On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 11:24:00AM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
GHC 7.4.1 started to ship and expose the binary library, version
0.5.0.3. On hackage is binary-0.5.1.0.
Actually, 7.4.1 comes with 0.5.1.0. The release notes have the wrong
version number, unfortunately.
* Use the version
And as the failures come when building the in-tree ghc-pwd copy, it
looks like we have a misbuild. This is what my explicit -optl-pthread
hack was to get around — so the ghc-pwd build links correctly.
I've added Ian (Lynagh) to cc. Ian, do you have any insight here? Do
we need to add AC_SEARCH_LIBS checks
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 12:54:49AM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Ian Lynagh wrote:
With the attached Makefile, make 3.80+3.81.b4-1 is much slower than
3.80-9 at running make -wr stage1/ghc-6.4.1 (only a few seconds in the
cutdown case, but more in the real thing - I never waited
Package: rubber
Version: 1.1-2.2
Severity: normal
$ rubber -p foo.tex
compiling foo.tex...
compiling foo.tex...
running dvips on foo.dvi...
$ rubber-info foo
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/rubber-info, line 9, in module
Main()(sys.argv[1:])
File
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 04:45:29PM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Ian,
I heard on the debian-haskell mailing list that this is up for adoption.
Is that so?
Yes.
If it is, I'd be happy to adopt it, bring it up to date and
add a man page.
Great; please adopt away.
Thanks
Ian
--
On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 02:01:39AM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
I’d like to bring up
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=464364
again, because haddock 2 has some features I’d really like to see.
GHC 6.10 will include haddock 2.
Thanks
Ian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
This looks like it isn't as simple as I'd assumed:
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/cvs-ghc/2008-June/042779.html
It sounds like currently it would need the haddock source to be put into
the ghc6 package, and the two built together.
Thanks
Ian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 06:40:20PM +0200, Stefan Potyra wrote:
Package: ghc6-doc
(forwarding https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235036 to you), summary:
Thanks for forwarding it, Stefan.
while ghc6-doc provides html pages showing the library sources, it would be
nice if it could also ship the
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 06:58:06PM +0200, Peter Berry wrote:
Though it does beg the question of why there was a ghc6-libsrc package
in the first place.
It was added by a previous maintainer, and at a time when the source
wasn't in the documentation.
Thanks
Ian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 01:45:52AM +0200, Jochem Berndsen wrote:
The ghc6 package does not create a symlink of /usr/bin/ghc-pkg to
ghc-pkg6,
Hmm, it should do. Can you tell me what
update-alternatives --display ghc
says please? And also
ls -l /usr/bin/ghc-pkg
ls -l
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 07:08:20PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 20.05.2008, 12:46 +0100 schrieb Ian Lynagh:
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 04:03:43PM -0500, Spencer Janssen wrote:
What is the status of bug #469852?
It is unlikely to be fixed before ghc6 and all the Haskell
On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 11:41:44AM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
After your upload of GHC 6.8.2-5 the build daemon on powerpc tried to
build a couple of packages of mine (haskell-hsql, haskell-uulib and
haxml) but failed to build them. In the logs I see the following happen:
dh_testdir
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 08:38:37AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
When I try to build programs with -fvia-C, I get:
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option -fno-toplevel-reorder
gcc is 4.2.2-1 here.
Works for me:
$ gcc -fno-toplevel-reorder q.c
$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.2.2 (Debian
Hi David,
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 09:11:07AM -0700, David Fox wrote:
The new haskell-utils 1.11 does a good job of determining what
versions of the library packages to create dependencies on, but the
control file that
results when building haskell-cgi also has strict build dependencies
on
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 01:39:05PM +, Chris Lamb wrote:
The latest version of Haddock (2.0.0.0) was released on January 8th 2008.
Hopefully it can uploaded soon.
I will be being cautious about moving to haddock 2 until it's more
widely used.
Everyone, please let me know if this causes a
Hi Joachim,
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 01:13:59AM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
I’ve stumbled a few times over failing builds because they were using
some of my user-installed haskell packages that were of incompatible
versions.
