Hi
Woody is long since outdated now, so I think we can assume this bug is
obsolete at this stage.
Regards,
Barrie
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
I'm going to see if I can get the related librsync1 bug fixed so this
problem can be resolved. It's really annoying when doing full backups
and since the rsync bug hasn't been touched for more than 2 years, I
think it needs attention.
Regards,
Barrie
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
Hi
I can confirm this bug still exists. I'm encountering it on some large
files when using rdiff-backup. It either results in a process loop
maximising CPU load, or provides a librsync 107 error as illustrated in
this thread.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=429797
The initial
Package: sylpheed-claws-gtk2-clamav
Version: 2.6.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi
After attempting to upgrade to the latest clamav packages, I found that it
wasn't possible without first removing the "sylpheed-claws-gtk2-clamav"
package. As the "sylpheed-claws-gtk2-
Package: conky
Version: 1.4.4-1
Severity: important
Hi
After installing a fresh copy of Conky without any existing configuration
files, running the program results in the following error.
Conky: tail logfile does not exist, or you do not have correct permissions
No obvious way to resolve t
Hi
I've also seen this bug before. In my case, it occurred when I was
trying out Compiz and had to upgrade to the Nvidia drivers in
experimental. When I downgraded back to unstable, this error occurred.
I unfortunately don't have time to debug it now, but I thought I should
mention my own experi
Hi
I tried the suggestion made by Tim and it worked perfectly, thanks for
that. I'm using the 2.6.16-1-k7 kernel packaged by Debian and the module
compiled properly for me without incident. It also compiled for
the 2.6.16-1-686 kernel. However, I'm using the unstable version of
Debian, so that mig
Package: nvidia-kernel-legacy-source
Version: 1.0.7182-1
Severity: important
Hi
I keep thinking that I must be making some kind of mistake, or somebody else
would surely of reported this a long time ago, but I'm having problems
building legacy Nvidia Debian kernel module packages using module-as
Hi
I've recently had another chance to look at this bug to see if I can
determine what the problem is. After some troubleshooting which included
re-generating Packages.gz files, removing items from sources.list
and fiddling around with the Release files in some of the repositories,
I noticed a str
Hi
I've installed and tried the new unstable versions of the Ogle
packages and can confirm that this bug no longer appears to exist.
Thanks
Regards,
Barrie
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 18:20:30 +0100
Alan Woodland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I'm the new Debian maintainer for Ogle. I'm currently
Hi
Just an additional note in case this helps. I ran the following test
and came up with an interesting result.
If I use the previous version of Apt (0.6.43.3) and run "apt-get update"
and then install the newest version and run "apt-get update" again, it
works perfectly. But if I then change
Hi
On Mon, 15 May 2006 12:55:19 +0200
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Reading package lists... Error!
> >> > E: Unable to parse package file
> >> >
/var/lib/apt/lists/_home_deb-i386_archive_official1_binary_Release
> > (1)
> >> > E: Problem opening
> >> >
/var/li
Hi
On Thu, 11 May 2006 12:02:22 +0200
Michael Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 03:15:54AM +0100, Barrie Millar wrote:
> > Package: apt
> > Version: 0.6.44
> > Severity: important
>
> Thanks for your bugreport.
>
> > After up
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.44
Severity: important
Hi
After upgrading to the newest version of Apt shown above, running "apt-get
update" results in the following error.
Reading package lists... Error!
E: Unable to parse package file
/var/lib/apt/lists/_home_deb-i386_archive_official1_binary_Rel
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.44
Severity: normal
Hi
When downloading an unofficial Debian package and including it into a local
repository, I attempted to refresh the package list using "apt-get update". I
received this error at the end of the process.
Reading package lists... Error!
E: Problem
Hi
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 02:36:52PM -0500, Ari Pollak wrote:
> > This should be fixed as of qemu 0.7.1 with the addition of this
option:
> >
> > -win2k-hack use it when installing Windows 2000 to avoid a disk
full bug
>
> So, consider this "solved". ;)
>
> thanks,
> guillem
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.43.2
Severity: normal
Hi
I have recently upgraded Apt to the newest version from the one contained in
Sarge version 3.1r0. Despite having installed the correct keys for the
Debian archives as well as the package debian-archive-keyring, I am getting
unauthenticated war
Package: ogle-mmx
Version: 0.9.2-2.2
Severity: important
Hi
I've recently upgraded to the latest version of Ogle (0.9.2-2.2) from a
previous Debian release (0.9.2-2) and have immediately started experiencing
a serious problem with shutting down the application after watching a DVD.
Using any GUI
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.41
Followup-For: Bug #335112
Hi
I can confirm this bug. It's absolutely crippling for those individuals who
run local repositories and results in a very serious limitation. There seems
to be no way around this through configuration either, so the only way of
getting aro
Package: gtodo
Version: 0.14+cvs20050820-1
Severity: normal
Followup-For: Bug #323008
Thanks for packaging the CVS version. Much appreciated.
