On Sat, Jun 05, 2004 at 04:13:32PM +0200, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Saturday 05 June 2004 14:57, Ben Collins wrote:
> > FYI, someone reported that adding rootfstype=ext2 made the images
> > bootable. Looks like something in the kernel isn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 05 June 2004 14:57, Ben Collins wrote:
> FYI, someone reported that adding rootfstype=ext2 made the images
> bootable. Looks like something in the kernel isn't checking the
> initrd for ext2. So this may not be a SILO problem (I know Josh i
FYI, someone reported that adding rootfstype=ext2 made the images
bootable. Looks like something in the kernel isn't checking the initrd
for ext2. So this may not be a SILO problem (I know Josh is already
aware of this, but others are probably interested in the results here).
--
Debian - http
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 05:09:06PM +0200, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Monday 31 May 2004 05:44, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > Here is a mini-ISO image I cooked up with SILO rolled back to 1.3.2.
> > Tom Callaway suggested that I try th
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 04:53:45PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> I'm hoping the kernel patch that was applied from me was removed before
> the images were built.
Oops.
Stay tuned.
--
Joshua Kwan
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 31 May 2004 05:44, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Here is a mini-ISO image I cooked up with SILO rolled back to 1.3.2.
> Tom Callaway suggested that I try this because a lot of new stuff
> related to initrds changed in 1.4.x.
>
> http://june
On Tue, 01 Jun 2004 23:45:06 -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> 1. After the initial boot it tries to load modules sunhme (which seems to
> be wrong for my hardware - Sparcstation 10) and sr_mod (which is not
> included). Following messages appear in /var/log/messages:
>
> Using /lib/modules/2.4.26-spa
On Sun, 30 May 2004, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Here is a mini-ISO image I cooked up with SILO rolled back to 1.3.2. Tom
> Callaway suggested that I try this because a lot of new stuff related to
> initrds changed in 1.4.x.
>
> http://june.voxel.net/~joshk/mini.iso
>
> Tell us what happens! (
On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 03:28:37PM +0200, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
> I haven't been able to connect to http://june.voxel.net all day. Could
> you please have a look at that, as I'd like to try out the .iso on an
> Ultra-5 I have.
Try http://people.debian.org/~joshk/mini.iso. It should be up.
A
On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 09:35:17AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> The only way it's going to work is if the kernels are less than 3.4Megs
> uncompressed. This is probably fine for cd boots though.
ergh. I might be just getting in under the gun.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/boot$ zcat vmlinuz-2.4.26-sparc64 >
On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 08:44:58PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Here is a mini-ISO image I cooked up with SILO rolled back to 1.3.2. Tom
> Callaway suggested that I try this because a lot of new stuff related to
> initrds changed in 1.4.x.
>
> http://june.voxel.net/~joshk/mini.iso
The
Folks,
Here is a mini-ISO image I cooked up with SILO rolled back to 1.3.2. Tom
Callaway suggested that I try this because a lot of new stuff related to
initrds changed in 1.4.x.
http://june.voxel.net/~joshk/mini.iso
Tell us what happens! (And wish me luck on finals!)
--
Joshua Kwan
signatur
12 matches
Mail list logo
