On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 11:23:16AM +0200, Thomas Lange wrote:
> Patch applied, and I've changed the URL to be more Debian specific.
Thanks for your quick action!
Should I wait for about 8 more hours before it's live at
https://www.debian.org/events/merchandise ? (Is there some nightly cronjob
ru
ation. Let me know if you have any questions for me
> or if you need more information. Hopefully, Ten Thousand Things will get a
> spot on your page. That would be so frickin' cool! 🤞
>
> --
> Thank you,
>
> Russell Stinnett
> PGP/GPG: 875979EAD8B9BC1A96F27C3C35FD0E
em to agree to the re-licensing
On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 01:23:10PM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
>
> For the record: https://bugs.debian.org/388141 "www.debian.org SPI copyright
> claim not legally valid until all contributors are contacted for relicensing",
> which
Control: retitle -1 ITA: leave -- Reminds you when you have to leave
Picking this one up, with help from urbec. See
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/leave/-/commit/02d26703aefd0811832e6071ed7fcda8a5dd48e2
.
Bye,
Joost
Hi Alexandru,
I guess given the current state of the release cycle, a mini-httpd/1.30-13
should go to experimental now, not unstable? Could you update d/changelog to
reflect that?
Thanks, Bye,
Joost
On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 06:45:36PM +0300, Alexandru Mihail wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-reques
Hi,
Thanks for your feedback. I'm sending this to https://bugs.debian.org/1070482
since it's more useful there I guess.
In general, suggestions for improving the Debian trixie release notes are
useful if posted as bugs to the 'release-notes' pseudo-package. Alternatively,
use our gitlab interfa
Package: klutshnik
Version: 0.1.0-1
Severity: normal
Control: block -1 by 995670
Hi,
klutshnik (0.1.0-1) as in experimental now, calls the upstream makefile,
man/makefile as well as python/setup.py . The stuff in server/ (zig code) is
build nor installed. Once we have a zig compiler in Debian,
Hi,
On Sun, May 11, 2025 at 10:45:19AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Jun 2023 08:04:44 + Holger Levsen
> wrote:
> > maybe we should have a release notes entry stating that debian-edu bookworm
> > is not yet ready?!? :((
> >
> > https://wiki.debian.org/DebianEdu/Status/Bookworm has th
of 10 days old"
as well as
( Date: Sat, 10 May 2025 04:39:03 + , Message-Id:
).
"systraq 20201231-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2025-05-19"
. HTH!
Bye,
Joost
note to self: https://wiki.debian.org/Autoremoval
On Sun, May 04, 2025 at 09:33:28AM +0200, Joost
Help in testing the changes would be very helpful, so if you can
> assist in testing the changes, this would be very appreciated.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > tobi
> >
> >
> > "Joost van Baal-Ilić" joostvb+deb...@uvt.nl – April 28, 2025 9:30 AM
>
tag -1 +wontfix
thanks
Hi Marc e.a.,
Hope this reply after 15 years is still useful to someone...
Le Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 08:46:48AM +0200, Marc MAURICE a écrit :
>·
> for the date in backup filenames, I would use something like the ls -l modif
> time format :
> orig.2008-11-26_16:05
> or
> ori
tags 594305 +wontfix
thanks
Hi Marc,
Le Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 08:44:09AM +0200, Marc MAURICE a écrit :
>·
> I think it would be great to use unified diff format by default (-u option to
> diff). From what I know it has become the most commonly used format.
Yes, that would indeed have been a more
Hi Dan e.a.,
Le Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 05:47:48PM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org a écrit :
> Mention return value
[...]
Thanks for your bugreport, I've spend some time on it.
One can find the setlock source at
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/daemontools/-/blob/debian/latest/daemontools-0.76/src/setloc
Hi Peter,
Le Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 02:40:28PM +0200, Peter T. Breuer a écrit :
>
> Could you please add some basic introductory explanations to the man
> pages (or e'en readme) for update-service and friends (svscan, svc,
> svscanboot)?
