Package: kuvert
Version: 2.0.5
Severity: normal
libmime-perl is going away, please update.
-- System Information
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT Prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, unstable) (1, experimental)
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux taiko 3.2.0-1-686-pae #1 SMP Fri Feb 17 06:27:21
On 22/03/12 10:32, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
Package: dnsmasq
Version: 2.60-1
Severity: grave
Hello,
I cannot start a (squeeze) netboot install (on an eee pc 701) using
dnsmasq on the server. In the past, I have already installed
(successfuly) computers this way. Today, dnsmasq keeps segfaulting
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Denis Washington den...@online.de
* Package name: synfigstudio
Version : 0.63.04
Upstream Author : Synfig Studio Development Team
* URL : http://www.synfig.org/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description :
Package: qemu-kvm
Version: 1.0+dfsg-9
Severity: important
Hello,
I encountered an issue with version 1.0+dfsg-9 of qemu-kvm (it worked fine with
1.0+dfsg-8). The network performances are really bad when I'm using vhost and
macvtap (bridge mode). Here is the cmdline launch by libvirt :
Source: php-tokyo-tyrant
Version: 0.6.0-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
Your d/control poinst in VCS to
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-php/php-tokyo-tyrant.git but it has
only the debian files for Version 0.5.0-1
Can you commit the changes since then?
Thanks!
-- System
On 22.03.2012 11:00, AnÃbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
The message above is part of a discussion in the libpng development
mailing list about the *lack* of security of libpng 1.2, after the
last
vulnerability was discovered by the chrome folks.
For more details see
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:21:36AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
We don't just not start transitions for our own amusement, and the
implication that the transition is primarily being blocked from our
side is not really appreciated.
I would like to apologise. It wasn't my intention to imply that.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tags 665002 +pending
fixed 665002 2.4.1-3
thanks
On 22.03.2012 10:46, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
The leftover files are actually alternatives that were installed by
the package but have not been properly removed.
Thanks for spotting this. I've fixed
Here is a patch to help:
* Update to Standards-Version to 3.9.3.1, debhelper to 9 and fix
miscellaneous Lintian warnings; like extra article in Description field.
* Update libmime-perl to libmime-tools-perl in depends (Closes: #665044).
Jari
From
Package: vim-runtime
Version: 2:7.2.445+hg~cb94c42c0e1a-1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
1. Alpine has lot of new options in .pinerc that is not parsed by actual
vim syntax file. A patch is attached.
2. I know very little about syntax files. Is there any way to
allow automatic highlighting of
On 22.03.2012 11:44, AnÃbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:21:36AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
We don't just not start transitions for our own amusement, and the
implication that the transition is primarily being blocked from our
side is not really appreciated.
I would
Package: mimefilter
Version: 1.7
Severity: normal
libmime-perl is going away, please update.
-- System Information
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT Prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, unstable) (1, experimental)
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux taiko 3.2.0-1-686-pae #1 SMP Fri Feb 17 06:27:21
Hi Lucas,
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Thanks for the information! Those rebuild tests are really useful to
notice build issues in advance and therefore much appreciated.
I'll have a closer look at it within the next
On 22.03.2012 11:21, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 22.03.2012 11:00, AnÃÂbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
So, the message is to move away from libpng 1.2 in Debian as soon as
we
can.
In that case, maybe someone could address some of the issues we
raised when the transition was first proposed? e.g.
Tue, 20 Mar 2012 19:34:33 +0100
Felix Geyer debfx-...@fobos.de wrote:
tags 664730 moreinfo
thanks
On 20.03.2012 12:43, Alexander Gerasiov wrote:
I'm running kernel linux-image-3.2.0-2-amd64 on i386 arch.
When I install linux-image-3.2.0-2-686-pae, dkms fails to build
virtualbox-dkms.
Please us this corrected patch. The package name libmime-tools-perl had a
typo; it also did not need version specification.
Jari
From 39b98457c584ff064e955926ae7c2152a914c0ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 07:57:39 -0400
Subject: [PATCH]
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.16.2
Severity: normal
File: /usr/bin/update-alternatives
# update-alternatives --remove /path/to/file name ; echo $?
0
If I add --verbose I get
# update-alternatives --verbose --remove /path/to/file name
update-alternatives: no alternatives for /path/to/file.
That
Please use this updated patch that uses corrected package name
libmime-tools-perl.
