Package: debootstrap
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi. I prepared a merge request to sync the Trisquel debootstrap
scripts with what they have been shipping for some time.
https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debootstrap/-/merge_requests/143
/Simon
+ don't remove gschemas.compiled if at least one GSettings schema
+still exists;
+ + don't remove giomodule.cache if at least one GIO module still exists
+- Refactoring to support the above
+ * d/tests/1065022-futureproofing:
+Add a test for #1065022, modified from the
ade from bookworm to trixie, rather than bookworm to sid
+- Optionally reproduce #1110696 instead
+- Optionally test the extra safety checks in the postrm
+- Add a simpler mechanism to test proposed packages for either
+ bookworm or trixie
+- Improve diagnostic output
+
+ -- Simon Mc
On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 at 14:58:32 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Are you planning to request an unblock for gdk-pixbuf 2.42.12+dfsg-4?
I'm happpy either way regarding the upcoming RC 3 (and 13.0). Just
thought I'd drop you a note with the full freeze coming up.
Thanks for the reminder, but the cha
Package: debian-installer
Severity: wishlist
Control: affects -1 + plymouth grub-installer systemd-boot-installer
Tags: d-i forky sid
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-desk...@lists.debian.org
Prompted by a user question on IRC about whether/when Debian will
"include a boot screen like ubuntu" (which it alrea
Source: gnome-desktop
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-i...@lists.debian.org,
debian-l10n-chin...@lists.debian.org, debian-boot@lists.debian.org
The version of libgnome-desktop in trixie (44.1) currently defaults to
ibus-table-cangjie5 for zh_HK, but we are now looking at updating to
gn
d their indexes from that prompt, and then
ask only for the required ones during installation. The user will still
need to prepare all of them if they need the guarantee that they will be
able to complete an installation, but at least the number of disc swaps
will be greatly reduced.
Simon
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- but in a completely offline install,
this is the only way to get a complete index.
Simon
[1] https://unix.stackexchange.com/q/796672
Control: retitle -1 unblock: glib2.0/2.84.2-1
Control: tags -1 - confirmed
On Fri, 09 May 2025 at 11:08:26 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
[ Reason ]
CVE-2025-4373 (#1104930).
I also took the opportunity to catch up with the upstream glib-2-84
branch by adding one unrelated bugfix commit (a 1
On Mon, 12 May 2025 at 19:09:42 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
I'm pondering an RC 1 now-ish, but trying to decide if and how it could
affect packages that could be ready in time for the hard freeze.
Now that RC 1 has been available for a few days, I've uploaded this to
unstable - I hope that's
On Mon, 12 May 2025 at 19:09:42 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
If your request is not urgent, I might give you a green light in a few
days. If you'd rather see it addressed right away, I could try and
squeeze your package into the next release.
This isn't urgent, it can wait a few days. (There's
On Fri, 09 May 2025 at 14:57:40 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
[ Reason ]
CVE-2025-4373 (#1104930).
I also took the opportunity to catch up with the upstream glib-2-84
branch by adding one unrelated bugfix commit (a 1-line change).
[ Impact ]
Fixes an out-of-bounds write if an attacker can so
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: trixie
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-m...@lists.debian.org, debian-gtk-gn...@lists.debian.org,
debian-boot@lists.debian.org
The current version of librsvg is not migrating to testing because it
FTBFS on mips64el. This appears to be caused by a kernel or h
Control: retitle -1 vte: Do not release with forky
Control: tags -1 = forky sid experimental
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 at 10:17:07 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> The transition/toolchain freeze for bookworm is today, so it's clearly
> too late to port d-i to GTK 3 for bookworm, and we are
Sorry, forgot to cc the installer team for the d-i ack. Full message
quoted below.
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 at 20:55:06 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> [ Reason ]
> CVE-2024-52533, https://bugs.debian.org/1087419
>
> [ Impact ]
> Heap/stack buffer overflow with unknown impact (most lik
On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 at 21:05:38 +0100, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Instead of maintaining a list of packages per desktop in tasksel (thus
> in task-*-desktop), managed by the installer-team (that has no deep insight,
> which package makes sense to be included in the respective desktops), we
> would li
On Sat, 02 Nov 2024 at 18:35:53 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> In trixie we will also freeze all packages that produce udebs
Is it straightforward to give packages whose udebs are not yet in active
use a semi-automatic exemption from this freeze, while still applying
other reasons they might b
Package: task-mate-desktop
Version: 3.77
Severity: minor
Tags: trixie sid
X-Debbugs-Cc: mate-desktop-environm...@packages.debian.org
This package Recommends network-manager-gnome, which is now a transitional
package.
