On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 09:33:30PM -0500, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Package: libxpp2-java
> Version: 2.1.10-4
> Severity: serious
>
> >From my pbuilder build log:
>
> ...
Nice pbuilder output.
To be serious. I can't reproduce this her in a clean pbuilder. Do you
did something special to your pbu
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 03:14:47PM +0100, Steffen Moeller wrote:
> Package: libjgrapht-java
> Version: 0.6.0-4
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hello, there is a version 0.7.3 on
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/jgrapht,
> please update.
For which project do you need this?
In the archive are currently
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 10:54:16AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> This happens because the existing version is "bigger than the new one".
>
> 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ dpkg --compare-versions 1.2.5-2etch1 gt 1.2.5-2+b1 &&
>
> echo bigger || echo smaller
> smaller
BTW: I sent an update to the secur
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 11:07:55AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Package: libsaxonb-java-doc
> Version: 9.0-2
> Severity: normal
>
> The -doc package associated to SaxonB only ships the JavaDoc API
> documentation. This is cool and useful, but several other stuff which is
> available as docum
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 12:11:15PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 02:58:13PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > Calls on external Java functions disabled by default
> >
> >
> > By default, the XSLT 2.0 processor of
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 10:33:21AM +, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Michael Koch wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 09:56:18AM +, Andrew Haley wrote:
> >> Has anyone actually attempted to debug this? Which code actually calls
> >> Runtime.exit()?
> >
> >
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 09:56:18AM +, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Has anyone actually attempted to debug this? Which code actually calls
> Runtime.exit()?
I tried to debug this but I dont found out from where exit is called
with code 13.
> I'm betting it's a bogus version check.
What kind of vers
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 03:17:44PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I hope you will include them as /usr/bin/ executables, but if you don't
> want to please consider at least shipping them under
> /usr/share/doc/contrib/ or something.
Yes, I have commited them to pkg-java SVN already and include
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:11:10AM +0100, Marcus Better wrote:
> Michael Koch wrote:
>> scom-sun-javadoc-$(VERSION).jar: classes $(com_sun_javadoc_jar_CLASSES)
>> - $(JAR) cf $@ -C classes com/sun/javadoc
>> + $(JAR) cf $@ -C classes com/sun/javadoc -C classes
>
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 03:44:43AM +0100, Marcus Better wrote:
> RuntimeError: File name in directory "com/sun/tools/javadoc/" and header
> "META-INF/" differ.
> Command exited with non-zero status 1
> 0.05user 0.03system 0:00.55elapsed 16%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
> 0inputs+0outputs (
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 03:53:30PM +0100, Marcus Better wrote:
> Michael Koch wrote:
> >> gjdoc currently uses upstream libtool 1.5.22 so it needs to be
> >> replaced.
> >
> > What's the reason for this?
>
> Umm, dunno. Me just follow orders... :)
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 06:37:55AM +0100, Marcus Better wrote:
> Package: gjdoc
> Version: 0.7.8-8
> Severity: important
>
> As recommended by autotools-dev documentation:
>
> "If your package uses libtool, make damn well sure it is using
> libtool 1.5.6 from Debian, or libtool 1.6 from upstr
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 05:19:43PM +0100, Mauro Sanna wrote:
> when can we have tomcat6 in sid at least?
I will fix the remaining issues in tomcat5.5 first and then fork the
package. So if you wanna help, send patches to fix tomcat5.5 first.
Cheers,
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 06:21:54PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> Package: tomcat5.5
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
>
> Hi,
> the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
> published for tomcat5.5.
>
> CVE-2007-5333[0]:
> | Apache Tomcat 6.0.0 through 6.0.14, 5.5.0 through 5.5.25
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 02:02:08PM +0100, JN Dybowski wrote:
> Package: eclipse
> Version: 3.2.2-4
> Severity: important
>
> Upon starting eclipse the attached stack trace is being displayed instead of
> file contents. Right clicking in the resource browser does not work.
> Error occurs with tes
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 03:46:03PM +0100, Torsten Werner wrote:
> this class is needed to package findbugs
> (http://findbugs.sourceforge.net/).
I have mailed with upstream. This class will be in the 5.3 release
expected soon.
Cheers,
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
severity 459281 important
forwarded 459281 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35168
thanks
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 09:18:06PM +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 07:42:41PM +0100, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Michael Koch
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 07:42:41PM +0100, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Michael Koch wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 10:19:26AM +0100, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> >> For information, libjfreechart-java still does not work with gcj
> >> 4.3-20
forwarded 459558 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35166
thanks
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 08:54:07AM +0100, Anders Boström wrote:
> http_proxy=http://proxy2:3128/
>
> And in the case of gcjwebplugin, firefox is using a proxy.pac file
> configuring the proxy settings. All other applicatio
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 10:19:26AM +0100, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> For information, libjfreechart-java still does not work with gcj
> 4.3-20080202-1.
