gcj 4.4 failures on fash.d.o but not on fano.d.o

2010-08-05 Thread Petr Salinger
* openjdk on both kfreebsd-i386/kfreebsd-amd64 man-power is missing, we use gcj similarly as hppa gcj 4.4 is currently broken on kfreebsd-amd64 per #576335. The forked-daapd failed three times on fash, but build for 1st attempt on fano. It looks like still the same problem as bellow.

Re: gcj 4.4 failures on fash.d.o but not on fano.d.o

2010-08-05 Thread Julien BLACHE
Petr Salinger petr.salin...@seznam.cz wrote: Hi, gcj 4.4 is currently broken on kfreebsd-amd64 per #576335. The forked-daapd failed three times on fash, but build for 1st attempt on fano. It looks like still the same problem as bellow. I knew I was forgetting something while checking the

Re: Releasability of the kFreeBSD ports

2010-08-05 Thread Axel Beckert
Aurelien Jarno wrote: Some smaller issues I noticed only happening on kfreebsd, but haven't tracked them down (probably no bug report yet either, partially also affects servers): * Emacs 23 via remote X doesn't work. No idea why yet. This is worse. It's even locally and I

32-bit uname with 64-bit kernel

2010-08-05 Thread Tuco
I found this problem when running uname inside a 32-bit chroot, 'uname -m' prints amd64! This often breaks configure scripts and build systems. With this glibc patch, uname corrects the output after it has been obtained with sysctl. Can I commit this? Is glibc-bsd/glibc-ports/kfreebsd/uname.c

Re: 32-bit uname with 64-bit kernel

2010-08-05 Thread Ed Maste
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 01:16:21PM -0400, Tuco wrote: I found this problem when running uname inside a 32-bit chroot, 'uname -m' prints amd64! This often breaks configure scripts and build systems. With this glibc patch, uname corrects the output after it has been obtained with sysctl.

Bug#591816: lib32ncurses on kfreebsd-amd64

2010-08-05 Thread Tuco
Package: ncurses Version: 5.7+20100313-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org Hi This patch adds lib32ncurses on kfreebsd-amd64. It is needed for wine. diff -ur ncurses-5.7+20100313/debian/control

Re: 32-bit uname with 64-bit kernel

2010-08-05 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Tuco tuco@gmail.com (05/08/2010): I found this problem when running uname inside a 32-bit chroot, 'uname -m' prints amd64! Just as a remark, usually on Linux, one is supposed to specify an appropriate personality. That can be achieved through “linux32 chroot …”. This often breaks

Bug#591820: /boot/zfs directory missing so zpool.cache is not created

2010-08-05 Thread Henrik Riomar
Package: zfsutils Version: 8.1-1 When creating a pool with the zpool command as follows; zpool create tank mirror ad1 ad2 The zpool.cache file is not get created, if manually creating /boot/zfs it is however created as /boot/zfs/zpool.cache. I suggest that the package zfsutils include the

Bug#591823: please include init.d script

2010-08-05 Thread Henrik Riomar
Package: zfsutils Version: 8.1-1 Severity: wishlist When rebooting the zfs volumes that where active at reboot are not available until you manually perform; zfs mount -a In FreeBSD there is a rc.d script handling this

Re: gcj 4.4 failures on fash.d.o but not on fano.d.o

2010-08-05 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 11:21:27AM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote: * openjdk on both kfreebsd-i386/kfreebsd-amd64 man-power is missing, we use gcj similarly as hppa gcj 4.4 is currently broken on kfreebsd-amd64 per #576335. The forked-daapd failed three times on fash, but build for 1st

Re: Releasability of the kFreeBSD ports

2010-08-05 Thread Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 17:52, Axel Beckert a...@debian.org wrote: * Emacs 23 via remote X doesn't work. No idea why yet. I haven't debugged it properly either, but the fix suggested in #559392 of adding this to src/s/gnu-kfreebsd.h works: #define BROKEN_FIONREAD That disables code paths

Re: 32-bit uname with 64-bit kernel

2010-08-05 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Tuco tuco@gmail.com (05/08/2010): I found this problem when running uname inside a 32-bit chroot, 'uname -m' prints amd64! That's correct IMHO: -m, --machine print the machine hardware name This often breaks configure scripts and build

Bug#591823: please include init.d script

2010-08-05 Thread Tuco
On 8/5/10, Henrik Riomar henrik.rio...@gmail.com wrote: Package: zfsutils Version: 8.1-1 Severity: wishlist When rebooting the zfs volumes that where active at reboot are not available until you manually perform; zfs mount -a /etc/init.d/mountall.sh runs mount -a, maybe mount can be fixed