If the functionality that it requires is /usr/bin/nm-connection-editor,
please r
On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 at 21:00:41 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 14.10.24 um 17:13 schrieb Simon McVittie:
> > On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 at 16:33:40 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > > The name of the network-manager-gnome package is indeed a bit misleading
> > > nowadays.
Package: task-xfce-desktop
Version: 3.77
Severity: minor
Tags: trixie sid
X-Debbugs-Cc: xf...@packages.debian.org
This package Recommends network-manager-gnome, which is now a transitional
package.
If the functionality that it requires is /usr/bin/nm-connection-editor,
please recommend the nm-con
Package: task-gnome-flashback-desktop
Version: 3.77
Severity: minor
Tags: trixie sid
X-Debbugs-Cc: gnome-flashb...@packages.debian.org
This package depends on network-manager-gnome, which is now a transitional
package.
If the functionality that it requires is /usr/bin/nm-connection-editor,
please
On Tue, 05 Nov 2024 at 12:05:41 +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> On Mi 16 Okt 2024 21:00:41 CEST, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > Am 14.10.24 um 17:13 schrieb Simon McVittie:
> > > On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 at 16:33:40 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > > > The name of the network-man
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 at 16:33:40 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> The name of the network-manager-gnome package is indeed a bit misleading
> nowadays.
> Thus for some time I contemplated splitting up the package (similar to how
> Fedora has done) into network-manager-applet and nm-connection-editor. Th
have it).
Briefly tested; both the default and accessible/dark installers show the
expected banner.
Thanks,
smcv
>From 1e3bdbc1043be54d8d24f34344c23d1fac1579b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Simon McVittie
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 18:47:12 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] graphics: Remove Debian 12 brand
.24.24/debian/changelog 2024-07-19 14:30:18.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+gtk+3.0 (3.24.24-4+deb11u4) bullseye; urgency=medium
+
+ * d/p/Stop-looking-for-modules-in-cwd.patch:
+Add patch backported from 3.24.43 to avoid looking for modules in
+current working directory (CVE-2024-6655)
+
+
++ gtk+3.0-3.24.38/debian/changelog 2024-07-19 11:57:06.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+gtk+3.0 (3.24.38-2~deb12u2) bookworm; urgency=medium
+
+ * d/p/Stop-looking-for-modules-in-cwd.patch:
+Add patch backported from 3.24.43 to avoid looking for modules in
+current working directory (CV
m 3.24.43 to avoid looking for modules in
+current working directory (CVE-2024-6655)
+
+ -- Simon McVittie Fri, 19 Jul 2024 12:19:26 +0100
+
gtk+2.0 (2.24.33-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Team upload
diff -Nru gtk+2.0-2.24.33/debian/control gtk+2.0-2.24.33/debian/control
--- gtk+2.0-2.24.33/d
Control: tags -1 + d-i
On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 at 12:29:05 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> [ Reason ]
> CVE-2024-6655. The security team has indicated that they do not intend
> to release a DSA for this vulnerability.
>
> [ Impact ]
> If not fixed, GTK 2 apps will load mo
he signing key for that source is provided inline in the .sources
file.
Simon
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.5
APT prefers stable-security
APT policy: (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500,
'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Control: severity 1070706 normal
Control: severity 1070714 normal
On Tue, 07 May 2024 at 22:53:33 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Simon McVittie (2024-05-07):
> > do the release/installer teams consider udeb dependencies
> > on non-udeb packages, by udebs that d-i does not curren
On Tue, 07 May 2024 at 22:02:12 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 07-05-2024 7:49 p.m., Simon McVittie wrote:
> > The version in testing, 4.12.5+ds-3, has the same dependencies, so this
> > is not a regression.
