Bug#1064188: mrpt: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-03-01 Thread José Luis Blanco-Claraco
Hi Steve, As package and upstream's maintainer, what should I do to ensure the library is change safe? Would it help to totally remove references to time_t in all public headers? El dom, 18 feb 2024, 9:00, Steve Langasek escribió: > Source: mrpt > Version: 1:2.11.9+ds-1 > Severity: important

Bug#1037783:

2023-06-14 Thread José Luis Blanco-Claraco
Thanks, Matthias for reporting. The issue is now fixed upstream [1]. We'll make a new Debian release of the package soon to close this bug. Cheers, JL [1] Branch "develop" of http://github.com/MRPT/mrpt/ as of today's version, commit hash 3b01ad11af786acd129f05152fdbfb505086509c

Bug#1035446: libmrpt-vision-lgpl-dev: missing Depends: libmrpt-vision-lgpl2.5 (= ${binary:Version})

2023-05-03 Thread José Luis Blanco-Claraco
Thanks, Andreas! Fixed on salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/robotics-team/mrpt/-/commit/37b6bbda747e7dc540cb61a001ed0026cd5be7f9 However, I think we can't make any release to Debian/sid at the moment due to the freeze, right? Cheers, JL On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 3:51 PM Andreas Beckmann wrote: > >

Bug#997530:

2021-10-24 Thread José Luis Blanco-Claraco
Hi Lucas, Thanks for reporting! I've investigated this and found that the error comes from building against a version of the package "cv_bridge" (libcv-bridge-dev) which wasn't yet rebuilt against the latest opencv 4.5.4, but for the older 4.5.3. Does this still qualify as a FTBFS error in

Bug#986071: libmrpt-vision-lgpl-dev: broken symlink /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmrpt-vision-lgpl.so -> libmrpt-vision-lgpl.so.2.1

2021-03-29 Thread José Luis Blanco-Claraco
Wow, good catch, thanks! It's now fixed upstream [1], the next release will come with this fixed. [1] https://github.com/MRPT/mrpt/commit/e585a555b556b97bef50a803b9dfd9d53070931f On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 11:09 AM Andreas Beckmann wrote: > > Package: libmrpt-vision-lgpl-dev > Version: 1:2.1.7-1

Bug#978209: mrpt: FTBFS: mainwindow.h:218:2: error: reference to ‘Tracker’ is ambiguous

2020-12-28 Thread José Luis Blanco-Claraco
Thanks Lucas for reporting. This seems to be an issue detected with gcc 10.2.1, since I tried with the exact opencv version 4.5.1 and both gcc 7.5 and 10.2.0 and it didn't complain about that ambiguity. I'll try to install gcc 10.2.1 to verify this. Best, JL

Bug#977247: FTBFS against opencv 4.5.0

2020-12-13 Thread José Luis Blanco-Claraco
Dear Mo: Thanks for reporting. Fixed upstream: https://github.com/MRPT/mrpt/commit/671d8f0d85d68b800a3d07e7e2371509683df5a0 I'll release a new version very soon. Best, JL On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 7:21 AM Mo Zhou wrote: > > Source: mrpt > Version: 2.1.5-1 > Severity: important > Tags: ftbfs > >

Bug#976803: mrpt uses private binutils shared library

2020-12-08 Thread José Luis Blanco-Claraco
Hi Matthias: I'm curious about the rationale of not using libbinutils as shared libraries... sorry if this seems a stupid question! The dependency was added in this last version to enable using BFD to find debug info in binaries and expose that in the upstream library functionality. Cheers, JL

Bug#902488: Use system libraries

2020-10-04 Thread José Luis Blanco-Claraco
Two years later... This is finally done! In the end, refactoring my changes to SimpleIni.h into a new local file allowed using SimpleIni as is, without modifications... Yay! Fixed upstream with [1]. Best, JL [1] https://github.com/MRPT/mrpt/pull/1099/

Bug#970818: mrpt: FTBFS on mipse64el: E: Build killed with signal TERM after 150 minutes of inactivity

2020-10-01 Thread José Luis Blanco-Claraco
Thanks, Scott, it worked! https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=mrpt=sid JL

Bug#970818: mrpt: FTBFS on mipse64el: E: Build killed with signal TERM after 150 minutes of inactivity

