Bug#991489: r-cran-cpp11: New upstream version needed by other R packages

2021-07-25 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel

Bug#991395: r-cran-knitr: New upstream version needed by other R packages

2021-07-22 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Package: r-cran-knitr Severity: normal We have knitr 1.31 per https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=r-cran-knitr but upstream is (since April) at 1.33 per https://cran.r-project.org/package=knitr which is now needed by e.g. rgl aka r-cran-rgl. We are in a freeze, so I too have been

Bug#989963: tclap: reproducible-builds: Embeds build path, binary paths and SHELL in example Makefiles

2021-06-16 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi there, On 16 June 2021 at 13:52, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: | Source: tclap | Severity: normal | Tags: patch | User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org | Usertags: buildpath usrmerge shell | X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org | | The build path, several binary

Bug#986472: gretl: broken symlink: /usr/share/gretl/examples -> ../doc/gretl-doc/examples

2021-05-05 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Andreas, On 9 April 2021 at 23:40, Andreas Beckmann wrote: | On 09/04/2021 23.23, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | > | The --doc-main-package option can be used when the | > | auto-detection is insufficient or to reset the path to its previous | > | value if there is

Bug#987651: install the examples in libgsl-dev

2021-04-26 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi John, On 26 April 2021 at 23:00, John Scott wrote: | Source: gsl | Version: 2.6+dfsg-2 | Severity: wishlist | | Examples are included in doc/examples along with text files that appear | to contain the programs' output. You'll probably want to just install | the *.c and *.h files though.

Bug#986472: gretl: broken symlink: /usr/share/gretl/examples -> ../doc/gretl-doc/examples

2021-04-09 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 9 April 2021 at 22:33, Andreas Beckmann wrote: | On 09/04/2021 22.19, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > That is ... quite possible. It's actually the same with line above in | > debian/rules. The actual underlying problem, though, is that a lot of | > content that once appears to have

Bug#986472: gretl: broken symlink: /usr/share/gretl/examples -> ../doc/gretl-doc/examples

2021-04-09 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 6 April 2021 at 17:18, Andreas Beckmann wrote: | Package: gretl | Version: 2021a-1 | Severity: normal | User: debian...@lists.debian.org | Usertags: piuparts | | Hi, | | during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates) | a broken symlink. | | >From the attached log

Bug#980809: rmatrix: breaks autopkgtest of r-cran-glmmtmb on s390x

2021-04-09 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 8 April 2021 at 11:29, Graham Inggs wrote: | Control: forwarded -1 https://deb.li/6f4z | | TMB upstream have submitted a bug report [1] to R-forge. | | > Headers need update corresponding to new SuiteSparse version 5.7.1 | > | > SuiteSparse was recently updated from version 4.2.1 to 5.7.1,

Bug#985898: /usr/bin/r: /usr/bin/r is not stripped

2021-03-25 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 25 March 2021 at 20:29, Rogério Theodoro de Brito wrote: | On March 25, 2021 1:31:11 PM GMT-03:00, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | >Howdy, | > | >On 25 March 2021 at 13:12, Rogério Brito wrote: | >| I was looking into some of my executables and discovered tha

Bug#985898: /usr/bin/r: /usr/bin/r is not stripped

2021-03-25 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Howdy, On 25 March 2021 at 13:12, Rogério Brito wrote: | I was looking into some of my executables and discovered that /usr/bin/r is | not stripped and it contains debugging info on my system: | | ,[ file /usr/bin/r ] | | /usr/bin/r: ELF 64-bit LSB pie executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV),

Bug#985898: /usr/bin/r: /usr/bin/r is not stripped

2021-03-25 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Rock, meet hard place. The last change I made for Debian was just that: https://bugs.debian.org/968531 So I may have to close your bug report instead. Dirk -- https://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org

Bug#980809: rmatrix: breaks autopkgtest of r-cran-glmmtmb on s390x

2021-03-09 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 9 March 2021 at 14:26, Graham Inggs wrote: | Control: tags -1 - fixed-upstream + upstream | Control: notforwarded -1 | | | >From TMB upstream [1]: | | > Digging a bit deeper I found that after calling | > | > M_cholmod_factorize_p(A, mm, (int*)NULL, 0 /*fsize*/, f, ) | > | > the

Bug#984820: jags: Wrong homepage

2021-03-08 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 8 March 2021 at 20:05, Davide Prina wrote: | Package: jags | Version: 4.3.0-3 | Severity: normal | | I have see that the project homepage do not respond anymore: | http://www-fis.iarc.fr/~martyn/software/jags/ Good catch. Martyn Plummer no longer works there but is now at Warwick. I'll

