Source: texlive-bin
Version: 2024.20240313.70630+ds-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Should not migrate to testing for now.
H.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.5
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500,
Source: biber
Version: 2.20-2
Severity: grave
biber should not migrate to testing for now.
H.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.5
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: arm64 (aarch64)
Foreign
Source: texlive-base
Version: 2024.20240401-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Should not migrate to testing for now.
H.
-- Package-specific info:
IMPORTANT INFORMATION: We will only consider bug reports concerning
the packaging of TeX Live as relevant. If you have
Source: mimalloc
Version: 2.1.4+ds-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs upstream
Dear Maintainer,
as you noticed the version 2.1.4+ds-1 does not build on some arches.
The issue has been discussed in [1], it is likely that the issue has
been solved in 2.1.6. So please package the new version to get
Package: lilypond
Version: 2.24.3-1
Severity: important
Control: affects -1 src:texlive-base
Dear Maintainer,
I recently uploaded TL 2024 to Debian experimental. I just noticed that the
autopkgtex test of your package fails w/ TL 2024. Currently I have no time
frame for the upload of TL 2024 to
* Bump Standards and dh compat version, no changes needed.
* Add upstream metadata file.
* Add "Conflicts: fq".
The package is marked as LowNMU (https://wiki.debian.org/LowThresholdNmu).
Regards,
--
Hilmar Preusse
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: texlive-base
Version: 2022.20230122-3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
I've created a manual page for simpdftex. Consider to include
it into our package.
Hilmar
-- Package-specific info:
IMPORTANT INFORMATION: We will only consider bug reports concerning
the packaging
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
X-Debbugs-Cc: texwo...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:texworks
Control: block #1057407 by -1
In #1057407 we got a request to remove texworks for i386, which is (currently)
the only
Source: mpfi
Version: 1.5.3+ds-6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-tex-ma...@lists.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
I'm on the way to package the TeX Live sources (also known as src:texlive-bin)
for TL 2024. The sources use the library mpfi. Unfortunately(?) the TL
maintainers
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: proftpd-mod-pr...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:proftpd-mod-proxy
[ Reason ]
The version currently in Debian stable suffers from the CVE-2023-48795
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: proftpd-d...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:proftpd-dfsg
[Reason]
The version currently in Debian stable suffers from two
different security issues:
-
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Fix FTBFS with TeXinfo 7.x (Closes: #1030350).
Regards,
--
Hilmar Preusse
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: libpoppler126
Version: 22.12.0-2+b1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
don't care about the system information below, these are just from the
system, running reportbug.
The poppler library has an issue rendering images / fonts correctly, when
running on big endian machines. Assume
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: proftpd-d...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:proftpd-dfsg
This transition was already started by the recent proftpd upload, but is not
caught automatically
Source: texlive-extra
Version: 2023.20231207-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
texlive-extra was uploaded with wrong urgency. Hence
it would migrate to testing earlier than src:texlive-base &
src:texlive-lang. This bug blocks the migration for now, I'll close
it, once the other two packages
Package: sbuild
Version: 0.85.0
Severity: normal
I run sbuild as following:
sbuild --no-run-lintian --arch-all --dist=sid *.dsc -d unstable-amd64-sbuild
, where unstable-amd64-sbuild references a chroot. Updating the chroot is done:
sudo sbuild-update -udcar unstable-amd64-sbuild
Both
e; urgency=medium
.
* Initial release. (Closes: #1032354)
Regards,
--
Hilmar Preusse
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Source: texlive-bin
Version: 2023.20230311.66589-8
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
the luazlib contains a check, which checks if the zlib version it was
linked with (compile time) is the same as which is used during
run time.
Package: zlib1g
Version: 1:1.3.dfsg-2
Followup-For: Bug #1056312
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-tex-ma...@lists.debian.org
Hello Mark,
In 1:1.2.6.dfsg-2 an "Breaks: ... texlive-binaries (<< 2009-12)" statement
was introduced to make sure the broken tl-bin packages are phased out.