>
> Is it? It seems that the version in unstable depends on libpng
Control: tags -1 + d-i
Control: found -1 4.12.5+ds-3
Control: retitle -1 gtk4 udeb has unsatisfiable dependencies
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: retitle -2 libvte-2.91-0-udeb depends on both GTK 3 and GTK 4
Control: reassign -2 src:vte2.91 0.75.92-1
On Tue, 07 May 2024 at 15:44:02 +0100, Peter Mich
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-Cc: coreut...@packages.debian.org, p...@packages.debian.org,
debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:coreutils src:pam
coreutils_9.4-3.1 and pam_1.5.3-7 aren't curre
Package: installation-reports
Severity: minor
Boot method: USB flash drive
Image version: reproduced on debian-12.5.0-i386-DVD-1.iso and
debian-12.5.0-amd64-netinst.iso
Date: 2024-02-10
Machine: not relevant
Partitions: not relevant
My partner encountered an unexpected UX during point release me
On Sun, 01 Oct 2023 at 11:52:25 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> I would like to update glib2.0 in Debian 11.9. We're too close to the
> 11.8 deadline for an update with this size of diffstat, so I'd like
> to upload it to bullseye-proposed-updates shortly after 11.8 is out,
>
On Sat, 28 Oct 2023 at 14:54:45 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Compared to what I get from a `dpkg-buildpackage -S` run locally (using
> the bullseye branch at tag debian/1.0.123+deb11u2), the source package
> available on coccia adds the debian/.gitignore file
I believe dpkg-source defaults to t
Package: unifont-bin
Version: 1:15.1.01-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i
X-Debbugs-Cc: Scott Talbert , debian-boot@lists.debian.org
unifont-bin depends on libwx-perl, which as mentioned in #1054146 is
unmaintained upstream and only minimally maintained in Debian.
debian-installer build-depends on u
On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 00:12:53 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> I did the same testing as for bookworm's #1050868, summarized on
> <https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debootstrap/-/merge_requests/105>.
> As with #1050868, all differences between the output of a reference
&g
On Sun, 15 Oct 2023 at 11:56:21 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> - copy the proposed debootstrap-udeb_1.0.128+nmu2+deb12u1_all.udeb into
> debian-installer_bookworm/build/pkg-lists/base
Sorry, that should of course have said: into
debian-installer_bookworm/build/localudebs/.
smcv
On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 at 23:40:12 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 at 16:27:12 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > Part of the transition to merged-/usr, and more specifically, allowing
> > us to stop shipping files in trixie whose physical path on disk does
> >
Control: tags -1 + d-i
On Sat, 16 Sep 2023 at 21:59:55 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> [ Reason ]
> New upstream bugfix release
I realise this technically needs a d-i ack, since dbus has udebs (for the
benefit of a11y in the graphical installer), although as discussed in
previous stable
On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 at 16:27:12 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> [ Reason ]
> Part of the transition to merged-/usr, and more specifically, allowing
> us to stop shipping files in trixie whose physical path on disk does
> not match their path in the dpkg database due to directory aliasin
On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 00:12:45 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> [ Reason ]
> The same changes proposed for bookworm in #1050868, but for bullseye.
> Because official buildds that build trixie/sid are not yet all running
> bookworm, we'll need this change in bullseye too.
>
&
(Closes: #1025657)
+
+ [ Hideki Yamane ]
+ * Add support for bootstrapping trixie
+
+ [ Simon McVittie, Luca Boccassi ]
+ * Backport merged-/usr support changes from trixie:
+- Implement merged-/usr by post-merging.
+ This changes the bootstrap order so that it will be possible for a
Control: tags -1 + d-i
On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 at 16:27:12 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Part of the transition to merged-/usr, and more specifically, allowing
> us to stop shipping files in trixie whose physical path on disk does
> not match their path in the dpkg database due to directory
3423) and not a debootstrap bug
+- With these changes, the autopkgtest is confirmed to pass in
+ autopkgtest-virt-qemu (Closes: #983197)
+
+ -- Simon McVittie Wed, 30 Aug 2023 15:21:17 +0100
+
debootstrap (1.0.128+nmu2) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
diff -Nru debootstrap
On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 at 17:07:39 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> The other aspect is that we want to ship the
> aliasing symlinks in a package (base-files probably).
...
> Is there any prerequisite you see missing before we can merge and upload
> this change? Any aspect to be analyzed? Any situation t
On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 at 12:42:11 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> In the meanwhile, I'll immediately revert the sabotage.
Both of you, please don't turn this into an NMU war in the archive:
that doesn't benefit anyone. I would have preferred it if Adam had not
immediately uploaded a 0-day revert, but
On Sat, 15 Jul 2023 at 18:27:24 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> bluca's NMU on 2023-07-15 makes debootstrap produce chroots using the
> aliased-dirs scheme.
