Hi,
Ssimply forwarding this reply to the BTS, for the record and future
investigation.
2016-05-07 19:05 GMT+01:00 Daniel Hahler <debian-b...@thequod.de>:
> On 04.05.2016 17:02, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>
>>> Using ":package-name-or-pattern" duri
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo + wontfix
Control: close -1
2016-04-26 20:13 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo:
In general, I think that the number of options currently supported by
aptitude (over 100) and the complexity of its interrelationship is quite
high, and I suspect that most users expect
Control: tags -1 + pending
Control: owner -1 !
Hi again,
2016-04-21 21:53 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo:
Hi Josh,
2016-04-20 01:50 Josh Triplett:
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.7.8-1
Severity: normal
"man aptitude" says:
-t , --target-release
Set the release from which packa
the next version.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo + wontfix
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
2016-06-02 03:55 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson:
"MAFM" == Manuel A Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com> writes:
MAFM> Do you have any more info to know why 8:6.8.9.9-7+b1 instead of +b2 is
MAFM> chosen? What's the current status of imagemagick? (e.g. half
MAFM> config
Control: tags -1 + pending
Hi Axel,
2016-02-14 15:16 Axel Beckert:
Hi,
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>if I call either 'aptitude -o "Aptitude::Pkg-Display-Limit=~i" -o
>"Aptitude::UI::Flat-View-As-First-View=true"' or 'aptitude -o
>"Aptitude::UI
Hi Axel,
2016-03-07 23:13 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo:
2016-03-07 22:40 GMT+00:00 Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>:
>but then again in the --sort
>section doesn't contain the policy names and it refers to the on-line
>guide (which in my opinion is good, to not repeat inform
use other
tools like grep-dctrl or build-rdeps (from devscripts I think) on
provide efficient and widely used ways to do this for a long time.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
rticular package
causing troubles.
So, for all the reasons above, marking as +wontfix and closing.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
2016-06-08 15:38 GMT+01:00 Lennart Sorensen <lsore...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 10:23:03PM +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>> After almost a decade, things got worse over the years after this report
>> (with the binary named aptitude-curses
So closing the report now.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
with aptitude-on-steroids and "breaks" things again.
So closing the bug now.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
orld applications are the ones providing
this file.
This is what other applications in Debian using OGRE already do.
Adding paths globally through /etc/ld.so.conf.d/ is not a good
solution, I think, because then all searches for libraries would be
forced to look into that directory, even if they are not OGRE
applications at all.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The former maintainer is apparently not active anymore. The last upload was
already a QA upload, effectively orphaning the package.
Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you will have enough time and attention to work on
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The former maintainer is apparently not active anymore. The last upload was
already a QA upload, effectively orphaning the package.
Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you will have enough time and attention to work on
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The former maintainer is apparently not active anymore. The last upload was
already a QA upload, effectively orphaning the package.
Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you will have enough time and attention to work on
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The former maintainer is apparently not active anymore. The last upload was
already a QA upload, effectively orphaning the package.
Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you will have enough time and attention to work on
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The former maintainer is apparently not active anymore. The last upload was
already a QA upload, effectively orphaning the package.
Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you will have enough time and attention to work on
ld packages that are not upgraded/removed/etc. (even
though the user tried to perform the action on them) because of the flag.
Overview already has something similar:
--\ Packages being held back (3)
...
--\ Packages being automatically held in their current state (4)
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
2016-06-01 08:18 Vincent Lefevre:
On 2016-05-31 19:12:40 +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
2016-05-29 01:46 Vincent Lefevre:
> In the gnuplot5-data upgrade, one has:
>
> Package: gnuplot5-data
> Source: gnuplot5
> Version: 5.0.3+dfsg2-1
> Depends: aglfn,
Package: wireshark-common
Version: 2.0.3+geed34f0-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
$ apt-cache show wireshark-common | sed -n '/^Depends: / s|, |,\n |gp'
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.15),
libcap2 (>= 1:2.10),
libgcrypt20 (>= 1.7.0),
libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.31.18),
libnl-3-200 (>= 3.2.7),
t "by hand"
with dpkg or similar is perhaps possible as a workaround.
[1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=imagemagick=sid
[2] https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=imagemagick=i386
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
or similar.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
a package status to hold using aptitude's "=" cpmmand, then the
hold is honored by aptitude, but the hold is not honored by either
apt-get or by dselect.
Thanks for the report. This seems to happen also with recent versions
of aptitude.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <
is not a good
option (it was supposed to fix other long-standing issues).