Thanks for your bugreport; after 17 years it's still useful
Hi Jonas e.a.,
systraq ships /etc/systraq/filetraq.default since 2004-05 . Usage of this file
is documented in /usr/share/doc/systraq/manual.html :
,--
|
| 2.5.2. filetraq.conf
|
|[...]
|
| If you don't like filetraq's default diff style, but, like me, prefer unified
| diff, do
|
| #
On Sun, May 04, 2025 at 08:56:47AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Joost,
>
> This bug is causing systraq to be removed from testing in two days, before
> the current version in unstable is ready to migrate. I'm pinging it for you
> now, because it resets the autoremoval timer a bit, allowing the v
tags 1102930 +patch
thanks
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 13, 2025 at 12:19:57PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Source: systraq
> Version: 20201231-3
> Severity: grave
> X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> systraq currently fails to install:
>
> Setting up systraq (20201231-3) ..
Hi,
As you're probably aware, issue
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2025-27773 has been open since
March 11, 2025. Is anybody working on fixing this? I could probably help out
with testing prereleases for Debian bullseye.
Thanks, Bye,
Joost
On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 11:56:41AM
Hi Helge,
Thanks for your interest! However, I don't think this would be a good use of
our time: see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1098801#15 .
Once I've finished my publicfile-work, I'll file an RM bug to ftp.debian.org
for the publicfile-installer package.
Thanks again any
Hi again Helge,
On Sat, Mar 29, 2025 at 06:50:50PM +, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Am Sat, Mar 29, 2025 at 06:14:16PM +0100 schrieb Joost van Baal-Ilić:
> > On Sat, Mar 29, 2025 at 03:39:36PM +, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > > Am Sat, Mar 29, 2025 at 03:03:36PM +0100 schr
Hi again Helge,
On Sat, Mar 29, 2025 at 03:39:36PM +, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Am Sat, Mar 29, 2025 at 03:03:36PM +0100 schrieb Joost van Baal-Ilić:
> > On Sat, Mar 29, 2025 at 09:31:04AM +, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > > Am Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 10:37:13AM +0100 schr
Hi Helge,
On Sat, Mar 29, 2025 at 09:31:04AM +, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Am Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 10:37:13AM +0100 schrieb Joost van Baal-Ilić:
> >
> > Thanks for reaching out. An NMU would be very much appreciated!
>
> Thanks for the heads up.
>
> I'm s
Hi Helge,
Thanks for reaching out. An NMU would be very much appreciated!
Thanks, Bye,
Joost
On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 09:28:51AM +, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Hello Joost,
> debian-history has an open translation which you fixed in git. Could
> you kindly upload it before the release of Trix
Hi Gianfranco,
Thanks for your very nice patch.
I asked upstream/debian maintainer, they said:
суб 15 17:19 < proycon> joostvb_: ja, zeker! prima
[ "yes sure, excellent" ] about you taking care of the upload in an NMU. If
you prefer not to, that's fine too and Ko van der Sloot, Maarten "proyc
Hi,
Some more facts on surf segfaulting:
root@nusku:~# apt -V install surf
[...]
Les NOUVEAUX paquets suivants seront installés :
surf (2.1+git20221016-4)
0 mis à jour, 1 nouvellement installés, 0 à enlever et 1 non mis à jour.
joostvb@nusku:~% surf
** (surf:1878339): WARNING **: 13:5
package: www.debian.org
Name: cyon GmbH, Basel, Switserland
Organization Type: commercial
Home page link: https://www.cyon.ch/
"At cyon we’re not just a web hosting company—we’re a digital powerhouse that
empowers makers to craft their own online adventures. With a spirited team of
around 50 exp
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: publicfile
Version : 0.52
Upstream Contact: Daniel J. Bernstein, https://cr.yp.to/lists.html#publicfile
* URL : https://cr.yp.to/publicfile.html
* License : Public Domain
Programming Lang: C
Description :
Hello Pablo,
Obrigado!