My intention in the MR that was included in the NMU[1] was to default to
merged-/usr chroots in all cases for trixie and up, but continue to
pr
On Sat, 15 Jul 2023 at 18:27:24 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> But, what matters here is the CTTE ruling in #1035831 -- for the time being,
> packages must not move files between locations affected by the aliasing.
If that happens in reality, then yes, that's bad, and reverting the change
is a miti
On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 at 16:58:54 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-07-12 at 12:34 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 at 12:12:47 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > > [ Reason ]
> > > https://bugs.debian.org/1040790
>
> Please go ahead, be
On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 at 12:12:47 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> [ Reason ]
> https://bugs.debian.org/1040790
> [ Changes ]
> All changes are part of resolving or testing #1040790.
Debdiff attached.
> [ Tests ]
I should also have mentioned that I'm running the proposed p
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@packages.debian.org, debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:dbus
[ Reason ]
https://bugs.debian.org/1040790
[ Impact ]
A regression in bookworm'
Control: reassign -1 src:dbus 1.12.20-3
On Mon, 10 Jul 2023 at 18:43:06 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> As a wild guess, maybe the split of src:dbus into multiple packages
> affected the order in which the postinsts run, and now systemd's runs
> first and creates /etc/machine-id, and then dbus-daemo
Control: tags -1 + patch
Control: forwarded -1
https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debootstrap/-/merge_requests/94
On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 at 01:19:46 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> So, if the buildds are still running non-usr-merged chroot, can you at least
> document the --usr-merge option which
upstream stable release 1.12.28
+- Fixes a denial of service issue if the root or messagebus user is
+ monitoring messages on the system bus with the Monitoring interface
+ (dbus-monitor, busctl monitor, gdbus monitor or similar)
+ (Closes: #1037151)
+
+ -- Simon McVittie Tue, 06 Jun 2
rtSidToStringSidA (psid, sid))
{
- _dbus_verbose("%s invalid sid\n",__FUNCTION__);
+ _dbus_verbose("invalid sid\n");
goto failed;
}
//okay:
diff -Nru dbus-1.14.6/debian/changelog dbus-1.14.8/debian/changelog
--- dbus-1.14.6/debian/changelog 2023-02-08
Control: reassign -1 src:e2fsprogs 1.47.0-1
Control: retitle -1 mke2fs: should not enable orphan_file by default until
trixie
Control: affects -1 installation-reports
On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 at 18:43:05 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Simon McVittie (2023-02-24):
> > caused by the
On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 at 16:56:23 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Cyril Brulebois (2023-02-19):
> > Simon McVittie (2023-02-19):
> > > Are d-i alphas and weekly builds built differently? Is it perhaps the
> > > case that alphas are built from testing udebs, while we
On Sun, 19 Feb 2023 at 17:56:04 -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 01:23:19PM +0000, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > I think this could be caused by debian-installer having udebs from
> > e2fsprogs 1.47.0-1 in the installation environment
>
> I thought the D
Control: retitle -1 d-i regression in weekly builds: FEATURE_C12 unsupported by
the installed e2fsck
On Sun, 19 Feb 2023 at 14:39:12 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Simon McVittie (2023-02-19):
> > Graphical installation proceeded normally (in particular #1031620 is
> > fixed
Package: installation-reports
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable (at least for inexperienced users)
X-Debbugs-Cc: e2fspr...@packages.debian.org
Boot method: virtual CD
Image version:
https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.is
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
This issue is already fixed in weekly builds as of 2023-02-09, but I'm
reporting it as errata for the alpha 1 milestone.
Boot method: virtual CD
Image version: debian-bookworm-DI-alpha1-amd64-netinst.iso
Machine: virt-manager "Debian testing" qemu V
On Sat, 03 Sep 2022 at 22:41:36 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Sun 28 Aug 2022 at 10:33PM -05, Daniel Lewart wrote:
> > Currently, python3 is Priority: optional.
> >
> > The following Buster packages have Priority: standard:
> > * python
> > * python-minimal
> > * python2.7
> > * python3-r
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 13:30, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 01:04:17PM +0200, Simon B wrote:
> >On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 12:32, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >>
> >> If you add "priority=low" as a command line option to an installer
> >
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 12:32, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 12:13:06PM +0200, Simon B wrote:
> >
> >For previous versions of the installer, I have always had the options
> >referred
> >to here:
> >
> >With Bullseye,
a screenshot, but I can if
it will help explain the issue.
