Bug#427774: marked as done (tetex-bin fails to install, missing alternatives for oxdvi.bin)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 08:38:20 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line "notfound" is not "done" has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsib

Bug#391170: marked as done (libjazzy-java: Please build with free java)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 08:09:03 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#391170: libjazzy-java: Please build with free java has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#420545: marked as done (xpad: option pads start on all workspacesm doesn't work)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 08:05:04 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line xpad: pads start on all workspaces option doesn't work has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#420544: marked as done (xpad: pads start on all workspaces option doesn't work)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 08:05:04 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line xpad: pads start on all workspaces option doesn't work has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#433235: marked as done (gnomeradio: egg_tray_icon_new() implicitly converted to pointer)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 05:47:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#433235: fixed in gnomeradio 1.7-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#419681: marked as done (ogre: FTBFS: error: cannot allocate an object of abstract type 'CEGUI::OgreCEGUITexture')

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 01:43:14 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug

Bug#421204: marked as done (FTBFS: ctangle: Command not found)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 05:17:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#421204: fixed in matanza 0.13-3.4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#429846: marked as done (Can't find org.postgresql.Driver after installation)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 07:13:45 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#429846: Can't find org.postgresql.Driver after installation has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this i

Bug#432915: marked as done (libswfdec0.4: Broken shlibs)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 00:25:14 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in 0.4.5-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#433269: marked as done (bittornado-gui: settings made in GUI are not saved)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 19:19:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#433269: bittornado-gui: settings made in GUI are not saved has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#408003: marked as done (gaim: MSN transport failing to deliver messages)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 13:42:43 +1200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug

Bug#432556: marked as done (ikiwiki: meta plugin: stylesheet embedding needs "type" instead of "style")

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 00:03:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#432556: fixed in ikiwiki 2.4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#423773: marked as done (gtk2hs: FTBFS: usr/share/doc/ghc6-doc/html/libraries/base/base.haddock.gz: No such file or directory)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 02:06:44 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#423773: gtk2hs: FTBFS: usr/share/doc/ghc6-doc/html/libraries/base/base.haddock.gz: No such file or directory has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you cl

Bug#433188: marked as done (ikiwiki: img plugin does not always need to provide a link)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 00:03:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#433188: fixed in ikiwiki 2.4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#430950: marked as done (darcs: Darcs 1.0.9 has been released)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 00:02:10 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#430950: fixed in darcs 1.0.9-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#406237: marked as done (darcs-server: README is missing)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 00:02:09 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#406237: fixed in darcs 1.0.9-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#333251: marked as done (Doesn't like pasted text.)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 00:02:09 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#333251: fixed in darcs 1.0.9-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#432045: marked as done (ikiwiki: toc plugin: anchors without closing tags confuse firefox)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 00:02:36 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#432045: fixed in ikiwiki 2.4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#433150: marked as done (aptitude: Totally Destroyed Debian as VMware appliance)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:46:22 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Not a bug in aptitude, don't know what's going on. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#207666: marked as done (sanduhr: New version available)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 23:17:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#207666: fixed in sanduhr 1.93-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#433253: marked as done (gtk+1.2: uninstallable in unstable, because not binNMU-safe)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 23:02:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#433253: fixed in gtk+1.2 1.2.10-18.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#174890: marked as done (cupsys: Attached PPD breaks MS Windows clients.)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:01:34 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Perturbed out of existence. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respon

Bug#431652: marked as done (dicomnifti: origin placed at wrong x-coordinate in sagital dicom-images)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 22:47:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#431652: fixed in dicomnifti 2.28-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#431591: marked as done (dicomnifti: Meaningfull header info would be nice)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 22:47:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#431591: fixed in dicomnifti 2.28-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#394577: marked as done (zsh-beta: Completion of date does not work)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 17:53:51 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed a while ago has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t

Bug#396659: marked as done (Completion for vim fails with "_arguments:435: _vim_files: function definition file not found")

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 17:47:42 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line no response has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop

Bug#430152: marked as done (kqemu: release packages for both testing and unstable kernels)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 23:47:39 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line kqemu: release packages for both testing and unstable kernels has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#432990: marked as done (doodle: wrong permissions (600) on doodle.db)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 21:32:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#432990: fixed in doodle 0.6.6-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#318308: marked as done (openoffice.org: Spreadsheet DataPilot filter does not work)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 00:32:58 +0300 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [Fwd: Bug#318308: Please close as irrelvant in Etch version] has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#424589: marked as done (mysql-connector-java: FTBFS if built twice in a row)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 21:32:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#424589: fixed in mysql-connector-java 5.0.4+dfsg-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#424732: marked as done (splashy: Missing conflicts with usplash)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 21:17:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#424732: fixed in splashy 0.3.4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#421611: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.20-1-amd64: sata_nv is broken on 2.6.20 but not in 2.6.18, same SATA DVD RW-Drive works on SIL 3114 (sata_sil))