I am not quite sure your translation will make it into Debian soon,
unfortunately: The publicfile-installer package should get replaced by a
publicfile package, now that the publicfile software is licensed as Public
Domain software. I'll see if I find the time for that...
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libperl-app-packager
Version : 1.440
Upstream Contact: Johan Vromans
* URL : https://metacpan.org/dist/App-Packager
* License : GPL-1+ or Artistic
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : Abstraction for Pack
Hi Andreas!
[ dropping Shane since his mail is bouncing ]
On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 10:29:22AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Am Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 07:12:27AM +0100 schrieb Joost van Baal-Ilić:
> > > IMHO the dotconf example shows that these established procedures do not
>
Hi all,
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 04:07:13PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Am Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 03:39:06PM +0100 schrieb Tobias Frost:
> > Well, there are established procedures in Debian that should be
> > followed, for example Developers Reference §7.4.
> >
> > Currently we have these¹ ways t
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 10:42:33AM +0100, Sebastian Humenda wrote:
>
> Thanks for taking the time to look into this!
>
> Joost van Baal-Ilić schrieb am 20.02.2025, 7:40 +0100:
> […]
> >
> >> Summary
> >> ===
> >>
> >> If th
Control: tags 1098287 -moreinfo
Hi Phil,
Thanks a lot for taking the time to do your analysis on this one!
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 01:48:01AM +, Phil Wyett wrote:
> On Wed, 2025-02-19 at 21:36 +, Phil Wyett wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 +moreinfo
> >
> > I see Sebastien has updated Salsa
reopen 1093192
thanks
Per the discussion in this bugreport, I don't believe the package vtgrab has
been salvaged in accordance with the Package Salvaging procedure as outlined in
the Developers Reference. Therefore, reopening.
Bye,
Joost
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
Sebastian Humenda is looking for a sponsor for his package freedict-wikdict (
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/freedict-wikdict ). Building it takes ~4 hr on
a normal system. He is a DM but needs a sponsor for "new binary packages"
(whi
Hi наб,
When dealing with #1093192 "ITS: vtgrab", you've set
"Maintainer: Package Salvaging Team "
in https://salsa.debian.org/salvage-team/vtgrab/-/blob/debian/debian/control .
However, you forgot to set the "Uploaders: "-field: no specific individuals
recorded as maintaining this package. I bel
Hi itd,
On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 06:23:22PM +0100, itd wrote:
> Joost van Baal-Ilić writes:
>
> > I guess patching the testing C code in autoconf_local/aclocal.m4 around
> > these
> > lines:
> >
> > 5127 /* function body */
> >
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 03:02:57PM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 11:44:37AM +0100, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
> >
> > In my previous attempts, I was post-editing config.h with sed.
> > I know it's horrible ... but it get things done.
>
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 11:44:37AM +0100, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In my previous attempts, I was post-editing config.h with sed.
> I know it's horrible ... but it get things done.
>
> I was later stuck by the other problems solved by наб
>
> Alexandre
>
> Le sam. 15 févr. 2025 à
Hi David,
Thank you!
Bye,
Joost
On Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 09:05:34PM -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> Control: tags 1092530 + patch
> Control: tags 1092530 + pending
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for daemontools (versioned as 1:0.76-13.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel
Andreas Tille wrote on Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 08:06:40
+0100:
>
> in this bug report you are refering to some commit which can't be
> accessed any more since the repository inside the Alioth archive got
> somehow lost
Maybe I am missing something, but isn't both upstream and debian packaging
now m
Package: wnpp
Control: affects -1 + src:validns
Severity: normal
Hi,
I intend to orphan the validns package.
I've just uploaded to sid with my name removed, and the name of not-DD Casper
Gielen removed.
It is C code, maintained using git on salsa, in the debian group. Latest
upstream commit wa
Package: ftp.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:libsphinx
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
Severity: normal
Hi,
Please remove src:libsphinx: it is no longer maintained upstream and has no
rdeps.
