Roland Clobus:
On 03/08/2024 18:30, Niels Thykier wrote:
Had a quick look at the testing `Sources` file for non-free-firmware.
We are 10/15 on `Autobuild: yes` with remaining 5 not having the header.
...
The 5 that are not `Autobuild: yes` would be:
atmel-firmware
bluez-firmware
I was
Paul Gevers:
Hi,
On 03-08-2024 11:55, Niels Thykier wrote:
Since the non-free is entirely opt-in and you had to be very active
about opt'ing in as a admin, this seem fine. With the change to
non-free-firmware now being enabled by d-i by default, we now have
non-free-firmware pac
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net,debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Hi,
Historically, we have had a major opt-out for non-free in regards to
Policy. One of these opt-outs are that the package does not have to be
auto-built on Debian buildds.
Since the
Source: installation-guide
Version: 20200715
Severity: normal
Usertags: compat-5-6-removal
Hi,
The package installation-guide uses debhelper with a compat level of 5 or 6,
which is deprecated and scheduled for removal[1].
Please bump the debhelper compat at your earliest convenience
/outside the
Cyril Brulebois:
> [...]
> Clarifying what I meant in the rest:
>
>>> While I'm of course fine with the idea of automating what can be
>>> automated,
>
> == your patch
>
>>> I think I'd be happier to also see some hint somewhere for
>>> maintainers who wish to drop the --add-udeb, e.g. checking
Cyril Brulebois:
> Niels Thykier (2019-07-20):
>> Thanks for the feedback. :)
>>
>> I have tested this and they do.
>>
>> Test method: I have verified this against systemd at git master[1] using
>> the following three variants/builds:
>>
>>
Niels Thykier:
> [...] The goal for this change is to simplify udeb handling to remove
> one papercut /in the common case/ for udeb packages in two forms:
>
> 1) Packages that need to add a new udeb will have one less step to
> worry about when they follow the naming conve
Cyril Brulebois:
> Hi,
>
> Niels Thykier (2019-02-24):
>> (Please CC me on replies per mail).
>
> (Done.)
>
>> I am seeing feedback on a PoC patch for dh_makeshlibs to have it
>> auto-detect udebs in the common case, where the udeb has the same name
>>
Niels Thykier:
> Hi,
>
> (Please CC me on replies per mail).
>
> I am seeing feedback on a PoC patch for dh_makeshlibs to have it
> auto-detect udebs in the common case, where the udeb has the same name
> as the deb followed by the suffix "-udeb". AFAICT, this wil
Cyril Brulebois:
> Simon McVittie (2019-06-04):
>> Please unblock package glib2.0 to fix CVE-2019-12450.
>>
>> glib2.0 builds a udeb (for the graphical installer) so this will need
>> a d-i ack.
>>
>> unblock glib2.0/2.58.3-2
>> unblock-udeb glib2.0/2.58.3-2
>
> Tests look good, no objections fro
Cyril Brulebois:
> Niels Thykier (2019-06-04):
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed d-i
>>
>> Vagrant Cascadian:
>>> Please unblock package ltsp
>>>
>>> unblock ltsp/5.18.12-3
>>
>> Looks good to me, CC'ing KiBi for a d-i ack before c
Cyril Brulebois:
> Niels Thykier (2019-06-04):
>> Vagrant Cascadian:
>>> unblock simple-cdd/0.6.7
>>
>> Looks good to me, CC'ing KiBi for a d-i ack before completing the unblock.
>
> No objections, thanks.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
Unblocked, thanks.
~Niels
Cyril Brulebois:
> Hi Kurt,
>
> Kurt Roeckx (2019-04-19):
>> Can you please unblock openssl. It fixes 2 important bugs.
>> debdiff attached.
>
> (And thanks for the cc.)
>
> I have been able to confirm during my work on haveged (#923675) that
> your upload indeed fixes the wget issues we had in
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
(X-CC'ed kibi + debian-boot).
Hi kibi/d-i,
The recent upload of busybox fixes the bug #925979 in busybox-udeb.
Should we (RT) unblock it now or do you prefer waiting (as I
understand it t
Source: debian-installer-netboot-images
Version: 20190118
Severity: serious
Hi,
The "Built-Using" field of debian-installer-netboot-images references
openssl1.0/1.0.2q-1~deb9u1 and ttf-freefont/20100919-1, neither of
which are in unstable nor testing at the moment. The former was
removed very re
Hi,
(Please CC me on replies per mail).
