On Wed Jul 25, 2001 at 06:00:59PM +0200, Thimo Neubauer wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 09:26:47AM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
> > If you find stuff that is enabled that shouldn't be, please do let me/us know
> > by posting to the list. I'm about to make a new busybox package in the next
> > hou
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 09:26:47AM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
> If you find stuff that is enabled that shouldn't be, please do let me/us know
> by posting to the list. I'm about to make a new busybox package in the next
> hour or two, so now would be a good time to mention any needed changes. O
On Wed Jul 25, 2001 at 04:49:57AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 02:28:16PM +0200, Thimo Neubauer wrote:
> >
> > What are the favorite ways of reducing the disksize anyway? As I'm
> > still totally new to boot-disks, can someone tell me where I have to
> > go? The lists of w
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 04:49:57AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> busybox has alot of cruft turned on that doesn't need to be, going
> through that and finding potential applets to kill would be useful.
> its probably a good idea to ask on the list first so the other
> archtectures can comment on wh
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 02:28:16PM +0200, Thimo Neubauer wrote:
>
> What are the favorite ways of reducing the disksize anyway? As I'm
> still totally new to boot-disks, can someone tell me where I have to
> go? The lists of what packages have to go on the bootdisk seems to be
> irreducible...
b
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 02:28:16PM +0200, Thimo Neubauer wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 02:33:58PM +0200, H.Heinold wrote:
> > the biggest problems with the alpha bootfloppies is the size of some
> > files. I think libary-reduction on alpha ist really a mess.
>
> What does that mean? Is there a
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 02:33:58PM +0200, H.Heinold wrote:
> the biggest problems with the alpha bootfloppies is the size of some
> files. I think libary-reduction on alpha ist really a mess.
What does that mean? Is there a possibility to reduce the size
further? I'd be very interested, because I
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 02:27:38PM +0200, Thimo Neubauer wrote:
>
> Yes, I'm running an up-to-date testing. The version of the system
> building the boot-floppies has no influence on the problem, because
> the apt-process showing the error uses his own
> boot-floppies/sources.list. Additionally,
Hi,
the biggest problems with the alpha bootfloppies is the size of some
files. I think libary-reduction on alpha ist really a mess.
The size of root.bin is around 1,7 MB (it was 1,70 MB on A DS20, 1,72 MB on
a XP-1000). This will not fit on a normal 1,44 floppy. For the builds
I used chroot sid
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 03:55:04AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> i never had any trouble with this, i used a woody chroot which is
> quite normal it has sysvinit and regular e2fsprogs (not -bf)
> installed. apt seems to have no trouble with this inside of
> boot-floppies build.
>
> are you sure
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 10:50:42AM +0200, Thimo Neubauer wrote:
> > e2fsprogs (>= 1.15-1) | e2fsprogs-bf (>= 1.15-1)
not needed
> Well, I thought about that as well, but if sysvinit had these
> dependencies a user and/or apt could get the idea that installing
> e2fsprogs-bf seems like a good ide
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 10:38:30AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> From a first glance it looks like a dependency problem:
>
> sysvinit: Depends e2fsprogs (>= 1.15-1)
> e2fsprogs: version 1.22-1 is available, but:
> e2fsprogs-bf version 1.22-1 will be installed, so the dependency is
> not fulfille
Thimo Neubauer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to build the Alpha-bootdisks, because up to now I haven't
> heard of anyone doing this and I want the release to happen ;-)
> Anyway, I'm getting an error when rootdisk.sh tries to download the
> needed packages. After setting the debug-variable I found
Hi,
I'm trying to build the Alpha-bootdisks, because up to now I haven't
heard of anyone doing this and I want the release to happen ;-)
Anyway, I'm getting an error when rootdisk.sh tries to download the
needed packages. After setting the debug-variable I found an
apt-error: (I wrapped the apt-c
14 matches
Mail list logo