From 1cbe248ca0b6cd6c0e3947c5e8d74ebcf77e7fd1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 08:01:41 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] 665001
Organization: Private
Content-Type:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:58:21AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 22.03.2012 11:21, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 22.03.2012 11:00, AnÃbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
So, the message is to move away from libpng 1.2 in Debian as
soon as we can.
In that case, maybe someone could address some of the
Source: biosig4c++
Version: 0.96.3+svn2677-2.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[4]:
Source: cowbell
Version: 0.2.7.1-6
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: castor
Version: 1.3.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory
Source: dwarves-dfsg
Version: 1.9-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering
Source: argyll
Version: 1.3.6-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian/rules clean
Source: ganeti-htools
Version: 0.3.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
debian/rules build
Source: debian-archive-keyring
Version: 2010.08.28
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]:
Source: node-eio
Version: 0.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian/rules
Source: libjrosetta-java
Version: 1.0.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot
Source: kdepim-runtime
Version: 4:4.4.11.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3]:
Source: maven-debian-helper
Version: 1.5
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
debian/rules build
Source: flowscan
Version: 1.006-13.2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
debian/rules build
Source: bnfc
Version: 2.2-3.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
debian/rules build
Source: kaya
Version: 0.4.4-5
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian/rules clean
Source: haskell98-report
Version: 20080907-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3]:
Source: jellydoc
Version: 1.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian/rules
Source: live-manual
Version: 1:3.0~a10-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: semidef-oct
Version: 1:2003-10
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: raincat
Version: 1.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory
Source: xen
Version: 4.1.2-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[7]: Entering directory
Source: libccss
Version: 0.5.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
debian/rules build
test
Source: velocity-tools
Version: 2.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
debian/rules build
Source: fontypython
Version: 0.4.2.3-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: jakarta-jmeter
Version: 2.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian/rules
Source: libjpfcodegen-java
Version: 0.4+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
debian/rules
Source: make-dfsg
Version: 3.81-8.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
debian/rules build
Source: jmock2
Version: 2.5.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
debian/rules build
Source: helium
Version: 1.7~pre20090428-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: jasperreports
Version: 4.1.3+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
debian/rules
Source: emdebian-archive-keyring
Version: 2.0.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]:
Source: sitemesh
Version: 2.4.1+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 23:19:08 +1100, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
libpng3-dev is an empty package that hasn't been removed yet, but can be
kept if you wish so. It was requiered for a previous transition. We
could make empty packages libpng12{,-0}-dev depending on libpng15-15
and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Jonathan,
it's me again. We've written the promised mail to
debian-devel-announce including pointers to the wiki with hands-on
tutorials how to reverse packagers should interact with us. Is this
somewhat what you expected to read?
For your
Hi,
On 03/21/2012 05:27 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
When booting with the quiet option off, I see that the lvm command in the initrd
segfaults.
Can you get a backtrace, for example by saving a core file to some
other (virtual) disk and analyzing it afterward with gdb?
See
Thu, 22 Mar 2012 09:20:56 +0100
Patrik Wallstrom pa...@blipp.com wrote:
/usr/share/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/openid/Auth/OpenID/Server.php
Are you sure, that you have wordpress-openid installed from package?
Because this file present in upstream plugin, but not in debian package.
PS Yes. I
On 12-03-22 at 12:06pm, Geoffroy Youri wrote:
A new version has been tagged, please consider packaging it :)
I had a look at the debian/watch file from sleekxmpp, your using
http://githubredir.debian.net.
I recently noticed it is possible to use github pages directly.
Thanks - also for your
Here is patch to help:
* Update to Standards-Version to 3.9.3.1
* Update libmime-perl to libmime-tools-perl in depends (Closes: #665049).
Jari
From 8de2c059bccfb09d9897f045c93c4c2cc4e62397 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 08:06:30 -0400
Package: yample
Version: 0.30-2
Severity: normal
libmime-perl is going away, please update.
-- System Information
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT Prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, unstable) (1, experimental)
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux taiko 3.2.0-1-686-pae #1 SMP Fri Feb 17 06:27:21
Some more datapoints.
On two machines running Squeeze (stable) and another running Wheezy
(testing), the '-ms' flag of xterm appears to have no effect on the
cursor. These machines all have gdm3 installed, and are running a
reasonably default Gnome desktop.