Bug#980809: rmatrix: breaks autopkgtest of r-cran-glmmtmb on s390x

2021-03-06 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi Graham and Martin, Thanks for coming back to this, I had also meant to write to Martin this weekend. On 6 March 2021 at 19:16, Graham Inggs wrote: | Is there a bug opened for this issue with Matrix upstream? Per field Bug-Reports in DESCRIPTION, the repo (and bug tracker) are (still) at

Bug#980809: rmatrix: breaks autopkgtest of r-cran-glmmtmb on s390x

2021-02-23 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Graham, Martin, So I logged back onto the s390x box we can access. Matrix 1.13-2 does fail the factorization test when doing _R_CHECK_FORCE_SUGGESTS_=false R CMD check --no-manual \ --no-vignettes Matrix_1.3-2.tar.gz and Matrix 1.2-18 passes it. So Graham was right all-along

Bug#980809: rmatrix: breaks autopkgtest of r-cran-glmmtmb on s390x

2021-02-23 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
If it were me I would turn off the autopkgtest in r-cran-glmmtmb (maybe just on s390x) and move on. I still have not been convinced by anyone that it is an issue in package Matrix causing this. Dirk -- https://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org

Bug#982465: Debian bug report 982465: dyn.load not useful for system libraries

2021-02-19 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Indeed: "Should" is the operational term here. But just pointing at packages for which I am upstream author / maintainer and Debian maintainer, we already use the other approach for RcppArmadillo, RcppEigen, RcppCCTZ, RcppDate, ... and we fudged it for BH with the empty shell r-cran-bh which

Bug#982465: Bug in r-base and r-cran-rcppparallel

2021-02-18 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
severity 982465 wishlist thanks I am sorry but I simply see no bug in package r-base here. The RcppParallel maintainer tried a Debian-local modification to that CRAN package. That didn't work, and now fingers are pointed at r-base. Which is simply not the right way to go about this as package

Bug#980809: Matrix package default tolerance on s390x (Re: Bug#980809: rmatrix: breaks autopkgtest of r-cran-glmmtmb on s390x)

2021-02-18 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Graham, Thanks for the bug tracker follow-up which made me aware of the ongoing discussion in #665 at glmmTMB. It's frustrating to have the run around but it really looks like as I argued all along: not an issue in Matrix. Now, TMB is of course a complex package too.. Appreciate you chasing

Bug#980809: Matrix package default tolerance on s390x (Re: Bug#980809: rmatrix: breaks autopkgtest of r-cran-glmmtmb on s390x)

2021-02-17 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 17 February 2021 at 16:58, Graham Inggs wrote: | Hi Dirk | | On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 at 15:10, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > Graham: What does that bigendian box say for Sys.info()[["machine"]] ? | | The other big-endian box I tested was perotto.debian.net [*], it says: |

Bug#980809: Matrix package default tolerance on s390x (Re: Bug#980809: rmatrix: breaks autopkgtest of r-cran-glmmtmb on s390x)

2021-02-17 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
wnloaded_packages$ (Obviously the if above could be indentented and all that.) Graham: What does that bigendian box say for Sys.info()[["machine"]] ? Should we test for endianness instead? And then maybe try to roll up to the cause of the difference? Dirk | Best, Martin |

Bug#980809: Matrix package default tolerance on s390x (Re: Bug#980809: rmatrix: breaks autopkgtest of r-cran-glmmtmb on s390x)

2021-02-15 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Martin, I have this long-running bug report against Matrix, triggered by glmmTMB on s390x. Graham has been chasing this patiently and we are now at the level of checking on a shell account on the appropriate hardware. We validated that everything does in fact "still break" with CRAN-current

Bug#980809: rmatrix: breaks autopkgtest of r-cran-glmmtmb on s390x

2021-02-14 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 14 February 2021 at 12:00, Graham Inggs wrote: | glmmTMB upstream came up with a minimal reproducer (see forwarded bug): | | stopifnot(require("testthat"), | require("glmmTMB"), | require("lme4")) | data("Orthodont", package="nlme") | fm1 <- glmmTMB(distance ~ age +

Bug#982465: Bug in r-base and r-cran-rcppparallel

2021-02-11 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 11 February 2021 at 16:06, Johannes Ranke wrote: | > | > The documentation does not list a search behaviour for bare library | > | > names on non-Windows systems. So completely ignoring the system library | > | > paths is kind of weird. | > | | > | I can see that it looks weird - but is it

Bug#982465: Bug in r-base and r-cran-rcppparallel

2021-02-11 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 11 February 2021 at 12:50, Johannes Ranke wrote: | Am Donnerstag, 11. Februar 2021, 12:20:33 CET schrieb Bastian Blank: | > Hi Johannes | | Hello Bastian! | | > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 09:26:48AM +0100, Johannes Ranke wrote: | > > dyn.load is used in base R to load compiled code from R