I’d suggest that the rules file should configure cabal (or
Hi Chris,
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 12:41:47PM +, Chris Lamb wrote:
Version: 6.8.2-1
Would it be possible for debian/copyright to describe which parts of the
upstream tarball that have been removed?
This file currently claims that this package is based on [0]
[0]
Hi Joachim,
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 05:24:08PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
I am doing an NMU upload of version 1.4.1
libghc6-x11-dev is just one small piece of a much larger, more
complicated system, and it is necessary to consider the whole system
when making changes to part of it.
I
Thanks for the report; I can see what the problem is and should have a
fix uploaded soon.
Thanks
Ian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Joachim,
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 06:10:59PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
your rules files use --enable-split-objs for all packages when on i386.
Some packages[1] have problems building with that option,
Do you mean
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=428060
? If so,
Hi Joachim,
On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 08:04:56PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
the xmonad 0.5 packages are now pretty much finished, and I’m just
waiting for the new version of X11 to appear in the archive. Do you mind
if I NMU the new version?
Please do not.
Thanks
Ian
--
To
Hi Dylan,
On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 10:43:28PM +0700, Dylan Thurston wrote:
The page file:///usr/share/doc/ghc6-doc/html/libraries/index.html used
to have links to all of the various modules organized by hierarchy.
This has now disappeared, and so it is difficult to navigate to the
reassign 431843 washngo
thanks
Hi John,
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 07:35:53AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
On Sunday 05 August 2007 6:54:30 am Kurt Roeckx wrote:
I can't reproduce this problem (on amd64) in either stable or unstable.
You won't be able to. You'll only be able to reproduce it
This is fixed in the upstream darcs repo.
Thanks
Ian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Norman,
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 03:48:37PM +0100, Norman Ramsey wrote:
This package installs files into the wrong directories.
Most of what goes into /usr/lib/mtl-1.0.1/ghc-6.6.1 needs to go into
/usr/lib/ghc-6.6.1/imports instead. The .a file needs to go into
/usr/lib/ghc-6.6.1.
for Int always output
64 bits, which looks like it solves the problem. I can't see anything
else likely to cause problems at first glance.
Thanks
Ian
New patches:
[Store Int's as Int64's regardless of how wide Int is
Ian Lynagh [EMAIL PROTECTED]**20070528122649
This is in order to make portable
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 03:18:20PM -0400, Mark Carroll wrote:
Package: ghc6
Version: 6.6-3
Severity: wishlist
Could we have ghc 6.6.1 provided somewhere?
It fixes a few bugs. Thanks.
http://urchin.earth.li/pipermail/debian-haskell/2007-May/000313.html
Thanks
Ian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 03:14:33PM +0100, Frederik Eaton wrote:
# /usr/sbin/update-alternatives --display ghc
ghc - status is manual.
link currently points to /usr/lib/ghc-6.4/bin/ghc
The alternatives system thinks you have manually set ghc to point to ghc
6.4. This is probably due to a
Package: libreadline5
Version: 5.2-2
Severity: normal
The documentation claims
Function: int rl_extend_line_buffer (int len)
but readline.h has
extern void rl_extend_line_buffer PARAMS((int));
and utils.c has
void
rl_extend_line_buffer (len)
int len;
i.e. it returns
reassign 408000 hpodder
thanks
Hi John,
http://tunes.org/~nef/logs/haskell/06.12.08 is the log of the last time
you asked me about this. Grepping for CosmicRay should give most, if not
all, of the relevant lines and little else.
Thanks
Ian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Mon, Dec 25, 2006 at 12:26:02AM +0100, Arjan Oosting wrote:
I have tracked them down and I am going to upload a NMU in a moment.
Attached is the interdiff.
Fantastic, thanks!
Greetings and a Merry Christmas,
And to you!
Thanks
Ian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 08:05:50PM +0100, Arjan Oosting wrote:
When compiled with ghc -package GLUT -lglut tut.hs it works fine. When
the ghc is called with -package GLUT it should imply -lglut.