Any help greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
Simon
On Thu, 19 Aug 2021 at 00:06:00 -0500, Daniel Lewart wrote:
> Please change gcc-9-base from:
> libs/required
> to:
> libs/optional
Reminder that this request for a priority reduction is still outstanding.
gcc 9 has not been the default gcc since 2020, and Debian 11 was released
with gcc 1
(Speaking only on my own behalf, not on behalf of the TC, here)
On Fri, 03 Dec 2021 at 16:08:24 -0500, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> 1. Debian isn't yet ready for usrmerge
Merged /usr is not actually the problem here, although it exacerbates what
appears to be a pre-existing bug in the rescue mode[
ntrol will
need to be regenerated afterwards), but there might be subtleties that
I'm missing.
Thanks,
smcv
>From f485b1e8e618ef12056d1eea54aa4b617ec10117 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Simon McVittie
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 14:20:16 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] d/control.m4: Make all pack
On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 at 19:37:37 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> While working through the debian-cd testing checklist I tried to install
> from the copy of d-i on the XFCE live image, onto a (degraded) RAID1 array
> with a single JFS partition that is the root filesystem.
I retried ins
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Boot method: USB
Image version: debian-live-11.0.0-amd64-xfce.iso release candidate, 2021-08-14
Date: 2021-08-14 approx 18:30 UTC
Machine: Lenovo Thinkpad X201, booted using BIOS
Partitions:
(transcribed by hand, might not be 100% accurate - I'l
On Sat, 24 Jul 2021 at 09:05:59 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> If we were to go the “(almost) all in” route, it might make sense to
> either blacklist (some of) those, or to whitelist the known-ok ones,
> which would require some monitoring of new additions over time (which
> dillon, behind d-i.de
an derivatives do. To boot Arch
successfully from the grub menu, we need to add all of their initrds
to the grub menu entry (detecting this situation requires an os-prober
patch, for which see <https://bugs.debian.org/820838>).
[Commit message added by Simon McVittie ]
Bug: https://savannah.
> > look bad when I get to them, I can always exclude prefer the version
> > currently in buster through some apt_preferences when building d-i
> > for
> > 10.10… (And we would have up to 10.11 to find a fix.)
>
> That sounds good to me; thanks.
>
> Simon - please feel free to upload.
Uploaded 2.58.3-2+deb10u3.
smcv
On Sun, 23 May 2021 at 14:43:33 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> When the GtkTreeView is resized as a result of the text being added,
> the top left corner of the visible area is what's preserved; if its
> selected row was near the bottom, the result is that the selected row
> is
On Sun, 23 May 2021 at 11:31:58 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > - Slightly shorter (`kvm -m 1G -cdrom mini.iso`, no disk layout or even
> >disk required), pick a language like French and all default choices,
> >until the mirror country selection, pick the very last one
ler, the position is not correct
> anymore (it's no longer “full-bottom” but a little higher as seen in the
> scrollbar), and the selected line gets out of sight.
>
> I've tried various things like having the focus_path happens in a
> “_later” indirection using the sa
is not
+installed. See #980396 for more information.
+adwaita-icon-theme already Recommends librsvg2-common, but people who
+routinely do not install recommended packages will get a better hint
+about how much will be broken by its removal if GTK also recommends it.
+
+ -- Simo
, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Following the rule of thumb that bad interactions between two components
> should often be fixed on *both* sides, I'd be tempted to clone this bug,
> reassign to both gtk+2.0 and cdebconf, and apply both changes.
As discussed with kibi on the merge requests,
On Mon, 17 May 2021 at 23:54:01 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Simon McVittie (2021-05-17):
> > It looks as though the problem is that the size GTK chooses for a
> > GtkTextView (a debconf "note" or similar) is flapping between two
> > values.
>
> Without
On Mon, 17 May 2021 at 17:48:45 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> I've checked what would
> happen with GTK 3 in cdebconf and cdebconf-gtk-terminal (I had forgotten
> about cdebconf-gtk-entropy until writing this reply).