Bug#982465: Bug in r-base and r-cran-rcppparallel

2021-02-10 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 10 February 2021 at 20:35, Bastian Blank wrote: | On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 01:30:10PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > Thanks for the CVE. I am happy to discuss this with R Core and one fellow in | > particular. | > Before I do so can you clarify what you think the issue is? Loa

Bug#982465: Bug in r-base and r-cran-rcppparallel

2021-02-10 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi Bastian, On 10 February 2021 at 20:03, Bastian Blank wrote: | Hi Dirk | | On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 12:18:04PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > As for your suggested patch to R's own dynload.c: that is very well tested | > and robust system code I do not have any real int

Bug#982465: Bug in r-base and r-cran-rcppparallel

2021-02-10 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi Bastian, Thanks for taking the time to propose a bug report. However (and please see below) I don't think this is the way forward. There have been a lot of recent changed in RcppParallel upstream (as I lurk on the GH repo which is part of our Rcpp org), and maybe some of these things will

Bug#980809: rmatrix: breaks autopkgtest of r-cran-glmmtmb on s390x

2021-02-08 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi Graham, On 2 February 2021 at 11:32, Graham Inggs wrote: | Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/glmmTMB/glmmTMB/issues/665 | | After another detour via #981623, r-cran-glmmtmb is now also rebuilt. | Even with the rebuilt r-cran-glmmtmb, I still see the "gradient | function must return a

Bug#982069: /usr/local/lib/R owned by group staff even if /etc/staff-group-for-usr-local not present

2021-02-06 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 6 February 2021 at 15:17, Sébastien Villemot wrote: | Le samedi 06 février 2021 à 08:12 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel a écrit : | | > # edd 03 Apr 2003 cf Section 10.1.2 of Debian Policy | > # edd 06 Feb 2021 #982069, with a nod to Python's debian/PVER-minimal.posti

Bug#982069: /usr/local/lib/R owned by group staff even if /etc/staff-group-for-usr-local not present

2021-02-06 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 6 February 2021 at 14:57, Sébastien Villemot wrote: | Le samedi 06 février 2021 à 07:49 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel a écrit : | > So I now have this. Or do I need to protect /usr/local/lib/R/site- | > library too? | | You need to protect both. | | In order to simplify the code, you ca

Bug#982069: /usr/local/lib/R owned by group staff even if /etc/staff-group-for-usr-local not present

2021-02-06 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
So I now have this. Or do I need to protect /usr/local/lib/R/site-library too? # edd 03 Apr 2003 cf Section 10.1.2 of Debian Policy # edd 06 Feb 2021 #982069 if [ ! -e /usr/local/lib/R ]; then if [ -f /etc/staff-group-for-usr-local ]; then if mkdir /usr/local/lib/R

Bug#982069: /usr/local/lib/R owned by group staff even if /etc/staff-group-for-usr-local not present

2021-02-06 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 6 February 2021 at 10:04, Sébastien Villemot wrote: | Package: r-base-core | Version: 3.5.2-1 That is two+ years behind (3.5.0 released April 2018, 3.6.0 in April 2019, 4.0.0 last year -- and 4.1.0 soon). | Severity: normal | | Hi Dirk, | | The /usr/local/lib/R directory (and its

Bug#980809: rmatrix: breaks autopkgtest of r-cran-glmmtmb on s390x

2021-01-31 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 31 January 2021 at 20:09, Graham Inggs wrote: | Hi Dirk | | On Sun, 31 Jan 2021 at 16:13, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > This is a bug in glmmTMB. | | I don't see how you can be so sure. Experience around R. glmmTMB is a huge package with many dependencies, there will be a stale

Bug#980809: rmatrix: breaks autopkgtest of r-cran-glmmtmb on s390x

2021-01-31 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 31 January 2021 at 09:20, Graham Inggs wrote: | Control: reopen -1 | | Hi Dirk | | Paul's test results showed that the run-unit-test autopkgtest still | fails with the same errors ( | Error: gradient function must return a numeric vector of length...) as | in my original report. | | | The

Bug#980809: [R-pkg-team] Bug#980809: rmatrix: breaks autopkgtest of r-cran-glmmtmb on s390x

2021-01-28 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi Graham, On 28 January 2021 at 08:19, Graham Inggs wrote: | On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 01:12, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > Any update here? It still points at Matrix aka rmatrix aka r-cran-matrix, | > and I still think wrongly. | | I'm still waiting for the results of the autopkgtest a

Bug#980809: [R-pkg-team] Bug#980809: rmatrix: breaks autopkgtest of r-cran-glmmtmb on s390x

2021-01-27 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Graham, Any update here? It still points at Matrix aka rmatrix aka r-cran-matrix, and I still think wrongly. Best, Dirk -- https://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org

Bug#981064: ITP: xrprof -- External sampling profiler for R

2021-01-25 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Package: wnpp Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel Severity: wishlist * Package name: xrprof Version : 0.3.1 Upstream Author : Aaron Jacobs * URL or Web page : https://github.com/atheriel/xrprof * License : GPL-2 Description : External sampling profiler for R This (still

Bug#980902: [R-pkg-team] Bug#980902: r-cran-tmb: prints warning when rmatrix is upgraded

2021-01-25 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 25 January 2021 at 21:39, Graham Inggs wrote: | Thanks again for your input on this issue! Always a pleasure :) Best, Dirk -- https://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org

Bug#980902: rmatrix: which reverse dependencies need rebuilds?

