On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 09:35:19PM +1100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-17 00:21]:
> > > You can (and should) just upload a fixed 2.4.22 package in the meantime.
> >
> > Upload a fixed package ? How ? Well, maybe i should upload a version of
>
> How? By mak
* Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-17 00:21]:
> > You can (and should) just upload a fixed 2.4.22 package in the meantime.
>
> Upload a fixed package ? How ? Well, maybe i should upload a version of
How? By making an update to the current version in unstable, use a
NMU scheme so your upl
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 08:08:19AM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 12:21:35AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 09:03:05AM +1100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > > * Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-16 18:40]:
> > > > Yeah, the difference is that the o
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 12:21:35AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 09:03:05AM +1100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > * Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-16 18:40]:
> > > Yeah, the difference is that the other maintainers can upload a fixed
> > > package, and one or two days l
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 09:03:05AM +1100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-16 18:40]:
> > Yeah, the difference is that the other maintainers can upload a fixed
> > package, and one or two days later, the package will be in the daily
> > builds.
> >
> > While for
* Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-16 18:40]:
> Yeah, the difference is that the other maintainers can upload a fixed
> package, and one or two days later, the package will be in the daily
> builds.
>
> While for the powerpc case :
> 1) the upload will be held in the NEW queue for an ind
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 08:37:27PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> Am Die, den 16.12.2003 schrieb Sven Luther um 18:40:
>
> > 2) linux-kernel-di need to be fixed to make use of it.
> What needs fixing there?
The modules are not in the kernel-image package, but in the
kernel-module package, and
Am Die, den 16.12.2003 schrieb Sven Luther um 18:40:
> 2) linux-kernel-di need to be fixed to make use of it.
What needs fixing there?
Gaudenz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 12:26:07PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > version of cvs2svn which know about the release tags, otherwise it will
> > > produce many useless copies as tags.
> > Those are cheap copies, I don't see the problem.
>
> the information about the releases are
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 12:26:07PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > version of cvs2svn which know about the release tags, otherwise it will
> > produce many useless copies as tags.
> Those are cheap copies, I don't see the problem.
the information about the releases are lost.
> > if we want to use tha
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 12:27:44PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > Furthermore, these packages contain the local root exploit, and there is
> > no way i will let the beta2 be released with them.
>
> As far as I know, *every* kernel in linux-kernel-di still has that
> exploit. At l
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 10:17:15PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Or why not to gnu arch?
which implementation? tla?
if you want to answer this question with "yes", go ahead and add
fundemental error checking first.
> Let me guess:
> We are only 18 days before a new release,
> so there is no t
Sven Luther wrote:
> Furthermore, these packages contain the local root exploit, and there is
> no way i will let the beta2 be released with them.
As far as I know, *every* kernel in linux-kernel-di still has that
exploit. At least the i386 one seems to, as it was last updated on 4
Oct.
--
see s
Bastian Blank wrote:
> If we want to do that without droping the history, we need a special
> version of cvs2svn which know about the release tags, otherwise it will
> produce many useless copies as tags.
Those are cheap copies, I don't see the problem.
> if we want to use that, please not on ali
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 02:37:12PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 12:42:04PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > It is really sad that this kind of thing can only advance with public
> > rants and threats, but this seems to be the way things work in debian.
>
> Are you sure that yo
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 12:42:04PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> It is really sad that this kind of thing can only advance with public
> rants and threats, but this seems to be the way things work in debian.
Are you sure that your rants don't just make fewer and fewer people
interested in listening
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 12:05:20PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> Am Die, den 16.12.2003 schrieb Sven Luther um 10:36:
> > Indeed we are ?
> >
> > Joeyh, what do you think of the powerpc kernel issue, if the plan is
> > still have a beta2 in 18 days, and nothing happens in this week about
> > th
Am Die, den 16.12.2003 schrieb Sven Luther um 10:36:
> Indeed we are ?
>
> Joeyh, what do you think of the powerpc kernel issue, if the plan is
> still have a beta2 in 18 days, and nothing happens in this week about
> the powerpc kernel hold hostage in the NEW queue, i will upload a
> version of t
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 10:17:15PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 09:06:29PM +0100, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 02:39:54PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > I've moved base-config's CVS repository to alioth.debian.org. I'd
> > > encourage anyone who wants
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Joey,
At 15 Dec 03 19:39:54 GMT,
Joey Hess wrote:
> I've moved base-config's CVS repository to alioth.debian.org. I'd
> encourage anyone who wants to to set up an alioth account if you do not
> already have one, and if you mail me your account user
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 09:06:29PM +0100, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> Why not migrate to subversion ?
If we want to do that without droping the history, we need a special
version of cvs2svn which know about the release tags, otherwise it will
produce many useless copies as tags.
if we want to use t
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 09:06:29PM +0100, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 02:39:54PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > I've moved base-config's CVS repository to alioth.debian.org. I'd
> > encourage anyone who wants to to set up an alioth account if you do not
> > already have one, and
Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 02:39:54PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > I've moved base-config's CVS repository to alioth.debian.org. I'd
> > encourage anyone who wants to to set up an alioth account if you do not
> > already have one, and if you mail me your account username, I'll
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 02:39:54PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> I've moved base-config's CVS repository to alioth.debian.org. I'd
> encourage anyone who wants to to set up an alioth account if you do not
> already have one, and if you mail me your account username, I'll add you
> to the committers of
I've moved base-config's CVS repository to alioth.debian.org. I'd
encourage anyone who wants to to set up an alioth account if you do not
already have one, and if you mail me your account username, I'll add you
to the committers of base-config (Petter is already added as co-admin).
Even non debian
25 matches
Mail list logo
