On 08/28/2014 07:45 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> I already did, multiple times. Your disagreeing with how we've been
> dealing with disruptive changes in Debian for years isn't an excuse to
> break stuff in testing in addition to unstable.
again: debian-installer is the only rdepends there ever wa
Daniel Baumann (2014-08-28):
> On 08/26/2014 10:35 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > now, can you give me a *technical* reason why the bugreport needs to be
> > kept open? is there a need to keep syslinux out of testing or why does
> > it need to be kept open?
>
> if you can't give a technical reason
On 08/26/2014 10:35 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> now, can you give me a *technical* reason why the bugreport needs to be
> kept open? is there a need to keep syslinux out of testing or why does
> it need to be kept open?
if you can't give a technical reason why the newer version of syslinux
should
On 08/26/2014 10:29 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Sure: breaking reverse dependencies is a bug; a quite nasty one when
> that happens in an uncoordinated and deliberately disruptive manner.
i do disgree with that interpretation which can be seen in the previous
mail, but insisting on that would not
On 08/26/2014 09:07 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Not until it's uploaded, and I'm not going to upload debian-installer
> just for that.
since this is not a bug in isolinux, can you explain why should it be
kept open?
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email:
Daniel Baumann (2014-08-26):
> On 08/26/2014 09:07 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Not until it's uploaded, and I'm not going to upload
> > debian-installer just for that.
>
> since this is not a bug in isolinux, can you explain why should it
> be kept open?
Sure: breaking reverse dependencies is
reopen 759189
Daniel Baumann (2014-08-26):
> close 759189
> thanks
>
> I see you've fixed the bug in your package:
>
> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/d-i/debian-installer.git/commit/?id=a212be5de579ed41643e4eaf1a03775839608ff5
>
> so this bug can be closed here, #751731 is enough to track it o
On 08/25/2014 07:35 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> [ Again, please keep debian-boot@ in the loop. ]
[ clicking on reply-all in icedove only adds CCs for addresses that were
CCed in the original message. ]
> Because your package is actively dropping features your reverse
> dependencies are using.
t
[ Again, please keep debian-boot@ in the loop. ]
Daniel Baumann (2014-08-25):
> why did you reassign #759189 back to syslinux? do you require a patch
> for #751731? are there any problems adding syslinux-utils to
> debian-installer build-depends?
Because your package is actively dropping feature
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 759189 debian-installer
Bug #759189 [isolinux] isolinux: isohybrid dropped, breaking debian-installer
builds
Bug reassigned from package 'isolinux' to 'debian-installer'.
No longer marked as found in versions syslinux/3:6.03~pre19+dfsg-3
Daniel Baumann (2014-08-25):
> reassign 759189 debian-installer
> forcemerge 759189 751731
> thanks
>
> On 08/25/2014 06:27 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > once again syslinux is breaking its reverse dependencies. We're now
> > getting this in d-i daily builds:
>
> please update your package as i
Cyril Brulebois (2014-08-25):
> Package: isolinux
> Version: 3:6.03~pre19+dfsg-3
> Severity: serious
> Justification: breaks rdepends
>
> Hi,
>
> once again syslinux is breaking its reverse dependencies. We're now
> getting this in d-i daily builds:
> | geniso_hybrid_plus_firmware_partition ./tm
Package: isolinux
Version: 3:6.03~pre19+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: breaks rdepends
Hi,
once again syslinux is breaking its reverse dependencies. We're now
getting this in d-i daily builds:
| geniso_hybrid_plus_firmware_partition ./tmp/netboot/mini.iso
| util/geniso_hybrid_plus_firmwa
13 matches
Mail list logo
