This was fixed in 0.641. Urge everyone to update.
Thanks
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 17:03, Jose Antonio Castro wrote:
>
> Package: lrzip
> Version: 0.640-1
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: tonio.cas...@gmail.com
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I use lrzip for compress large (~5Gb) database dumps. With old
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:26:49 jari wrote:
> On 2011-09-21 09:13, jari wrote:
> | On 2011-09-21 09:50, Con Kolivas wrote:
> | | On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:37:35 you wrote:
> | | > Package: lrzip
> | | > Version: 0.607+20110917+git79c2e9a-2
> | | > Severity: important
>
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:37:35 you wrote:
> Package: lrzip
> Version: 0.607+20110917+git79c2e9a-2
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
> User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: hurd
>
> Hi,
>
> currently[1], lrzip does not compile on GNU/Hurd.
> This is because it is not configured to use a f
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 03:09:06 you wrote:
> Package: lrzip
> Version: 0.552+20110217+gitcd8b086-1
> Severity: normal
>
> [NOTE: This still seems to be a problem with the most recent upstream
> version of 0.603 - try with "lrzip -lvv" - hence Cc:ing to upstream
> Co
On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 02:04:55 you wrote:
> Source: lrzip
> Version: 0.551-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: kfreebsd
>
> Hi,
>
> your package no longer builds on kfreebsd-*:
> | g++ -o lrzip main.o rzip.o runzip.o stream.o util.o 7zCrc.o
I cannot reproduce this bug with newer versions of lrzip. It's possible you
were hitting a different bug which has since been fixed. The latest version as
of this email is 0.543
Regards,
Con
--
-ck
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsu
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:51:23 Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Con Kolivas wrote:
> > Wait. I don't understand how suggesting installing a package from the
> > experimental packages is meant to be a solution for the stable
>
> I didn't. The only thing I did wa
Wait. I don't understand how suggesting installing a package from the
experimental packages is meant to be a solution for the stable
release. I have this same problem on 3 standard lenny installations on
different machines, all of them up to date with updates.The text works
fine left to right, but
Wait. I don't understand how suggesting installing a package from the
experimental packages is meant to be a solution for the stable
release. I have this same problem on 3 standard lenny installations on
different machines, all of them up to date with updates.The text works
fine left to right, but
display managers are
installed (xdm, gdm, kdm), and I believe are all fixed with dpkg reconfigure
but should not use nice -10 by default.
Regards,
Con Kolivas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10 matches
Mail list logo
