Package: kbd
Version: 1.15.5-1
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
This package uses open(1).
This usage is neither standard (in terms of LSB and POSIX) nor popular.
The unpopularity can be seen as BusyBox implements openvt(1) only [1]
while toybox
has no plan for openvt(1) or open(1) [2].
Libav is an annoying virus.
On one hand, it pretends itself to be FFmpeg; maybe this is due to the
fact that many software don't bother to port.
On the other hand, it tries very hard to discredit FFmpeg and doesn't
bother to be compatible with new FFmpeg development.
( The converse is not true. )
Any updates on this item?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 4:39 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org wrote:
Closing. There has been no helpful response from the requestor or
maintainers since November, despite intrigeri's prompts. I can find no bug
that would be justification for an unblock, just this vague mention of the
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote:
I would propose to re-upload 1.4 with a new epoch to unstable, to
unbreak current sitatuon.
I prefer Let IBus be IBus.
Debian is not a one-stop shop like some other distros.
I guess we don't have to hide something from
Hi, all.
FYI, manually compiled IBus 1.5.0 works fine on my Ubuntu 12.10 box
(with MATE as DE); I have used that box for many days.
For errors like ERROR:root:Could not find any typelib for IBus
Have you installed GI stuff properly?
Have you got gir1.2-ibus-1.0 installed?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote:
Is this really gone? (BTW, even if they remove it, I would consider
it a bug that should be reintroduced upstream )
Yes.
http://code.google.com/p/ibus/issues/detail?id=1568
But GNOME blog says such feature is
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Aron Xu happyaron...@gmail.com wrote:
The option has been hidden in ibus-setup, but I'm worry that whether
ibus 1.5 itself has removed the capability.
I believe that it is removed since changing dconf key has no effect either.
For IBus (1.4.99+) + GNOME combo,
You have latest ibus and ibus-table upstream release in unstable now.
I just want to remind you guys that other components of IBus may need
update also.
For example latest upstream release of ibus-anthy is 1.5.0 while you
have 1.2.x something.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
As I checked the debian/rules file and the errors given, it should be
clear that the IBus itself is not built correctly.
You build flags looks reasonable but they are different from Arch's
and Fedora's.
(Arch and Fedora have been using IBus 1.5 for a while.)
You probably hit some build system
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 5:25 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de wrote:
No, unfortunately the package is not ok yet. When I install the package
b43-fwcutter, it will prompt the debconf question in Spanish.
Really?
Where to check the source package content?
Also, after
Ping?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: acpid
Version: 1:2.0.17-1
Since the current list doesn't contain mate-power-manager, MATE users
(including me) will get a immediately shut down after pressing power
button. See also:
https://github.com/mate-desktop/mate-power-manager/issues/23
powerbtn.diff
Description: Binary data
I strongly support inclusion of MATE.
Why not packaging GNOME 2 directly?
GNOME 2 and GNOME 3 are not parallel installable. And MATE renamed binaries.
Why not GNOME Fallback?
It is dropped in GNOME 3.8
It is indeed different from GNOME 2, though non-heavy users may not
notice the difference.
It
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Aron Xu a...@debian.org wrote:
We are going to release Wheezy with IBus 1.4.x + GNOME 3.4.x, which is
working. GNOME 3.6 has made IBus not useable when the integration is
enabled, details are in GNOME's desktop-devel-list. ibus-mozc isn't in
its white list so
IBus integration in GNOME = 3.6.0 is filtering input method engines
and properties, which makes most of the commonly used engines being
filtered out, or being completely broken because their configuration
menu items (properties) are almost all being filtered out. Although
engines that are not
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 5:44 AM, Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org wrote:
Anyway, GNOME 3.6 is not stable enough platform yet. It needs to
stabilize itself before we package for Debian unstable (at least around
IME related things.) We are shipping GNOME 3.4 so ibus 1.4.? is good
choice.
I'm not
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Aron Xu happyaron...@gmail.com wrote:
Integration isn't always a good thing, and it is good only when people
have done it correctly. Ubuntu has not used the whole stack of GNOME
for several cycles, and it shouldn't be an excuses that GNOME got the
keyboard
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Aron Xu happyaron...@gmail.com wrote:
GNOME 3.6 can live with older version of ibus if you don't enable the
compile time integration, and currently the integration makes input
experience gets downgraded heavily, it's highly recommended not to enable it
at
As I tried ibus-xkbc recently on (I'm sorry) Ubuntu 12.04 and checked
its upstream repo in https://github.com/sun-im/ibus-xkbc
It seems like ibus-xkbc is not in good state, there is no commits for
about 2 years and it may not work well with newer systems, say Wheezy.
