màticament i ja no és necessari:\n"
aka: "ŀl" changed to "l·l". Is that intended?
Attached is the file (compressed) as it came out of our 'make update-po'
which additionally re-wrapped some lines, so you can see what I mean
with the plurals (which end up being marked as f
aluating and moving to other testing frameworks,
which is time better spent on other bugs if we can help it…
Beside, even if you decide not care that would still need to be
expressed in the metadata, so reassign the bug as to be handled by you.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
dpkg::install::recursive "false";
dpkg::install::recursive::force "true";
So, lets let everyone pick his/her preferred poison and we will see who
dies last in this vote… (cc'ed dpkg as they are as involved in it as apt
is).
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
'
user – and 99% of users will never need it (or at least shouldn't be
forced by 6+ years outdated advice to use it).
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
he manpage advice and append the label of the
repository to the option to have it not effect all your sources, but
just those with that label (l= in apt policy output). btw: In stretch
you are able to just mark the sources line(s) for your local mirror(s)
directly with those options.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
haven't looked closely, but apt tries
to not explore solutions caused by M-A:same version screw – aptitude
seems way more willing to suggest such solutions; that is okay I guess
as it is way more interactive, too.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
for that format to not be changed and
text-based formats tend to be easier to work with for humans.
I have a patch for this mostly done which I am going to merge if I don't
hear people complain bigtime about it and would consider this report
+wontfix then. Any comments?
Best regards
David Kalnisch
the idea],
so that should absolutely be doable if someone wants to work on
implementing it.
If someone wants to try feel free to contact us on deity@/#debian-apt!
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
¹ and it isn't clear if we do change to something else at some point as the
dependency chain
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 10:06:17PM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 01:29:07PM +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> > You should also update your README.Debian and the descriptions with the
> > new paths and the transitional package as [...]
>
elpful messages.
Other solvers have a lot more liberty of course: I haven't tried but
aptitude or apt with --solver aspcud (or another) likely solves this
specific situation – but they have other drawbacks in exchange.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 07:20:47AM +0900, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Wed 2016-11-16 22:42:04 +0900, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 02:40:59PM +0900, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> >> weird that it says "1 not upgraded" in response to
ace period the better…
btw: Upstream seems to have retired their remark on compiling googletest
on your own as I can't find it any longer on their website and e.g. in
the RPM/BSD worlds you get a binary only.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ll relevant information of system state for
the resolver in one still big but at least highly compressed file
I might want to have later if my guess from above is completely wrong.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ring questions on q tend to be in the very
vocal "no idea, but I get points for posting stuff anyhow" group.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
test shouldn't be hard (at least I hope so)
& could provide some confidence that the pkg-config files actually work
(and will continue to work in the future) – and that the libraries
aren't completely broken either of course. :)
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
looks good, applies cleanly & works, but let me be picky and
ask for some more changes anyhow:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:05:52PM +, James Clarke wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 02:31:02PM +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> e.g. APT::FTPArchive::Release::Origin. The
ted from /var/backups if need be)
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ts-Arch packages
as
Build-Depends which means it is going to install those packages… not really
what we want it to do (apt unpatched + libapt support would do the same btw).
Thanks for consideration & Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
e field via sed at the moment. It shouldn't be hard to
change it to use the new setting instead. No need to come up with a new
testcase here to be able to confidently say "well tested". :)
Thanks again for working on that issue!
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
th
my pillow with those questions already…
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
to the responsible translator (Chris Leick) instead as he
will know best what the "state of the union" is.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Especially in the first one every
keypress can count, so perhaps you want to expand on what you do – but
aptitude people will know better than me what to do (of course, in the
event that this is a libapt regression feel free to hand it back).
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
e? If a bug effects central parts of the
infrastructure its always more problematic than a bug in leaf package…
the hope is that such bugs are unlikely enough that we don't have to
base our bugreporting system on handwritten notes and carrier pigeons.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
f your
troubles. :)
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
larily better
than this without guessing and overriding Tors choices.
So I would strongly advice to not make typos I guess… ;)
Do you have any specific ideas?
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
1). This example and reading the manpage will also help you
configure apt to download additional translation files it isn't going to use
later on if you really want to pursue this venue instead/too.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
on address with http only:
Err:1 http://vwakviie2ienjx6t.onion/
Direct connection to .onion domains is blocked by default. If you meant to
use Tor remember to use tor+http instead of http.
Disclaimer: This response pre-depends on the recently uploaded 0.3
version in combination with apt 1.3.
B
henticated pattern even if you
want to).
(keep the URI http:// through as a https:// one needs the optional
-https transport your users might or might not have installed)
If you think that process could be streamlined you are probably right,
but nobody designed and implemented it yet.