Assuming that the new apt relase will happen in a reasonable time-frame,
I guess that it's better just to wait for that.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
Control: forwarded -1 linux1394-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
2013-07-10 20:42 Alexandre Rebert:
Package: libiec61883-dev
Version: 1.2.0-0.1
Severity: normal
User: may...@forallsecure.com
Usertags: mayhem
plugctl crashes with exit status 139. We confirmed the crash by
re-r
Control: reopen -1
Control: notfixed -1 libunistring/0.9.6-1.1
New upstream upload temporarily reverted.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
ahead.
> Manuel, if you want to re-do the transition, you can simply use
> version 0.9.6+really0.9.6, until 0.9.7 is released.
Yes, I'll look into it once the main problem is addressed.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
Hi!
2016-05-01 15:42 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo:
If it needs this change, I think that my solution is not very robust
and that the assumptions made don't work and can fail in other cases.
So I've been fighting with this for a while this morning and couldn't
get it to work as originally
(Discussing this is quite pointless anyway... but as a final message
from my side...)
2016-05-18 10:38 Vincent Lefevre:
On 2016-05-18 10:04:50 +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
2016-05-18 2:53 GMT+01:00 Vincent Lefevre <vinc...@vinc17.net>:
> On 2016-05-18 01:26:45 +010
Control: retitle -1 aptitude offers to remove manually installed packages with
SolutionCost "safety, removals"
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
g magic here.
If aptitude is asked to mark all upgradable packages to upgrade and
finds conflicts, it's quite natural than then it reports conflicts and
that you have to pick the upgrades one by one (or use the resolver
effectively).
So I understand why you find it inconvenient/annoying, but aptitude
cannot magically fix things for you, specially since you using stable,
unstable and experimental at the same time, and multi-arch with out of
sync packages.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
reported the bug, there were more packages
> proposed for upgrade, but because any solution wanted to remove
> packages, I had to select the upgradable packages (those with no
> conflicts) one by one to upgrade them. Very annoying!
aptitude cannot magically resolve problems when the packages/versions
involved are incompatible, so I am not sure why you think that it's a
problem caused by aptitude, but it isn't.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
r all the reasons above, I don't think that this report is very
useful to keep open... thus closing now.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
le),
- this bug not having seen any secondings after the reformulation,
- and no real actions taken towards this since the formulation
So closing.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
Try this:
CXXFLAGS="-std=c++14" ./configure --prefix=/usr
("c++14" will be the default with the just-released GCC-6).
May I ask why you need this? It's probably easier to get the binary
package from Debian, if you have problems compiling.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
need the -dev package installed, not that one.
config.log has a more concrete error about what's wrong.
Apart from that, the GTK front-end has been unmaintained and disabled
for a long time, I don't think that it works nowadays.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
s not so (search patterns work with
package-versions, not "packages"), and the rest of the documentation is
quite clear about this.
So I am going to change the description of ?any-versions to clarify this.
Note that “?widen(~Atesting)” achieves the desired result.
Example: aptitude versions '?widen(?exact-name(apt)?any-version(~Atesting))'
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Control: close -1
Hi,
2016-03-18 12:15 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo:
2016-03-18 11:36 Steinar H. Gunderson:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:33:41AM +, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
Have you had some recent-ish experience with this, and remember
uch as '*a*' should match arm64 and amd64, or
also OSs named with that pattern, and also linux-any or any-"cpu" (since
"any" matches "*a*"), or "native".
So I think that the best solution now is to change the documentation to
better reflect this behaviour, and not change the current
implementation.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
do
the normal thing instead of my first idea / what you request here.
So in summary: it's possible, but I am not sure that it's a good idea.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
n
starting the UI and when continuing after suspending, and entangled with
these event handlers.
So even if it was desired (unclear at this point), it's not a simple
thing to do.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
e, by
being forced before into installing conflicting versions).
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
Hi,
2016-05-10 10:32 GMT+01:00 Vincent Lefevre <vinc...@vinc17.net>:
> Hi,
>
> On 2016-05-04 20:20:59 +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>> 2006-11-09 01:33 Vincent Lefevre:
>> > One may want to mark deleted packages as purge to get rid of obsolete
>
So closing the bug as fixed with that version number.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
case, a kind of APT::"Install"::Pre-Invoke (if "Install" or
equivalent would exist, I don't think that it does now) would be ideal.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
2016-05-09 11:31 GMT+01:00 Dmitry Smirnov <only...@debian.org>:
> On Wednesday, 4 May 2016 9:16:39 PM AEST Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>> pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy : Depends: php-mail-mimedecode which is
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Control: close -1
2016-05-08 04:18 Russ Allbery:
"Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo" <manuel.montez...@gmail.com> writes:
2010-01-28 17:59 Daniel Burrows:
I tracked down one bug that was part of this: aptitude was incorrectly
treating the a
ess
somebody steps up to do it).
