/main amd64 Packages
3.1.1-3+deb8u1 1001
500 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ jessie/main amd64 Packages
If you don't think it's worth following up upstream regarding the
quality of their error messages, you can close this bug report.
Regards, Faheem Mitha
Thank you,
--
Samuel Henrique
or suggestions for debugging
appreciated.
Regards, Faheem Mitha
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.0
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500,
'oldstable-updates'), (500, 'oldstable-debug'), (500, 'stable'), (500,
'oldstable'), (50, 'unstable
Hi Daniel Baumann,
Do you have an update on this? I just installed this using pip. It's a
Python program, so probably not too hard to package unless it has a lot of
dependencies.
Regards, Faheem Mitha
les/pyyaml, though I don't
currently have an account on salsa, and do not know anything about the
service.
Let me know. Thanks.
Regards, Faheem Mitha
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.4
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-debug'), (500, 'sta
There's also a mention of luahbtex in
https://packages.debian.org/de/sid/texlive-luatex
luahbtex -- LuaTeX with HarfBuzz library for glyph shaping
But I have version 2019.20191208-4 installed, and it doesn't contain
`luahbtex`.
Regards, Faheem Mitha
This one should probably be closed, since the bug submitter said it was
user error.
Regards, Faheem Mitha
on the Debian Mercurial package, the location of
tests/run-tests.py in the Debian Mercurial package could then be
hard-wired into Evolve's `debian/rules`. It could probably be
installed in the mercurial-common package, at
`/usr/share/mercurial/tests/run-tests.py`.
Regards, Faheem Mitha
-- System
in sponsoring it.
Regards, Faheem Mitha
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.0
APT prefers testing-debug
APT policy: (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-5-amd64 (SMP w/6 CPU
, because some of these
issues will not receive an unblock for buster.
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 08:39:35PM +0530, Faheem Mitha wrote:
Package: elpa-elpy
Version: 1.28.0-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I've been struggling with getting elpy to work on Debian stable.
Thank you for letting me
: Internal TMDS
[ 112.253] (--) NVIDIA(GPU-0): DFP-0: 330.0 MHz maximum pixel clock
I could not find anything relating to the crash in earlier X logs.
Regards, Faheem Mitha
-- Package-specific info:
X server symlink status:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Jul 31 2013 /etc/X11/X
available if required, but I'm not sure what would be
relevant right now.
Since 2.10.8-2 isn't actually installed on my system when this bug
template was generated, the Gimp package information refers to the
Gimp in staxble.
Regards, Faheem Mitha
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.8
APT
of dependencies. So the versions reported are a bit off.
I'd appreciate any ideas about what these failed tests might mean.
Regards, Faheem Mitha
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.8
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable'), (50, 'unstable'), (1
(Python), 1.28.0 (Emacs Lisp)
though. What's the difference between those two cases?
7) I suggest adding Python 2 packages to the package
dependencies/recommends/suggests too. Like for Jedi. People are still
using Python 2, and are likely to be doing so for awhile.
Regards, Faheem Mitha
-- System I
Related:
https://bugs.debian.org/870350
and may be related
or a dupe.
Regards, Faheem Mitha
root@orwell:/home/faheem# systemctl disable cron --now
Synchronizing state of cron.service with SysV service script with
/lib/systemd/systemd-sysv-install.
Executing: /lib/systemd/systemd-sysv-install disable cron
insserv: warning: current start
I'm seeing this in a virtual machine created by virt-manager.
LVM on top of RAID 1.
I'm not sure what debugging information would be useful here, but please
do ask if you want any.
Regards, Faheem Mitha
Package: grub-common
Version: 2.02~beta3-5
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
See https://unix.stackexchange.com/q/375155/4671
I reproduce the content of that question below. Please also see the
comments, where a couple of other U users confirm that they can
reproduce the bug. I haven't
Hi Gianfranco,
Thanks for the commit.
Regards, Faheem Mitha
On Tue, 10 May 2016, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
control: tags -1 pending
Hi, I committed and uploaded this new file a few seconds ago.