Re: Releasability of the kFreeBSD ports

2010-08-05 Thread Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 19:13, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason ava...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 17:52, Axel Beckert a...@debian.org wrote: * Emacs 23 via remote X doesn't work. No idea why yet. I haven't debugged it properly either, but the fix suggested in #559392 of adding this to

Bug#591823: please include init.d script

2010-08-05 Thread Henrik Riomar
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Tuco tuco@gmail.com wrote: /etc/init.d/mountall.sh runs mount -a, maybe mount can be fixed to also do ZFS? Like adding a system(zfs mount -a) call ZFS is more then just the fs it self it is also a volume manager and a software raid solution. Also note that

Bug#591837: wine on kfreebsd-i386

2010-08-05 Thread Tuco
Package: wine Version: 1.0.1-3 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd X-Debbugs-CC: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org Hi With this patch, wine builds on kfreebsd-i386. I also tested it with a simple Windows program. --- configure.ac 2010-08-05

wine on kfreebsd-amd64

2010-08-05 Thread Tuco
Hi I want to fix wine to build on kfreebsd-amd64, but lib32ncurses5-dev and ia32-libs are missing. First I fixed wine for kFreeBSD (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=591837). I also sent a patch for lib32ncurses5-dev (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=591816). And I

Re: Bug#591816: lib32ncurses on kfreebsd-amd64

2010-08-05 Thread Tuco
On 8/5/10, Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote: …for wine you would also need ia32-libs, wouldn't you? I don't know if anybody wants to maintain that mess on yet another architecture. I made ia32-libs work, but yes it's a mess :-(. I just sent a mail to debian-bsd asking about that. Besides,

Re: Releasability of the kFreeBSD ports

2010-08-05 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Wed, 04 Aug 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote: So, what do you think is still missing? What would we need to communicate as a disclaimer to the users if releasing kFreeBSD in this state? From the server point of view, I think we reached something close to other debian-ports, with even some

Re: Releasability of the kFreeBSD ports

2010-08-05 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 05/08/10 at 22:41 +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: On Wed, 04 Aug 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote: So, what do you think is still missing? What would we need to communicate as a disclaimer to the users if releasing kFreeBSD in this state? From the server point of view, I think we

Bug#591823: please include init.d script

2010-08-05 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Henrik Riomar henrik.rio...@gmail.com [2010.08.05.2214 +0200]: ZFS is more then just the fs it self it is also a volume manager and a software raid solution. What happened to the Unix philosophy? -- .''`. martin f. krafft madd...@d.o Related projects: : :' : proud Debian

Re: Releasability of the kFreeBSD ports

2010-08-05 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Thu, 05 Aug 2010, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 05/08/10 at 22:41 +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: On Wed, 04 Aug 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote: So, what do you think is still missing? What would we need to communicate as a disclaimer to the users if releasing kFreeBSD in this state?

Re: wine on kfreebsd-amd64

2010-08-05 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 04:34:15PM -0400, Tuco wrote: Hi I want to fix wine to build on kfreebsd-amd64, but lib32ncurses5-dev and ia32-libs are missing. First I fixed wine for kFreeBSD (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=591837). I also sent a patch for lib32ncurses5-dev

Re: 32-bit uname with 64-bit kernel

2010-08-05 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 09:06:41PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 01:34:17PM -0400, Ed Maste wrote: On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 01:16:21PM -0400, Tuco wrote: I found this problem when running uname inside a 32-bit chroot, 'uname -m' prints amd64! This often breaks

Bug#591820: marked as done (/boot/zfs directory missing so zpool.cache is not created)

2010-08-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 06 Aug 2010 02:50:25 + with message-id e1ohd0r-0004gw...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#591820: fixed in zfsutils 8.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #591820, regarding /boot/zfs directory missing so zpool.cache is not created to be marked as done. This

Bug#591823: marked as done (please include init.d script)

2010-08-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 06 Aug 2010 02:50:25 + with message-id e1ohd0r-0004gc...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#591823: fixed in zfsutils 8.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #591823, regarding please include init.d script to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Re: Testing with VMWare Fusion... No virtual SCSI devices

2010-08-05 Thread Brian Gupta
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net wrote: On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 11:37:53PM -0400, Brian Gupta wrote: Seems that none of the SCSI options work with the AMD64 mini.iso.. I believe the device emulated is an LSI Logic SCSI adapter. (But am not 100% certain since

Re: Testing with VMWare Fusion... No virtual SCSI devices

2010-08-05 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 11:13:35PM -0400, Brian Gupta wrote: On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net wrote: On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 11:37:53PM -0400, Brian Gupta wrote: Seems that none of the SCSI options work with the AMD64 mini.iso.. I believe the device