I am seeing feedback on a PoC patch for dh_makeshlibs to have it
auto-detect udebs in the common case, where the udeb has the same name
as the deb followed by the suffix "-udeb". AFAICT, this will make
--add-udeb obsolete in many cases as many udebs follow
Boyuan Yang:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> X-Debbugs-CC: k...@debian.org debian-boot@lists.debian.org
>
> Dear Release Team and d-i Team,
>
> As previously mentioned in [1], I made a new upload (QA upload) for
Holger Wansing:
> Hi,
>
> Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Source: tasksel
>> Version: 3.44
>> Severity: important
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The manpages-fr package is outdated and unmaintained
>> (defacto-orphaned too).
>>
>> Please remove
Source: tasksel
Version: 3.44
Severity: important
Hi,
The manpages-fr package is outdated and unmaintained
(defacto-orphaned too).
Please remove the dependency on manpages-fr in task-french so we can
remove the package from testing or the archive.
Thanks,
~Niels
Hi,
I noticed that nslu2-utils was removed from unstable (#869430) in August
2017, but at the moment we have a constraint to keep it in testing for d-i.
Please let us know when we can drop this constraint and let britney
remove nslu2-utils from testing.
Thanks,
~Niels
Hi,
I noticed that apex and nis are currently testing despite the
auto-remover wanting to remove them (#865585 and #862778). At the
moment, they are (only) retained due to a constraint that ensures that
d-i's packages are all present and installable.
Please have a look at these packages and let
clone 886968 -1
retitle -1 debhelper: Make -V the default for dh_makeshlibs
severity -1 wishlist
tags -1 patch
thanks
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
> [...]
>
> It's not in policy (but I don't think it has to be), but following the
> conversation on #-ftp yesterday I opened:
>
> #895949 lintian: warn a
Cyril Brulebois:
> Hi,
>
> Debian FTP Masters (2017-12-16):
>> debian-archive-keyring (2017.7+exp) experimental; urgency=medium
>> .
>>* Team upload.
>>* Install separate keyrings for each release in /usr/share/keyrings
>> (both in the regular deb and the udeb). This is to enable
Cyril Brulebois:
> Package: debhelper
> Version: 10.10
> Severity: serious
> Tags: d-i
> Justification: triggers FTBFS
>
> [ Please keep both debian-boot@ and myself in the loop, thanks. ]
>
> Hi,
>
> debian-installer uses compat 7, a build/ directory, and its daily-build
> script is started fro
On Mon, 31 Jul 2017 00:44:30 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Package: debhelper
> Version: 10.2.5
> Severity: normal
>
> Following up on an observation I made in #868674:
>
> udebs are currently compressed with "xz -1 -extreme",
> while normal packages are compressed with "xz -6".
>
> "xz -1" requir
On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 15:54:00 -0700 Russ Allbery wrote:
> Ansgar Burchardt writes:
>
> > I discussed this a bit on IRC with the other ftp-masters and we came to
> > this summary:
>
> > 0) We would like to drop the requirement for packages to not depend on
> >packages of lower priority: it is
Cyril Brulebois:
> Release team, please hint it into testing:
>
> unblock debian-installer/20170608
> urgent debian-installer/20170608
>
>
> [...]
Hints added, thanks.
~Niels
Cyril Brulebois:
> Hi,
>
> Samuel Thibault (2017-06-08):
>> Could we have an unblock for installation-guide=20170607 to be in d-i
>> RC5, to be uploaded soon?
>
> This was definitely on my checklist for stretch; release team: unblock
> welcome.
>
> Samuel: Thanks again for dealing with the inst
Baptiste Jammet:
> Hello,
>
> Dixit Niels Thykier, le 03/04/2017 :
>
>> Please let reply to this thread once the changes have been done, so I
>> can mark them as done in my checklist. :)
> Doing so, see
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2017/0
Samuel Thibault:
> Hello,
>
> Could we have an unblock for installation-guide=20170525 to be in d-i
> RC4, to be uploaded soon?
>
> Thanks,
> Samuel
>
Done.
Thanks,
~Niels
Cyril Brulebois:
> Vagrant Cascadian (2017-05-16):
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: unblock
>> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-boot@lists.debian.org,
>> simple-cdd-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
>>
>> Thanks for all your work on t
Holger Wansing:
> Hi,
>
> [...]