2021-01-25 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 25 January 2021 at 09:17, Graham Inggs wrote: | Hi | | On Sun, 24 Jan 2021 at 18:06, Graham Inggs wrote: | > I'm awaiting autopkgtest results on the binNMU'd r-cran-tmb. I will | > update this bug and #980809 when they are in. | | The autopkgtests for r-cran-tmb [1] and r-cran-glmmtmb [2]

Bug#980902: r-cran-tmb: prints warning when rmatrix is upgraded

2021-01-25 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 25 January 2021 at 10:21, Andreas Tille wrote: | Hi Graham, | | On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 10:31:36AM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote: | > Control: tags -1 + patch | > | > The attached patch upgrades the warning() to a stop(). | > This will cause r-cran-tmb's autopkgtests to fail whenever rmatrix is

Bug#980902: rmatrix: which reverse dependencies need rebuilds?

2021-01-24 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi Graham, On 24 January 2021 at 18:06, Graham Inggs wrote: | Hi Dirk | | On Sun, 24 Jan 2021 at 14:47, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > R code can promote warnings to errors on a per-session basis: | | Thanks! This could be useful in the r-cran-tmb autopkgtest. | | > I am still not quit

Bug#980902: rmatrix: which reverse dependencies need rebuilds?

2021-01-24 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Howdy, On 24 January 2021 at 18:01, Graham Inggs wrote: | Hi Andreas | | On Sun, 24 Jan 2021 at 09:55, Andreas Tille wrote: | > dh-r injects versioned dependencies if this is specified in the | > DESCRIPTION file of an r-* package. If this is not specified we | > need to add this manually

Bug#980902: rmatrix: which reverse dependencies need rebuilds?

2021-01-24 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi Graham, On 24 January 2021 at 17:53, Graham Inggs wrote: | On Sun, 24 Jan 2021 at 07:10, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > There is a confusion here. You filed this again rmatrix (aka "Matrix"). | > Matrix does not impose dependencies -- dependent packages do. | | I filed

Bug#980902: rmatrix: which reverse dependencies need rebuilds?

2021-01-24 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 24 January 2021 at 06:08, Graham Inggs wrote: | The actual warning message is generated by r-base, is there a way to | make this an error instead of a warning? R code can promote warnings to errors on a per-session basis: > warning("I am just a warning") Warning message: I am just

Bug#980902: rmatrix: which reverse dependencies need rebuilds?

2021-01-23 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Graham, On 24 January 2021 at 06:08, Graham Inggs wrote: | Source: rmatrix | Version: 1.3-2-1 | Severity: important | Control: affects -1 src:r-cran-tmb | X-Debbugs-CC: debia...@lists.debian.org | | Hi R Maintainers There is a confusion here. You filed this again rmatrix (aka "Matrix").

Bug#980809: [R-pkg-team] Bug#980809: rmatrix: breaks autopkgtest of r-cran-glmmtmb on s390x

2021-01-23 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi Graham, On 23 January 2021 at 00:21, Graham Inggs wrote: | On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 at 23:38, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > Can you still please talk to the corresponding Debian maintainer for glmmTMB | > so that he/she can walk it upstream? | | I have assigned this bug to both packages,

Bug#980809: [R-pkg-team] Bug#980809: rmatrix: breaks autopkgtest of r-cran-glmmtmb on s390x

2021-01-22 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi Graham, On 22 January 2021 at 23:13, Graham Inggs wrote: | Hi Dirk | | On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 at 22:39, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > Matrix 1.3.0 from December has long been known to fail. Please use release 1.3.2. | | The test at [2], run at 2021-01-22 17:34:51 UTC was against | r-c

Bug#980809: rmatrix: breaks autopkgtest of r-cran-glmmtmb on s390x

2021-01-22 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 22 January 2021 at 22:03, Graham Inggs wrote: | While investigating this failure, I noticed the following output in | the test log: | | | > library('glmmTMB') | Warning message: | In checkMatrixPackageVersion() : Package version inconsistency detected. | TMB was built with Matrix version

Bug#980809: rmatrix: breaks autopkgtest of r-cran-glmmtmb on s390x

2021-01-22 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 22 January 2021 at 21:45, Graham Inggs wrote: | Source: rmatrix, r-cran-glmmtmb | Control: found -1 rmatrix/1.3-0-1 | Control: found -1 r-cran-glmmtmb/1.0.2.1-1 | Severity: serious | Tags: sid bullseye | X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org | User: debian...@lists.debian.org | Usertags:

