Re: FTBFS splitvt 1.6.6 on kfreebsd

On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Mats Erik Andersson wrote: fredag den 18 mars 2011 klockan 21:34 skrev Petr Salinger detta: I mantain splitvt and the last release fails to build on kfreebsd-i386 [0] and on kfreebsd-amd64 [1]. This problem is reported here [2]. Any help with this would be very appreciated

Re: FTBFS splitvt 1.6.6 on kfreebsd

fredag den 18 mars 2011 klockan 21:34 skrev Petr Salinger detta: >> I mantain splitvt and the last release fails to build on kfreebsd-i386 >> [0] and on kfreebsd-amd64 [1]. This problem is reported here [2]. >> >> Any help with this would be very appreciated :-) > > Port it to POSIX ? > > The spli

Re: porting: utimensat(3) equivilant

Petr Salinger wrote: > For utimensat with AT_FDCWD, you can use for link/regular file > > int lutimes(const char *filename, const struct timeval tv[2]); > int utimes(const char *filename, const struct timeval tv[2]); Ok, if that works I can use it.. I had though utimensat might be more broadly po

Re: FTBFS splitvt 1.6.6 on kfreebsd

I mantain splitvt and the last release fails to build on kfreebsd-i386 [0] and on kfreebsd-amd64 [1]. This problem is reported here [2]. Any help with this would be very appreciated :-) Port it to POSIX ? The splitvt already supports termio, so basically convert ioctl(fd, TCGETA, (char *) &tt

Re: porting: utimensat(3) equivilant

My git-annex package detects that kfreebsd does not seem to support utimensat(3), and so avoids enabling a feature using it. I'm using utimensat to change the mtime of a symlink. I was hoping this would be available on the BSDs since it's in POSIX 200809. Can anyone suggest an alternative I shoul

porting: utimensat(3) equivilant

My git-annex package detects that kfreebsd does not seem to support utimensat(3), and so avoids enabling a feature using it. I'm using utimensat to change the mtime of a symlink. I was hoping this would be available on the BSDs since it's in POSIX 200809. Can anyone suggest an alternative I should

FTBFS splitvt 1.6.6 on kfreebsd

Hi, I mantain splitvt and the last release fails to build on kfreebsd-i386 [0] and on kfreebsd-amd64 [1]. This problem is reported here [2]. Any help with this would be very appreciated :-) Thanks in advance, Mònica [0] https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=splitvt&ver=1.6.6-8&arch=kfreebsd

Re: Kernel capabilities in buildd machines

måndag den 14 mars 2011 klockan 20:06 skrev Petr Salinger detta: >>> Why is this capability needed in running kernel on buildd ? >> > No, the headers come from kfreebsd-kernel-headers package, > the 0.54 will be based on 8.2. > > My question is "why is this capability needed in running kernel". It

Re: How do I get into porting?

Wiadomość napisana przez Witold Baryluk w dniu 2011-03-18, o godz. 00:51: > On 02-25 21:19, Robert Millan wrote: >> 2011/2/25 David Hiran Watson : >>> Is it better to port vbox from Debian GNU/Linux or build the source code? >> >> I recommend that you build it from Debian source >> (apt-get source