>
> After Samuel's commits
> https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/d-i?view=revision&revision=70661
> and
> https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/d-i?view=revision&revision=70695
> this issue is now done.
>
>
> Holger
>
>
Thanks for the follow up and thanks to Samuel
Cyril Brulebois:
> Niels Thykier (2017-04-15):
>> Jan Dittberner:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>>> Usertags: unblock
>>>
>>> Please unblock package cracklib2
&
Cyril Brulebois:
> Hi,
>
> FTPmasters, please sync the installer from sid to testing:
>
> dak copy-installer 20170407
>
>
> Release team, please hint it into testing:
>
> urgent debian-installer/20170407
>
>
> KiBi.
>
I have urgent'ed the installer. :)
Thanks,
~Niels
Baptiste Jammet:
> Hi,
>
> Dixit Niels Thykier, le 03/04/2017 :
>
>>> * release-notes: d-i team signoff for specials with this update
>>> (check esp. if old versions of d-i should be purged if new versions
>>> enter $suite's d-i area)
>>>
Niels Thykier:
> Hi,
>
> There are two d-i related items in the release checklist that we need
> input from the d-i team[1]
>
> Items are:
> * Installation Guide should be up-to-date
Besides the "arm" notes that Holger + Samuel brought up, I have not
heard an
Samuel Thibault:
> Holger Wansing, on dim. 26 mars 2017 19:16:00 +0200, wrote:
>> Niels Thykier wrote:
>>> There are two d-i related items in the release checklist that we need
>>> input from the d-i team[1]
>>>
>>> Items are:
>>> * Ins
Cyril Brulebois:
> → ACK for the whole lot.
>
>
> KiBi.
Unblocked, thanks.
~Niels
Cyril Brulebois:
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (2017-03-26):
>> - pcre3
>
> ACK.
>
>> - screen
>
> Already ACK'd separately.
>
>> - glib2.0
>
> ACK.
>
>> - dmraid
>
> config.{guess,sub} updates, and version encoded in directories = yay.
>
> No objections anyway.
>
>> - debootstrap
>
> Lemme t
Hi,
There are two d-i related items in the release checklist that we need
input from the d-i team[1]
Items are:
* Installation Guide should be up-to-date
* release-notes: d-i team signoff for specials with this update (check
esp. if old versions of d-i should be purged if new versions enter
Cyril Brulebois:
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (2017-02-22):
>> On 22/02/17 00:29, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>>> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (2017-02-22):
#854616scdaemonscdaemon cannot access yubikey using ccid
driver without pcscd
>>>
>>> Not sure it's d-i related?
>>
>> ftr: as said
Cyril Brulebois:
> Cyril Brulebois (2017-02-21):
>> I think that should work, yes. Please let me know when that's happened,
>> and I'll do the testing as soon as possible.
>
> This has happened, and building a netboot-gtk image with stretch udebs
> and with p-u enabled got me a 1.18-4.1 version o
Cyril Brulebois:
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (2017-02-22):
>> Some more:
>>
>> #854474 src:alsa-libalsa-lib: FTBFS when built with
>> dpkg-buildpackage -A
>
> No objections.
>
>> #854616 scdaemonscdaemon cannot access yubikey using ccid
>> driver without pcscd
>
> Not sure
Cyril Brulebois:
> Niels Thykier (2017-02-19):
>> [...]
>
> Hrm. You mentioned on IRC you were pondering possibly rebuilding wget
> against 1.1 for stretch; if that happens, this needs d-i testing…
>
>
> KiBi.
>
I did and I agree on the testing part. Would a
Cyril Brulebois:
> Kurt Roeckx (2017-02-18):
>> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 06:16:28PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>>> How soon do you want to see this package in testing? Given I've just
>>> fixed a few things related to https support in d-i, it would be nice if
>>> I were able to perform a full te
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
> On 14/02/17 03:48, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Emilio asked me on IRC to have a look at a bunch of packages which both
>> have block-udeb and RC bug fixes. Here's a list with comments, I'm OK
>> with unblock-udeb'ing most of them (which doesn't mean you shouldn'
Cyril Brulebois:
> Hi,
>
> FTPmasters, please sync the installer from sid to testing:
>
> dak copy-installer 20170127
>
>
> Release team, please hint it into testing:
>
> urgent debian-installer/20170127
>
>
> KiBi.