Bug#980430: ITP: r-cran-nanotime -- nanosecond resolution date and time calculations for R

2021-01-18 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Package: wnpp Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel Severity: wishlist * Package name: r-cran-nanotime Version : 0.3.2 Upstream Author : Dirk Eddelbuettel and Leonardo Silvestri * URL or Web page : https://github.com/eddelbuettel/nanotime * License : GPL-2+ Description

Bug#977919: vm: Mail quoting no longer works in emacs27

2021-01-18 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 18 January 2021 at 13:49, Ian Jackson wrote: | Control: tags -1 + confirmed | | Dirk Eddelbuettel writes ("Bug#977919: vm: Mail quoting no longer works in emacs27"): | > | > As per the previous bug report emacs27 and vm are having some issues. Another | > wart i

Bug#977918: vm: Package vm prevents clean emacs27 start

2021-01-18 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 18 January 2021 at 13:47, Ian Jackson wrote: | Control: priority -1 normal | | Dirk Eddelbuettel writes ("Bug#977918: vm: Package vm prevents clean emacs27 start"): | > And of course in a minimal container with just emacs27 and vm the issue does | > not reproduce. Wh

Bug#979353: rmatrix: Please package 1.3-2 to file errors

2021-01-05 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 6 January 2021 at 05:33, Peter Hickey wrote: | Thanks. I've been camping since Christmas without laptop/reception but I'll | be back next week and deal with these issues Ah the 'seasonal' advantages of being down under! Lovely. Take your time; we have to wait on Martin Maechler and CRAN to

Bug#979353: rmatrix: Please package 1.3-2 to file errors

2021-01-05 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 5 January 2021 at 19:20, Michael R. Crusoe wrote: | On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 at 19:12, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | > On 5 January 2021 at 18:41, Michael R. Crusoe wrote: | > | | | > | r-cran-matrix 1.3-0-1 causes a bug that is evidently fixed in version | > | 1.3-2 | &g

Bug#979353: rmatrix: Please package 1.3-2 to file errors

2021-01-05 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 5 January 2021 at 18:41, Michael R. Crusoe wrote: | Source: rmatrix | Version: 1.3-0-1 | Severity: important | | -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- | Hash: SHA512 | | Hello, | | r-cran-matrix 1.3-0-1 causes a bug that is evidently fixed in version | 1.3-2 |

Bug#978483: r-cran-pbkrtest: not installable in sid

2020-12-27 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 28 December 2020 at 00:25, Aurelien Jarno wrote: | Package: r-cran-pbkrtest | Version: 0.5-0.1-1 | Severity: serious | | r-cran-pbkrtest is currently not installable in sid: | | # apt-get install r-cran-pbkrtest | Reading package lists... Done | Building dependency tree | Reading state

Bug#978136: RFP: r-cran-rcppdate -- R bindings of Date library

2020-12-26 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: r-cran-rcppdate Version : 0.0.1 Upstream Author : Dirk Eddelbuettel * URL or Web page : https://cran.r-project.org/package=RcppDate * License : GPL (>= 2) Description : R bindings of Date library This is the sec

Bug#978134: RFP: r-cran-rcppcctz -- R binding for CCTZ

2020-12-26 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: r-cran-rcppcctz Version : 0.2.9-0 Upstream Author : Dirk Eddelbuettel * URL or Web page : https://cran.r-project.org/package=RcppCCTZ * License : GPL (>= 2) Description : R binding for CCTZ This is one of th

Bug#977918: vm: Package vm prevents clean emacs27 start

2020-12-22 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Package: vm Version: 8.2.0b-6 Severity: serious Using the (awesome !!) newer emacs 27.1, I am having issues with package vm. One issue is that on startup, a message 'Package cl is deprecated' is shown. Startup appears to finish in interactive, but does not in daemon

Bug#977919: vm: Mail quoting no longer works in emacs27

2020-12-22 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Package: vm Version: 8.2.0b-6 Severity: serious As per the previous bug report emacs27 and vm are having some issues. Another wart is that mail replies no longer work. Hitting 'F' for a quoted reply inserts the full email including headers _unquoted_ and _unindented_ with an error message

Bug#977918: vm: Package vm prevents clean emacs27 start

2020-12-22 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Package: vm Version: 8.2.0b-6 Severity: serious Using the (awesome !!) newer emacs 27.1, I am having issues with package vm. One issue is that on startup, a message 'Package cl is deprecated' is shown. Startup appears to finish in interactive, but does not in daemon mode which is how I used to

Bug#936609: Advent calendar bug squashing issue (Was: Bug#936609: cblas / gsl hint needed (Was: Bug#936609: Ported ghmm to Python3 but issues with clapack))