We now need the same
Control: block -1 by 1056204
Control: merge -1 1056183
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Control: severity -1 grave
Control: merge -1 1056183
On 19.11.23 François Rozet (francois.rozet...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
> Package: texlive-binaries
> Version: 2023.20230311.66589-7
>
> The luatex binary shipped with texlive is not compatible with zlib 1.3
> (zlib1g 1:1.3.dfsg-2 on Debian
Package: auctex
Version: 12.2-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I intend to salvage that package as a member of the Debian TeX team and
to put it into team maintenance. I contacted Davide G. M. Salvetti two
times [1] and offered a co-maintenance, but did not get a response.
The criteria
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: proftpd-d...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:proftpd-dfsg
[ Reason ]
In Proftp 1.3.8 the buffer size for SSL communicatio set to small,
so some SFTP
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: proftpd-d...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:proftpd-dfsg
This transition was already started by the recent proftpd upload, but is not
caught automatically
Package: raspi-firmware
Version: 1:1.20231024+ds-1+rpt1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 6.4
Hello,
the package fails to install on my system. I simply assumes that /boot/firmware
is a
mount point and fails if this is not the case. If /boot/firmware is expected to
be a
mount point the
Package: autoproject
Version: 0.20-14
Severity: important
With the upload of TeXInfo 7.1 the autopkg test fails to run:
72s autopkgtest [03:20:32]: test test: - - - - - - - - - - results - - - - -
- - - - -
72s test FAIL stderr: gpl.texinfo:1: warning: @setfilename
after the
* Split luajit based binaries into texlive-binaries-sse2 to make
TL usable on non-sse2 capable CPU's at all (Closes: #1041148).
* Remove kfreebsd* from LuaJIT arches.
Regards,
--
Hilmar Preusse
--
sigmentation fault
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
* Split luajit based binaries into texlive-binaries-sse2 to make
TL usable on non-sse2 capable CPU's at all (Closes: #1041148).
Regards,
--
Hilmar Preusse
--
sigmentation fault
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Source: r-bioc-biocstyle
Version: 2.28.0+dfsg-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I just noticed, that the autopkgtest of your package fail, since I uploaded
TL 2023 to unstable [1].
178s You can now run (pdf)latex on ‘maketitle_test_1.tex’
179s Timing stopped at: 0.754 0.102 1.264
179s
Control: retitle -1 RFS: texlive-bin/2023.20230311.66589-4 -- TeX Live: Package
split
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On 27.07.23 Hilmar Preusse (hill...@web.de) wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for m
ncy=medium
.
* Split luajit based binaries into texlive-binaries-sse2 to make
TL usable on non sse2 capable CPU's at all (Closes: #1041148).
Regards,
--
Hilmar Preusse
--
sigmentation fault
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
al release. (Closes: #1041668)
Regards,
--
Hilmar Preusse
--
sigmentation fault
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hilmar Preusse
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: hintview
Version : 1.3.1
Upstream Contact: Martin Ruckert
* URL : https://hint.userweb.mwn.de/
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang: C
ble socket in luatex by default
+(Closes: #1036470).
+
+ -- Hilmar Preusse Mon, 12 Jun 2023 23:19:18 +0200
+
texlive-bin (2022.20220321.62855-5.1) unstable; urgency=high
* Non-maintainer upload.
diff -Nru texlive-bin-2022.20220321.62855/debian/control texlive-bin-2022.20220321.62855/debi
Package: fonts-junicode
Version: 2+git20230104+ds-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
the package description reads:
"This is a TrueType Unicode font targeted at medievalists..."
However the package just contains OpenType fonts since one of the
latest uploads. Not sure if this is intended.
-02 12:56:07.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+texlive-extra (2022.20230122-4) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Apply patch for pstricks.tex to fix dvi color handling
+(Closes: #1035313).
+
+ -- Hilmar Preusse Tue, 02 May 2023 12:56:07 +0200
+
texlive-extra (2022.20230122-3) unstable; urgency
(2.10.07-1) experimental; urgency=medium
.