It should not get shipped with upcoming Debian stable release.
Bye,
Joos
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Joost van Baal-Ilić
* Package name: klutshnik
Upstream Author : Stefan Marsiske
* URL : https://github.com/stef/klutshnik
* License : GPLv3
Programming Lang: Python, C
Description : store encrypted OPAQUE-password
Package: cmark
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Version: 0.30.2-6+b2
Hi,
When generating manpages from markdown syntax, cmark uses "\f[C]" to indicate
code (represented between backticks in the markdown source). (It likely uses
this too for code blocks and blockquotes.) This is not valid roff: 'C
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Joost van Baal-Ilić
* Package name: opaque-store
Upstream Author : Stefan Marsiske
* URL : https://github.com/stef/opaque-store
* License : GPLv3
Programming Lang: Zig, Python
Description : store encrypted blobs of
Hi Stefan,
On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 05:13:47PM +0100, Stefan Marsiske wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 04:44:32PM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> > > fixed upstream:
> > > https://github.com/stef/liboprf/commit/ce3f2aa7bb113dc2ca385e602344e0db3925c09c
> >
> >
tags 1092041 +upstream
thanks
Hi Santiago,
For the record: upstream is on it.
Thanks for reporting, Bye,
Joost
Hi Stefan,
On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 04:15:24PM +0100, Stefan Marsiske wrote:
> this is a bug, the rest of liboprf was already using level 3. thank you for
> pointing this out.
Aha!
> fixed upstream:
> https://github.com/stef/liboprf/commit/ce3f2aa7bb113dc2ca385e602344e0db3925c09c
Cool, I'll che
Hi again Gianfranco,
On Sun, Dec 29, 2024 at 03:28:03PM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2024 at 03:12:34PM +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> >
> > Hello, looks like the code is setting FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 directly from
> > makefile, not allowing to ove
Hi Gianfranco,
Thank you for this report + patch!
Stefan: what do you think about it? Would you like to apply it upstream?
Or would you prefer to keep the default on FORTIFY_SOURCE=2?
Gianfranco: I'll wait on Stefan's reply and then decide on how to tackle this
in the Debian packaging.
Bye,
J
Thanks,
Should be fixed with [2024-12-15] libequihash 1.0.10-2 upload.
Will close in due time.
Bye,
Joost
On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 05:51:37PM +, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Package: src:pwdsphinx
> Version: 1.99.2-beta-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
>
> Dear maintainer:
>
> During a rebu
Thanks,
Should be fixed with [2024-12-15] libequihash 1.0.10-2 upload.
Will close in due time.
Bye,
Joost
On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 05:51:39PM +, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Package: src:pyequihash
> Version: 0.2-3
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
>
> Dear maintainer:
>
> During a rebuild of
On Sat, Oct 19, 2024 at 08:55:21PM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2024 at 08:01:01PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > Migration status for libopaque (0.99.3-1 to 0.99.7-2): BLOCKED
[...]
> > Issues preventing migration:
> > ∙ ∙ missing build on ppc64
Hi Paul,
Thanks, I'm in contact with upstream about this.
Hi Stef,
суб 19 20:17 <@joostvb> @ #klutshnik:
>> stf: opaque_CreateRegistrationResponseSegmentation fault
>> @
>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libopaque&arch=ppc64el&ver=0.99.7-2&stamp=1726766202&raw=0
>> it's that
Hi again Stijn,
*ping* ?
BTW, if you prepare a patch, or a .tar.gz, I am happy to do some testing.
C U!
Bye,
Joost
On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 07:41:54AM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> Hi Stijn,
>
> Excellent, thanks a lot!
>
> BTW, I am not quite sure if, from \tt{st
Hi Phil e.a.,
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 03:57:10PM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-10-11 at 16:30 +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> >
> > Now
> >
> > dget -x http://mdcc.cx/tmp/caspar/caspar_20240818-2.dsc
> >
> > should get you a
anks again, Bye,
Joost
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 03:39:51PM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Thanks a lot for this review. I know how to fix the problem, will do another
> release soonish.