I don't think the end user should have privileges to mount/unmount disks, so I
gave up
On Fri, 22 Apr 2016, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
Hi, can you please provide a patch for this?
I can also install a policykit file if needed, just please send a patch
thanks
G.
Hi Gianfranco,
This is the same patch as I posted earlier in
https://github.com/coldfix/udiskie/issues/111
the maintainer has thoughts about it. See
https://github.com/coldfix/udiskie/issues/111 Feel free to comment if you
wish.
Regards, Faheem Mitha
Il Venerdì 22 Aprile 2016 3:03, Faheem Mitha <fah...@faheem.info> ha scritto:
Package: udiskie
V
Package: udiskie
Version: 1.4.9-1
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
See the discussion in https://github.com/coldfix/udiskie/issues/102
The upshot is that one needs to allow policykit to give permissions to
udiskie for doing certain things - in this case, cron. Despite what
Jason says, I
/#unprivileged
I have the following in my /etc/fstab
UUID="4E1AEA7B1AEA6007" /mnt/passport autorw,user,noauto 0 0
Can anyone help me out? Thanks.
Regards, Faheem Mitha
On Wed, 6 Apr 2016, Tim Retout wrote:
On Wed, 2016-04-06 at 20:53 +0530, Faheem Mitha wrote:
If I try to go to http://www.rbt.ca/autodoc/, I get
Hi Faheem, and thanks for the bug. It's been that way for a while. :(
The closest I've found to an alternative upstream is this github repo
Package: postgresql-autodoc
Version: 1.40-3
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
If I try to go to http://www.rbt.ca/autodoc/, I get
##
Not Found
The requested URL /autodoc/ was not found on this server.
Additionally,
the problem. And indeed, when I added
the epochs, it stopped complaining.
Regards, Faheem Mitha
-- Package-specific info:
-- apt-config dump --
APT "";
APT::Architecture "amd64";
APT::Build-Essential "";
APT::Build-Esse
Package: apt
Version: 1.0.9.8.1
Severity: normal
File: /usr/bin/apt-get
Dear Maintainer,
Consider:
apt-get install gnumeric
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:
On Sun, 27 Dec 2015, Michael Meskes wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 02:57:28AM +0530, Faheem Mitha wrote:
Package: smuxi-engine
Version: 0.11~rc5-1~bpo70+1
Severity: wishlist
I doubt wishlist is the right priority, it should by higher IMO.
Actually I wonder if policy says anything about
ackage.
###
Regards, Faheem Mitha
that the Christian patch is the
correct way to go? It looks good to me, but I don't understand the context
well enough to say.
Regard, Faheem Mitha
On Fri, 4 Dec 2015, Jürgen Braun wrote:
Hi all,
the Patch from Christian works for me as well with one exception. I had
to remove the file /lib/udev/rules.d/usbmount.rules after creating
/etc/udev/rules.d/usbmount.rules. If I do not remove the original file,
usbmount is called twice which
introduced
the package.
Ok.
So this bug seems to be invalid to me.
Ok. It was just a suggestion. Like I said, it's good to give credit where
credit is due.
Regards, Faheem Mitha
(of course feel free to reopen if you don't agree with me
Package: borgbackup
Version: 0.28.2-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
The borg man page was written by Debian, or so Thomas Waldmann tells
me. But this is not mentioned anywhere on it. It should be mentioned.
Regards, Faheem Mitha
-- System Information
Package: summit.debconf.org
Severity: minor
In http://debconf15.debconf.org/registration.xhtml described is
mis-spelled a couple of times as decribed (missing 's').
Regards, Faheem
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.1
APT prefers
or something very similar.
calibre Mike\ Davis\ -\ Late\ Victorian\ Holocausts_El\ Nino\ Famines\ and\
the\ Making\ of\ the\ Third\ World.epub
Failed to unpickle stored object:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/lib/calibre/calibre/utils/config.py, line 215, in refresh
d =
Hi,
I opened http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=15566
Faheem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I was able to reproduce most of these test failures using vanilla Cmake
sources. Thanks to Nils Gladitz for the suggestion. Nils also suggested
that I report this upstream if I can reproduce it on master, so I'll check
master next.
