Accepted:
kfreebsd-10_10.0~svn226224-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/k/kfreebsd-10/kfreebsd-10_10.0~svn226224-1.debian.tar.gz
kfreebsd-10_10.0~svn226224-1.dsc
to main/k/kfreebsd-10/kfreebsd-10_10.0~svn226224-1.dsc
kfreebsd-10_10.0~svn226224.orig.tar.gz
to main/k/kfreebsd-10/kfreebsd-10_10.0~svn226
kfreebsd-10_10.0~svn226224-1_kfreebsd-i386.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
kfreebsd-10_10.0~svn226224-1.dsc
kfreebsd-10_10.0~svn226224.orig.tar.gz
kfreebsd-10_10.0~svn226224-1.debian.tar.gz
kfreebsd-source-10.0_10.0~svn226224-1_all.deb
kfreebsd-headers-10
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2011 06:34:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#644417: fixed in kfreebsd-10 10.0~svn226224-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #644417,
regarding CPU-faults early on boot (regression)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
kfreebsd-10_10.0~svn226224-1.debian.tar.gz
kfreebsd-10_10.0~svn226224-1.dsc
kfreebsd-10_10.0~svn226224.orig.tar.gz
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be proce
When I run "reporbug aptitude" as david, I get:
Your version (0.6.3-4) of aptitude appears to be out of date.
The following newer release(s) are available in the Debian archive:
stable: 0.6.4-1
unstable: 0.6.4-1
I am trying to see if a bug report exists for aptitude, but all I'm getting is
t
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 10:04 PM, David Watson wrote:
> Can I select just one package from sid or do I have to download the whole
> repo release file?
You will need the whole release file, but you will only need to
install packages from sid that are required to meet the dependencies
of aptitude.
Can I select just one package from sid or do I have to download the whole repo
release file?
Also I understand that sid's version of aptitude is higher than wheezy, but why
would reportbug indicate both stable and unstable have the newer version?
--Original Message--
From: Zac Slade
To:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 9:57 PM, David Watson wrote:
> If the version exists in wheezy then why is it not showing up even after
> running apt-get update?$
If the version has made it to wheezy then yes. As you can see
however, the upgrade hasn't made it to wheezy yet:
# wheezy (testing) (admin)
If the version exists in wheezy then why is it not showing up even after
running apt-get update?$
--Original Message--
From: Zac Slade
To: David H. Watson
Cc: Mailing List - Debian GNU/*BSD
Subject: Re: New package version releases
Sent: 10 Oct 2011 22:53
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 9:46 PM
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 9:46 PM, David Watson wrote:
> Would a newer version of a package exist only in unstable and stable but not
> testing?! According to reportbug my version of aptitude (0.63-4) is out of
> date, but the newer version exists in stable and unstable. I confirmed by
> running
Would a newer version of a package exist only in unstable and stable but not
testing?! According to reportbug my version of aptitude (0.63-4) is out of
date, but the newer version exists in stable and unstable. I confirmed by
running aptitude and I have the latest (and only) version available!
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 9:34 PM, David Watson wrote:
> So I use reportbug to file bugs too? What about the package debbugs? I
> installed thinking I need to use it, but reading the doc is making me think
> otherwise.
debbugs is for hosting your own version of the bts. If you are just
going to
So I use reportbug to file bugs too? What about the package debbugs? I
installed thinking I need to use it, but reading the doc is making me think
otherwise.
--Original Message--
From: Zac Slade
To: David H. Watson
Cc: Mailing List - Debian GNU/*BSD
Subject: Re: Searching website for a
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 9:20 PM, David Watson wrote:
> Hi I'm trying to search www.debian.org/bugs to see if a bug report has been
> created for an issue I'm having with aptitude. But once I click submit it's
> taking a long time to do a search. Is this normal? Can I do a CL search in
> kfreebs
Hi I'm trying to search www.debian.org/bugs to see if a bug report has been
created for an issue I'm having with aptitude. But once I click submit it's
taking a long time to do a search. Is this normal? Can I do a CL search in
kfreebsd?
David
e: hiranwat...@gmail.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 8:52 PM, David Watson wrote:
> Slim?
> I don't mind helping with testing; since I'm running kfreebsd as a vm, when
> I get a chance I'll clone the vm and install wheezy gnome, kde, and xfce.
> Does pastebin work in kfreebsd? What about the bts package?
The bts works fine i
Slim?
I don't mind helping with testing; since I'm running kfreebsd as a vm, when
I get a chance I'll clone the vm and install wheezy gnome, kde, and xfce.
Does pastebin work in kfreebsd? What about the bts package?
David Watson
e: hiranwat...@gmail.com
On 9 October 2011 14:42, Christoph Egge
Accepted:
kfreebsd-8_8.2-8.debian.tar.gz
to main/k/kfreebsd-8/kfreebsd-8_8.2-8.debian.tar.gz
kfreebsd-8_8.2-8.dsc
to main/k/kfreebsd-8/kfreebsd-8_8.2-8.dsc
kfreebsd-headers-8-amd64_8.2-8_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
to main/k/kfreebsd-8/kfreebsd-headers-8-amd64_8.2-8_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
kfreebsd-head
Your message dated Mon, 10 Oct 2011 20:49:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#644417: fixed in kfreebsd-8 8.2-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #644417,
regarding CPU-faults early on boot (regression)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
kfreebsd-8_8.2-8_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kfreebsd-8_8.2-8.dsc
kfreebsd-8_8.2-8.debian.tar.gz
kfreebsd-source-8.2_8.2-8_all.deb
kfreebsd-headers-8.2-1_8.2-8_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
kfreebsd-image-8.2-1-amd64_8.2-8_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
kfre
Apparently, there are more problems than -fgcse. "gcc-4.6 -fno-gcse"
still fails whereas "gcc-4.4 -fno-gcse" doesn't.
I've downgraded the dependency to get a working kernel. Before we
upgrade, I think we could use experimental as testing ground to
resolve the problems. It's very bad that this ki
2011/10/7 Robert Millan :
> 2011/10/5 Petr Salinger :
>> Would you mind to rebuild latest kfreebsd-8 with gcc-4.3 from stable ?
>
> This works. In fact I made a backport out of it and uploaded it to
> bpo (in case someone's interested in running kfreebsd 8.2 in Squeeze).
>
>> And by current "gcc-4
reassign 644868 libgnustep-base1.22
retitle 644868 Programs abort on kfreebsd* when arguments exceed 512
affects 644868 gnustep-back-common
block 629477 with 644868
thanks
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 11:02:25PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Package: gnustep-back-common
> Version: 0.20.1-2
> Severity: s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
On 10.10.2011 07:06, Robert Millan wrote:
> Hi Arno,
>
> Nice work. Would be nice if you could put this on SVN untill it can
> be uploaded to experimental.
You are maintaining zfsutils. If you want, I can certainly do this :)
> What would b
24 matches
Mail list logo