For example, its setup
If you are trying to package ibus-anthy for Raring, please consider
ibus-anthy 1.4.99
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Jeremy Bicha jbi...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Yes, we'll be switching to the new ibus in Raring soon but we need to
port our indicator patch to the new ibus first. We also have a bit
more work to do with gnome-settings-daemon and gnome-control-center
3.6 first.
For
On 10/25/12 1:18 AM, Marcus Lundblad wrote:
Trying to use ibus-anthy with gnome-shell 3.6.1 in experimental.
I add a Japanese keyboard layout using anthy. Things don't work.
After some digging around, I found that the file
/usr/share/ibus-anthy/engine/_config.py contains invalid paths.
These
I didn't follow previous bugs.
However, have you noticed IBus 1.4.2?
It fixed some trivial bugs from 1.4.1:
https://github.com/ibus/ibus/commits/1.4.y
Released tarball is here:
http://code.google.com/p/ibus/downloads/list
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: tegaki-zinnia-traditional-chinese
Version : 0.3
* URL : http://tegaki.org/
* License : LGPL 2.1
Description : Traditional Chinese handwriting model for Zinnia.
The upstream offer Japanese, Simplified Chinese
(Sorry, Aron, forgot reply to all)
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 2:10 AM, Aron Xu happyaron...@gmail.com wrote:
The situation here isn't that optimistic, because if one has enabled
IBus integration at build time, then whenever a ibus-daemon exist no
other input method can work because
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org wrote:
I am a bit neutral to this. I do not think we need to be
confrontational to upstream (GNOME3 mainly by Fedora=RH). Fedora is
their test ground with little regards to the stability. They have
reason to do so. If we want
I've done the not-so-hard package upgrading.
You may find the source package here:
https://code.launchpad.net/~damage3025/ubuntu/quantal/rar/v420
What should I do next?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Aron Xu happyaron...@gmail.com wrote:
I see your point, and I agree it's not intuitive. But unfortunately we
can't add ibus to Recommends for all desktop tasks, and even if any
GNOME package do that then it is a bug.
It's a long story to tell the whole thing,
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Aron Xu happyaron...@gmail.com wrote:
From a distribution's perspective, we should preserve the possibility
of choosing their favorites to users, but not always given them a
default and tell them use it or go away. Your claim on those editors
are not related to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name : ibus-libpinyin
Version : 1.4.92
Upstream Author : Peng Wu alexep...@gmail.com
URL : https://github.com/libpinyin/ibus-libpinyin
License : GPL2
Description :
Its UI is similar to ibus-pinyin, but its internal language model is
more advanced.
Smooth
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
RIME, or Rime Input Method Engine, is an excellent Chinese Input Method.
URL: http://code.google.com/p/rimeime/
License: GNU GPL v3
Notes: You may refer to http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/li/librime/PKGBUILD
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
RIME, or Rime Input Method Engine, is an excellent Chinese Input Method.
URL: http://code.google.com/p/rimeime/
License: GNU GPL v3
Notes: You may refer to http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ib/ibus-rime/PKGBUILD
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
add ibus-devel to CC.
I'd like know whether upstream developers of ibus have idea of Debian
packaging of ibus.
Regards,
Ma Xiaojun
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
I'm sorry.
CCing ibus-devel didn't work.
Let's CC main ibus upstream developer.
This is a Debian bug regarding ibus packaging.
ibus ui needs certain icons that are not yet declared as dependency.
However, different themes of icons are all OK for ibus.
So the dependency declaration is a bit hard.
Package: ibus
Version: 1.4.1-6
ibus-ui (included in ibus package) need certain GNOME/GTK icons to start up.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ibus/+bug/854333
But it is not treated as dependency currently.
http://packages.debian.org/sid/ibus
So users may encounter strange error in
Package: debian-handbook
Version: 6.0+20120509
Severity: wishlist
The way of using wine mentioned by section 13.5 is strongly against
wine project's official recommendation.
http://wiki.winehq.org/FAQ#head-878d4f6d1d0654ac8c0806990af095a4a4cafa13
In general, wine project recommend users to
37 matches
Mail list logo