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
Control: tags -1 + pending
Hi Axel,
2016-05-08 10:17 Axel Beckert:
Hi,
Axel Beckert wrote:
If I press "!" in aptitude's TUI and there's no conflict to solve,
aptitude segfaults.
JFYI: This doesn't happen with aptitude 0.7.5 in Testing.
Fixed, thanks!
--
Manuel A. Fernandez
2016-05-04 21:16 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo:
2016-04-10 03:09 Dmitry Smirnov:
Sorry, I'm unable to spot anything useful... Maybe you could try?
Simple "apt-get source civicrm" is enough to fetch the package suitable to
reproduce the problem.
I don't always have the time, as I d
or the
most sensible, at any rate) is to use apt methods because this
integration happens when acquiring the packages -- which aptitude
doesn't do directly.
If there's nothing that we can do from aptitude's side until that
happens, I think that it's better to close this report.
Cheers.
--
2016-04-25 19:22 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo:
2016-04-25 12:22 Axel Beckert:
Hi Manuel,
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
If I select a package for reinstallation by pressing "L" in the TUI and
then press 2x "g", the package will be reinstalled.
Afterwards at "
iceable. (In my system it takes less than 1 second, among other
reasons because the files are in cache due to continuous testing, so
it's difficult to notice).
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
nonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=aptitude/aptitude.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/wip-cmdline
This branch never came to be merged, so this doesn't apply now.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
2016-04-10 03:09 Dmitry Smirnov:
On Saturday, 9 April 2016 2:40:45 PM AEST Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
wrote:
From "buildpackage" until it starts unpacking the package's source and
compiling.
Sorry, I'm unable to spot anything useful... Maybe you could try?
Simple "apt-get
being renamed, to preserve the information from before. If
old and new packages share config files, probably this is handled
specially by dpkg.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
to do
anything about this, and keeping it open indefinitely does not make
sense.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
at this point.
In any case, 3+ years later, this is neither confirmed nor planned, so
marking as +wontfix.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
of its actions
are.
Have you experienced this problem lately?
If affirmative, does it happen with the recently released 0.8, or is it
with older versions?
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
fference between the two, or complaining that it's absurd
> MAFM> to have the two when they actually do the same, etc.
>
> (Well just document that there is no difference.) But OK never mind.
The "We'll" actually always means "You'll" in practice (and "me" in
Control: close -1
2016-03-30 12:33 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo:
Control: tags -1 + wontfix
Hi Ludovic,
2006-12-15 23:04 Ludovic Gasc:
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.4.4-1
With apt-build, it's possible to recompile easily a deb.
It would be greatful if it's possible with a keyboard
is quite non-trivial to implement and maintain.
So I am closing this as +wontfix, because unless somebody would step up
to implement and maintain the feature it wouldn't happen, and it's been
laying there already for more than 4 years without receiving any
attention.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez
obably nevery going to happen, but anyway, tagging as
+help as an admission that the current devel resources are not enough to
tackle this.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
it will take, so I don't think that it's trivial or possible to
make very accurate estimations in any case.
So I am going to close this as +wontfix, because since this cannot be
addressed by aptitude there's not much point in keeping it open
indefinitely, sorry.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
1,234.5 kB
12.9 kB
789.7 kB
This is basically a duplicate of #323303, so closing.
(Could be merged, but since the other covers all aspects, merging will
only cause to spend extra time when reviewing the other).
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
Contol: tags -1 + wontfix
Contol: close -1
Repeating, it seems that it wasn't processed...
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
for this purpose, to
remind you why a package was installed by you, in the case that you
forget.
As it is, I don't think that this is going to be implemented any time
soon, and seeing that it was already open for a decade with no action, I
am going to close it as +wontfix.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fer
closing this 14-year old bug because it doesn't make
sense to keep it open indefinitely.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
.
This doesn't seem to have been a problem for 14 years and nobody else
requested it, so closing now.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
how all 145 of them (count of packages named like
that today).
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
in, at some point maybe the
only solution is to remove the french documentation package.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
ith an
action that you requested. If we default to "q" in those cases, we
would soon have requests for people complaining that "aptitude doesn't
default to the sensible request".
