Re: Installation on NSLU2 does not complete (initramfs nslu2 hook requires user interaction)

2008-02-02 Thread Gordon Farquharson
Hi Joey On Feb 2, 2008 7:14 PM, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-02 16:16]: > > > I've uploaded with this patch. Is ixp4xx_eth built into the 2.6.24 > > > kernels in unstable? > > > > No, it's a module. > > So something sti

Re: Installation on NSLU2 does not complete (initramfs nslu2 hook requires user interaction)

2008-02-02 Thread Joey Hess
Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-02 16:16]: > > I've uploaded with this patch. Is ixp4xx_eth built into the 2.6.24 > > kernels in unstable? > > No, it's a module. So something still needs to be done to get udev to load it? -- see shy jo signature.asc Descript

Re: Installation on NSLU2 does not complete (initramfs nslu2 hook requires user interaction)

2008-02-02 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-02 16:16]: > I've uploaded with this patch. Is ixp4xx_eth built into the 2.6.24 > kernels in unstable? No, it's a module. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Re: Installation on NSLU2 does not complete (initramfs nslu2 hook requires user interaction)

2008-02-02 Thread Joey Hess
Gordon Farquharson wrote: > Attached is a patch to the nslu2-utils initramfs nslu2 hook that > updates the nslu2-utils package to work with Krzysztof's driver. I > have also taken the liberty of adding some logic to the initramfs > local-top nslu2 script to remove the module loading message that on

Re: Installation on NSLU2 does not complete (initramfs nslu2 hook requires user interaction)

2008-02-02 Thread Gordon Farquharson
Hi Joey and Martin On Dec 15, 2007 8:19 AM, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Gordon Farquharson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-15 02:13]: > > > if ls -l /sys/class/net/$iface/device | grep -q ixp4xx_mac; then > > > echo "firmware in use" > > It does work (I updated the script

Re: Installation on NSLU2 does not complete (initramfs nslu2 hook requires user interaction)

2008-02-01 Thread Gordon Farquharson
Hi Martin On Dec 15, 2007 8:19 AM, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Gordon Farquharson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-15 02:13]: > > > if ls -l /sys/class/net/$iface/device | grep -q ixp4xx_mac; then > > > echo "firmware in use" > > It does work (I updated the script above to

Re: Installation on NSLU2 does not complete (initramfs nslu2 hook requires user interaction)

2007-12-15 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Gordon Farquharson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-15 02:13]: > > if ls -l /sys/class/net/$iface/device | grep -q ixp4xx_mac; then > > echo "firmware in use" > It does work (I updated the script above to use the commands in svn > revision 130). Gordon, can you also check which with Krzyszto

Re: Installation on NSLU2 does not complete (initramfs nslu2 hook requires user interaction)

2007-12-15 Thread Gordon Farquharson
Hi Joey On Dec 12, 2007 1:26 PM, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > iface=$(ip route | grep '^default' | cut -d ' ' -f 5) > if ls -l /sys/class/net/$iface/device | grep -q ixp4xx_mac; then > echo "firmware in use" > else > echo "firmware not in use" > fi > > Does this work on

Re: Installation on NSLU2 does not complete (initramfs nslu2 hook requires user interaction)

2007-12-12 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 12 December 2007, Joey Hess wrote: > iface=$(ip route | grep '^default' | cut -d ' ' -f 5) > if ls -l /sys/class/net/$iface/device | grep -q ixp4xx_mac; then Wouldn't using readlink be more logical? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Installation on NSLU2 does not complete (initramfs nslu2 hook requires user interaction)

2007-12-12 Thread Joey Hess
Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Gordon Farquharson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-03 00:12]: > > nslu2-utils is version 0.10+r71-13, but I don't see any changes to the > > initramfs hook that should cause this problem. I am using a DFSG image > > that does not contain the NPE-B firmware. > > I guess the

Re: Installation on NSLU2 does not complete (initramfs nslu2 hook requires user interaction)

2007-12-04 Thread Eddy Petrișor
On 04/12/2007, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Gordon Farquharson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-03 00:12]: > > nslu2-utils is version 0.10+r71-13, but I don't see any changes to the > > initramfs hook that should cause this problem. I am using a DFSG image > > that does not contain t

Re: Installation on NSLU2 does not complete (initramfs nslu2 hook requires user interaction)

2007-12-03 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Gordon Farquharson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-03 00:12]: > nslu2-utils is version 0.10+r71-13, but I don't see any changes to the > initramfs hook that should cause this problem. I am using a DFSG image > that does not contain the NPE-B firmware. I guess the best way this should be handled is

Installation on NSLU2 does not complete (initramfs nslu2 hook requires user interaction)

2007-12-02 Thread Gordon Farquharson
Hi Joey Installation on the NSLU2 using the daily build from 2007/12/01 stops when generating the initramfs: Dec 3 05:15:48 in-target: update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.22-3-ixp4xx Dec 3 05:18:21 in-target: Warning: ixp4xx_npe ethernet driver firmware file /lib/firmware/NPE-B no