We should get
ld-options: -lglut -lSM -lICE -lXmu -lXi -lGLU -lGL -lm
in
severity 403842 normal
thanks
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 06:24:29PM -0600, JP Sugarbroad wrote:
% hmake -ghc test.hs
MkProg: hmake: the compiler 'ghc' is not known.
You can use
hmake -hc=ghc6 test.hs
or, after running the following:
hmake-config new
hmake-config add ghc
or just
Package: libc6-dbg
Version: 2.3.6.ds1-8
Severity: normal
Edited highlights of a conversation on IRC with Daniel Jacobowitz (drow):
Igloo I have the impression that I should be able to use gdb to step
into libc functions if I set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to /usr/lib/debug, but
it doesn't seem to
Hi John,
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 03:32:30PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
I am also seeing a lot of this:
Program error: handle: IO.getContents: protocol error (invalid
character encoding)
Do you have a way to reproduce this, either with 0.7 or 0.8?
Also, what arch are you using?
Version: 6.6-1
6.6-1 successfully built 6.6-2.
Thanks
Ian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Version: 6.4.1-2
Sparc started being built unregisterised in 6.4.1-2, fixing this
problem.
Thanks
Ian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Arjan,
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 02:55:45PM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
I have prepared a diff.gz for the new upstream release.
Thanks, I'll take a look.
I could not test the build with GHC 6.6 yet as libghc6-readline-dev is
not available yet.
It should be provided by ghc6 - please let
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 12:07:43PM -0400, Bryan Donlan wrote:
ghc6 6.6-1 no longer includes the mtl package:
It is now packaged separately as libghc6-mtl-dev, and I've just uploaded
it. It'll have to be manually processed out of the NEW queue as it is a
new package, though.
I'll leave this
I have a patched 6.6 RC that seems to work, albeit currently overly
cautious (and hence slower than necessary).
Thanks
Ian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Emilio,
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 04:15:02PM +0200, Emilio Gallego wrote:
I'm glad to see ghc-cvs updated again, thank you very much! But
I've been testing my Haskell programs against it,
Thanks for doing the testing!
I'm aware that beginning with ghc 6.6, lots of extra libs won't be
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 04:28:37PM -0700, David Fox wrote:
It is very helpful to have the configured versions of the files in mk
for building some external libraries.
Do you have any examples of libraries that need this, and what they need
it for?
Thanks
Ian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 10:04:29AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
Are you going to upload it any time soon?
Yes (possibly this weekend, but that might well turn out to be
infeasible).
Thanks
Ian, with a strong sense of deja vu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Hi Dieter,
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 03:48:23PM +0200, Dieter Schuster wrote:
If I have the following file, then gchi-6.4.1 will crash on PowerPC if
I try to create a Object of type Test.
--
module Bug where
data Test =
Hi Arjan,
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 04:41:20PM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
I am preparing an NMU of hat
My plan has been to file a bug requesting hat's removal. If you would
like to take over the package then please feel free, but an NMU would
probably be a waste of effort.
Thanks
Ian
--
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 03:23:31PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
I'm willing to do a binNMU build of ghc6 with gcc-4.1 to ensure that
works and to get us in sync.
Will future maintainer uploads then build OK on m68k, or will I need to
build-dep on and explicitly use gcc-4.1?
However, I
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 09:15:20AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
On 06-Mar-31 00:15, John Goerzen wrote:
There may be better ways to do that -- perhaps -mminimal-toc for gcc?
Yes, something like this would be better.
I've forwarded the suggestion to the Gentoo guys. However, in Debian
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 07:50:06AM -0500, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
The source for HaXml is in the corresponding ghc6-libsrc package,
but imports are nowhere to be found.