>
Urgented.
~Niels
Package: preseed
Version: 1.76
Severity: normal
Hi,
Noticed this issue in the lintian archive wide processing (runs stable
w. -backports):
"""
N: Processing source package preseed (version 1.76, arch source) ...
[...]
ERROR: xgettext failed to generate PO template file because there is non-ASCII
Hi,
The submission period for the Stretch work is now over. We have
received 11 (confirmed) submissions for Stretch.
Please give a hand to the artists, whom took their time to prepare an
artwork submission for Debian Stretch! :)
* Alberto Moshpirit (3 submissions)
* Federico Mosquera
* Fern
Holger Wansing:
> [Added debian-boot to the loop]
>
>
> [...]
>
> There is some room for improvement with the current debian-installer page for
> Stretch: https://www.debian.org/releases/stretch/debian-installer/
> contains the chapter for Stretch (stable) images
> ("To install Debian (stretch)
Alex Bennée:
>
> Niels Thykier writes:
>
>> Alex Bennée:
>>> Package: debhelper
>>> Severity: normal
>>>
>>
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> I am a bit confused by this bug. Did you perhaps intend to submit it
>> against debootstrap i
Cyril Brulebois:
> Hi again,
>
> [...]
> Release team: since that's a binNMU, the source is already in
> testing, so no action needed AFAICT?
>
>
> KiBi.
>
Indeed, Britney will try it on the next run.
~Niels
Hi,
On the Release Team's IRC meeting today we concluded the following[1]:
* We expect to release Stretch with the LTS release based on Linux 4.10
* We intend to delay the freeze (all milestone dates) by 2 months to
accommodate the above.
- Note that the expected release date of Linux 4.1
Ben Hutchings:
> On Tue, 2016-02-02 at 07:34 +0000, Niels Thykier wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> Would you prefer that we moved future freezes (i.e. Buster and later),
>> so we could always rely on Greg's branch?
>
> Yes, I would.
>
Ok, we will take it into cons
Hi Ben,
Pulling in d-i on this, since they might be affected by this. If you
know of a maintainer that would be similarly affected, let me know, so
we can ask them as well.
Ben Hutchings:
> [...]
>
> For stretch, I would very much like to choose a kernel version for
> stretch that gets longterm
Cyril Brulebois:
> [ not sure what happened with my previous mail… retrying with the right
> version this time. ]
>
> Hi,
>
> FTPmasters, please sync the installer from sid to testing:
>
> dak copy-installer 20160106
>
>
> Release team, please hint it into testing:
>
> urgent debian-ins
On 2015-07-16 09:23, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> > As for doing a t-p-u: sounds fine with me.
>> > I'll be around today/Thursday but then away until Monday. But systemd is
>> > in more then capable hands with Martin.
> I'm attaching the source debdiff against the version in testing to this
> mail, so
On 2015-07-13 01:36, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hello release team,
>
> Now that linux is built on all archs, we're able to contemplate a d-i
> release. I'm wondering whether enabling all block-udeb entries from the
> freeze hints file would be appropriate to make sure that no last moment
> update r
On 2015-06-02 21:06, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 2015-06-02 13:25, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> Actually, I think they might be useful just for helping with core
>> dumps after the fact? We don't tend to have that many binary-arch
>> udebs, but debugging a crash is difficult in-situ. At least getting a
>>
Hi,
There is an existing experimental patch series for debhelper to have it
automatically create "ddebs"[1][2]. Currently, it /also/ happens for
udebs, which leads me to:
* Is it useful for you to have ddebs generated from udebs?
* Are there limitations or tweaks that I should be aware of in
On 2015-04-28 06:52, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Niels Thykier (ni...@thykier.net):
>> Control: retitle -1 libtextwrap: Memory leak in libtextwrap
>
>
> Well, there were potential memory leaks too in cdebconf, no?
>
> Given that it appeared inocuous, I committed
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 15:31:17 -0400
=?utf-8?b?R3VvIFlpeHVhbiAo6YOt5rqi6K2eKQ==?= wrote:
> Package: cdebconf-udeb
> Source: cdebconf
> Severity: normal
> Tags: d-i
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to use jessie RC-3 to install on a powerpc (Power Mac G5).