Even if I shutdown the desktop and
Carlos Martín Nieto car...@cmartin.tk writes:
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 09:15 +1100, Russell Sim wrote:
Carlos Martín Nieto car...@cmartin.tk writes:
Another reason is that I don't know how much sense it makes to package
the released version, as we've made a lot of bugfixes and added
features
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:19:08PM +1100, AnÃbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:58:21AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 22.03.2012 11:21, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 22.03.2012 11:00, AnÃbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
So, the message is to move away from libpng 1.2 in Debian as
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 01:21:14PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
I hope this is a joke.
Emtpy in the sense that they are not the real thing. They will have a
bunch of symbolic links in them to files/directories in other packages.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Fixed upstream. Did not get around to it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Owner: Youhei SASAKI uwab...@gfd-dennou.org
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ruby-rack-protection
Version : 1.2.0
Upstream Author : Konstantine Haase
* URL or Web page : http://rubygems.org/gems/rack-protetcion
* License : Expat
Description : Protects
Hi,
On 03/22/2012 01:12 PM, Rik Theys wrote:
Would unpacking the initramfs on a sid box with the 3.3 kernel and
chrooting into it be able to provide any additional info? I believe the
initramfs uses another C library than glibc, or is that no longer the case?
I did this, but when I chroot
Package: gnome-boxes
Severity: grave
Version: 3.3.91-1
It fails with the following error message
(gnome-boxes:7818): Boxes-CRITICAL **: media-manager.vala:26: Error
connecting to Tracker:
GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name
org.freedesktop.Tracker1 was not provided by
Package: php5-xcache
Version: 1.3.2-1.1+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Current version does not work with the php 5.4 in the archive, but crashes with
segfault.
#0 ZEND_SEND_VAL_SPEC_CONST_HANDLER (execute_data=0x7f687334e098)
at
reopen 662323
thanks
Hi,
AFAIK, the build will fail when the first alternative build dependency
is unfillable, which will happen when libpng12 is removed, and so it
will prevent an easy fix with a simple binnmu...
So I guess this should probably be fixed.
--
Best,
Lionel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:44:09 +0100
Patrik Wallström pa...@blipp.com wrote:
On Mar 22, 2012, at 1:19 PM, Alexander GQ Gerasiov wrote:
Thu, 22 Mar 2012 09:20:56 +0100
Patrik Wallstrom pa...@blipp.com wrote:
/usr/share/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/openid/Auth/OpenID/Server.php
Are you
On Mar 22, 2012, at 1:19 PM, Alexander GQ Gerasiov wrote:
Thu, 22 Mar 2012 09:20:56 +0100
Patrik Wallstrom pa...@blipp.com wrote:
/usr/share/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/openid/Auth/OpenID/Server.php
Are you sure, that you have wordpress-openid installed from package?
Because this file
Package: php5
Version: 5.4.0
Severity: important
I'm seeing the following on a system when upgrading to 5.4.0-2:
Setting up php5-gd (5.4.0-2) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/php5-gd.postinst: line 21: local: can only be used in a
function
dpkg: error processing php5-gd (--configure):
subprocess
On 03/18/2012 02:55 AM, jari.aa...@cante.net wrote:
Package: libapache-mod-log-sql
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi Thomas,
As we spoke before, here is the proposed NMU patch.
Let me know if there is anything that needs adjusting or if it is ok
to upload with these changes.
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 22.03.2012, 12:46 +0200 schrieb Ilias Tsitsimpis:
The package libghc-llvm-base-dev depends on llvm-dev (which is currently
at version 3.0-9 in testing) but libghc-llvm-base-dev-3.0.0.0 doesn't support
LLVM 3.0 yet.
according to
Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: normal
The BTS no longer sends an Acknowledgement message after bug
submission. Instead, an incorrect Info received message
(Thank you for the additional information you have supplied
regarding this Bug report.) is sent.
In particular, this breaks the procmail
Package: topal
Version: 72-1
Severity: minor
More precisely 'topal' _suggests_ 'metamail' that is not available
in squeeze.
Gabor
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.4
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500,
'stable')
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:41:39AM -0300, Igor Palmieri wrote:
But, Debian´s acpi-support upstream is linked to Ubuntu´s package (as
seen in http://packages.qa.debian.org/a/acpi-support.html). Some time
later, Ubuntu´s own hdparm and pm-utils packages evolved to include a
chain of other
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 01:26:52PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
debian/rules build
test -f debian/rules
cp -p /usr/share/misc/config.guess /usr/share/misc/config.sub .