HaXml is not built by the upstream GHC by default, and furthermore we
believe that, where possible, libraries in Debian should
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 04:06:08AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
Package: ghc6
Severity: wishlist
- Forwarded message from Jeffrey Bolden [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
This came up in a websearch. But there is a manpage for GHC you may
just want to forward this to whomever would be
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 07:16:27AM -0600, Taral wrote:
I'm sorry, I must not have been clear. The problem here isn't that amd64
wasn't registerised (that was already noted). It was that unregisterised
build need to have the NCG disabled to prevent them having this same
problem.
I'm sure
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 12:06:27PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
Package: ghc6
Version: 6.4.1-2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of ghc6_6.4.1-2 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 85
[...]
Hi Jurij,
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 09:40:49AM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
As it appears that upstream is reluctant to consider it a bug in make
(see 346248 for discussion), I started playing with ghc6 build system in
an attempt to come up with a workaround. I was able to build it in under
Hi Jurij,
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 11:49:32PM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
There has been no improvement on ghc6 situation on sparc since December.
At the moment about 20 packages FTBFS there due to the fact that ghc6 is
unusable. It would be great if you could do something about it, or give
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 12:15:55PM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
So, it looks like there are more severe problems on sparc than the ones
you've mentioned.
I know ghc6 is broken on sparc, but when it is also unbuildable
/everywhere/ I can't fix it.
If it's important to you to do a binary-only
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 09:59:44AM -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
I was writing a program that needed large quantities of random numbers,
and so I used randomRs to generate a stream that I could consume:
map (lineChars!) $ randomRs (bounds lineChars) g
lineChars is of course an array
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 10:56:53AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
Ian is right, make has now been processing ghc6 for 11 hours
(/tmp/buildd/ghc6-6.4.1/ghc/compiler). Why did you say, that you
think it eventually terminates?
Because the testcase I gave when reporting the bug terminates, and I
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 01:33:20AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
ghc6 compilation sends make into an infinite loop
This sounds like http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=346248
I don't believe it's infinite, incidentally.
This can run for many minutes..
For days, IME.
Thanks
Ian
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 04:43:37PM +, Ian Lynagh wrote:
With the attached Makefile, make 3.80+3.81.b4-1 is much slower than
3.80-9 at running make -wr stage1/ghc-6.4.1 (only a few seconds in the
cutdown case, but more in the real thing - I never waited for it to
terminate to know how
tags 337603 +unreproducible
On raptor I get well past the failure the buildd saw, failing at the
install point the other arches failed at instead.
Can anyone reproduce this?
Thanks
Ian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Package: make
Version: 3.80-9
Severity: normal
With the attached Makefile, make 3.80+3.81.b4-1 is much slower than
3.80-9 at running make -wr stage1/ghc-6.4.1 (only a few seconds in the
cutdown case, but more in the real thing - I never waited for it to
terminate to know how much more).
Thanks
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 06:26:16AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
The original bug appears to be limited to s390. I see binary packages
have been built for 8 platforms without trouble. I believe the bug
lies with GHC, so I am reassigning this bug to ghc6.
I'll try and have a look when DA have
Hi all,
These look like symptoms of bitrot in ghc6's registerised sparc support.
I'll make it unregisterised for the next ghc6 upload, but this won't
happen until I can install ghc6's build-deps again (#338327 / #340076).
Thanks
Ian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 09:19:41AM +0100, Matej Vela wrote:
Package: ghc6
Version: 6.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: causes an FTBFS for haskelldb, washngo
Tags: upstream patch
Thanks. I'll look into this once ghc6's build-depends are in order.
Ian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 12:50:57PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Hello! It appears that ghc6 still needs bootstrapping on sparc and m68k.
AFAIK these have unrelated problems and all bootstrapping is done.
#33 looks like the bug to me.
Thanks
Ian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 07:13:25PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 12:47:36PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 12:35:31PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Package: pugs
Version: 6.2.9-1
Severity: important
Your package is failing to build on 64 bit
Hi Florian,
See forwarded e-mail.
Thanks
Ian
---BeginMessage---
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 06:22:35PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 07:13:25PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 12:47:36PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 12:35:31PM +0200
Hi Kurt,
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 12:35:31PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Package: pugs
Version: 6.2.9-1
Severity: important
Your package is failing to build on 64 bit arches with the
following error:
Triggering rebuild... done.