A summary of the test failures with the vanilla
Package: apt
Version: 1.0.9.8
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
I noticed that if I switch servers, apt goes ahead and re-downloads
the package file information from scratch, completely ignoring the
already existing file. But usually these files are similar, if not
identical. Also, as of the
Package: x11-common
Version: 1:7.7+7
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
While debugging a recent upgrade to jessie, I tried logging in with
the failsafe option. This apparently just starts up a terminal
specifically the terminal currently set in `x-terminal-emulator`. In
my particular case,
something, please reopen this bug report.
Thanks.
Regards, Faheem Mitha
On Sun, 12 Apr 2015, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the texlive-latex-base package
Hi Antonion,
See at bottom.
On Wed, 7 Jan 2015, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Hello Faheem,
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 09:36:23PM +0530, Faheem Mitha wrote:
Package: ruby2.1
Version: 2.1.5-1
Severity: normal
Ruby 2.1 fails to build on Wheezy, even though the build
On Fri, 2 Jan 2015, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Control: tags -1 + pending
Hello,
[snip]
It's actually sorta both. See
debian/patches/texi2html_to_texi2any_migration.patch which we introduced
to migrate from texi2html to texi2any. It happens that upstream didn't
actually checked for
to
file an upstream bug, I may post it upstream as well.
Regards, Faheem Mitha
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.7
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable'),
(50, 'unstable'), (50
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014, Javi Merino wrote:
Hi Faheem,
I've seen that you are using the backported version. As Jessie will
release with 3.1.2, wheezy-backports will stay with 3.1.2. I can
upload 3.2 (well, 3.2.1, which shall be uploaded soon) to
wheezy-backports-sloppy if you are interested in
) command should apply the patches before running any
command, and presumably unapply it afterwards. I don't see a downside
to this.
Regards, Faheem Mitha
###
section of debian/rules dealing
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014, Faheem Mitha wrote:
The subject line says it all. I noticed today that if the patches in
debian/patches are not applied, then
debuild clean
does not apply them, and if a patch is required to run clean
successfully
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014, Faheem Mitha wrote:
Hi Raphael,
Ok, if you don't think it is a bug, please close it.
I'll let Guillem do that if he agrees with me.
Ok.
If you can take a moment, can you advise me what the correct approach to
handling
Hi Javi,
On Thu, 6 Nov 2014, Javi Merino wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 02:58:31PM +0530, Faheem Mitha wrote:
Package: mercurial
Version: 3.1.2-1~bpo70+1
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
Hi Faheem,
Please consider packaging 3.2. I can build it myself, but the Debian
patches have
be helpful. Thanks.
Regards, Faheem Mitha
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.7
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable'),
(50, 'unstable'), (50, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.28~bpo70+1
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
When building an experimental CL implementation, namely
https://github.com/drmeister/clasp with the Debian packaging at
https://bitbucket.org/faheem/clasp-debian
I get the following odd messages. I've not seen them
Package: usbmount
Version: 0.0.22
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
I gather usbmount is not longer maintained, but this trivial patch
adds support for usbmount to mount ntfs filesystems. Please consider
applying it.
Regards, Faheem
This bug is present in 1.5-cvs20081009-1, 6 years later. Was this ever
reported upstream?
Regards, Faheem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Package: smuxi-engine
Version: 0.11~rc5-1~bpo70+1
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
It would be nice to have an init script for smuxi-server in the
smuxi-engine Debian package.
There are a couple of examples at
http://blog.elsdoerfer.name/2010/04/23/init-d-script-for-smuxi-server/
I don't know if
Package: pry
Version: 0.9.12.6-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
pry installs on Debian wheezy (stable) but crashes on startup. I get
faheem@orwell:~$ pry
/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/pry/code.rb:53:in singletonclass':
uninitialized constant MethodSource::CodeHelpers (NameError)
from
Package: apt
Version: 1.0.1ubuntu2
Severity: normal
See http://unix.stackexchange.com/q/148303/4671
Note, this is probably an Ubuntu machine.