2020-12-05 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 5 December 2020 at 12:09, Andreas Tille wrote: | this issue is something for our advent calendar. Anybody with cblas | knowledge? I am the GNU GSL maintainer, and I at one point also worked a lot with the Atlas and other LAPACK/BLAS packages. I think Mo may be wrong here: I did the same

Bug#975661: rquantlib: FTBFS against boost_1.74

2020-11-25 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
| Thanks! | | | Anton | | Am Di., 24. Nov. 2020 um 21:57 Uhr schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel : | > Thanks, that is pertinent. The error is actually from the final step where R | > tries to load the package it just built. So the simplest solution then is to | > check that libquantlib0-dev

Bug#975661: rquantlib: FTBFS against boost_1.74

2020-11-24 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi Anton, On 24 November 2020 at 20:53, Anton Gladky wrote: | Package: rquantlib | Version: 0.4.12-1 | Severity: important | Tags: ftbfs | User: team+bo...@tracker.debian.org | Usertags: boost174 | | -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- | Hash: SHA512 | | Dear maintainer, | | it was discovered

Bug#975611: ITP: r-cran-mathjaxr -- GNU R package for 'Mathjax' use in Rd files

2020-11-23 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Package: wnpp Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel Severity: wishlist * Package name: r-cran-mathjaxr Version : 1.0-1 Upstream Author : Wolfgang Viechtbauer * URL or Web page : https://github.com/wviechtb/mathjaxr * License : GPL-3 Description : GNU R package for 'Mathjax

Bug#963392: [Help] r-cran-bayestestr: autopkgtest regression

2020-11-19 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 19 November 2020 at 19:07, Andreas Tille wrote: | Control: tags 972074 pending | Control: block 972074 by 963392 | | On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 07:53:06AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | | > | I do not have the slightest idea what this might mean. | > | > ABI/API slippage

Bug#972074: [Help] r-cran-bayestestr: autopkgtest regression

2020-11-19 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 19 November 2020 at 14:37, Andreas Tille wrote: | Control: tags -1 help | | Hi, since version 0.7.0 (uploaded by Dylan Aïssi in CC) the autopkgtest | of r-cran-bayestestr fails with the error mentioned in the bug log. It | has slightly changed with the version I pushed to Git. It is now: |

Bug#955211: release.debian.org: Transition r-base for 4.0.0

2020-10-31 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 31 October 2020 at 18:46, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: | On 2020-05-28 11:58:09 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > Thanks everybody for the help with the transition: 4.0.0-3 is now in testing. | | So let's close this one. Indeed. Thanks for catching that! Dirk |

Bug#968531: littler: probably shouldn't use install -s

2020-08-16 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi Simon, On 16 August 2020 at 23:53, Simon McVittie wrote: | Source: littler | Version: 0.3.11-1 | Severity: minor | | A bug report against fteqcc (#968524) prompted me to look for other | instances of the same anti-pattern on codesearch.debian.net. | | d/rules in littler invokes 'install

Bug#957837: sprng: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-08-13 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Nilesh, On 12 August 2020 at 21:17, Nilesh wrote: | Hi, | | This patch fixes the build. Let me know if something else is needed: | | --- a/SRC/primes_32.c | +++ b/SRC/primes_32.c | @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ |  #define NO  0 |  #define NPRIMES 1000 |   | -int primes[NPRIMES]; | +extern int

Bug#957134: dieharder: ftbfs with GCC-10

2020-07-25 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi Shane, On 25 July 2020 at 10:34, Shane McDonald wrote: | This FTBFS is caused by a change in the default | behaviour of GCC from version 9 to version 10. | In version 10, if a global variable is defined in a | header file, and that header file is included by | several files, this results in

Bug#964753: ITP: r-cran-conquer -- GNU R package for convolution-type smoothed quantile regression

2020-07-09 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Package: wnpp Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel Severity: wishlist * Package name: r-cran-conquer Version : 1.0.1 Upstream Author : Xuming He, Xiaoou Pan, Kean Ming Tan, and Wen-Xin Zhou * URL or Web page : https://cran.r-project.org/package=conquer * License : GPL-3

Bug#962713: please add support for x13as

2020-06-12 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 12 June 2020 at 16:38, Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti wrote: | On Fri, 12 Jun 2020, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | > | Quickly looking at the source code of gretl, I am under the impression that it | > | may need to be slightly patched in order to find the x13as executable (it

Bug#962713: please add support for x13as

2020-06-12 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi Seb, On 12 June 2020 at 15:59, Sébastien Villemot wrote: | Package: gretl | Version: 2020b-1 | Severity: wishlist | | Hi Dirk, | | gretl is able to take advantage of X-13ARIMA-SEATS (a.k.a. x13as) for | performing seasonal adjustment of time series. I know. There was some back and forth

