Bug#955387: Regression: flashrom programmer support reduced on non-x86

Package: flashrom Version: 1.2-5 Dear maintainers, Compared to version 1.1-1 arm64, the following programmers are missing in version 1.2-5 on arm64: ATAVIA DRKAISER GFXNVIDIA IT8212 NICINTEL NICINTEL_EEPROM NICINTEL_SPI OGP_SPI SATASII This might be related to switching the build from GNU Make

Bug#948192: flashrom -R does not show version number

On Sat, 04 Jan 2020 22:48:19 -0500 Antoine Beaupre wrote: > flashrom 1.0 and 1.1, as packaged in Debian, do not correctly show the > expected version number in the -R output: > > anarcat@angela:~(master)$ flashrom --version > flashrom on Linux 4.19.0-6-amd64 (x86_64) > flashrom is free

Bug#873339: strongswan: configured DH group CURVE_25519 not supported

I believe this is fixed since 5.6.1. Quoting from the upstream changelog https://wiki.strongswan.org/projects/strongswan/wiki/Changelog56 "No hard-coded default proposals are passed from starter to the stroke plugin anymore (the IKE proposal used curve25519 since 5.5.2, which is an optional

Bug#851507: regression: strongswan mediation support no longer enabled

Package: strongswan Version: strongswan_5.5.1-2 Severity: normal Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, commit 290d5aa4fa5e888c51b1abce745399366dda46f5 in pkg-swan/strongswan disabled mediation, medsrv and medcli because the clearsilver build-dep FTBFS. mediation is an IKE feature and does not depend on

Bug#639957: Dediprog SF100 support is disabled (CONFIG_DEDIPROG)

Hi Kyle, I have added high speed write support to the Dediprog SF100 driver in flashrom and it should now be close to the native speed seen with the vendor Windows tool. However, the Dediprog SF100 needs someone to check what happens on the SPI bus with the help of a logic analyzer before it is

Bug#379628: [Linux-NTFS-Dev] Bug#379628: Bug#379628: CALL FOR HELP: Vista beta compatibility testing

Hello Frans, hello Andree, Frans Pop wrote: On Tuesday 28 November 2006 13:08, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote: There are two NTFS during resizing. The original and the resized. When the resizing is over then the latter is consistent and the old one is irrelevant. ntfsresize doesn't work like the

Bug#379628: [Linux-NTFS-Dev] Bug#379628: CALL FOR HELP: Vista beta compatibility testing

Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote: On Thu, 9 Nov 2006, Frans Pop wrote: On Thursday 09 November 2006 09:03, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote: Andree confirmed that it's true for data partitions as well. You should have got a copy too. But that seems completely inconsistent with what you wrote in the rest of