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:28:46 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in 2.6.21 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#422070: marked as done (please mention faq and fb modes in README.Debian)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 21:17:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#422070: fixed in splashy 0.3.4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#421441: marked as done (splashy: splashy->gdm hangs system randomly)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 21:17:07 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#421441: fixed in splashy 0.3.4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#407666: marked as done (ITA: gv -- PostScript and PDF viewer for X)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 21:17:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#407666: fixed in gv 1:3.6.3dfsg-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#424567: marked as done (FTBFS with GCC 4.2: 'sp' may be used uninitialized)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 21:17:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#424567: fixed in splashy 0.3.4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#397118: marked as done (gv can't open files whose name begins with "-")

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 21:17:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#397118: fixed in gv 1:3.6.3dfsg-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#419978: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.20-1-amd64: wont boot, locks up box (2.6.18-4-amd64 works flawlessly))

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:28:46 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in 2.6.21 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#424466: marked as done (rhino - FTBFS: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 21:02:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#424466: fixed in rhino 1.6.R5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#336822: marked as done (poedit: includes a sv_SE.po translation instead of sv.po)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:47:15 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#336822: fixed in poedit 1.3.7-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#428996: marked as done (rt2400: FTBFS: /usr/include/linux/wireless.h:650: error: '__s32' does not name a type)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:47:17 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#428996: fixed in rt2400 1.2.2+cvs20070219-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#399921: marked as done (monodevelop tramples on my envrionment variables)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:47:13 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#399921: fixed in monodevelop 0.14+dfsg-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#432532: marked as done (rt2400-source: does not compile against 2.6.22)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:47:17 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#432532: fixed in rt2400 1.2.2+cvs20070219-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#430033: marked as done (gtk-sharp2: Version 2.10.1-1 breaks monodevelop)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:47:13 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#430033: fixed in monodevelop 0.14+dfsg-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#432365: marked as done (monodevelop: FTBFS: error CS1502: The best overloaded method match for `Stetic.Project.CreateActionGroupDesigner(Stetic.ActionGroupInfo, bool)' has some invalid arguments)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:47:13 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#432365: fixed in monodevelop 0.14+dfsg-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#428725: marked as done (initramfs-tools: please provide hook to initialize LVM before mounting crypto-root)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 22:38:29 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#428725: [Pkg-cryptsetup-devel] Bug#428725: initramfs-tools: please provide hook to initialize LVM before mounting crypto-root has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This

Bug#423232: marked as done (linux-2.6: provide vserver flavor for itanium (ia64))

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:22:14 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#423232: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.22-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#384737: marked as done (supports Sempron but doesn't list it)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:22:14 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#384737: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.22-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#215812: marked as done (security.debian.org: http://www.debian.org/security/ should include a search function for packages)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 22:11:47 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line This is covered by the Security Tracker has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#177100: marked as done (security.debian.org: no ls-lR, sid here but not there)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 22:11:40 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line All documented has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r

Bug#289152: marked as done (security.debian.org: Please also issue security advisories for unfixable security problems)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 22:11:35 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line This is done nowadays has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibili

Bug#433149: marked as done (Funnyboat music is not free)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 22:19:31 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#433149: Funnyboat music is not free has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#391682: marked as done (ITP: torrus-cisco-cbqos-plugin -- Cisco class-based QoS discovery and collection plugin for Torrus)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 21:04:00 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Processed: closing 433227

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6 > close 433227 Bug#433227: exim4_debian_po.po: Arabic debconf templates translation update 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug#433222: [INTL: ar

Bug#432369: marked as done (xml-crimson: FTBFS: unable to resolve external entity: "project.dtd")

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 19:47:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#432369: fixed in xml-crimson 1:1.1.3-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#218910: marked as done (cupsys: Excessively slow printing to LPD/JetDirect socket)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 22:52:53 +0300 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [Pkg-cups-devel] Bug#218910: cupsys: QA response: bug still present but can be easily worked around has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#429019: marked as done (rt2500: FTBFS: /usr/include/linux/wireless.h:886: error: 'IFNAMSIZ' was not declared in this scope)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 19:47:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#429019: fixed in rt2500 1:1.1.0-b4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#432358: marked as done (rt2500-source: fails to compile with 2.6.22 kernel)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 19:47:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#432358: fixed in rt2500 1:1.1.0-b4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#422593: marked as done (rdiff-backup: Fails to backup from FAT32 to FAT32)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 19:32:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#422593: fixed in rdiff-backup 1.1.12-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#422961: marked as done (strange failure)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 19:32:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#422961: fixed in rdiff-backup 1.1.12-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#289393: marked as done ("No space left on device." Which device?)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 19:32:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#422961: fixed in rdiff-backup 1.1.12-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#395100: marked as done ('--no-compression' flag cause rdiff-backup to crash)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 19:32:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#395100: fixed in rdiff-backup 1.1.12-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#426806: marked as done (rdiff-backup: typo in package description)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 19:32:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#426806: fixed in rdiff-backup 1.1.12-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#349593: marked as done (AttributeError: RPath instance has no attribute 'inc_compressed')