* Initial release. (Closes: #1034501)
Regards,
--
Hilmar Preusse
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hilmar Preusse
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
I'm not fully sure about the final name of the source package. The OpenSuSE
people name it texlive-context-bin, maybe I'll use a similar naming.
* Package name: luametatex
Version
Package: release-notes
Followup-For: Bug #1033877
Control: retitle -1 "general version mismatch in release notes."
Dear Maintainer,
all information in section "x.y.z. Desktops and well known packages"
are still outdated. When one compares that section from
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: texlive-b...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:texlive-base
Please unblock package src:texlive-base. I did not upload the
package to unstable, I'd like to hear
+0100
+++ texlive-extra-2022.20230122/debian/changelog 2023-02-15 13:55:21.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+texlive-extra (2022.20230122-3) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Apply patch for ooffice.4ht to fix conversion LaTeX ->
+OOffice documents (Closes: #1033008).
+
+ -- Hilmar Preusse We
Package: nagios-plugins-basic
Version: 2.3.3-4
Followup-For: Bug #516097
Please note that the PR related to the upstream issue was merged
to the master branch today so it will be part in one of the next
releases. Consider the patch in one of the next uploads.
Hilmar
-- System Information:
ncy=medium
.
* Initial release. (Closes: #1032354)
Regards,
--
Hilmar Preusse
--
sigmentation fault
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hilmar Preusse
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: srcpd
Version : 2.1.5
Upstream Contact: Guido Scholz
* URL : https://sourceforge.net/projects/srcpd/
* License : GPL2
Programming Lang: C
On 25.02.23 Gard Spreemann (g...@nonempty.org) wrote:
Hi Gard,
> Installing a combination like
>
> texlive-latex-base texlive-latex-recommended texlive-latex-extra
> texlive-pictures texlive-luatex texlive-pictures-doc
>
> on a fresh Bullseye system with no TeX packages present fails with
>
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package
"monitoring-plugins-check-oracle-health":
* Package name : monitoring-plugins-check-oracle-health
Version : 3.3.2.1-1
Upstream contact : Gerhard Laußer
* URL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hilmar Preusse
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: monitoring-plugins-check-oracle-health
Version : 3.3.2.1
Upstream Contact: Gerhard Laußer
* URL : https://labs.consol.de/de/nagios/check_oracle_health
Source: gnustep-make
Version: 2.9.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs patch
Usertags: texinfo70
the package fails to build from source when using TeX Info 7.0.x. This
happens due to this change:
,
| 7.0 (7 November 2022)
| * texi2any
| . HTML output:
| . use manual_name_html as output
Source: gnustep-dl2
Version: 0.12.0-15.1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
Usertags: texinfo70
Dear Maintainer,
the package fails to build from source when using TeX Info 7.0.x. This
happens probably due to this change:
,
| 7.0 (7 November 2022)
| * texi2any
| . HTML output:
| . use
Source: flite
Version: 2.2-5
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs patch
Usertags: texinfo70
the package fails to build from source when using TeX Info 7.0.x. This
happens due to this change:
,
| 7.0 (7 November 2022)
| * texi2any
| . HTML output:
| . use manual_name_html as output directory
Source: proofgeneral
Version: 4.4.1~pre170114-1.2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs patch
Usertags: texinfo70
the package fails to build from source when using TeX Info 7.0.x. This
happens due to this change:
,
| 7.0 (7 November 2022)
| * texi2any
| . HTML output:
| . use
Package: recode
Version: 3.6-24
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs patch
Usertags: texinfo70
Dear Maintainer,
the package fails to build from source when using TeX Info 7.0.x. This
happens due to this change:
,
| 7.0 (7 November 2022)
| * texi2any
| . HTML output:
| . use
Package: sharutils
Version: 1:4.15.2-8
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs patch
Usertags: texinfo70
Dear Maintainer,
the package fails to build from source when using TeX Info 7.0.x. This
happens due to this change:
,
| 7.0 (7 November 2022)
| * texi2any
| . HTML output:
| . use
Package: wdiff
Version: 1.2.2-4
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs patch
Usertags: texinfo70
Dear Maintainer,
the package fails to build from source when using TeX Info 7.0.x. This
happens due to this change:
,
| 7.0 (7 November 2022)
| * texi2any
| . HTML output:
| . use
Source: festival
Version: 1:2.5.0-9
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs patch
Usertags: texinfo70
Dear Maintainer,
the package fails to build from source when using TeX Info 7.0.x. This
happens due to this change:
,
| 7.0 (7 November 2022)
| * texi2any
| . HTML output:
| . use
Source: avrdude
Version: 6.3-20171130+svn1429-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs patch
Usertags: texinfo70
Dear Maintainer,
the package fails to build from source when using TeX Info 7.0.x. This
happens due to this change:
,
| 7.0 (7 November 2022)
| * texi2any
| . HTML output:
| . use
Package: m4
Version: 1.4.19-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs patch
Usertags: texinfo70
Dear Maintainer,
the package fails to build from source when using TeX Info 7.0.x. This
happens due to this change:
,
| 7.0 (7 November 2022)
| * texi2any
| . HTML output:
| . use manual_name_html
Source: fweb
Version: 1.62-14
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs patch
Usertags: texinfo70
Dear Maintainer,
the package fails to build from source when using TeX Info 7.0.x. This
happens due to this change:
,
| 7.0 (7 November 2022)
| * texi2any
| . HTML output:
| . use manual_name_html
Source: elpa-transient
Version: 0.3.7-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
Usertags: texinfo70
Dear Maintainer,
the package fails to build from source when using TeX Info 7.0.x. This
happens due to this change:
,
| 7.0 (7 November 2022)
| * texi2any
| . HTML output:
| . use
Source: quelcom
Version: 0.4.0-16
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs patch
Usertags: texinfo70
Dear Maintainer,
the package fails to build from source when using TeX Info 7.0.x. This
happens due to this change:
,
| 7.0 (7 November 2022)
| * texi2any
| . HTML output:
| . use
Source: gnushogi
Version: 1.4.2-7
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
Usertags: texinfo70
Dear Maintainer,
the package fails to build from source when using TeX Info 7.0.x. This
happens due to this change:
,
| 7.0 (7 November 2022)
| * texi2any
| . HTML output:
| . use manual_name_html as
Package: diffutils
Version: 1:3.8-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
Usertags: texinfo70
Dear Maintainer,
the package fails to build from source when using TeX Info 7.0.x. This
happens due to this change:
,
| 7.0 (7 November 2022)
| * texi2any
| . HTML output:
| . use manual_name_html
Source: octave
Version: 7.3.0-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
Usertags: texinfo70
Dear Maintainer,
the package octave runs into a endless loop when trying to build with
TeXInfo 7.0.x. It happens, when ./doc/interpreter/mk-qthelp.pl is called:
perl ./doc/interpreter/mk-qthelp.pl octave.html
Source: pycirkuit
Version: 0.5.1-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Bug submitted as "important" for now, could be RC instead.
A few days ago I uploaded a new TeX Live snapshot. Since
then the test suite of your package fails to run, see [1].
Interestingly I can run the line from the test
Source: texlive-lang
Version: 2022.20230122-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Dear Maintainer,
TL-base & TL-extra won't migrate to testing for now, cause they break
other packages (latexml & pycirkuit). Therefore I block TL-lang too
until the other issues are sorted
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
the vcswatch service currently fails to run:
"Error: fatal: Unable to create
'/srv/scratch/qa.debian.org/vcswatch/c/cm-super/shallow.lock': No
space left on device"
this hits a few of my git repositories. Please be so kind to solve
;: override and fix.
- Fix "bad-whatis" in texi2dvi.1 manual page.
- Fix "no-dep5-copyright".
Regards,
--
Hilmar Preusse
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: lintian
Version: 2.115.3
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I was wondering, why my lintian overrides did not work as expected. Then I
found out that the named test does not generate reproducible results.