>
> Bye,
>
> Joost
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 11:4
Hi Phil,
Thanks a lot for this review. I know how to fix the problem, will do another
release soonish.
Bye,
Joost
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 11:48:00AM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
> Control: tags -1 +moreinfo
>
> Hi Joost,
>
> MAny thanks for your contribution to Debian.
>
> I will not perform
rk on my caspar package.
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "caspar":
* Package name : caspar
Version : 20240818-1
Upstream contact : Joost van Baal-Ilić
* URL : http://mdcc.cx/caspar/
* License : GPL-3+
* Vcs : htt
Hi Andreas,
On Sat, Oct 05, 2024 at 10:53:29AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> this bug came up as some candidate for the Bug of the Day[1] today.
> Usually the package salvage team is creating a Git repository (which I
> did[2] for your comfort in case you might want to keep the package
> either
Hi Holger,
fixed in git in ea279c0..659f9d9 , thanks!
Bye,
Joost
On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 04:43:02PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Package: debian-history
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch,l10n
>
>
> Hi,
>
> attached is an updated german translation for debian-history.
>
> Please include i
severity 1081819 normal
retitle 1081819 liboprf: test tp-dpg-corrupt segfaults on riscv
thanks
Lower severity from serious to normal: liboprf 0.3.2-3 builds fine on all
release architectures (including riscv64), see
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=liboprf .
Adjusting this in order
Hi Helmut,
Thanks for taking care of the debian-timeline bug list.
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 08:17:26AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Control: severity 655664 serious
>
> Hi Ana and others,
>
> I looked into #1032166 as it is an rc bug without activity for prolonged
> time. It asks for debian-tim
Thanks again Yue Gui! It's the same problem as for liboprf. I'll get to it in
a few days.
Bye,
Joost
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 10:52:21AM +0800, Yue Gui wrote:
> Source: libopaque
> Version: 0.99.7-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: FTBFS, patch
> User: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: ris
Hoi,
Op Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 03:11:15AM + schreef benatt...@gezapig.nl:
> X-Debbugs-Cc: team+pyt...@tracker.debian.org, debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org,
> python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org,
> python-modules-t...@alioth-lists.debian.net
Please do not do that. Your bug report will be
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: email-oauth2-proxy
Version : 2024-09-12
Upstream Author : Simon Robinson https://simon.robinson.ac e.a.
* URL : https://github.com/simonrob/email-oauth2-proxy
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Python
De
Hi Étienne,
Thanks for reporting! Just fixed in 4d485c1..c4a6308 @ salsa , will end up in
next FAQ release.
Bye,
Joost
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 11:18:02AM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> Package: debian-faq
> Version: 11.1
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I had a quick lookup at th
Hi Gui-Yue,
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 09:04:28AM +0800, Yue Gui wrote:
> Dear maintainer,
> I'll test that again.By the way, I noticed that this package has upgraded
> to 0.3.2-2,however the modifications i suggested seem not applied.Could you
> give me more information about this upgrade?
I only s
Hi Andreas,
Your assumption is correct, you are very welcome to move metar git/maintenance
to the debian science umbrella.
Thanks!
Bye,
Joost
On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 07:54:02AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> metar showed up as Bug of the Day[1] and I'd like to work on the bugs of
> th
Hi,
FYI: The mclucas package ( program to perform Lucas-Lehmer test on a Mersenne
number) will likely get removed from Debian sid soonish (and won't be released
with upcoming trixie) unless someone spends some time on it soonish.
See https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/mlucas and
https://bugs.debian.o
Op Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 17:27:26 -0800, schreef Kevin Madrid:
> I can adopt this package if still needed.
Yes, please do. I like leave.