Generating precompiled Prelude... pugs: internal error:
reassign 283981 alex, ghc-cvs, haddock
thanks
ghc6 removed: 6.4.1-1 built with gcc 4.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
ghc5 is uninstallable, obsolete and doesn't build with the current
toolchain. Please remove it (all arches and source).
Brief discussion at:
http://urchin.earth.li/pipermail/debian-haskell/2005-September/000124.html
Thanks
Ian
-- System Information:
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
nhc98 can no longer cover the arches ghc doesn't build on, and hasn't
followed important development of the Haskell language.
Please remove it from unstable (all arches and source).
Brief discussion at:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 08:45:31AM +0200, Florian Ragwitz wrote:
ghc 6.4.1 has been released. Please update your package.
The current plan is to wait until the gmp transition has happened before
doing that.
In the mean time, there are source and binary packages in the i386
Haskell Unsafe repo
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 11:45:48AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On which arch did you test that ?
x86.
Thanks
Ian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just had a quick look at this.
This is reproducible for me (note the changing result):
$ dchroot
Executing shell in 'unstable' chroot.
$ xsltproc /html/docbook.xsl conftest.xml; echo $?
warning: failed to load external entity /html/docbook.xsl
cannot parse /html/docbook.xsl
0
$ xsltproc
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 02:30:31PM -0700, Isaac Jones wrote:
So what needs to happen for the GHC
bootstrapping is that a binary version of GHC needs to get uploaded to
each platform? I'm still wondering if Ian is planning to let it enter
testing at that point.
If GHC
Hi Kurt,
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:04:22AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
I would like to get a new version of ghc6 into unstable soon.
I think it's best to build the current version with gcc 3.3.
Upstream seem to be taking a while to get the new release out
Yeah; the release seemed imminent
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 04:52:13PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
I was experimenting with writing a functional heap when I got the following
error from ghc:
ghc-6.4: panic! (the `impossible' happened, GHC version 6.4):
ds_app_type PriorityQueue.PriorityQueue{tc r1qv} [k{tv a1vx}]
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 07:08:54PM -0500, Eric Etheridge wrote:
Then I searched for libsm.a in the debian packages, found that it was in
libsm-dev, and installed that:
I searched for libxmu.a, found it was in libxmu-dev, and installed that.
That was enough for successful compilation.
It
Package: libghc6-cabal-dev
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
libghc6-cabal-dev depends on ghc6 ( 6.2.3), but 6.4-4 is currently in
unstable. Thus it is uninstallable.
This is causing other packages to fail to build, e.g.:
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 10:30:24PM -0700, Isaac Jones wrote:
I believe that GHC 6.4 should come with Cabal, but I'm not positive
about what Ian decided. Ian: Does it come with Cabal?
All the latest versions of the implementations come with cabal (although
the nhc98 with cabal isn't yet
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 04:01:04AM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
Is this bug already coordinated with ghc upstream.
Yes. One problem is already found and fixed, but it looks like there is
at least one still to go...
Thanks
Ian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 08:21:45PM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote:
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 08:18:43PM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote:
hppa people, any idea what's going on?
echo 1 /proc/sys/kernel/unaligned-trap
and try again.
Gah. Let me try that again from the top.
echo 0
tags 309025 +unreproducible
thanks
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 03:44:02PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
Package: ghc6
Version: 6.4-3
Severity: important
Tags: sid
From the build log at
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=missinghver=0.11.0arch=hppastamp=1115974118file=logas=raw
make setup
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 02:47:05AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the patient explanation. I know it's too late, but ...
The locale based filename thing in hugs is also a concern, though, in my
opinion. Currently two packages build-depend on hugs: haskell-utils and
cpphs. I
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 11:12:55AM +0100, Ross Paterson wrote:
Ian Lynagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We're not sure the new hugs should go into sarge without matching new
ghc/nhc98 due to library changes. We also need to check these changes
don't cause any breakage elsewhere.