So, +wontfix and closing.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
closing this bug now, it doesn't make sense to keep it open
indefinitely if this is not going to be implemented.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
.
Since a while ago can be done with:
apt edit-sources
So I am closing it as wontfix, after 9+ years and no indication that
this is going to be solved now.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
s.
So 5 years after and with no intention to implement this, I am closing
this request.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
. Or say that
the "+" is the default action and optional.
I'm saying that you say what happens when "+" is added, but don't say if
that does or doesn't happen when it is not added.
You're reading the documentation phrase by phrase rather than on the
whole, as with many other bug reports. that way it doesn't work.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
that it affects one of my
packages so I was about to NMU it myself, and came here only to see that
you saved me from it.
So just wanted to say that -- Thanks!
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
2016-04-30 2:35 GMT+01:00 Jason Pleau <ja...@jpleau.ca>:
> On 04/29/2016 06:44 AM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>> Jason, if you want to test it to see if it works fine, then I can
>> submit both to upstream's bug report for them to decide.
>
> It looks lik
2016-04-29 12:43 Guillem Jover:
Hi!
On Thu, 2016-04-28 at 22:30:13 +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.18.4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Control: user debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
Control: usertag -1 + riscv64
What ${subject} says. Patch attached
Control: forwarded -1 https://bugzilla.libsdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3295
2016-04-27 22:41 GMT+01:00 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
<manuel.montez...@gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> 2016-04-27 14:08 GMT+01:00 Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofb...@debian.org>:
>> Hi Manuel and libsd
for libibus-1.0 and rebuild with it.
Support enabled now, will be present in the next release.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
ed, thanks!
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
.
It has been submitted for review to the debian-l10n-dutch mailing list.
Please add it to your next package revision.
It should be put as "po/nl.po" in your package build tree.
===
Commited, thanks!
--
Manuel A.
-25 12:47:31.0 +
+++ dpkg-1.18.4+nmu1/debian/changelog 2016-04-28 21:15:57.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+dpkg (1.18.4+nmu1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Add support for riscv64 (RISC-V 64 bits little-endian). Closes: #-1
+
+ -- Manuel A. Fernandez
play with whitespace in this way.
I'm fine with it in general, though; but since this is not Debian
specific I prefer if it's applied (or at least blessed) by upstream
first. If it's failing for Jason, it should affect more people using
other distros or the code directly from SDL repos.
Cheers.
--
2016-04-27 8:37 GMT+01:00 Vincent Lefevre <vinc...@vinc17.net>:
> On 2016-04-26 23:47:13 +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>> Many of these problems were fixed in releases of the 0.7 series; I
>> suppose that this was one of those cases.
>
> Note that I ca
dding an
appropriate -o option, but it would be great to have that feature in
aptitude proper.
If it's individual comman line options that are used quite often, I
suppose that shell command aliases can be a reasonable workaround as
well.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
is bug report, and I
don't consider doing it at this point.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
s, which was
about a week, I estimate that even very minor gains (<5%) can take
the best part of a day at the very least
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
y doesn't show
them (it probably does). ?broken and similar search patterns can be
used for this.
I just don't have all possible ways to list them on the top of my head.
The users will have to do some work on their own.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
quot; for a list of those already
unfulfilled.
If you install those recommended packages (or disable
APT::Install-Recommends, but I don't recommend that) the delay should
not happen. You might want to try this while a version fixing this
problem is not released.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
feel free to close the bug report.
OK, thanks for the follow-up.
Closing now.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
y, then don't use aptitude
for a few days, then do "aptitude update" and "aptitude", if there was
another update to pkgA in the meantime, pkgA will be automatically
marked for upgrade -- because it didn't have time to register that the
upgrade had already happened in previous sessions, and so to remove it
from pending actions.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo + pending
2016-04-25 01:52 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo:
Control: severity -1 minor
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi,
2016-04-23 14:48 Christian Klein:
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.8-1
Severity: normal
From time to time, I invoke a "purge&qu
2016-04-25 12:22 Axel Beckert:
Hi Manuel,
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>If I select a package for reinstallation by pressing "L" in the TUI and
>then press 2x "g", the package will be reinstalled.
>
>Afterwards at "Press Return to continue, 'q' f
it appear:
- with this in the command line: aptitude search '~n^gcc-6$'
- in curses, with '/' plus '^gcc-6$' and "OK"
- in curses, with 'l' plus '^gcc-6$' and "OK"
If it doesn't, please see if "aptitude update" works and gets all files
correctly.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
601 - 700 of 2047 matches
Mail list logo