Thanks, Bye,
Joost
Hi,
FYI: I've built 11/bullseye and 12/bookworm-binaries of python3-oletools. I've
used the git repo at https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/python-oletools
. For 11/bullseye I had to apply a trivial patch; 12/bookworm builds out of
the box. Binaries and source packages are available from
30d39c61dd05fb5
Author: Joost van Baal-Ilić
Date: Sun Aug 18 09:24:17 2024 +0200
use English, not German spelling for nome de guerre of Lev Davidovich Bronstein
diff --git a/doc/en/03_general_ideas.xml b/doc/en/03_general_ideas.xml
index 19607f1..c74bb00 100644
--- a/doc/en/03_general_idea
Hi again stef,
On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 12:21:10PM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 12:06:44PM +0200, stef wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 07:08:13AM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> > >
> > > I just found out https://pypi.org/proj
On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 12:06:44PM +0200, stef wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 07:08:13AM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> > Hi stef,
> >
> > I just found out https://pypi.org/project/pysodium/#files lacks a
> > pysodium-0.7.18.tar.gz.asc . (It's not publishe
Hi stef,
I just found out https://pypi.org/project/pysodium/#files lacks a
pysodium-0.7.18.tar.gz.asc . (It's not published on
https://github.com/stef/pysodium/releases either.) (You did sign your pysodium
releases in the past, didn't you?) Could you please pgp sign your release,
and upload t
Hi Laura e.a.,
Op Thu, 4 Apr 2019 08:28:53 +0200 schreef Laura Arjona Reina:
>
> It would be nice to gettextize the Debian Social contract.
> The web page of the Debian Social Contract is considered upstream
> version for the package debian-doc, and the Debian flyers also produce a
> LaTeX-based v
iently
> slow for some reason let me know, then I can be quicker.
>
> Best wishes,
> Stijn
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 7:11 PM Joost van Baal-Ilić
> wrote:
>
> > Package: aephea
> > Version: 12-248-3
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Hi *,
&
Package: aephea
Version: 12-248-3
Severity: normal
Hi *,
When using \verbatim{stuff} or \tt{stuff} in an .azm file, the roff output
features
.nf \fC
stuff
.fi \fR
or
\fC stuff \fP
. It seems that's not valid roff; lots of details are available from
https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?645
Package: publicfile-installer
Version: N/A
Severity: normal
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 03:18:42PM +0200, D. J. Bernstein wrote in Message-ID:
<20240720131842.85956.qm...@cr.yp.to> To: publicf...@list.cr.yp.to:
> Bastian Germann writes:
> > https://cr.yp.to/distributors.html does not list publicfile.
Hi Boyuan Yang,
On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 12:45:49PM -0400, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> Package: pyreadstat
> Version: 1.2.6-1
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch pending
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for pyreadstat (versioned as 1.2.7-1)
Great, thanks a lot!
> and
> uploaded it to DELAYE
Hi,
FYI: pwdsphinx 1.0.19-1 just migrated to testing. This should partly fix
#1068975 "src:python-zxcvbn: Abandoned upstream and unmaintained": pwdsphinx no
longer has a hard zxcvbn dependency.
HTH, Bye,
Joost
Hi Andreas,
On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 07:56:40AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> there was a series of testing removals due to bug #1071355 of
> r-cran-maptools. Since maptools was removed from CRAN[1] we intend to
> remove this package. However, before doing so I would like to
> understand why p
severity 1067112 wishlist
retitle 1067112 fangfrisch: mention clamdscan in Suggests or Recommends and/or
Enhances
thanks
Op Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 10:09:34PM -0400 schreef Scott Kitterman:
> On Monday, March 18, 2024 11:39:04 AM EDT Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> > Package: fangfrisch
&g
Hi Ananthu!
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 11:38:36PM +0530, Ananthu C V wrote:
>
> It seems that you are no longer intending to work on this.
> I, on the other hand, require webdriver manager for packaging
> lightnovel-crawler.
> So if you don't mind, can I pick this up?
Sure, be my guest. I hope my
Package: fangfrisch
Version: 1.9.0-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
Thanks for maintaining fangfrisch!