Upshot of the issue (note, I was not the person who asked this
question):
If we add the line
to /etc/apt/sources.list, and run
apt-get download
I should have written:
If we add the line
deb http://mirror.cs50.net/appliance50/2014/debs/dists/trusty/main/binary-i386 /
to /etc/apt/sources.list, and run...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi,
If you have some Debian packaging for Kallithea done, can you make it
public, and share the url? Thanks.
Regards, Faheem Mitha
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
On Fri, 11 Jul 2014, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:48:28PM +0530, Faheem Mitha wrote:
Hi,
If you have some Debian packaging for Kallithea done, can you make it
public, and share the url? Thanks.
I haven't pushed anything yet, but
git://anonscm.debian.org/collab
Package: tortoisehg
Version: 3.0
Severity: normal
Just writing this to pass on the report from
https://bitbucket.org/tortoisehg/thg/issue/3814/libqscintilla-not-a-requirement-in-debian
Report pasted below.
Regards, Faheem
###
Anonymous
Hi,
I also think this is a useful feature. The particular use case I'm
interested in is as follows. Currently schroot removes the DISPLAY env
variable, However, I'd prefer if it wasn't, because this breaks
running X applications from inside the chroot.
Loic wrote
I second this feature
Hi Javi (and Max),
On Wed, 18 Jun 2014, Max Bowsher wrote:
On 17/06/14 23:40, Javi Merino wrote:
Control: tags -1 - pending + wontfix
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 09:35:43PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
The problem here is that some manual sed hackery munging the /usr/bin/hg
shebang was removed in
Package: mercurial
Version: 3.0-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
When I backported the mercurial 3.0-1 package in unstable to wheezy,
something odd happened. The hash bang at the top of the installed
/usr/bin/hg in the backported 3.0 mercurial package is
#!/usr/bin/python2.6. This is wrong, of course,
On Sat, 7 Jun 2014, Max Bowsher wrote:
The problem here is that some manual sed hackery munging the /usr/bin/hg
shebang was removed in PAPT SVN r10748, with the justification that
dh_python2 would take care of it automatically.
Unfortunately, it was not considered that the package
On Mon, 26 May 2014, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Hello Faheem,
Am Samstag, den 24.05.2014, 21:36 +0530 schrieb Faheem Mitha:
A more standard wording would be:
It neither supports audio encoding to AAC via faac nor MP4 format
muxing via libmp4v2. It falls back to the MKV format instead
Source: handbrake
Version: 0.9.9+svn6032+dfsg1-2
Severity: minor
The current description includes
It does neither support audio encoding to AAC via faac nor MP4
format muxing via libmp4v2, it falls back to the MKV format
instead.
A more standard wording would be:
It neither
Package: apt
Version: 0.9.7.9+deb7u1
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
Us people on unix.stackexchange.com were discussing autoremove and
related issues, see http://unix.stackexchange.com/a/126375/4671 and
some related discussion starting
http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/15142000#15142000
Package: biber
Version: 1.8-1
Severity: normal
As can easily be checked, biber 1.8 build depends on Perl 5.16, not
5.14, as listed in the build dependencies (see below).
Package: biber
Binary: biber
Version: 1.8-1
Maintainer: Debian TeX maintainers debian-tex-ma...@lists.debian.org
Uploaders:
Hi,
Any update on this bug?
Regards, Faheem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
/lib/dpkg/status
1.15.8.13 0
500 http://debian.lcs.mit.edu/debian/ squeeze/main amd64 Packages
I suggest removing this dependency.
Regards, Faheem Mitha
-- Package-specific info:
IMPORTANT INFORMATION: We will only consider bug reports concerning
the packaging of TeX Live
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014, Rafael Jesús Alcántara Pérez wrote:
El Domingo, 2 de marzo de 2014 22:28:47 Faheem Mitha escribió:
On Sun, 2 Mar 2014, Rafael Jesús Alcántara Pérez wrote:
Hi:
We have been watching this ITP for some months but we have found that
there is no advance. Is there any chance
have to wait till it gets into Debian
(assuming that ever happens). As far as I know it should work, though it
has only been lightly tested.
