debian-installer-utils (0.06) unstable; urgency=low . * Added french translation from Pierre Machard (Closes: 165857).

Bug#157816: No /dev/sr[01] in m68k installer

On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 08:45:26AM +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > Package: boot-floppies > Version: woody (m68k) > > The current Woody installer for m68k does not have device nodes > /dev/sr[01] for SCSI cdrom drives (/dev/sr[23] are there, though). In > order to install from 1st or 2nd cdrom dri

Bug#157815: No affs in m68k installation

On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 08:41:48AM +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > Package: boot-floppies > Version: woody (m68k) > > The current Woody installation system on m68k does not provide a kernel > module for the Amiga FastFileSystem (affs). Since Linux has to be booted > from within AmigaOS, there shou

[m68k] bf 3.0.23: documentation fails to build

Hi, checked out today: [...] ln -s dynamic_ca_m68k.ent dynamic.ent debiandoc2text -l ca -O install.ca.sgml > install.ca.txt nsgmls:ca/inst-methods.sgml:801:19:E: general entity "mac-install-docs" not defined and no default entity make[4]: *** [install.ca.txt] Error 1 Christian -- To UNSUBSC

Re: non-i18n'd arches

On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 06:17:46PM +, Philip Blundell wrote: > On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 16:50, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 04:42:31PM +, Phil Blundell wrote: > > > Can you try running bterm on its own and see if it works at all for you? > >

Re: non-i18n'd arches

On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 11:43:23AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > On Mon, 4 Mar 2002 01:34:00 + > Richard Hirst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > For ia64 and hppa, there will be frame buffer support in the kernel, but > > (for hppa, anyway) it might not support the particular h/w. Also the >

Re: 3.0.19 installation report on i386

On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 08:22:42PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote: > > ppoeconf is missing from the basedebs (bug already filed). Since ppp is part > of base, (can't fit in the installer system), you can't use ppp to install; > basedebs is really only there for modem and ppp users. Once pppoeconf i

3.0.19 installation report on i386

Hi, I did a fresh install of 3.0.19 on my i386 box today. I used the standard root.bin and rescue.bin and basedebs.tar from auric. There were only two problems with the installation, first I had to convert basedebs.tar to basedebs.tgz (this is fixed with 3.0.20?). Second, as this box is my route

Re: cvs b-f on m68k test report

On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 01:56:34AM +, Richard Hirst wrote: > The build expects some things in m68k-speicals that are not in CVS, and > I had to go google for Penguin-19.hqx. There are other things in my > m68k-specials dir which are not in cvs, I guess I found those elsewhere > last time I t

Re: non-i18n'd arches

On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 07:48:00PM +, Philip Blundell wrote: > I see that sparc, mips, hppa and m68k have not yet enabled the > LANGUAGE_CHOOSER. Is there any particular reason for that? It would be > good to have i18n on as many architectures as possible by the time we > release. Speaking

Bug#132838: boot-floppies: cannot install base system

On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 07:23:11AM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote: > > > > > > Can you try downloading this file on tty2 and see if it works? > > > > > > # wget http://http.us.debian.org:80/debian/dists/woody/Release > > I can download it (on i386). What do you mean with works? How do I test > > that?

Re: does grab_paths need root?

On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 09:11:42AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > info "downloading m68k-vme-tftplilo" > > package=`grab_paths m68k-vme-tftplilo` > > How about just adding $ROOTCMD to your package= line? The question is where, and will it work? I guess this will not work: $ROOTCMD pac

does grab_paths need root?

I've been trying to build bf 3.0.12 for m68k about 5 times now, and they all failed due to lack of disk space, then a lost network connection and now finally with a permission denied: I: downloading m68k-vme-tftplilo I: Retrieving http://zeus.kernel.org/debian/pool/main/m/m68k-vme-tftplilo/m68k-v

problem with common_posttasks

Hi, this is bad release.sh: do_common_posttasks() { # # standard post stuff # # this script is self-destructing echo "find . -type d -exec chmod 775 \{\} \;" >> $release/$bfin