When running
clamav@donmel:~$ fangfrisch --conf /etc/fangfrisch.conf initdb
, in order to get fangfrisch properly setup, the fangfrisch software fails with:
Mar 18 16:01:29 donmel fangfrisch[143542]
Hi Vincent,
Thanks for this nice bugreport, will get to it.
Bye,
Joost
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 02:31:11PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Package: doc-debian
> Version: 11.3+nmu1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> The bug-reporting.txt file is rather small, thus it does not need to
> be compressed. Havi
1+git20231001.0da3e2b/debian/control
> --- liboprf-0.1+git20231001.0da3e2b/debian/control2023-10-04
> 14:07:26.0 +0000
> +++ liboprf-0.1+git20231001.0da3e2b/debian/control2024-02-28
> 16:06:06.0 +
> @@ -3,14 +3,17 @@
> Priority: optional
> Maint
Package: ftp.debian.org
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
Severity: normal
Please remove the freedict-swa-eng source and dict-freedict-swa-eng binary
packages. All other currently maintained dict-* packages are build from one
source package. The freedict-swa-eng package w
tags 1063692 +pending
thanks
Hi Helmut,
On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 02:17:47PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 10:19:50AM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> > Thanks a lot for this beautiful patch. Do you intend to take care of
> > uploading
> > it to
Hi Helmut,
Thanks a lot for this beautiful patch. Do you intend to take care of uploading
it to unstable too? If not, I'm happy to do that of course.
Bye,
Joost
On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 07:47:03AM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Package: uruk
> Version: 20231009-1
> Tags: patch trixie sid
> User
Hi Reiner,
Thanks for your interest.
On Sun, Feb 04, 2024 at 09:19:16PM +0100, Reiner Herrmann wrote:
> Joost schreef:
> > A not yet packaged new upstream is available, since 2016. Upstream has not
> > commited any code after 2016.
> >
> > ruby-ami has no reverse-depends in our archives, no pac
Package: wnpp
Control: affects -1 + src:ruby-ami
Severity: normal
Hi,
I intend to orphan the ruby-ami package.
A not yet packaged new upstream is available, since 2016. Upstream has not
commited any code after 2016.
ruby-ami has no reverse-depends in our archives, no package build-depends upon
Hi,
[sorry for yet another one, i clicked sent too early...]
On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 03:01:04PM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 02:22:20PM +0100, Maarten van Gompel wrote:
> >
> > On second thought, I read https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/64bi
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 02:22:20PM +0100, Maarten van Gompel wrote:
>
> On second thought, I read https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/64bit-time and
> checked the updated Frog sources, there is no time_t exposed at all anymore
> in the new version I'm packaging.
That's nice.
> So if I unde
Hi Maarten e.a.,
On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 06:29:20PM +0100, Maarten van Gompel wrote:
> On Tue Jan 30, 2024 at 2:31 PM CET, Lukas Märdian wrote:
> > As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
> > architectures in 2038 and beyond
> > (https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/64bi
Hi,
I've had a look at the diff, lgtm. I'd appreciate the upload to unstable in
due time. Thanks a lot for your work, much appreciated!
Bye,
Joost
On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 10:57:49PM +, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Source: liboprf
> Version: 0.1+git20231001.0da3e2b-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags
reopen 1049742
thanks
on second thought i'm not quite sure wether this bug is actually fixed now;
reopening.
On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 02:45:03PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Your message dated Mon, 09 Oct 2023 14:42:24 +
> with message-id
> and subject line Bug#1049742: fixed
Hi Geert,
On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 11:32:07AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
>
> The manual page of caspar is unaware of the build target.
>
>
> $ grep --context 4 build /usr/include/caspar/mk/caspar.mk | head -n 9
> _csp_DIRS := $(shell for d in *; do test -d "$$d" && echo "$$d"; done)
> _csp_DIR
1 - 100 of 521 matches
Mail list logo
