Re: Should the ITP for freebsd-quota be reassigned?

tisdag den 7 juni 2011 klockan 21:31 skrev Guillem Jover detta: > On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 21:24:02 +0200, Mats Erik Andersson wrote: > > > > Yes, I can have a go at it. In passing by, I agree with Robert that > > the executables should be built from 'freebsd-utils'. That was the > > solution that P

Re: AFP support

On Jun 9, 2011, at 20:04 , Petr Salinger wrote: >>> Are there any plans to port the netatalk package to kfreeBSD? >> >> It hasn't been mentioned in this list, so no. But looking at the package >> description, it should be fairly easy. > > To get it compiled, it suffices to add "#define _GNU_SOU

Re: AFP support

Are there any plans to port the netatalk package to kfreeBSD? It hasn't been mentioned in this list, so no. But looking at the package description, it should be fairly easy. To get it compiled, it suffices to add "#define _GNU_SOURCE 1" into (generated) config.h. Are you able to test the res

Re: AFP support

2011/6/9 Mattias Welponer : > Hi! > > Are there any plans to port the netatalk package to kfreeBSD? It hasn't been mentioned in this list, so no. But looking at the package description, it should be fairly easy. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org

Processed (with 1 errors): kfreebsd-i386: ld: 3dfx.kld(set_modmetadata_set+0x0): reloc against `.data': error 4

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 629586 binutils 2.21.51.20110601-1 Bug #629586 [kfreebsd-8] FTBFS on kfreebsd-i386: ld: 3dfx.kld(set_modmetadata_set+0x0): reloc against `.data': error 4 Bug reassigned from package 'kfreebsd-8' to 'binutils'. Bug No longer marked as fou

Re: Testing new getpt(3) and posix_openpt(3) implementation

There are failures in testsuite, at least ptsname.c have to be updated too. Other related functions are: grantpt(), ptsname(), unlockpt() The set of changes is in our glibc-bsd SVN. It passes the testsuite, seems to work inside chroot. I have not committed it into pkg-glibc SVN due to tie with

AFP support

Hi! Are there any plans to port the netatalk package to kfreeBSD? BR Mattias

Re: Testing new getpt(3) and posix_openpt(3) implementation

On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 11:05:28 +0200, Petr Salinger wrote: > There are failures in testsuite, at least ptsname.c have to be > updated too. > > Other related functions are: > grantpt(), ptsname(), unlockpt() Ok, I guess the obvious answer to this is:

Re: Testing new getpt(3) and posix_openpt(3) implementation

There are failures in testsuite, at least ptsname.c have to be updated too. Ah right, had a small change for that one, but as there seemed to be more changed needed there I didn't include it, was not suspecting it would cause test suite failures. :) Attached now. Although the line with: p[0]

Re: Testing new getpt(3) and posix_openpt(3) implementation

On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 11:05:28 +0200, Petr Salinger wrote: > >>or run tested the code, so if someone with an eglibc > >>build-tree around could test the attached patch (against the > >>glibc-ports tree) that would be pretty helpful > > > >With slight modification in progress. Thanks for the buildi

Bug#601803: patch for wireless support

2011/6/9 Guillem Jover : >> libjail is used for "ifconfig vnet" (see manpage) feature >> which has nothing to do with wireless support. > > We can enable it later on when we've added libjail to freebsd-libs and > it's gotten through NEW. I don't see significant demand for this feature (actually, w

Re: Testing new getpt(3) and posix_openpt(3) implementation

or run tested the code, so if someone with an eglibc build-tree around could test the attached patch (against the glibc-ports tree) that would be pretty helpful With slight modification in progress. There are failures in testsuite, at least ptsname.c have to be updated too. Other related fu

Bug#629586: FTBFS on kfreebsd-i386: ld: 3dfx.kld(set_modmetadata_set+0x0): reloc against `.data': error 4

On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 06:48:39AM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote: > > >Package: kfreebsd-8 > > >ld -Bshareable -z common-page-size=8192 -d -warn-common -o 3dfx.ko 3dfx.kld > >"@3dfx.lopt" > >ld: 3dfx.kld(set_modmetadata_set+0x0): reloc against `.data': error 4 > >ld: final link failed: Nonrepresen

Re: Testing new getpt(3) and posix_openpt(3) implementation

Hi! I've not build true ;-) or run tested the code, so if someone with an eglibc build-tree around could test the attached patch (against the glibc-ports tree) that would be pretty helpful With slight modification in progress. Petr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.de