Regards, Faheem Mitha
--
+--
| Rafael Jesus Alcantara Perez.
| Email: mailto:ralcant
,
Sincerely, Faheem Mitha
On Mon, 30 Sep 2013, Faheem Mitha wrote:
Hi,
I don't mean to be impatient, but would it be possible for the FTP Master
team to make a call on this, please? It does not seem like *so* difficult a
technical issue
to pay
attention.
Thanks.
Regards, Faheem Mitha
Greets.
Rafael J. Alcántara Pérez.
--
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, Daniel Reichelt wrote:
Hi there,
I managed to track down what's going wrong with compiling
jitsi/2.4.4.997-1 on wheezy, although I didn't solve it in the sense
that it is now compilable on plain Wheezy but on a Wheezy-based
system, pulling in some build-depends from
On Tue, 14 Jan 2014, Michael Vogt wrote:
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 01:05:23AM +0530, Faheem Mitha wrote:
Package: apt
Version: 0.9.7.9+deb7u1
Severity: normal
Unlike, for example `apt-cache show` and `apt-cache policy`,
`apt-cache showsrc` shows duplicate entries. I can't see any good
reason
Package: sbcl
Version: 1.1.14
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was the outcome of this action?
Package: apt
Version: 0.9.7.9+deb7u1
Severity: normal
Unlike, for example `apt-cache show` and `apt-cache policy`,
`apt-cache showsrc` shows duplicate entries. I can't see any good
reason for this inconsistency.
For example:
On Mon, 6 Jan 2014, Norbert Preining wrote:
tags 733414 + pending
thanks
This source package, currently only in unstable, fails to build from
source on stable. The build ends with:
git commit 949761d tightens the build-dep to = 4, which is needed.
Tagging the bug as pending
Hi Norbert,
Source: texlive-base
Version: 2013.20131219-1
Severity: normal
This source package, currently only in unstable, fails to build from
source on stable. The build ends with:
dh_installdocs -p texlive-base README readme-txt.dir readme-html.dir
debian/CHANGES.packaging
# nasty trick
# mptopdf needs
Package: mercurial
Version: 2.8.1-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
In rev 10223 of
svn://anonscm.debian.org/python-apps/packages/mercurial/trunk/debian
i.e.
r10223 | mithrandi | 2013-12-06 04:44:57 +0530 (Fri, 06 Dec 2013)
On Sat, 7 Dec 2013, Faheem Mitha wrote:
The
rm tests/test-check-pyflakes.t
breaks repeated builds for me here, specifically `debuild
clean`. Obvious comment: rm returns an error if the file it is asked
to remove does not exist, and once it has been removed, it is not
going to be restored
On Sun, 8 Dec 2013, Faheem Mitha wrote:
On Sat, 7 Dec 2013, Faheem Mitha wrote:
The
rm tests/test-check-pyflakes.t
breaks repeated builds for me here, specifically `debuild
clean`. Obvious comment: rm returns an error if the file it is asked
to remove does not exist, and once
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013, Faheem Mitha wrote:
On looking at this more closely, I see the problem. As you can see from the
error message, the errors occur at the lines
# Move templates and help installed by setup.py to their FHS-correct location
mv
$(CURDIR)/debian/mercurial-common/usr/lib
On Sun, 17 Nov 2013, Javi Merino wrote:
control: tags -1 + moreinfo
control: severity -1 minor
2013/11/17 Javi Merino vi...@debian.org:
I've just done this in a wheezy chroot:
apt-get source -t sid mercurial
cd mercurial-2.8/
dch --bpo
debuild -us -uc
And it built
On Sun, 17 Nov 2013, Javi Merino wrote:
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 10:03:40PM +0530, Faheem Mitha wrote:
Package: mercurial
Version: 2.8-1
Severity: normal
Hi. I tried to rebuild 2.8 from source as stable as I usually do. I
comment out the
override_dh_auto_test:
stanza because the tests often
Getting the same error with 2.8-2.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: mercurial
Version: 2.8-1
Severity: normal
Hi. I tried to rebuild 2.8 from source as stable as I usually do. I
comment out the
override_dh_auto_test:
stanza because the tests often fail, but otherwise don't change anything.