Re: boot-floppies_3.0.8_i386.changes REJECTED

On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 03:03:30PM -0400, Debian Installer wrote: > > Rejected: no source found for boot-floppies 3.0.8 (install-doc_3.0.8_i386.deb). > Rejected: no source found for boot-floppies 3.0.8 (boot-floppies_3.0.8_all.deb). Wow, thats cool, I got it (not the source, the _all package) fro

Re: [webguy@wingnutmedia.com: Mac 68K boot instructions]

On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 04:59:51PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > - Forwarded message from Greg Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - > > Delivery-date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 07:08:44 +0200 > Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 01:07:27 -0500 > From: Greg Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Organization: Wingnut Media > X-Acce

Re: Install Success

On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 07:35:36PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote: > > I installed the new 3.0.8 release of boot-floppies on a Quadra 650 tonight. > I used the network to install base, as my network was automatically > supported. DHCP configured without any problem. In fact, the whole > installation

Re: woddy from disk install problem

On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 09:01:44PM -0400, Robert Schweikert wrote: > Chris Tillman wrote: > > Does this mean my recently (2 weeks ago) downloaded packages are no longer > working with the disks from /debian/dists/woody/main ? Do I have to get the > new packages from the pool directory? Which is m

Re: woddy from disk install problem

On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 09:58:10PM -0400, Robert Schweikert wrote: > Hi, > > I have an install problem with woddy and would appreciate help to get it > fixed. Have you ever installed a debian system before? If not, I'd suggest you use the stable version for installing, you can even get it on CD.

Re: New cvs snapshot of woody boot-floppies (supports basedebs.tgz)

On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 01:41:00AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote: > Hello, > > I have built a new cvs snapshot of boot-floppies. built that for m68k. On my auric page. > basedebs.tgz should be sitting loose in the directory you specify on > the choose_medium dialog. thus if you have a partition

Re: basedebs.tgz

On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 04:38:04PM -0400, Russell Hires wrote: > Okay, I got the stuff...but now what to do with it? From the archives of this > list, I think that I have to go to a console, copy the basedebs.tgz over to > /target (from the macos partition where it was originally), tar xvzf > b

Re: Mac68k keymaps (was: bf-3.0.7 report: failure)

On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 05:21:25PM +0200, Bjoern Brill wrote: > > > Looks more like its hardcoded, but I did not see yet how/where the installer > > offers you six keymaps... > > > Looks like that's hardcoded as well -- utilities/dbootstrap/kbdconfig.c, > near the top. Note MacPPC (a little bit

Re: [M68k-build] boot-floppies 3.0.7 for m68k

Hi, On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 03:02:04PM -0500, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > Hi, > I am uploading the latest m68k boot-floppies build to: > http://auric.debian.org/~cts/bf/ I just put a CVS build (not yet finished 3.0.8) there. Works much better for me. Now it fails when trying to in

Re: boot-floppies 3.0.7 for m68k

On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 03:01:57PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote: > > can you find out what version of busybox these boot-floppies were > built with? this problem went away for me as soon as i started > building with busybox 0.51-9. busybox_1%3a0.51-10_m68k.deb I suspect, because thats in archive

Re: boot-floppies 3.0.7 for m68k

On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 03:02:04PM -0500, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > I am uploading the latest m68k boot-floppies build to: > http://auric.debian.org/~cts/bf/ what a pitty that I have to follow up myself... trying to install this at home, I get the following messages: installing

boot-floppies 3.0.7 for m68k

Hi, I am uploading the latest m68k boot-floppies build to: http://auric.debian.org/~cts/bf/ I had to complete the build by hand (my own fault, I improved[1] the boot-floppies) and I do not want to waste the CPU cycles. It will still take a few minutes until the upload is completed and I have gene

Bug#103025: kernel problem potato m68k Mac Powerbook 520c

On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 02:17:52PM -0700, D James wrote: > Package: boot-floppies (disks-m68k) > Version: 2.2 Potato Stable m68k (taken from > www.kernel.org/debian/dists/potato/main/disks-m68k/2.2.19-2000-12-03/) > > Any suggestions? Can you please report that to the right list, like debian-68k

Re: *-fdisk.txt not being generated in woody

On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 10:31:30PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote: > > I was just trying an m68k install, and checking out the mac-fdisk.txt and > other *disk.txt files in the 68k doc folder. They all are present, but > there's an error message inside instead of the document contents: > > ** man pag