Best regar
will not be subsumed
in most (= I would say all, but if you are an 'evil' maintainer you can
do it. Practical use is subzero through) cases even if you would allow
it anyhow.
Hope that adding some context helps here.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
install -s awesome apt-doc+ dpkg-dev-
This installs (or upgrades) 'awesome' and 'apt-doc' and removes
'dpkg-dev'.
Is that what you are asking for?
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
23910.
I am going to write a patch for apt later, but I guess that can't be
considered a bugfix and hence might not be 1.3 material (depending on
how big or not that might turn out to be).
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
[0] file:///usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy-1.html#f55
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
n:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/apt/apt.git/commit/?id=70ff288b98a7aae2c2808112015d34f76f2d5114
Feel free to ignore the warning until apt transitions to testing as it
is perfectly harmless – no need to upgrade apt out of line to fix this.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
This seems to be documented e.g. in "BINARY SPECIFIC CONFIGURATION" of
apt.conf manpage. Have you just not found this, was the text unclear or
what do you think we should be doing to resolve this bug?
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 02:10:14PM +0200, ydir...@free.fr wrote:
> > >> I don't see sysvinit being Essential anymore in unstable:
> > >>
> > >> → apt-cache show sysvinit | fgrep -i Essential
> > >> This package depends on init, which is an essential package that
> > >> →
> > >>
> > >> Any chance
https-everywhere (and many other extensions) in
Debian to have it just one apt call away! :)
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 09:29:37AM +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> Anyway, as I proposed this mergeback I will see if I can come up with
> the relevant packaging changes now instead of just imagining things.
So, here we go: My proposal in code instead of text (tmp location):
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 09:17:19AM +0100, Tim Retout wrote:
> On 21 August 2016 at 22:36, David Kalnischkies <da...@kalnischkies.de> wrote:
> >> So, assuming we can agree on that this is in general a good idea, this
> >> would leave apt-transport-tor relatively e
(and would explain Timos "fix").
So, perhaps you can redo your tests, but as _apt e.g. with:
su _apt -s /bin/sh -c 'apt-key list'
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
dex files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones
used instead.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
, 2016 at 06:08:26PM +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> back in 2014 then apt-transport-tor was introduced it started as
> a pretty straight copy of apt-transport-https with the reasoning of
> being able to backport it (#745259).
>
> It is two years later now with an eye on the upcom
today, too.
Flaming about their software without any sort of details is how most
developers are motivated to work on it after all.
Best regards^W^WBye
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
last hex-digit. True, it
wasn't very friendly to copy the fingerprint as you needed to
remove the spaces, but I implemented automatic space-removal for the
lazy just today, so that shouldn't be a problem either.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
t; being run. Not sure where, perhaps there is another use of AptPkg in cme?
The first is correct, the later indicates that $_config->init was never called
as Dir couldn't be empty in that case (and that Dir::State gets its default
value here is actually an unattended but harmless side effect of the dpkg/status
finding code in its current form). Given that the error message has a '/' in
front I lean towards assuming that the configuration is eventually initialized,
just too late.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
g into initializing apt in the right order or
you will eventually will run again into issues with config options not
having the option set they are supposed to have, which is why I leave
this bug here – unsure if its a cme or libapt-pkg-perl problem, I am
just not enough of a perler to know…
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Control: reassign -1 apt-listchanges
APT isn't respecting this file because it isn't its file and knows
nothing about it nor has any functionality which would use it.
It is the file of a hookscript, hence reassigning to that, full-quoting
the initial mail for reassigning benefit.
On Tue, Aug
returning 404 for files which should
be there… switch to another perhaps?
Based on this report and #831762 I made a bunch of commits which for
this report I am not entirely sure will fix the problem, but I at least
have some hope for it. We will see with the next upload I guess. In the
meantime: Thanks for
orry for the moment), so I aim low and
treat it as a feature request rather than a bug. Not sure how
non-apt-based frontends like dselect behave through, so for them that
might be one…
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
rce-only upload failed, so beside the need to fix
this build-failure the package (which I see you claim to have done
already in your newest version) will also have to pass binary-NEW now.
So, you should be preparing and asking for sponsorship of 4.2.2-2
(just answering the question, /me not vol
btw – actually LC_NUMERIC=C.UTF-8 is enough.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
s. Its also not for state keeping (/var/lib) and not a cache
(/var/cache) as its never read. It does log the current state of the
system through which is why I placed it in /var/log. Its not ideal that
this is root-only, but as mentioned I really don't like ~/.
Do you have a better suggestion for a location?
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
to discuss this – nor is my existance exorbitantly interested in
'chairing' such a discussion at the moment as there are other things
I should be working on, which is also why I only think in private that
this might be a topic which should end up on d-d@ as it effects at least
the big virtual packages.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ter (a
successful) apt call a broken file has slipped in creating errors.