> When resizing a HFS
On 2015-04-20 08:26, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le dimanche, 19 avril 2015, 20.17:27 Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
>> Holger Wansing (2015-04-19):
>>> The release-notes currently contain
>>>
>>> Graphical installer
>>>
>>> Graphical installer is now the default on supported platforms.
On 2015-04-19 21:23, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Niels Thykier wrote:
>> I tried to ask in #debian-i18n about the new languages, but so far no
>> one has replied me. I am a bit overbooked, so if any you have time to
>> follow on that, then I would greatly apprec
On 2015-04-17 15:44, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Cyril Brulebois [2015-04-17 14:15 +0200]:
>> I tried to follow the code path in Ubuntu, which offers this option, to
>> track down where the offset can come from; and see whether Debian was
>> affected. I didn't mean to imply that Debian pro
On 2015-04-11 08:07, Baptiste Jammet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Dixit Niels Thykier, le 16/03/2015 :
>
>> I am contacting you to do a final review of the release-notes for the
>> d-i related topics (as listed on [1]):
>
> Here are some items I think it's imp
Source: sbuild
Version: 0.65.1-1
Severity: grave
Tags: d-i
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: jessie-is-blocker
Hi,
The debian-installer currently FTBFS on various architectures, but the
build itself is followed by "I: Built successfully". Then there is a
message later saying
On 2015-03-19 03:09, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> [...]
>
> Thank you. Could we get those added as well please?
>
>
> # fix for nasty bug #778773:
> unblock partman-base/183
> unblock-udeb partman-base/183
>
> # no objection from d-i PoV at first glance:
> unblock-udeb openssh/1:6.7p1-4
>
Ack, ap
On 2015-03-18 16:25, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here's another list of stuff that would be nice to unblock. Feel free to
> urgent anything (from this list or from the previous ones), so that we
> don't get previous hints obsoleted.
> [...]
>
>
> Mraw,
> KiBi.
>
Unblocked, thanks.
~Niel
Package: release-notes
Severity: normal
Dear installer team,
I am contacting you to do a final review of the release-notes for the
d-i related topics (as listed on [1]):
"""
Check with d-i team for specials with this update (check esp. if old
versions of d-i should be purged if new versions ente
On 2015-03-08 20:38, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Control: tag -1 confirmed
>
> [...]
>>
>> KiBi, if you (as d-i RM) are happy with that, I am willing to make the
>> exception - you are the one that gets to keep the pieces if it breaks. :)
>
> Sure, fair enough; let's do that, ta!
>
> Mraw,
> KiBi.
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo d-i
On 2015-02-09 22:14, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Le dimanche, 8 février 2015, 21.54:04 Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
>> Niels Thykier (2015-02-06):
>>> [...]
>> Since d-i-n-i is basically about collecting files
On 2015-03-05 12:16, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Samuel Thibault (2015-03-05):
>> Cyril Brulebois, le Thu 05 Mar 2015 07:07:27 +0100, a écrit :
>>> here's a first round of unblock/unblock-udeb hints for the upcoming d-i
>>> jessie RC2. Don't hesitate to ask questions if anything looks fishy.
>>
>> Ca
On 2015-03-05 07:07, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi people,
>
> here's a first round of unblock/unblock-udeb hints for the upcoming d-i
> jessie RC2. Don't hesitate to ask questions if anything looks fishy.
>
Hi,
Done all except:
> [...]
> # various keymap/options/etc. changes:
> unblock console
On 2015-01-26 00:16, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Niels Thykier (2015-01-16):
>> On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 11:08:45 + Simon McVittie wrote:
>>> Another possibility would be to use a low-priority question that is
>>> only shown in the "expert" installer, but can be
On 2015-01-25 22:16, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Control: tag -1 confirmed
>
> Kurt Roeckx (2015-01-20):
>> Can you ACK that, or is there someone else in the d-i team that
>> can do that?
>
> Not at the time this unblock was requested or pinged, but right now:
> yes.
>
> Mraw,
> KiBi.
>
Added -u
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 11:08:45 + Simon McVittie wrote:
> [...]
>
Hi,
Thanks for the summary.
CC'ing debian-boot as I suspect the "easiest" solution will involve
documentation this in the installation-guide.
> [...]