I got
# Move templates and help installed by setup.py to
Package: mercurial
Version: 2.7.2-1~bpo70+1
Severity: normal
Currently, I see the mercurial wheezy backport is
2.7.2-1~bpo70+1 0
100 http://debian.lcs.mit.edu/debian/ wheezy-backports/main amd64
Packages
and `apt-cache show` gives
Package: mercurial
Version: 2.7.2-1~bpo70+1
Hi,
I don't mean to be impatient, but would it be possible for the FTP Master
team to make a call on this, please? It does not seem like *so* difficult
a technical issue.
Thanks, Faheem
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013, Faheem Mitha wrote
Package: apt
Version: 0.9.7.9
Severity: normal
On wheezy amd64, I'm getting:
faheem@orwell:~$ sudo apt-get install libjpeg62-dev libtiff4-dev
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This
On Sat, 28 Sep 2013, David Kalnischkies wrote:
Hi Faheem,
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Faheem Mitha fah...@faheem.info wrote:
On wheezy amd64, I'm getting:
faheem@orwell:~$ sudo apt-get install libjpeg62-dev libtiff4-dev
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013, Faré wrote:
: Faheem Mitha
The main outstanding thing that (probably) should be fixed before the
CCL package itself is ready to be submitted to NEW is to remove the
local copy of ASDF from CCL and configure CCL to look for the Debian
installation of ASDF. I think
Hi Faré,
Sorry to put you to the trouble of having to explain this again. I'm
sure you have had to do it before.
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013, Faré wrote:
Can you elaborate on the reasons why looking to an external ASDF is
not a good idea? I assume that having multiple versions of ASDF in
the archive
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013, Faré wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Faheem Mitha fah...@faheem.info wrote:
But just to play devil's advocate, it is possible to have multiple
versions of ASDF installed simultaneously, right?
Depends what you mean by installed, but I'll take it that you mean
Package: debbugs
Severity: normal
I just sent the following to cont...@bugs.debian.org
retitle 609047 ITP: ccl -- Clozure CL
owner 609047 !
thanks
This gave the error:
###
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 609047 ITP: ccl --
: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 21:00:37 +
From: Luca Falavigna ftpmas...@debian.org
To: Debian Common Lisp Team pkg-common-lisp-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org,
Faheem Mitha fah...@faheem.info, a...@debian.org
Subject: ccl-ffigen_1.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi,
sorry, but we do not think introducing
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Hi,
sorry, but we do not think introducing a convenience copy of gcc
is a good thing. Also, the 4.0 sources contain files licensed under
GFDL with invariant sections, which are not suitable for main.
Please try to build your code using existing gcc
Package: llvm-toolchain-snapshot
Version: 1:3.4~svn183914-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
I tried to rebuild this package on stable. It failed. I tried to
rebuild it again, but the package did not clean itself properly. Build
log is attached. Probably running
debuild -uc -us
twice will reproduce
Package: qcomicbook
Version: 0.8.2-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
I had to install unrar from non-free in order to get qcomicbook to
work. Therefore, I think recommending unrar-free is perhaps not the
right thing to do. Maybe recommend unrar instead?
Additionally qcomicbook 0.9 has now been released.
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was the outcome of this
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013, Niels Thykier wrote:
Control: retitle -1 lintian: 2.5.14 not supported on Squeeze
Control: tags -1 confirmed wontfix
On 2013-07-15 23:06, Faheem Mitha wrote:
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.14
Severity: minor
Hi,
I'm aware that squeeze is no longer stable
1 - 100 of 349 matches
Mail list logo