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 19:32:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#349593: fixed in rdiff-backup 1.1.12-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#388720: marked as done (crash: 'assert self.conn is Globals.local_connection' failed)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 19:32:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#388720: fixed in rdiff-backup 1.1.12-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#376781: marked as done (rdiff-backup python problems)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 19:32:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#376781: fixed in rdiff-backup 1.1.12-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#426216: marked as done (rdiff-backup: Backup fails without decodable error message)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 19:32:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#426216: fixed in rdiff-backup 1.1.12-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#432673: marked as done (moc: Line editing in "i" and "o" commands gets corrupted)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 19:17:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#432673: fixed in moc 1:2.5.0~alpha2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Processed: your mail

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 385908 Bug#385908: rdiff-backup: "Security Violations" when using --remove-older-than with "B" time formats 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Joel Fuster <[EMAIL

Bug#409514: marked as done (rdiff-backup: Data corruption by default)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 21:01:11 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line rdiff-backup: Data corruption by default has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#357745: marked as done (rdiff-backup-statistics stops due to TypeError in get_sorted_inc_rps)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:54:09 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line rdiff-backup-statistics stops due to TypeError in get_sorted_inc_rps has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#415712: marked as done (eclipse: Cannot find compatible vm (sun-java6-* installed))

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 18:32:09 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#415712: fixed in eclipse 3.2.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#418877: marked as done (eclipse looks for installed JDK in wrong path)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 18:32:09 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#415712: fixed in eclipse 3.2.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#147332: marked as done (cupsys : ends up eating all CPU when started with no network available)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:11:59 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#147332: [Debian QA] please review your old bug reports against CUPS has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#415146: marked as done (qgo: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD: tweaks needed)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 18:02:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#415146: fixed in qgo 1.5.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#433161: marked as done (compiz: messes up xfce workspaces)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 13:59:02 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#433161: compiz: messes up xfce workspaces has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#431762: marked as done (xracer: [INTL:de] initial German po file translation)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 17:32:10 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#431762: fixed in xracer 0.96.9.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#432187: marked as done (xracer: [INTL:pt] Portuguese translation for debconf messages)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 17:32:10 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#432187: fixed in xracer 0.96.9.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#431764: marked as done (xracer: Old FSF adress in programm output)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 17:32:10 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#431764: fixed in xracer 0.96.9.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#431037: marked as done (xracer: [INTL:vi] Vietnamese debconf templates translation)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 17:32:10 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#431037: fixed in xracer 0.96.9.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#414529: marked as done (ITA: xracer -- Futuristic racing game)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 17:32:10 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#414529: fixed in xracer 0.96.9.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#392397: marked as done (ships architecture-dependent files in /usr/share)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 17:32:10 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#392397: fixed in xracer 0.96.9.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#431309: marked as done (xracer: [INTL:ru] Russian debconf templates translation)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 17:32:10 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#431309: fixed in xracer 0.96.9.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#431982: marked as done ([INTL: ar] Debconf Arabic Template Translation)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 17:32:10 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#431982: fixed in xracer 0.96.9.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#424101: marked as done (xracer: FTBFS if built twice in a row)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 17:32:10 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#424101: fixed in xracer 0.96.9.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#405213: marked as done (libjgoodies-forms-java: new upstream version available (1.0.7))

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 18:45:54 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#405213: version 1.1.0 has been released (#405213: libjgoodies-forms-java: new upstream version available) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#427154: marked as done (socket created long after startup)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:17:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#427154: fixed in clamav 0.91-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#432857: marked as done (clamav: Package new version 0.91 which fixes long startup time)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:17:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#432857: fixed in clamav 0.91-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#432334: marked as done (clamd socket unavailable during reload)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:17:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#432334: fixed in clamav 0.91-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#412096: marked as done (cdw-common dependency)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:17:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#412096: fixed in cdw 0.3.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#373112: marked as done (ijsgutenprint/cups/PPD files - can not print ANYTHING!)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 17:07:40 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Close non-bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re

Bug#324803: marked as done (cdw Segmentation fault)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:17:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#324803: fixed in cdw 0.3.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#313234: marked as done (cdw: segfault on AMD64)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:17:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#313234: fixed in cdw 0.3.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#423879: marked as done (qpsmtpd fails to start without -D option)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:17:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#423879: fixed in clamav 0.91-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#428675: marked as done (Timeout on clamd.sock)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:17:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#428675: fixed in clamav 0.91-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#430506: marked as done (cdw: New upstream version that fixes bugs)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:17:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#430506: fixed in cdw 0.3.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#398252: marked as done (RFH: cdw -- Tool for burning CD's - console version)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 18:05:08 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line close cdw RFH has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re

Bug#334102: marked as done (cupsys-driver-gutenprint: fails to install in the first run)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:42:49 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#334102: cupsys-driver-gutenprint: fails to install in the first run has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#433210: marked as done (Debian-installer should include /dev/md0, /dev/md1 (plus mdadm, MAKEDEV?))

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 17:50:24 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#433210: Debian-installer should include /dev/md0, /dev/md1 (plus mdadm, MAKEDEV?) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has bee

Bug#421393: marked as done (pdns-recursor: 3.1.4-3 is missing changelog entries for 3.1.2-1 through 3.1.4-2)

2007-07-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 15:32:28 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#421393: fixed in pdns-recursor 3.1.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

  1   2   >