Regards,
Barrie
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux IridiumDB 2.4.27-bm041127-686 #1 Tue Nov 30 02:17:46 GMT 20
Package: gtodo
Version: 0.14-4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: sid
Hi
Would it be unreasonable to ask if the current CVS version of Gtodo could be
packaged in Debian unstable? The CVS version contains a number of new
features, including most notably for me, an increased number of task
priorities. The a
Package: qemu
Version: 0.7.0-2
Severity: normal
Followup-For: Bug #318487
No, I'm certain it's a bug with the qemu package, because it actually closes
down qemu with the "File size limit exceeded" error on the terminal and it
happens
on the two gigabyte boundary, which seems too suspicious to me.
Package: qemu
Version: 0.7.0-2
Severity: important
Hi
I've run into a problem using qemu with large-disk images. I recently
created an 8 gigabyte image file using the qcow format and attempted to
install Windows 2000 on it. All seemed to be going well until qemu suddenly
crashed with a "File siz
Package: gtodo
Version: 0.14-4
Followup-For: Bug #313218
Hi Guilherme
I have tested out the package you suggested and gtodo now works perfectly.
Thanks for the information you provided, much appreciated :)
Regards,
Barrie
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
APT prefers unstable
AP
Package: samba
Version: 3.0.14a-3
Followup-For: Bug #259687
Hi
I can confirm that this bug does indeed exist. When I upgraded from Woody
to Sarge as part of the new Debian release, the writelist option stopped
working.
It worked perfectly with the Samba 2.2.xxx release that was
maintained as pa
Package: gtodo
Version: 0.14-4
Followup-For: Bug #313218
Hi Guilherme.
My apologies for the time delay. Unfortunately the spare time available to
me is short.
I would wager you are using the 2.6 kernel :) After upgrading to Gnome 2.10,
several of my Gnome applications failed with different va
Hi
Thank you for your message explaining the situation. I have answered in
more detail below.
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 20:52:14 +0200
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2005, Barrie Millar wrote:
> >
> > I would, but the
]> wrote:
> reassign 313219 gnome-vfs2
> retitle 313219 gnome-vfs2 crashes in read_entire_file with HAL and
Linux 2.4
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2005, Barrie Millar wrote:
> >
> > I'm afraid not. More information was provided, but it appears most
Package: gtodo
Version: 0.14-4
Followup-For: Bug #313218
No problem, I agree with what you're saying. I wish I could of avoided
upgrading to 2.10 too, but unfortunately the core must of been upgraded
during the update of another package. I had 2.8 installed previously and had no
problems like you
Package: gedit
Version: 2.10.3-1
Followup-For: Bug #313219
I'm afraid not. More information was provided, but it appears mostly
stripped, despite my attempts to rebuild a non-stripped version which
seemed to go perfectly.
The backtrace information is displayed below
Regards,
Barrie
Backt
Package: gedit
Version: 2.10.3-1
Followup-For: Bug #313219
Hi
I've included some relevant information based on this bug. I am now also
using reportbug as suggested. I'm currently completing a major project
and therefore have very little spare time available to me.
Unfortunately, I will therefor
Package: gedit
Version: 2.10.3-1
Severity: critical
Hi
When attempting to load via any method, Gedit crashes with the following
helpful error:
The application "gedit" has crashed unexpectedly.
The debugging information for this error is shown at the bottom of this
message. Unfortunately it see
Package: gtodo
Version: 0.14-4
Severity: critical
Hi
After performing a security update this afternoon which also downloaded
and installed Gnome 2.10, gtodo totally fails to restart if a single
todo item is located on an existing list. It starts perfectly if a
configuration cannot be found. How
Package: bygfoot
Version: 1.8.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi
Just thought I'd say that there is a new release of Bygfoot
available (1.8.1). The current Debian packaged version is 1.8.0.
Regards,
Barrie
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
Package: bygfoot
Version: 1.8.0-1
Severity: important
Hi
I've been playing this game for a while under the previous 1.6.0
version. I recently upgraded to 1.8.0-1 and noticed that several new
bugs that I didn't see before are present. In fact, they were so
obvious that I saw them immediately dur
My apologies for re-reporting it. I checked yesterday and nobody had
mentioned it, so wrote an email and then queued it for dispatch today.
Seems somebody posted in the meantime.
Regards,
Barrie
On Tue, 10 May 2005 17:45:43 +0200
Elrond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> package qemu
> tags 308494
Package: qemu
Version: 0.6.1+20050407-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi
There is a new upstream version of qemu available. Although it is
unlikely to provide considerable improvement over the current CVS
version, it is likely to provide additional application stability while
providing a better reference po
Package: timidity
Version: 2.13.2-6
Severity: wishlist
Hi
I recently upgraded from 2.11.2-4 to 2.13.2-6 and was stunned at the
differing processing requirements. While 2.11.2-4 used about 10% of my
CPU by default, 2.13.2-6 actually overloaded it and proved useless
without extensive re-configurati
38 matches
Mail list logo