I have tested 4.3-20080116-1 and 4.3-20080202-1 locally and both worked.
The generated image is slightly different to the one generated by SUN
bu
tag 464735 wontfix
thanks
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 07:05:11PM +0100, klaus zerwes wrote:
> Package: libswt3.2-gtk-java
> Version: 3.2.1-4
>
> Unfortunately libswt3.2-gtk-java is not using the alternatives system
> like libswt-gtk-3.2-java. This makes it impossible / hard to package
> other softw
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 11:12:10AM +0100, Marcus Better wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what's the status of this? Anything that can be done to help?
I'm on this. It basicallz builds but needs some testing to make
everything working properly. I will upload that to experimental soon.
In parallel I started on lo
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 01:49:02PM +0100, Anders Boström wrote:
> jamvm isn't working at all for me (see above), but cacao seems to
> execute the applet. I tried to run
> 'strace cacao -Xbootclasspath/p:/usr/share/classpath/tools.zip
> gnu.classpath.tools.appletviewer.Main http://www.gnu.org/softw
tag 452875 - pending
thanks
bug is not pending anymore.
Cheers,
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 10:54:13PM +0100, Daniel Hahler wrote:
> Package: xmlgraphics-commons
> Version: 1.2.dfsg-1
> Followup-For: Bug #452875
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: origin-ubuntu hardy ubuntu-patch
>
> In Ubuntu, we've applied the attached patch to achieve the following:
>
> *
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 08:25:02AM +0100, eM.Scheierling wrote:
> Thanx for your help, but I'm giving up.
> After two years trying to setup Linux to my needs I'm tired of
> researching and tinkering all the time - mostly without success.
> Etch was an improvement - but since I can do nothing worth
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 07:23:35PM +, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> Any chance to get fop into main? I have to build-depend on it
> and would prefer to have my package in main. TIA.
Problem is that fop depends on batik providing some classes that get
only built when batik is built with SUN JDK. I
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 11:47:24PM +0200, Magnus Danielson wrote:
> Package: antlr
> Version: 2.7.6-9
> Severity: normal
>
> The new ANTLR system, v3.01 has been released from upstream source.
> Has C, C# and Java backends (which should all be installed). It may be
> necessary to have the old antl
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 08:55:45AM -0600, Joseph Smidt wrote:
> Dear Java Devs,
>
> Please package Photran from eclipse.
>
> Photran is for fortran like cdt is for C/C++.
>
> Photran is an IDE for Fortran 77, 90, and 95 based on Eclipse and the CDT.
> It includes: Syntax-highlighting editor, CVS s
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:28:30AM +0100, Kai Wb. wrote:
> notfound 447202 1.2.13-1
> thanks
>
> Package: eclipse-platform
> Version: 3.2.2-4
> Followup-For: Bug #447202
>
> Hello Michael,
>
> Michael Koch wrote:
> > This issue is not so trivial. Dif
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 05:24:25PM +, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Source: tijmp
> Version: 0.5~pre1-1
> Severity: minor
> Usertags: dehs-no-upstream
>
> Hello maintainer,
>
> The debian/watch file of your package on the unstable distribution fails to
> report upstream's version.
> Uscan's mess
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 04:38:01PM +0100, eM.Scheierling wrote:
> Package: eclipse
> Version: 3.2.1-4
>
> Hi,
> after successfully building the famous HelloWorld Java Application I
> wanted to use eclipse as HTML editor so I installed the WebStandardTools
> via SoftwareUpdates|FindAndInstall fro
Hello Kai,
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 10:51:16PM +0200, Kai Wb. wrote:
> Hm, I see your point. And this was no problem for me, but a friend of mine who
> is quite new to Debian installed eclipse-cdt and thought that Debian/dpkg
> would
> solve all dependencies for him. Which is the normal behaviour
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 06:09:40PM -0800, Alexander Hvostov wrote:
> This bug is indeed in the upstream code.