The attached log shows apt behaving as intended – well, perhaps apt
should be clever enough to remove broken files from its lists/ directory
but thats a wishlist as it shouldn't end up in a situation in which it
has broken files there in the first place…
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ore obvious if we know how the file
came to be – and as we do run afresh, lets add a few debug options to
have the most "fun" with it (beware, lots of output):
-o Debug::pkgAcquire::Worker=1 -o Debug::Acquire::http=1
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
shlist, that report would have it…
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
From bae1b41a7d450e9be895edee4220fe34bbe99946 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Kalnischkies <da...@kalnischkies.de>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 10:07:53 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [INCOMPLETE] dpkg-maintscript-helper: support DPKG
can't really happen…
Anyway, I would suggest dropping the entire configuration file from
above and run apt with the following debug options (lots of output):
-o Debug::pkgAcquire::Worker=1 -o Debug::Acquire::http=1
Then we have a chance to know what apt/proxy/server are up to.
Best regards
David Kalni
you can't provide
a detailed step by step guide on how to reproduce this I fear this
report isn't actionable.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
else on your "behalf" even without your explicit
knowledge) runs 'apt install libutf8proc1' – even if that ends up doing
"nothing".
Either way, without you telling us what "you" did this remains as
unactionable as before.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
P.S.: In the m
is just who messed up: If Pdiff we would have potentially
ed-artifacts in the file, otherwise it could be the write-buffered
implementation or perhaps its the downloader picking up a partial file
incorrectly, ………
Hard to say without details.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
st regards
David Kalnischkies
[0] That could be improved upon by now, but that requires a recent apt,
so in the interest of backports I will leave that slide for the moment
– and it doesn't change the manual vs auto part discussed here anyhow.
From fbb1d6e1d19496c52b208fe155fa6eb3bebbaab5 Mon Sep 1
merging and co, but
suggests that the trailer actually must be modified in the --no-git-author
case (which is the default ATM).
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
[0]
https://git.sigxcpu.org/cgit/git-buildpackage/commit/?id=c3258c19c6cfa291c8bebac1dae230f6e3ccca36
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
MERIC=C.UTF-8 as a workaround should keep the l10n intact.
As I said the last two times already: How hard can date parsing be…
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Control: tags -1 unreproducible moreinfo
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:24:18AM +0200, Eric Valette wrote:
> On 06/24/2016 09:40 AM, David Kalnischkies wrote:
>
> > All http sources broken with malformed header lines… that sounds a lot
> > like a proxy running amok. The "
dvise against using!)
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
placement is bugfree…
In unrelated news: I would strongly suggest to switch to http for the
debian sources.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:15:14AM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-06-20 at 23:35 +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Jun 2016, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> > I guess the nagios check shouldn't use 'apt-get upgrade', but that
> > > depend
't use 'apt-get upgrade', but that
depends on what it is supposed to show (aka what its users expect) and
what it actually uses (based on "critical updates" I guess it is using
its own code, perhaps a binding…) but both I don't know hence
reassigning.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
than
letting me wade through aptitude code on my own…
(as the lz4 leak is by far the biggest eater of fds in your case this
bug could be closed with it, but we gonna catch them all…)
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
some huge
Baader-Meinhof bias… [2]
(and I am bit surprised we had nobody on non-hurd complain about
'strange' messages being emitted while using apt-key – but perhaps that
just means nobody is using apt-key anymore… if only that were true…)
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
[1] The mai
te_8h_source.html
> │ ├─dpkg-query -L imagemagick:all
> │ └─grep -F -q -x
> /usr/share/doc/imagemagick/www/api/MagickCore/utility-private_8h_source.html
Well, that looks like a maintainerscript running amok as apt doesn't
call dpkg-query. As that loop seems to be produced by
dpkg-maintscript-helper itself, reassigning to dpkg (and keeping
a clone), but perhaps its also imagemagick calling it wrong as
imagemagick is only newly 'all', it used to be 'any'…
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
titude people hang out together)!
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
hat this bug is a
> duplicate of #815650; I'm filing a separate bug since that's just
> a hunch.
Red hering; completely unrelated as yours is a problem in the resolver
while this one is with the interaction between APT↔dpkg which in the
resolver failing cases isn't even part of the execution path.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
it turns out to be hard feel free to merge back.
(Lets see how hard that is going to be in libapt…)
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 01:32:20PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> On 21-May-2016, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> > As an example, your changes in the context of gpgv are incorrect as
> > the official term in rfc2440 for the "key-value pairs" is "Armor
> > Heade
llection of header fields is not named
> ‘headers’, or that an individual field is not named ‘header’).