>
> * However, new installations of Debian 8 do not ask which configuration
reopen 644430
reassign 644430 installation-guide
On 2014-11-26 10:31, pille wrote:
> so was this addressed in >=7 versions?
>
Sorry, it seems your request was parked at the wrong package - assuming
I understand your request correct. What you seem to be wanting is that
the installation-guide had
Hi,
Reviewing a part of the Lintian code, I noticed the following[1]:
"""
# I'm not sure about the udeb case
if ($type ne 'udeb' and $file->size == 0) {
tag 'control-file-is-empty', $file;
}
"""
My question is: Are there control files for udebs where it makes
On 2014-02-25 17:56, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Cyril Brulebois (2014-02-13):
>> [...]
>> Failing a short resolution, I'm tempted to pretend sparc isn't an issue,
>> and maybe ask for a migration to testing + dak copy-installer.
>>
>> @debian-release: would that sound reasonable?
>
> Ping?
>
> [..
On 2013-04-08 02:02, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Updated summary:
>
> Cyril Brulebois (07/04/2013):
>> Cyril Brulebois (06/04/2013):
>>> Things I'd like to see merged:
>>> - netcfg (preseed bug -- fixed in git -- and iw installation); awaiting
>>>some bits of review for the wireless-* settings
On 2013-04-07 13:23, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> here's another set of queries.
>
> Please hurry those into testing:
> - apt-setup/1:0.79
> l10n + apt-setup/multiarch unbreakage. Even if AFAICT it's
> undocumented, keeping nonworking cruft looks like a bad idea
> sin
On 2013-04-06 10:38, Christian PERRIER wrote:
>> Things that want to be migrated (release managers, please push them to
>> > testing):
>> > - partman-base/165 (l10n + kbsd fix).
Unblocked by Adam.
>> > - yaboot-installer/1.1.26; fix submitted a while ago, but never
>> >reviewed/uploaded unt
On 2013-02-13 19:25, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is this time of the release again!
>
> ftpmasters: please dak copy-installer 20130211
>
> release team: please urgent debian-installer/20130211
>
> Thanks!
>
> Mraw,
> KiBi.
Urgented.
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot
On 2013-02-10 16:14, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> please unblock & urgent (if needed) the following packages:
>
> # lacks a reference to #696786, changelog fixed in git master:
> lowmem/1.38
>
> # fix missing network configuration in the installed system on bsd:
> netcfg/1.106
>
>
On 2013-01-28 02:34, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Christian PERRIER (03/01/2013):
>> Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
>>> I'd like you to figure out whether you want the *.po updates from
>>> 1.92 to 1.94 in master to be cherry-picked in the wheezy branch
>>> which is the base for a 1.92+deb
On 2013-01-28 02:54, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Christian PERRIER (06/01/2013):
>> Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
>>> Christian PERRIER (03/01/2013):
Well, it had two translation updates, one being Jordi's
harmonization of "double l" in Catalan, so it might be good to have
>>>
On 2012-12-20 05:19, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> and sorry for the lag (as said on IRC, cc:kibi would have made me
> reply earlier ;p).
>
> Niels Thykier (10/12/2012):
>> Control: tags -1 d-i
>>
>> On 2012-12-10 13:32, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>&
Control: tags -1 d-i
On 2012-12-10 13:32, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Ivo
>
> [...]
>
> Uploaded to t-p-u as posted on debian-mentors.
>
> Regards,
> Salvatore
Approved from my PoV, just needs a d-i ack.
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
On 2012-10-25 08:49, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On Oct 25, 2012 01:53 "Cyril Brulebois" wrote:
>> Hello folks,
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Lintian folks, maybe it would be nice to have some check to detect
>> unexpanded #DEBHELPER# tokens in maintainer scrip
On Oct 25, 2012 01:53 "Cyril Brulebois" wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> [...]
>
> Lintian folks, maybe it would be nice to have some check to detect
> unexpanded #DEBHELPER# tokens in maintainer scripts (as shipped in
> binary packages)?
>
> Mraw,
> KiBi.
>
As far as I understand dh_installdeb and
Package: installation-reports
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: USB pen with NetInst CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/non-free/cd-including-firmware/current/amd64/iso-cd/firmware-6.0.3-amd64-netinst.iso
(Last-Modified: 08-Oct-2011 21:53)
Date: 07-Dec 2011
92 matches
Mail list logo