Test suite:
hille@sid-amd64:~$ dget -d
Package: file
Version: 1:5.41-4
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
I just read the lintian report of texlive-extra. It reads:
texlive-extra 2022.20221123-2 warning source-contains-prebuilt-windows-binary
[texmf-dist/fonts/vf/public/cooperhewitt/CpHwt-Heavy-sup-t1.vf]
I was wondering how this
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: proftpd-d...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:proftpd-dfsg
This transition was already started by the recent proftpd upload, but is
not caught caught
Source: texlive-lang
Version: 2022.20221123-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Dear Maintainer,
this piece of software is tightly bind to package texlive-extra.
This package in turn currently can't migrate to testing due to
incompatibility to LaTeXML. The issue is
Source: texlive-base
Version: 2022.20221123-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Dear Maintainer,
this piece of software is tightly bind to package texlive-extra.
This package in turn currently can't migrate to testing due to
incompatibility to LaTeXML. The issue is
Package: pyqt5-dev-tools
Version: 5.15.7+dfsg-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
not sure if this is a duplicate of an existing (closed) bug, but for me this
tool
still generates not reproducible output.
We use that tool in package asymptote like this:
Control: retitle -1 ITP: monitoring-plugins-check-logfiles -- Nagios plugin
check_logfiles
On 04.11.22 Hilmar Preusse (hill...@web.de) wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Hilmar Preusse
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
>
> * Package name: ch
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hilmar Preusse
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: check-logfiles
Version : 4.1
Upstream Author : Gerhard Laußer
* URL : https://labs.consol.de/nagios/check_logfiles/
* License : GPL
Control: reassign -1 texlive-latex-base
On 29.07.22 Lucas Nussbaum (lu...@debian.org) wrote:
Hi,
this happened due to a change in doc package. Reassign to
texlive-latex-base for now, will close shortly.
Hilmar
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/brucemiller/LaTeXML/issues/1963
On 12.10.22 Hilmar Preusse (hill...@web.de) wrote:
Dear Maintainer,
> This is just for the records: since the latest upload of
> texlive-base/texlive-lang/texlive-extra snapshot the latexml
> test suite fai
Package: latexml
Version: 0.8.6-4
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
This is just for the records: since the latest upload of
texlive-base/texlive-lang/texlive-extra snapshot the latexml
test suite fails to run. The issue is known in upstream.
Hilmar
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Control: forwarded -1
https://github.com/huertatipografica/Alegreya-Sans/issues/24
On 10.11.19 Adam Borowski (kilob...@angband.pl) wrote:
Hi,
> I'm afraid your package fails to build from source:
>
I made the mistake to declare a Dep on your package w/o checking
before if there are RC bugs on
n download the package with 'dget' using this command:
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tex-gyre/tex-gyre_20180621-4.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
tex-gyre (20180621-4) unstable; urgency=medium
.
[ Hilmar Preusse ]
* Lintian
W: tex-gyre source: p
Package: texlive-base
Version: 2022.20220722-1
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
during setup of the package we see a lot of:
Setting up texlive-base (2022.20220722-1) ...
grep: warning: stray \ before /
grep: warning: stray \ before /
grep: warning: stray \ before /
grep: warning: stray \
Package: lintian
Version: 2.115.3
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
the upstream source code of package "asymptote" contains the rapidjson.
Lintian correctly complains: license-problem-json-evil .
However that license file states:
"If you have downloaded a copy of the RapidJSON source code
Control: retitle -1 PSTricks requests to use -dALLOWPSTRANSPARENCY even if not
needed.
On 07.01.22 Peter Mueller (petermuel...@ro.ru) wrote:
Hi,
giving that bug a sane title.
Hilmar
> From: Peter Mueller
> Reply-To: Peter Mueller , 1003...@bugs.debian.org
> To: submit
> Subject:
Source: auto-multiple-choice
Version: 1.5.2-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
yesterday I uploaded a new snapshot of LaTeX packages. Since then the test
suite of your package fails to run [1]. Unfortunately the error message
does not give an idea, what the root cause could be.