Well, as usual, we can't easily change public API so I would like to
avoid that for the moment… we could look into it after stretch.
If it is non-public like in methods/ you could run wild…
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
[0] https://wiki.debian.org/LSBInitScripts/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
tential of hiding bugs (at the
expense of opening some like here). Either way, that needs more thought
than I can shell out at the moment & adapting the call site should be
easy.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
port 'crazy' DPKG_ROOT values
like directories containing spaces and magic shell characters.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
[0] run e.g. as autopkgtest, but pkg-config isn't in the (build-)
dependencies of apt so far, so that effects 'just' developer machines.
[1] some info on the why and
of apt-get.
What we probably should do is deprecate "-u" (as that doesn't deserve
a short option, but not sure) and document the "--no-" version as we do
with install-recommends, download and a few more. btw: As every
commandline option is backed by a configuration option you have even
more ways of changing the value…
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 04:25:23PM +0200, Pietro Abate wrote:
> On 10/05/16 15:09, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> > > 'APT::Solver::aspcud::Preferences=-removed,-changed,-new,-count(solution,APT-Release:=/experimental/)'
> > ^^
> >
> > The
bread-and-butter thing for dpkg and gets
hence a much better look from someone who actually works with tar much.
So: please go ahead with extending dpkg – apt will follow suit then!
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
From 8bab10645097198f8f527c2b9e7737068bab879a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: St
equested 'dump' to resolve it, but
the preferences string is for 'aspcud'.
So, seems to work as intended, doesn't it – or did I miss anything?
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
electing 'libfontconfig1-dev'
instead of 'libfontconfig-dev'" as response to "apt purge
libfontconfig-dev", but does nothing anyhow.
> I noticed that the 'Virtual packages ...' line vanishes if stdout is
> piped through, e.g., cat and wonder if this is done deliberately.
Yeah (although
foo recommends bar | bar:i386".
Anyway, please split it off (cloning feels a bit wrong as it isn't
overly related to the other long messages in this report) to a new bug
for record keeping. Perhaps I even have some time later this week to
look into implementing this…
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ease'?
If you download it with wget/curl?
In any case, I don't see much potential for improvement from the apt
side here as "garbage in, garbage out", but perhaps if you can shine
some light on what is going on there might be something so I am not
closing downright… but I am damn close.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ext of apt]. After all, if you don't want apt to do that, why are
you using https…
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
sentials are far from common.
(well, the super real solution is to write a better resolver, which has
an easier time reverting its own decisions)
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
it got the mksh idea from.
(That is probably a lot of output, so redirecting to a file and attaching it
here is adviceable)
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
getting the right message across in 'update' commands which
should already bug you about these repositories…
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Instead of fixing these flat-entries you could also consider dropping
them as these flat (or "one directory") repositories are a bit unlikely
to have dep11 support in the first place…
Or as the documentation words it: "Support for these flat repositories
exists mainly for legacy pur
org
anymore – "ftp.debian.org" would, but:
The Release file of at least the current releases have a Contents-source
file (for each Component), which looks like it includes the requested
data, so instead of cloning I am just dropping the block.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
sorts of problems with it… for example:
I couldn't survive without ssh and mosh gets you only so far…, but
I digress.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
nd the same name ftp.debian.org, so
with the IP we have a chance to figure out which mirror of the many in
the rotation is it your machine was talking to (aka: its not your IP or
otherwise a secret).
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
r twenty old versions is arbitrary indeed,
apt-ftparchive picked 2 olds (probably at semi-random) but any other
number would work. Any time-based requirement would work, too. For some
values of A and B at least. Perhaps the spec shouldn't require anything
and just leave this to be figured out by the
feel free to reopen/ask.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
notes. :)
Feel free to translate this inline in a reply instead of rolling a complete po
if that is easier for you.
Thanks again & Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ing --criteria-plain
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
s on it…
This might also be the right time for users to reconsider if they really
need all these third-party repositories they have configured over the
years. Debian has an evergrowing archive of software after all – and if
it isn't in the archive yet, consider adding it!
Best regards
David K
ists before you do this in case this isn't always
reproducible (if you get the "wrong" mirror for example).
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 03:21:14PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 11:11:57PM +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> > Zip up the lists/ directory + your /etc/apt. DO NOT run update again
> > before doing that. Upload that somewhere.
>
> http://q.bofh.de/~mh/
or do they
change default behaviour.¹ "apt" is just another binary which comes with
a slightly different set of default options we deem more reasonable for
interactive usage, but uses the very same code as apt-get and co.
So if you have a script, please continue to use 'apt-get update
--pri
ll debug packages (copy back the buggy lists/
directory after that) and provide a stacktrace.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
301 - 400 of 1109 matches
Mail list logo
