Frans Pop wrote:
Now this _is_ a valid reason to use expert install. That will give you the
option to enter module parameters which should still be used after the
reboot.
Not anymore, but adding this on the boot line will work:
3c509.xcvr=3
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description:
On Tuesday 18 April 2006 20:52, Joey Hess wrote:
Frans Pop wrote:
Now this _is_ a valid reason to use expert install. That will give
you the option to enter module parameters which should still be used
after the reboot.
Not anymore, but adding this on the boot line will work:
On Monday 10 April 2006 02:03, Jack Carroll wrote:
I speculated that the reason for the error might be that the daily
builds did not include a boot.img floppy, and the root.img and
net-drivers.img that were provided might not be compatible with the
Etch RC2 boot.img. Until that question
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 03:11:58PM -0400, Jack Carroll wrote:
That revealed the place where the files get deleted. I'll see if I
can move the log to disk and attach it to this message. Just copying a few
key items from the screen on the test machine:
It happens at the 93% point
reassign 361180 base-installer
retitle Selecting 2.6 kernel when installing using 2.4 will break install
thanks
On Monday 10 April 2006 21:11, Jack Carroll wrote:
That revealed the place where the files get deleted. I'll see if I
can move the log to disk and attach it to this message.
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 10:20:36PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
reassign 361180 base-installer
retitle Selecting 2.6 kernel when installing using 2.4 will break install
thanks
On Monday 10 April 2006 21:11, Jack Carroll wrote:
That revealed the place where the files get deleted. I'll see
Please do not reply to all. I had set a correct reply-to header for my
previous mail. In general: please only reply to the bug report
([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
On Monday 10 April 2006 23:36, Jack Carroll wrote:
I don't see any particular reason why an
installer shouldn't run under a 2.4 kernel,
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 10:20:36PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
So, if you'd just accept the 2.4 kernel offered by default, the
installation will go fine. You can upgrade to a 2.6 kernel after the
installation finishes.
This procedure worked with a PCI network board (3c59x). The
You're still replying to all kinds of addresses you don't need to...
On Tuesday 11 April 2006 01:05, Jack Carroll wrote:
modprobe 3c509 xcvr=3
ifup eth0
Now this _is_ a valid reason to use expert install. That will give you the
option to enter module parameters
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 11:55:26PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
Please do not reply to all. I had set a correct reply-to header for my
previous mail. In general: please only reply to the bug report
([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
OK.
On Monday 10 April 2006 23:36, Jack Carroll wrote:
I don't
retitle 361180 Selecting 2.6 kernel when installing using 2.4 will break install
thanks
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 361180 Selecting 2.6 kernel when installing using 2.4 will break
install
Bug#361180: base-installer: Selecting 2.6 kernel when installing using 2.4 will
break install
Changed Bug title.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 08:42:02PM -0400, Jack Carroll wrote:
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 08:21:52AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
What is the reason for using 'expert'?
I've been doing it that way for so long, it's reflex now. I want to
make sure it doesn't try to do something like
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 11:08:51AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 08:42:02PM -0400, Jack Carroll wrote:
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 08:21:52AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
What is the reason for using 'expert'?
I've been doing it that way for so long, it's
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 09:18:51PM -0400, Jack Carroll wrote:
Here you are:
Disk /dev/hda: 80.0 GB, 80026361856 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 9729 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/hda1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Tags 361180 moreinfo
Bug#361180: Debian installer doesn't install kernel
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
Tags 361180 moreinfo
thanks
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 12:23:00AM -0400, Jack Carroll wrote:
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer 2006-0406
daily build
uname -a: Not available. Boot failed.
Date: 20060406 1800
Method: How did you
On Friday 07 April 2006 06:23, Jack Carroll wrote:
FIRST RUN:
At reboot, the GRUB screen listed only Other operating systems,
showing the kernel previously installed in /dev/hda1. It didn't list
the newly installed kernel.
Which probably means that you are running an old grub and not
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 05:08:45PM -0400, Jack Carroll wrote:
Two of you replied to my bug report. I'll send my replies to both
of you.
Oops. Excuse me being too familair with the Debian Bug Tracking System.
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 01:21:50PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
I'll run
Two of you replied to my bug report. I'll send my replies to both
of you.
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 01:21:50PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 07 April 2006 06:23, Jack Carroll wrote:
FIRST RUN:
At reboot, the GRUB screen listed only Other operating systems,
showing the kernel
- Forwarded message from Jack Carroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 17:08:45 -0400
From: Jack Carroll [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#361180: Debian installer doesn't install kernel
Two of you
On Saturday 08 April 2006 00:03, Jack Carroll wrote:
During kernel download, ls /target/boot shows
System.map-2.6.15-1-686
config-2.6.15-1-686
initrd.img-2.6.15-1-686.new
vmlinuz-2.6.15-1-686
Good so far. I'm assuming that you are looking while the initrd is being
generated and that
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 12:19:30AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
It would also be nice if you used a mail address that does not have
ridiculous blocking when I send from my normal address:
Your message cannot be delivered to the following recipients:
Recipient address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 12:19:30AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 08 April 2006 00:03, Jack Carroll wrote:
During kernel download, ls /target/boot shows
System.map-2.6.15-1-686
config-2.6.15-1-686
initrd.img-2.6.15-1-686.new
vmlinuz-2.6.15-1-686
Good so far. I'm assuming
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 08:21:52AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
Tags 361180 moreinfo
thanks
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 12:23:00AM -0400, Jack Carroll wrote:
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer 2006-0406
daily build
uname -a:
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 08:21:52AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
Please provide the output of
fdisk -l /dev/hda
Here you are:
Disk /dev/hda: 80.0 GB, 80026361856 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 9729 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer 2006-0406
daily build
uname -a: Not available. Boot failed.
Date: 20060406 1800
Method: How did you install? Network, with 3C905 card, DHCP
What did you boot off? Floppies
If network
27 matches
Mail list logo