./configure
Le 22/03/2012 11:59, Sergey B Kirpichev a écrit :
Well, may be it's ok. For now, I'm not certain that
1) the severity of this bug IS important (please see this
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities)
2) patch not break things
I cannot be sure the patch won't break things.
On 2012-03-22 21:18, Thomas Goirand wrote:
|
| Thanks a lot for your work.
|
| The patch looks really fine. Please go ahead and upload. However, it'd
| be nice to keep debhelper compat to 8, as there's nothing that the
| package need from debhelper 9, and IMO, it's not helping to promote the
|
This looks like an absent mounted /dev/shm or mounted without proper
permissions
Please verify
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: joblib
Version: 0.6.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs
On 03/22/2012 03:21 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 22.03.2012, 12:46 +0200 schrieb Ilias Tsitsimpis:
The package libghc-llvm-base-dev depends on llvm-dev (which is currently
at version 3.0-9 in testing) but libghc-llvm-base-dev-3.0.0.0 doesn't support
LLVM 3.0 yet.
On 22/03/12 at 12:58 +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 01:26:52PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
debian/rules build
test -f debian/rules
cp -p
Arno Töll wrote:
However, reading your snippet I realized, you use module directives
which aren't available until one enables the rewrite module in your
case. We might think how to allow packagers of web applications to
tell us, your configuration needs a special module. As we wrote in
the
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: DVD
Image version: Last image, downloaded from debian's webpage
Date: today :P
Machine:
Processor: AMD Athlon X2
Memory: 2GB
Partitions:
S.ficherosTipo Bloques de 1K UsadoDispon Uso% Montado en
/dev/sda8 ext437569200 4257852 31402920
Maybe you installed gtk-qt-engine. See bug #582609.
-a.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22.03.2012 14:46, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Ideally the pathinfo stuff should be conditional on whether the
rewrite module is already loaded.
That's reasonably easy to achieve:
IfModule mod_rewrite.c
RewriteEngine on
RewriteRule [whatever]
On 22 March 2012 14:42, Lucas Nussbaum lucas.nussb...@loria.fr wrote:
My version of /etc/services has:
# cat /etc/services |grep http
www 80/tcp http
According with netbase 4.47 [1]:
$ grep http /etc/services
...
http80/tcp www #
Package: libpcre3
Version: 8.30-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
It looks like there is some error in the name and/or version of .so files and
links
Found:
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcre.so.2.13.1
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcre.so.2
Expected:
What happens if you uninstall fglrx, rather than letting it load and
then unloading it before loading radeon?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
I'm always amazed by the number of people who take up solipsism because
they heard someone else explain it. - E*Borg on alt.fan.pratchett
signature.asc
severity 664678 minor
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi Sergey,
Sergey Platov wrote:
** Tainted: PIO (6145)
* Proprietary module has been loaded.
* Working around severe firmware bug.
* Out-of-tree module has been loaded.
[...]
[113170.960076] [fglrx] module unloaded - fglrx 8.95.3 [Feb 14 2012]
[113218.218326] [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0
Package: nodejs
Version: 0.6.12~dfsg1-1
Severity: normal
It works with openssl 1.0.0h-1.
Suspect (from openssl 1.0.1-1 changelog) :
* s_client and s_server were forcing SSLv3 only connection when SSLv2 was
disabled instead of the SSLv2 with upgrade method. (Closes: #664454)
Unclear wether
Package: libreoffice
Version: 1:3.4.5-5
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I've tried to insert svg image with text in it to ods document.
There are no text comments to svg objects appeared.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (550, 'testing'),
Package: pstoedit
Version: 3.50-3+b1
Severity: important
Pstoedit is probably not correctly linked to some
libraries and crashes in Debian Squeeze.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.4
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package
ruby-addressable, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package
ruby-algorithm-diff, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-amrita, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
--
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-bdb, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
--
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-amrita2,
due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-barby, due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
--
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
These packages are transitional packages for the binary package ruby-bsearch,
due
to a change in the naming convention for Ruby packages. Therefore, they should
be considered as oldlibs, and as such, their priority sould be set to extra.
Thanks!
101 - 200 of 556 matches
Mail list logo