What
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 06:21:00AM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
cd ./codeGen/should_compile
'/tmp/buildd/ghc-cvs-20050331/ghc/compiler/stage2/ghc-inplace' -no-recomp
-dcore-lint -Dsparc_unknown_linux -c cg002.hs -O -prof -auto-all
cg002.comp.stderr 21
Compile failed (status 25344)
---BeginMessage---
Gérard Milmeister [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I cannot compile nhc98 1.18 on Fedora Core 3 with gcc 3.4.3.
The same was the case with nhc98 1.17 and 1.16.
Here is the problem:
OS allocated a heap in high memory (0x8000)
which breaks this program's run-time system.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 11:55:18AM +, Ross Paterson wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 03:54:19AM +, Ian Lynagh wrote:
Do you have a list of functions which behave differently in the new
release to how they did in the previous release?
(I'm not interested in changes that will affect
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 09:54:54PM -0800, Echo Nolan wrote:
Package: ghc6
Version: 6.2.2-3
Severity: wishlist
see http://haskell.org/ghc/download_ghc_64.html
Thanks.
There are some issues with 6.4, so I haven't uploaded it to unstable
yet, but there are i386 deps in experimental.
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 01:38:48PM +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote:
When building 'haddock' on amd64 with gcc-4.0,
amd64 doesn't actually use a later gcc than other arches, right?
This looks like #283981, which I was just letting new upstream versions
fix in the natural order of things, but I
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 01:33:44AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 07:14:25PM +, Ian Lynagh wrote:
Most importantly, though: is there any way to remove this file without
doing something like an FFI import of unlink?
Is there anything LC_CTYPE can be set
Package: hugs
Version: 98.200503.08-1
Severity: normal
We're not sure the new hugs should go into sarge without matching new
ghc/nhc98 due to library changes. We also need to check these changes
don't cause any breakage elsewhere.
Thanks
Ian
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT
severity 299702 serious
thanks
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 10:45:19PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Ian Lynagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-03-15 22:21]:
Package: hugs
Version: 98.200503.08-1
Severity: normal
^^
We're not sure the new hugs should go into sarge without matching
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 10:44:28AM +, Ross Paterson wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 07:38:09PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
I've got some gzip (and Ian Lynagh's Inflate) code that breaks under
the new hugs with:
handle: IO.getContents: protocol error (invalid character encoding)
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
Please can you remove nhc98 on m68k only in unstable?
It produces incorrect code for even trivial programs.
Thanks
Ian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reassign 283981 ghc6, alex, ghc-cvs, haddock
thanks
happy removed: fixed in 1.15-1.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 09:43:18AM -0800, Daniel Schepler wrote:
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 10:41:57PM -0800, Daniel Schepler wrote:
When I set the default compiler to gcc-3.4 instead of -3.3
Can you clarify exactly what you mean here please?
Are you just manually altering the
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 11:27:21AM -, Simon Marlow wrote:
On 10 February 2005 23:35, Ian Lynagh wrote:
I'm no library expert, so there may be a cleaner/simpler/more portable
equivalent to the above.
I'm not that familiar with libtool, but I guess what you're doing here
is creating
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 11:13:36PM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
Package: ghc6
Version: 6.2.2-2
/usr/lib/libpthread.so (comes from libc6-dev 2.3.2.ds1-20) is a GNU
linker script, not a shared object. This breaks ghci.
Known problem:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 07:00:47PM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
Hi Ian,
What is your particular problem?
Running Darcs under ghci.
This seems to work for me (at least in as much as ghci loads and
FastPackedString.lengthPS (FastPackedString.packString Foo)
says 3):
rm -rf .libs
rm
Hi John,
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 08:35:13AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
Although its manpage implies that hmake handles proprocessor flags
automatically in all cases, it dies compiling files that use HaXml
because it tries to process the GHC code (which happens to occur first)
instead of
100 matches
Mail list logo