2020-09-26 Thread José Luis Blanco-Claraco
On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 3:30 AM Scott Talbert wrote: > If you don't mind, please do a new package upload to mentors. Sure! Done here: https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mrpt/mrpt_2.1.0-2.dsc Best, JL

Bug#970818: mrpt: FTBFS on mipse64el: E: Build killed with signal TERM after 150 minutes of inactivity

2020-09-25 Thread José Luis Blanco-Claraco
Hi Sebastian (cc: Scott): On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 10:50 PM Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Reducing the optimization level on mips64el might help to reduce the > compile time. Alternatively, if possible, one could split the source > files into smaller ones. Hmmm... great idea! In fact, there was

Bug#970818: mrpt: FTBFS on mipse64el: E: Build killed with signal TERM after 150 minutes of inactivity

2020-09-25 Thread José Luis Blanco-Claraco
Thanks for reporting, Sebastian! Although, I'm not sure how to proceed in this case... it compiled in the past but it looks like the builder machine entered into swapping (?) this time. JL -- /** * Jose Luis Blanco-Claraco * Universidad de Almería - Departamento de Ingeniería * [Homepage](

Bug#970837: mrpt: please move away from libdc1394-22-dev to libdc1394-dev

2020-09-24 Thread José Luis Blanco-Claraco
tags 970837 + fixed-upstream Thanks! It's been fixed upstream in https://github.com/MRPT/mrpt/commit/767e764c7df58c22f803cb5223fc2445ed8c80f3 JL

Bug#964044: mrpt: FTBFS: test failure

2020-07-17 Thread José Luis Blanco-Claraco
Hi, Gianfranco: > > This issue has been fixed upstream: > > https://github.com/MRPT/mrpt/commit/15234dc335c2413e3fd41021f7511f1d36fe915b. > > Could you please apply the fix to the Debian package so that > > ros-geometry2 transition can be completed? Thanks > > > looks like that commit is already

Bug#960703: mrpt: FTBFS on amd64: test failures

2020-05-16 Thread José Luis Blanco-Claraco
Thanks for reporting. It has been fixed in version 2:2.0.3-3. Cheers, JL

Bug#922586: FTBFS against opencv 4.0.1 (exp)

2019-10-26 Thread José Luis Blanco-Claraco
Ok, sorry, forgot my last message, you already mentioned the new problem: > But now that missing mipsel build can't be addressed without > also updating mrpt for auto-opencv because it currently FTBFS in > unstable. It's a shame, but I think that perhaps I'll just leave mrpt to be removed from

Bug#922586: FTBFS against opencv 4.0.1 (exp)

2019-10-26 Thread José Luis Blanco-Claraco
Hi Olly, > It was waiting for mrpt 2.0.0 for wxwidgets3.0-gtk3 that got us into the > current mess of having two entangled transitions on the go for mrpt. If > we'd just updated the B-Ds of the existing package we'd have got that > out the way weeks (possibly months) ago. Instead mrpt is now

Bug#933469: mrpt: Please rebuild against wxWidgets GTK 3 package

2019-09-28 Thread José Luis Blanco-Claraco
> I think the reason it doesn't show on the list on the front page of > mentors.d.n is that only packages with "Yes" for "Needs a sponsor?" > show up there. Oops! So stupid... thanks! I'll ask first to me usual uploader to check if he is still available and wanting to upload this new version.

Bug#933469: mrpt: Please rebuild against wxWidgets GTK 3 package

2019-09-25 Thread José Luis Blanco-Claraco
Hi all, I'm the maintainer of the upstream library, and have just released upstream bug-fix release (v1.5.8) which also comes with an updated debian/control per this original bug report. It would be great if some of you could sponsor its upload so this bug gets fixed asap... The new package for

Bug#922586: FTBFS against opencv 4.0.1 (exp)

2019-02-18 Thread José Luis Blanco-Claraco
Thanks! This problem is already solved upstream in the forthcoming mrpt-2.0.0 version. I'm marking this as "fixed-upstream" in the meanwhile. Best, On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 7:42 AM Mo Zhou wrote: > > Source: mrpt > Version: 1.5.6-1 > Severity: important > > headers have been moved to