Bug#962497: r-base breaks r-cran-data.table autopkgtest: 'origin' must be supplied

2020-06-10 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
It would be nice if we could hear from team r-cran-data.table on this matter. Dirk -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org

Bug#962497: r-base breaks r-cran-data.table autopkgtest: 'origin' must be supplied

2020-06-08 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
As a follow-up, I may have found the one commit for fixing the "'origin' must be supplied" issue (from reading the upstream NEWS [1] backwards landing at #4428 [2] Dirk [1] https://rdatatable.gitlab.io/data.table/news/index.html [2] https://github.com/Rdatatable/data.table/pull/4428 --

Bug#962497: r-base breaks r-cran-data.table autopkgtest: 'origin' must be supplied

2020-06-08 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 8 June 2020 at 21:25, Paul Gevers wrote: | Source: r-base, r-cran-data.table | Control: found -1 r-base/4.0.1-1 | Control: found -1 r-cran-data.table/1.12.8+dfsg-1 | Severity: serious | Tags: sid bullseye | X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org | User: debian...@lists.debian.org |

Bug#962361: ITP: r-cran-tmvnsim -- GNU R package for truncated multivariate normal simulation

2020-06-06 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Package: wnpp Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel Severity: wishlist * Package name: r-cran-tmvnsim Version : 1.0-2 Upstream Author : Samsiddhi Bhattacjarjee * URL or Web page : https://cran.r-project.org/package=tmvnsim * License : GPL-2 Description : GNU R package

Bug#961725: libopenblas-dev: On some cpus, openmp and pthread dead-lock

2020-06-04 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi Graham, On 4 June 2020 at 10:50, Graham Inggs wrote: | On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 at 18:36, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > Graham do you think you can get it turned off for at least openblas? | | Already fixed in Groovy [1] and the Stable Release Update [2] for | Focal is in the queue [3] await

Bug#961725: libopenblas-dev: On some cpus, openmp and pthread dead-lock

2020-06-03 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Conrad (of Armadillo fame) sent me this (and ok'ed passing it on): According to an Intel report back from 2011, -Bsymbolic-functions "is a dangerous option which can often result in some non-intuitive side effects". The report explicitly shows various problems with the option.

Bug#961725: libopenblas-dev: On some cpus, openmp and pthread dead-lock

2020-06-01 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
For completeness, Conrad Sanderson (who is the main author of Armadillo, which is used inter alia by MLPACK) posted another good summary with links to other projects including also a launchpad bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openblas/+bug/1870138 Dirk --

Bug#961725: libopenblas-dev: On some cpus, openmp and pthread dead-lock

2020-05-30 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 30 May 2020 at 21:39, Sébastien Villemot wrote: | Control: tags -1 + patch | | Hi Graham, | | Le samedi 30 mai 2020 à 15:09 +0200, Graham Inggs a écrit : | | > I was able to reproduce this in Ubuntu 20.04 on i7-2600 with the | > Rscript -e "example(solve)" | > test case. Rebuilding

Bug#961725: libopenblas-dev: On some cpus, openmp and pthread dead-lock

2020-05-30 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 30 May 2020 at 15:09, Graham Inggs wrote: | Hi | | I was able to reproduce this in Ubuntu 20.04 on i7-2600 with the | Rscript -e "example(solve)" | test case. Rebuilding with | export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_STRIP="-Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions" | in debian/rules solved it for me. | | On Sat,

Bug#961725: libopenblas-dev: On some cpus, openmp and pthread dead-lock

2020-05-29 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 30 May 2020 at 01:19, Mo Zhou wrote: | Control: tags -1 -moreinfo | | Hi Sébastien, | | Good catch! I tried to remove the mentioned LDFLAG | | DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_STRIP="-Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions" | | and rebuilt the openblas 3.8 package. | | Then deadlock issue disappeared. Wow. Nice

Bug#961709: lintian: Warn if R binary packages don't depend on virtual r-api-* package

2020-05-29 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Dylan, On 29 May 2020 at 08:03, Dylan Aïssi wrote: | Hi Dirk, | | Le jeu. 28 mai 2020 à 18:03, Dirk Eddelbuettel a écrit : | > | > OTOH the way we implement the tag doesn't it get added automagically by the | > r-base-core package when constructing an r-{cran,bioc,...}-* package? | &

Bug#955211: release.debian.org: Transition r-base for 4.0.0

2020-05-29 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 29 May 2020 at 07:51, Dylan Aïssi wrote: | Hi, | | Le jeu. 28 mai 2020 à 18:58, Dirk Eddelbuettel a écrit : | > | > Thanks everybody for the help with the transition: 4.0.0-3 is now in testing. | > | | \o/ | | Both transition trackers (r-api-4.0 and r-api-bioc-3.11) were