Re: 2.3.6 uploaded

On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 11:16:35AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 04:56:22PM -0500, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 01:20:48PM -0500, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > > Im testing debootstrap now (and build bf 2.3.6 for upload

Re: 2.3.6 uploaded

On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 01:20:48PM -0500, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > Im testing debootstrap now (and build bf 2.3.6 for upload in parallel, just > be patient...) [...] I: Retrieving http://ftp.kernel.org/debian/pool/main/i/ipchains/ipchains_1.3.10-10_m68k.deb E: Couldn't

Re: 2.3.6 uploaded

On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 11:51:00PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > Sure, on i386. But every port has its own little subtleties, and that's the > first ever time it's been built for m68k... Thats not true, I built it several times at home, but never tested it... > > > Find somewhere with around

Re: 2.3.6 uploaded

On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 12:22:25AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > How are you going to upload it at all if you can't get it through the > phone line? Burn a CD and mail it to you, wait for my DSL, or build it on another machine. I went for option three. > The error clearly is apt-get failing o

Re: 2.3.6 uploaded

On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 12:56:35PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 08:05:39PM -0500, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > Sorry no patch (but I uploaded debootstrap for m68k :-) > > I don't suppose you tested it? It'd probably be a good idea to. N

Re: 2.3.6 uploaded

On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 02:44:37AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > Boot-floppies 2.3.6 for i386, powerpc, and source, has been uploaded. How much time do we have before you upload 2.3.7? I have 2.3.5 ready for m68k, but I can't get it through the phone line... Trying 2.3.6 on another machine, but

dpkg-checkbuilddeps

Hi, I'm having a little trouble with the boot-floppies dpkg-checkbuilddeps: dpkg-buildpackage: build architecture is m68k dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: zlib-bin, dosfstools, linuxdoc-tools, snarf dpkg-buildpackage: Build dependencies/conflicts unsatisfied; aborting. dpkg-buildpac

Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody

On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 02:46:44PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > Yes, it pulls from a archive. I don't know if woody cdrom images are > around so I always pull from http.us.debian.org or whatever. I haven't seen any woody images yet, especially not for m68k. > Excellent to hear. Are you going

Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody

On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 11:32:35AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > Besides that m68k suffers from a busybox<->linux-2.2 incompatiblity, Richard > > is working on a fix. I guess I may not tell more right now ;-) > > Huh, well, be sure to file bugs against busybox if needed. I built a busybox with

Re: problem building b-f, need help

On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 03:08:13PM -0700, Ron Farrer wrote: > > Sorry, I should have meantioned I _DID_ try that.. as well as putting > them in /archive/debian/local and /archive/debian/Incoming (this files > in my previous post in updates/ were copied there by the scripts from > /archive/debian/

Re: problem building b-f, need help

On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 02:52:53PM -0700, Ron Farrer wrote: > Adam Di Carlo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > Yes, jack up the size of the rootdisk. > > Ok, got past that and a lot further: > > ---cut-here--- > I: downloading required packages from files > /usr/src/boot-floppies/scripts/rootdisk

Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody

On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 11:32:35AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > ROOTCMD := $(shell [d -u = 0 ] || echo sudo) > > Guess it will fail when I build as root, and no sudo is installed. > > Just replace the "sudo" part by whatever you use to achieve root > (super should work too). I

Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody

On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 08:23:24PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > Are you applying this patch or do you need someone to apply it? > > If you are sending patches to this need that need applying, please > make it very clear, perhaps with subject of [APPLY PATCH PLS]. I applied the subarch/system

Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody

On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 08:54:39PM +0100, Richard Hirst wrote: > > Anyway, so far I hit a problem with rescue.sh doing tests on > $system for 'atari', etc, when rescue.sh has been invoked with > $subarch='atari' and $system=''. For now I've swapped $system > for $subarch in rescue.sh and am carr

Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody

On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 02:40:50PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > Nobody is working on m68k boot floppies for Woody at the moment. This > is a bad situation. Unless m68k porters start working on getting > things going for their architecture, won't that mean we don't have an > install system an

Bug#99185: Problem installing Potato on an Amiga 1200

On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 07:17:10AM +0200, peter karlsson wrote: > > It does format them for you, I think the step is called initiali(s|z)e a > > linux partition. This one should be called before trying to mount the > > filesystems, did you do that? > > Well, as I said, the installer doesn't find

Bug#99185: Problem installing Potato on an Amiga 1200

On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 10:54:31PM +0200, peter karlsson wrote: > > Now since this version did not work either for Peter, can you mount the > > linux partion by hand in the installer? Maybe it is not formatted yet? > > I haven't formatted it yet -- I was hoping the installer would do that > for m

Bug#99185: Problem installing Potato on an Amiga 1200

On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 12:58:59PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > "Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Maybe you can try the "experimental" boot-floppies (I thought I had uploaded > > them long ago?). Link is on my potato page, but

Bug#99185: Problem installing Potato on an Amiga 1200

On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 01:48:40AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > > fdisk -l /dev/hda: > > > > ===[ cut ]=== > > Disk /dev/hda: 16 heads, 17471 sectors, 18613 cylinders, RDB: 3 > > Logical Cylinders from 1 to 22364, 143122432 bytes/Cylinder > > > >Device Boot Mount Begin End S

Re: Problem installing Potato on an Amiga 1200

On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 12:02:52PM +0200, peter karlsson wrote: > This is regarding version 2.2.19 of the boot-floppies for Amiga: > > I am unable to install potato (and because of the problems with the > m68k builds at the moment, I don't dare trying install testing or > unstable) on my Amiga 12

Re: APUS Debian Boot-Floppies Images and bugs

On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 04:23:38PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote: > > > > not that i can think of. certainly boot-programs (such as the > > APUS/AF-booter (by Mr Duncan ) need MUI libraries, but the plain > > boothack/bootstrap for APUS just needs powerpc.library, which is in ROM I don't use APUS, pl

Re: APUS Debian Boot-Floppies Images and bugs

On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 02:45:28PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote: > On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 11:57:11AM +0100, Alan Buxey wrote: > > hi, > > > > > Can you boot from an external 1.76MB floppy ? > > > > yes. its treated just as the old classic external floppies that I'm sure > > most people had with the

Re: APUS Debian Boot-Floppies Images and bugs

On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 01:05:03PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote: > > I don't know if it is possible to enable such a per subarch warning (altough > it may be common the the m68K/amiga folk). Floppys on m68k are completely useless AFAIK. Since Amigalilo is not supported by Debian, who needs floppies a

Re: sponsor for QEmacs maybe

On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 01:42:19AM +0400, Peter Novodvorsky wrote: > "John H. Robinson, IV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Current snapshot (please do not redistribute since it is not > > finished): qemacs-0.2.tar.gz > > Current version of qemacs segafaults after a typing ~ 20 letter

Re: Boot floppies 2.2.23

On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 12:31:23PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > Jonathan McDowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > If I recall, building on m68k in particular needs a lot of files > > > external to CVS for some reason. Poor ghetto port that it is. > > > > The bootstra.tpp file is the only on

Re: building woody bf

On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 12:44:17PM +0100, Stefan Nobis wrote: > David Whedon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Try putting it in > > /build/cts/boot-floppies/updates/ > > > > make_paths searches in there and in $archive/cache/archives. Someone should > > also update the docs to this effect. >

Re: debootstrap_0.1.1

On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 11:21:16AM -0800, David Whedon wrote: > > Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: > > console-data: Depends: perl but it is not going to be installed > This is odd. console-data doesn't depend on perl as far as I know. Is it that > cannot be found? Ye

Re: debootstrap_0.1.1

On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 08:41:25AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 04:14:55AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > I put it in a local apt-gettable directory and added this directory to the > sources.list. Now I get: > I: downloading required pack

Re: debootstrap_0.1.1

On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 04:14:55AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > Somebody with root on the various archs needs to make it work on their arch. > Root is not a problem (even you could get root on an m68k box). But what > does this package do? What do I need to fix for m68k?

Re: debootstrap_0.1.1

On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 09:21:58AM -0800, David Whedon wrote: > > debootstrap_0.1.1.dsc: m68k not in arch list: i386 -- skipping > > So, does m68k need debootstrap or not? > All archs will need debootstrap. So the package must be arch: any. And it must be installed for all arches (at least on m

debootstrap_0.1.1

Hi, trying to build woody-bf on m68k: make release [...] make[1]: Entering directory /build/cts/boot-floppies' ./rootdisk.sh "" /archive/debian/download 3700 2.3 "atari" C "" I: ld.so on this architecture is ld.so.1 I: single locale mode (USE_LANGUAGE_CHOOSER = false) I: downloading required pac

Re: building woody bf

On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 09:12:16AM -0800, David Whedon wrote: > Try putting it in > /build/cts/boot-floppies/updates/ Did not help. > make_paths searches in there and in $archive/cache/archives. Someone should > also update the docs to this effect. I also put busybox_* in /archive/debian/downl

building woody bf

Gnargl, tried a zillion times today, but how do I fix this: make[1]: Entering directory /build/cts/boot-floppies' ./rootdisk.sh "" /archive/debian/download 3700 2.3 "atari" C "" I: ld.so on this architecture is ld.so.1 I: single locale mode (USE_LANGUAGE_CHOOSER = false) I: downloading required

Re: call for volunteers -- woody boot-floppies

On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 09:25:15PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > "Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 01:07:56AM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > > > > OTOH, we do want to freeze woody prior to July, so we&

Re: call for volunteers -- woody boot-floppies

On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 01:07:56AM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > OTOH, we do want to freeze woody prior to July, so we're going to need > to hobble along with boot-floppies for one more release -- woody. Will we need another set for potato or only for woody? > Please help me out. Otherwise, go

Re: test boot-floppies (2.2.21) for m68k available

On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 01:31:39AM -0500, Ray Knight wrote: > Changing the execute bit doesn't change the output. If I enter the > amiboot command from a prompt instead of using the StartInstall as > follows: > > Games2:debian/amiga> amiboot-5.6 -d -k linux -r root.bin root=/dev/ram > > Hit th

Re: test boot-floppies (2.2.21) for m68k available

On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 09:09:04PM -0500, Ray Knight wrote: > I get the following when clicking the StartInstall icon on either Amiga: > > EXECUTE: Invalid directive > Error -1 Probaby amiboot is not executable, that flag always get lots on linux.. chmod +x amiboot-5.6 if you have ADE installed.

Re: test boot-floppies (2.2.21) for m68k available

On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 04:08:51PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > "Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hi, > > TEST boot-floppies, built from fridays CVS are available at > > http://auric.debian.org/~cts/bf/ > > I used 2.2.17

Re: time to upload udebs!

On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 05:02:53PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: > James just announced that package pools are fully rolled out. This means > that there is (untested) udeb support in the archive now, and we can > start uploading udebs. I encourage everyone who is responsible for a > package in the tree

test boot-floppies (2.2.21) for m68k available

Hi, TEST boot-floppies, built from fridays CVS are available at http://auric.debian.org/~cts/bf/ I used 2.2.17 kernel-images (thats why they should be tested!) and included also Penguin17 (18 is still there). Will feed those changes into CVS if I get some feedback. Its working fine on my Amiga.

Re: boot-floppies 2.2.19 vs 2.2.20

On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 11:22:47AM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > There were some minor changes between 2.2.19 and 2.2.20 which were not > in debian/changelog (naughty hackers for not changing changelog > file!): There must have been some other change... 2.2.19 (probably a CVS version) built fin

Re: Boot floppies 2.2.19

On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 12:11:57PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > The build is going now; unless someone screams very loudly, I'll do > source and powerpc uploads as soon as it is done. AARGH, loud enough? Well, actually I am still trying to build 2.2.18 for m68k. Besides the missing python-de

Re: FALSE == 1

On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 11:18:52AM +0200, Sven wrote: > On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 05:53:24PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > > Nick Holgate wrote: > > > +#define FALSE ((int) 1) > > > +#define TRUE((int) 0) > > Why not do : > > #define TRUE (0==0) > #define FALSE (!TRUE) > > or something su

Re: READ-pl.txt

On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 04:34:14AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > "Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > That's done for i386, but I do not see any trace of READ-??.txt for the > > other arches? What happens there? > > Sounds like

  1   2   >