On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 07:43:45PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Michael Bramer wrote:
> > A debian package maintainer don't need some reasons for a new package.
> > If the package is free and someone make the work, the ftp master(s)
> > should include the package on the debian ftp server.
> No
On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 09:12:13AM +0100, Richard Hirst wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 06:54:39PM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote:
> > gluck.d.o (aka ddtp) is down. Know someone the problem?
>
> That's hosted at HP, isn't it? they are having some internal routing
> problems the last day or so.
ye
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 06:54:39PM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote:
> gluck.d.o (aka ddtp) is down. Know someone the problem?
That's hosted at HP, isn't it? they are having some internal routing
problems the last day or so.
Richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit:
> On Wed, 2002-06-12 at 01:59, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>
> > For Japanese, we at least need some kind of debconf fix for
> > utf-8 character conversion support, or a working japanese character
> > terminal (jfbterm for all arches?).
> Couldn't
Michael Bramer wrote:
> A debian package maintainer don't need some reasons for a new package.
> If the package is free and someone make the work, the ftp master(s)
> should include the package on the debian ftp server.
Not without good reason, and not if there is a consensus against or
si
On Wed, 2002-06-12 at 01:59, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> For Japanese, we at least need some kind of debconf fix for
> utf-8 character conversion support, or a working japanese character
> terminal (jfbterm for all arches?).
Couldn't debconf just use iconv, or am I missing something?
--
To UNSUB
* Junichi Uekawa
| possible slang-utf-8 for cdebconf ?
hopefully I'll have some time to look at this during the weekend.
--
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' :
hello
I will not make a new flamework with you or any other debian developer.
You make a big and good job Anthony! But I must put some comments on
your statements.
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 11:30:59PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 06:50:30AM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote:
>
Michael Bramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit:
> > Yes, and those six months have been spent fixing the existing problems.
> > I'm sorry, but the standard i18n hystrionics aren't helpful or
> > interesting. If you want to ever have Debian support i18n well you need
> > to start working on
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 11:26:27PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 07:45:15AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > IIRC we would need at least translated templates for passwd and
> > console-data. When I asked about chances of making i18n in Woody, I got
> > a veto, explaining that
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 11:26:27PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 07:45:15AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > IIRC we would need at least translated templates for passwd and
> > console-data. When I asked about chances of making i18n in Woody, I got
> > a veto, explaining that
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 06:50:30AM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote:
> Only may request: it is to late for a translated 2. install stage, it is
> to late for a apt-i18n, it is to late for a 'select ddtp-source in the
> b-f', it is to late for a ...
No, it's not "too late" for apt-i18n, apt-i18n is scr
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 07:45:15AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> IIRC we would need at least translated templates for passwd and
> console-data. When I asked about chances of making i18n in Woody, I got
> a veto, explaining that I was too late and we are very close to the
> release and it may be po
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 07:45:15AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > - make the release without the missinig translated templates
> > - better translate the missing tamplates. IMHO this is not a big
> >problem.
>
> IIRC we would need at least translated templates for passwd and
> console-dat
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002 14:37:24 -0400
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, this is just not going to happen for woody, r0 at least. I have
> never gotten a well-tested patch to base-config that is obviously
> correct. I did get a great deal of off-the-cuff, untested, large,
> nonobvious, pe
#include
Michael Bramer wrote on Tue Jun 11, 2002 um 05:07:03PM:
> Eduard already send/make a fix. See mails from Sep 2001 and from the
> last months on this list. (sorry, I don't find the mail with the fix in
> my mail archive. Eduard can you help?)
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 20:17:04 +0100
Subjec
[Joey Hess]
> Petter Reinholdtsen was on the right track, I think with bug
> #135565, but I don't think he ever got back to me with test results.
Still working on it, but decided to postpone it until Tollef got the
debian-installer working for our Skolelinux project.
I've tested the patch withou
Michael Bramer wrote:
> Woody sucks because the install system don't have translated texts after
> the reboot.
>
> Please make new fixed Boot-floppies!
>
> Eduard already send/make a fix. See mails from Sep 2001 and from the
> last months on this list. (sorry, I don't find the mail with the fix
Woody sucks because the install system don't have translated texts after
the reboot.
Please make new fixed Boot-floppies!
Eduard already send/make a fix. See mails from Sep 2001 and from the
last months on this list. (sorry, I don't find the mail with the fix in
my mail archive. Eduard can you
19 matches
Mail list logo