Bug#961725: libopenblas-dev: On some cpus, openmp and pthread dead-lock

2020-05-28 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 29 May 2020 at 01:13, Mo Zhou wrote: | Control: severity -1 important | Control: tags -1 +moreinfo | Clarification: possibly a Ubuntu bug You may be right! I just double checked the earliest report (on the r-sig-debian list) and it too was on Ubuntu 20.04! | Hello guys, | | The way to

Bug#955211: release.debian.org: Transition r-base for 4.0.0

2020-05-28 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Thanks everybody for the help with the transition: 4.0.0-3 is now in testing. Which is lovely as upstream is already at work with 4.0.1 which will drop on June 6 [1]. I'll likely make an rc upload. Special thanks to Graham for calmly pulling a few strings here and there. Cheers, Dirk [1]

Bug#961725: libopenblas-dev: On some cpus, openmp and pthread dead-lock

2020-05-28 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 28 May 2020 at 16:55, Sébastien Villemot wrote: | Hi Dirk, | | Le jeudi 28 mai 2020 à 07:07 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel a écrit : | > Package: libopenblas-dev | > Version: 0.3.8+ds-1 | > Severity: serious | | > In short, when libopenblas-dev is installed (as e.g. fro

Bug#961398: src:quantlib-swig: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on mipsel

2020-05-28 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi Paul, On 28 May 2020 at 08:23, Paul Gevers wrote: | Hi Dirk, | | On 28-05-2020 01:14, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > Shall I close this one 'by hand'? Or will it get closed by migrating | > quantlib-swig? I just close the other one (#956830) that was at the start of | > thi

Bug#961709: lintian: Warn if R binary packages don't depend on virtual r-api-* package

2020-05-28 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 28 May 2020 at 10:10, Dylan Aïssi wrote: | Package: lintian | Version: 2.77.1 | Severity: wishlist | X-Debbugs-CC: debia...@lists.debian.org | | Hi, | | I just saw a R binary package (r-cran-isospec) with wrong dependencies | (bug not yet opened). Lintian doesn't warn about a problem in its

Bug#961725: libopenblas-dev: On some cpus, openmp and pthread dead-lock

2020-05-28 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Package: libopenblas-dev Version: 0.3.8+ds-1 Severity: serious This is a somewhat 'late' bug report followed several on and off discussion threads on debian-science and/or debian-r (and started on the r-sig-debian list from the R Project). In short, when libopenblas-dev is installed (as e.g.

Bug#961398: src:quantlib-swig: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on mipsel

2020-05-27 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Paul, Shall I close this one 'by hand'? Or will it get closed by migrating quantlib-swig? I just close the other one (#956830) that was at the start of this by hand. Best, Dirk -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org

Bug#961398: src:quantlib-swig: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on mipsel

2020-05-26 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Paul, Thanks for the hint. The package for mipsel is now gone, migration of quantlib-python should now resume. Leaves the second part. Come to think about it I have never written an debian/rules to _not_ build something. So maybe something like ifneq "$(findstring $(cpu), mipsel)"

Bug#955211: release.debian.org: Transition r-base for 4.0.0

2020-05-26 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 25 May 2020 at 09:32, Graham Inggs wrote: | Hi All | | Thanks everyone for doing all the hundreds of uploads that were needed | for this combined transition. | All rebuilds for r-api-bioc3.11 are done [1] and there's one | outstanding FTBFS on a release architecture for r-api-4.0 [2]. The

Bug#961555: ftp.debian.org: Please remove mipsel binary of quantlib-swig

2020-05-25 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal My package quantlib-swig failed to build on mipsel for a while; I believe this to be a standard 'resource starvation': the package is heavy on templated C++ and needs a lot of ram. Paul (CC'ed) reminded me in #961398 that the held up migration would

Bug#961398: src:quantlib-swig: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on mipsel

2020-05-24 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi Paul, On 24 May 2020 at 20:31, Paul Gevers wrote: | Hi Dirk, | | On 24-05-2020 20:19, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > Hm. Easy to implement but won't it create a permanent 'fail' on that platform? | > (But then maybe that is the goal once I ask the release team to drop the old | &g

Bug#961398: src:quantlib-swig: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on mipsel

2020-05-24 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi Paul, On 24 May 2020 at 19:54, Paul Gevers wrote: | Hi Dirk, | | On 24-05-2020 19:09, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > But how I prevent the build in the future? | > | > Via 'Architecture: any [!xyx]' ? Last I checked I though we had no such | > explicit white/black listin

Bug#961398: src:quantlib-swig: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on mipsel

2020-05-24 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 24 May 2020 at 18:47, Paul Gevers wrote: | Hi Dirk, | | On 24-05-2020 13:43, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > This used to build. It just takes a long as it is a library with old-school | > many templates "big C++". | > | > There is nothing I can do here. If it ends being

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >