On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 11:14:42AM -0500, Jurij Smakov wrote:
>
> This does not make any sense to me. For one thing, silo-installer runs
> after the base install.
I mean that silo-installer can contain your finish.d hooks. Ofcourse
they will be run by partman before the base install. In silo-in
Hi,
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
reassign 286265 silo-installer
thanks
Silo-installer already includes finish.d hooks so it is better for this
patch to be applied there and not in partman-target.
This does not make any sense to me. For one thing, silo-installer runs
after the base in
reassign 286265 silo-installer
thanks
Silo-installer already includes finish.d hooks so it is better for this
patch to be applied there and not in partman-target.
Anton Zinoviev
> On Saturday 18 December 2004 23:35, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> >
> > I've cooked up a little patch, implementing a finish
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 286265 silo-installer
Bug#286265: Partman hook for various checks on sparc
Bug reassigned from package `partman-target' to `silo-installer'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Deb
Package: partman-target
Severity: wishlist
This way the patch won't get lost in the mailarchives...
On Saturday 18 December 2004 23:35, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've cooked up a little patch, implementing a finish.d hook for
> partman, which makes sure that the chosen partitioning scheme is
5 matches
Mail list logo