Re: Testing new getpt(3) and posix_openpt(3) implementation

2011-06-09 Thread Petr Salinger
Hi! I've not build true ;-) or run tested the code, so if someone with an eglibc build-tree around could test the attached patch (against the glibc-ports tree) that would be pretty helpful With slight modification in progress. Petr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#629586: FTBFS on kfreebsd-i386: ld: 3dfx.kld(set_modmetadata_set+0x0): reloc against `.data': error 4

2011-06-09 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 06:48:39AM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote: Package: kfreebsd-8 ld -Bshareable -z common-page-size=8192 -d -warn-common -o 3dfx.ko 3dfx.kld @3dfx.lopt ld: 3dfx.kld(set_modmetadata_set+0x0): reloc against `.data': error 4 ld: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section

Re: Testing new getpt(3) and posix_openpt(3) implementation

2011-06-09 Thread Petr Salinger
or run tested the code, so if someone with an eglibc build-tree around could test the attached patch (against the glibc-ports tree) that would be pretty helpful With slight modification in progress. There are failures in testsuite, at least ptsname.c have to be updated too. Other related

Bug#601803: patch for wireless support

2011-06-09 Thread Robert Millan
2011/6/9 Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org: libjail is used for ifconfig vnet (see manpage) feature which has nothing to do with wireless support. We can enable it later on when we've added libjail to freebsd-libs and it's gotten through NEW. I don't see significant demand for this feature

Re: Testing new getpt(3) and posix_openpt(3) implementation

2011-06-09 Thread Guillem Jover
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 11:05:28 +0200, Petr Salinger wrote: or run tested the code, so if someone with an eglibc build-tree around could test the attached patch (against the glibc-ports tree) that would be pretty helpful With slight modification in progress. Thanks for the building and

Re: Testing new getpt(3) and posix_openpt(3) implementation

2011-06-09 Thread Petr Salinger
There are failures in testsuite, at least ptsname.c have to be updated too. Ah right, had a small change for that one, but as there seemed to be more changed needed there I didn't include it, was not suspecting it would cause test suite failures. :) Attached now. Although the line with: p[0]

Re: Testing new getpt(3) and posix_openpt(3) implementation

2011-06-09 Thread Guillem Jover
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 11:05:28 +0200, Petr Salinger wrote: There are failures in testsuite, at least ptsname.c have to be updated too. Other related functions are: grantpt(), ptsname(), unlockpt() Ok, I guess the obvious answer to this is:

AFP support

2011-06-09 Thread Mattias Welponer
Hi! Are there any plans to port the netatalk package to kfreeBSD? BR Mattias

Re: Testing new getpt(3) and posix_openpt(3) implementation

2011-06-09 Thread Petr Salinger
There are failures in testsuite, at least ptsname.c have to be updated too. Other related functions are: grantpt(), ptsname(), unlockpt() The set of changes is in our glibc-bsd SVN. It passes the testsuite, seems to work inside chroot. I have not committed it into pkg-glibc SVN due to tie

Processed (with 1 errors): kfreebsd-i386: ld: 3dfx.kld(set_modmetadata_set+0x0): reloc against `.data': error 4

2011-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 629586 binutils 2.21.51.20110601-1 Bug #629586 [kfreebsd-8] FTBFS on kfreebsd-i386: ld: 3dfx.kld(set_modmetadata_set+0x0): reloc against `.data': error 4 Bug reassigned from package 'kfreebsd-8' to 'binutils'. Bug No longer marked as

Re: AFP support

2011-06-09 Thread Robert Millan
2011/6/9 Mattias Welponer matt...@welponer.net: Hi! Are there any plans to port the netatalk package to kfreeBSD? It hasn't been mentioned in this list, so no. But looking at the package description, it should be fairly easy. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: AFP support

2011-06-09 Thread Petr Salinger
Are there any plans to port the netatalk package to kfreeBSD? It hasn't been mentioned in this list, so no. But looking at the package description, it should be fairly easy. To get it compiled, it suffices to add #define _GNU_SOURCE 1 into (generated) config.h. Are you able to test the

Re: AFP support

2011-06-09 Thread Mattias Welponer
On Jun 9, 2011, at 20:04 , Petr Salinger wrote: Are there any plans to port the netatalk package to kfreeBSD? It hasn't been mentioned in this list, so no. But looking at the package description, it should be fairly easy. To get it compiled, it suffices to add #define _GNU_SOURCE 1 into

Re: Should the ITP for freebsd-quota be reassigned?

2011-06-09 Thread Mats Erik Andersson
tisdag den 7 juni 2011 klockan 21:31 skrev Guillem Jover detta: On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 21:24:02 +0200, Mats Erik Andersson wrote: Yes, I can have a go at it. In passing by, I agree with Robert that the executables should be built from 'freebsd-utils'. That was the solution that Petr