I think it's much too late in the Debian 11 cycle to be doing this for
Debian 1
On Mon, 17 May 2021 at 18:12:35 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> And for those not following #debian-boot, I'm finding myself between a
> rock and a hard place, as both options (trying to work around the
> rendering-related hangs versus switching to GTK 3 at the last moment)
> are very far from idea
On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 at 12:11:44 -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> In Ubuntu, we are in the process of moving the i386 architecture to a
> compatibility-only layer on amd64. ... We would like to drop [some] udebs
Do I understand correctly that Ubuntu now builds all packages with the
noudeb build-profi
cdebconf/-/merge_requests/4>.
smcv
>From f66ecc20da5f265cecf361f6983d92670a723bf8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Simon McVittie
Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 13:04:08 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gtk: Capture new-style GLib structured logging messages under
d-i
GLib 2.50 replaced the non-machine-
te
GUI program then it doesn't *necessarily* have to move to GTK 3 at the
same time that cdebconf-gtk does. I'm also not sure whether it's actively
used for anything?
smcv
>From 5cb0a7ca277527a51c3449d1c61b232adc08058c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Simon McVittie
Date: Fri
On Mon, 03 May 2021 at 17:17:21 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> I've also been able to attach a debugger to debconf. My preliminary finding
> is: we enter gtk_container_idle_sizer() in GTK 2 and never exit, because
> every time we go into gtk_container_check_resize()
On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 at 18:54:56 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Version 1.44.4 is the first one I was able to build, using the packaging
> from debian/1.44.6-1 (first 1.44.x version that was packaged and that's
> also known to be buggy).
I've been able to hack together packaging for 1.43.0 (works)
ion-even-if-mount-was-not-found.patch:
+ Fix inability to display SMB server's list of shares
+ (e.g. smb://192.168.1.1/) in Nautilus
+ * d/p/updateiconcache-Sort-list-of-entries.patch:
+Mark as applied upstream to GTK 3 as well as to GTK 4
+
+ -- Simon McVittie Sun, 02 May 2021
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: si...@josefsson.org
Boot method: USB
Image version:
https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/bullseye_di_rc1/amd64/iso-cd/debian-bullseye-DI-rc1-amd64-netinst.iso
Date: 2021-05-01
Machine: Lenovo
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK
On Thu, 03 Sep 2020 at 11:46:56 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Simon McVittie (2020-09-03):
> > One way to resolve [needing a libstdc++ udeb]
> > might be to build the vte2.91 udeb with
> > -static-libstdc++, which makes it about 200K larger than it would
> > othe
On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 at 13:05:11 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 22.02.2021 13:00, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > Control: reassign -1 src:debootstrap 1.0.123
> > Control: retitle -1 debootstrap: autopkgtest regression under
> > autopkgtest-virt-qemu
> []
> > > n
Source: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.118
Severity: important
Back in 2017, I added an autopkgtest to debootstrap. One of the things
that it does is to run a simplified version of schroot, to make sure that
a chroot produced by debootstrap is usable by schroot - in other words,
to make sure the deboots
Control: reassign -1 src:debootstrap 1.0.123
Control: retitle -1 debootstrap: autopkgtest regression under
autopkgtest-virt-qemu
On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 at 08:45:48 +0900, Ryutaroh Matsumoto wrote:
> I report here another different behaviors of lxc and qemu testbeds.
> The testbeds were made by debci
On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 at 14:15:27 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Simon McVittie, le mar. 17 nov. 2020 11:11:53 +, a ecrit:
> > So I think losing libgdk_pixbuf_xlib-2.0.so.0 from the
> > udeb would be OK.
>
> I had a run on the amd64 .udebs, and could not find a bina
On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 at 11:11:53 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> I'll follow up to this bug when I have a gdk-pixbuf version with the
> proposed split ready for testing. It would be great if someone who knows
> d-i could try a build of the graphical installer with those pa
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
The libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 package and its corresponding udeb have
traditionally included two shared libraries, libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 and
libgdk_pixbuf_xlib-2.0.so.0.
Gdk-Pixbuf upstream recently split the source package, moving the Xlib
parts into their ow
On Sun, 21 Jan 2018 at 21:27:47 +0100, Egmont Koblinger wrote:
> > We don't do c++ in d-i.
>
> Unfortunately this sounds really problematic. As of version 0.42 vte
> has been using (more and more) C++. This is not like Ubuntu's PCRE2
> hack which is a matter of a few hours of work reverting and me
On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 at 14:34:06 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt (2020-06-20):
> > I suspect this will be the last such update before stretch moves to
> > LTS, but that seems fair.
> >
> > This will need the usual KiBi ack, so tagging and CCing.
>
> No objections, thanks.
Does th
Control: retitle -1 buster-pu: package dbus/1.12.20-0+deb10u1
On Sat, 20 Jun 2020 at 20:26:24 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-06-02 at 21:22 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > dbus 1.12.18 fixes a local denial of service vulnerability for which
> > the Security Team have
1 - 100 of 359 matches
Mail list logo