Please be so
Package: cdcd
Version: 0.6.6-13.1+b4
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
your package declares a dependency on "install-info". However this dependency
should only be needed for info viewers, as they have to care about updating
the info index.
Your package do not seem to be an info viewer hence the
Package: barcode
Version: 0.99-5
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
your package declares a dependency on "install-info". However this dependency
should only be needed for info viewers, as they have to care about updating
the info index.
Your package do not seem to be an info viewer hence the
Package: allegro4-doc
Version: 2:4.4.3.1-2
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
your package declares a dependency on "install-info". However this dependency
should only be needed for info viewers, as they have to care about updating
the info index.
Your package do not seem to be an info viewer
Package: acl2-doc
Version: 8.4dfsg-2
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
your package declares a dependency on "install-info". However this dependency
should only be needed for info viewers, as they have to care about updating
the info index.
Your package do not seem to be an info viewer hence the
On 21.06.22 hud...@hudsonlacerda.com (hud...@hudsonlacerda.com) wrote:
Hi Hudson,
> I noticed "info" only crashes when called in a pt_BR environment:
>
> LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 info octave(OK)
> LANGUAGE=13_97.UTF-8 info octave(OK!)
> LANGUAGE=⍒⍋_⊣⊢.UTF-8 info octave (OK!!!)
>
Package: gnubik
Version: 2.4.3-3+b3
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
The package declares a dep on "install-info". However this dep should only
be needed for info viewers, as they have to care about updating the info index.
Your package do not seem to be an info viewer hence the Dep on
Package: gettext
Version: 0.21-6
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
The package declare a dep on "install-info". However this dep should only
be needed for info viewers, as they have to care about updating the info index.
Your package do not seem to be an info viewer hence the Dep on
Package: w3m-el-snapshot
Version: 1.4.632+0.20220414.2221.89ed3cf-1
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
The package declare a dep on "install-info". However this dep should only
be needed for info viewers, as they have to care about updating the info index.
Your package do not seem to be an info
Package: guile-cairo-dev
Version: 1.11.2-5
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
The package declare a dep on "install-info". However this dep should only
be needed for info viewers, as they have to care about updating the info index.
Your package do not seem to be an info viewer hence the Dep on
Package: w3m-el
Version: 1.4.632+0.20210201.2305.54c3ccd-1
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
The package declare a dep on "install-info". However this dep should only
be needed for info viewers, as they have to care about updating the info index.
Your package do not seem to be an info viewer
Package: guile-3.0-doc
Version: 3.0.8-2
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
The package declare a dep on "install-info". However this dep should only
be needed for info viewers, as they have to care about updating the info index.
Your package do not seem to be an info viewer hence the Dep on
Package: guile-2.2-doc
Version: 2.2.7+1-6
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
The package declare a dep on "install-info". However this dep should only
be needed for info viewers, as they have to care about updating the info index.
Your package do not seem to be an info viewer hence the Dep on
Package: gsasl
Version: 1.10.0-5+b1
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
The bug hits the package from experimental too.
These packages declare a dep on "install-info". However this dep should only
be needed for info viewers, as they have to care about updating the info index.
Your packages do not
Package: librplay3
Version: 3.3.2-18
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
The bug hits the following packages too, I guess they come
from the same source: librplay3-dev
These packages declare a dep on "install-info". However this dep should only
be needed for info viewers, as they have to care
Package: bash-doc
Version: 5.2~beta-1
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
The version in Debian unstable is affected too.
These packages declare a dep on "install-info". However this dep should only
be needed for info viewers, as they have to care about updating the info index.
Your packages do
Package: readline-common
Version: 8.1.2-1.2
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
Version in experimental is affected too, further package readline-doc.
These packages declare a dep on "install-info". However this dep should only
be needed for info viewers, as they have to care about updating the
1 - 100 of 1684 matches
Mail list logo