>
> I wrote a very simple JSP and put it in the ROOT webapp that comes with
> Tomcat. The JSP says:
>
> BEGIN
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] session="false" %>
> <% java.util.logging.Logge
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 10:17:47PM +0200, Thomas Girard wrote:
> reassign 432541 gcj-4.2
> retitle 432541 gcj-4.2 can no longer compile Eclipse plugins
> merge 432539 432541
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> after having slowly updated an etch chroot to a sid one using
> snaphsot.debian.net, I have found that
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 11:16:58AM -0600, Bob Black wrote:
> > I just uploaded jamvm 1.5.0-1 to the archive. So this should not be a
> > problem.
>
> Damn, you debian java guys are awesome.
>
> I almost requested a jamvm 1.5.0 package last night, but figured
> I'd try and set up my own crosstools
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 05:36:15PM +0200, Evgeni Dobrev wrote:
> Package: java-package
> Version: 0.39
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> ibm-java2-sdk-5.0-6.0-linux-ppc.tgz is not recognized by the
> ibm-j2sdk.sh script. The attached pach fixes this.
Thanks for your patch.
Are there also sim
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 10:06:20AM +0100, eM.Scheierling wrote:
> Package: eclipse
> Version: 3.2.1-4
>
> Hi,
> dont know whether thats a severe bug or only me being unskilled with Linux:
>
> I installed the packages eclipse and free-java-sdk on Debian etch, all
> stable, all up-to-date.
> After
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 02:27:37PM -0600, Bob Black wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 07:14:38AM +0100, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> > Bob Black wrote:
> >> Will classpath .95 (or .96) be packaged for arm, or is it basically
> >> armel only going forward?
> >>
> >>
> > It's packaged for arm, but it doe
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 11:29:10AM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> Package: gjdoc
> Version: 0.7.8-7
> Severity: normal
>
> when upgrading gjdoc in a chroot environment without /proc mounted, i
> get the following string of errors:
>
> Preparing to replace gjdoc 0.7.8-6 (using .../gjdoc_0.7.8-7
.8/debian/control
> +++ kaffe-1.1.8/debian/control
> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
> Priority: optional
> Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Uploaders: Ean R. Schuessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]>, Adam Heath <[EMAI
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 01:26:50AM -0400, Jose Luis Rivas wrote:
> Package: eclipse
> Version: 3.2.2-4
> Severity: important
>
> I'm running fluxbox in my machine and when I want to run any application
> I built there's no window, I mean, there's no window showed, eclipse is
> still running ok e
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 05:41:10AM +, David Pashley wrote:
> Package: jsvc
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-95 includes a patch to
> reopen the log files used for stdout and stderr. This would allow, among
> other things, to have a working log
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 02:20:51PM +0100, Anders Boström wrote:
> >>>>> "MK" == Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> MK> On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 04:59:41PM +0100, Anders Boström wrote:
> >> >>>>> "MK" ==
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 04:59:41PM +0100, Anders Boström wrote:
> >>>>> "MK" == Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> MK> Hmm, I tried with both, cacao and jamvm, locally and it just worked. I
> MK> can't really say what is/was wro
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 01:00:48AM +, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> Package: libsaxon-java
> Version: 1:6.5.5-1
> Followup-For: Bug #408842
>
> This bug has been quiet for a long time; can we have an update on what
> the current status is?
>
> (Just another user who would like to be able to use XSLT
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 11:46:47PM -0800, Alexander Hvostov wrote:
> On Saturday 19 January 2008, Marcus Better wrote:
> > If the user creates that file then the security exception still gets
> > thrown, so it would be very confusing to pretend the file doesn't
> > exist. I'm not too happy about th
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 12:44:11PM -0800, Alexander Hvostov wrote:
> On Thursday 17 January 2008, Marcus Better wrote:
> > Yes, see #460839 where we deal with this for the tomcat5.5-webapps.
> >
> > The stricter permissions are part of a tightened security policy. I
> > think our options are:
> > (
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 09:56:07AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > :0: error: verification failed at PC=0: invalid signature
> > :0: error: verification failed at PC=0: invalid signature
> > :0: error: verification failed at PC=0: invalid signature
> > :0: error: verification failed a
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 09:49:39AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > antlr/WildcardElement.java:30: error: String cannot be resolved to a type
> >public void setLabel(String label_) {
> > ^^
> > antlr/WildcardElement.java:34: error: String cannot be resol
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 01:07:30PM +0200, Arie Skliarouk wrote:
> sudo apt-get install java-gcj-compat-dev java-gcj-compat
>
> $ eclipse
> searching for compatible vm...
> testing /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj...found
> $
>
> Apparently works. How can I see for sure, whether it uses gcj?
It did alread
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 12:24:20PM +0200, Arie Skliarouk wrote:
> On Jan 15, 2008 12:16 PM, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 12:01:36PM +0200, Arie Skliarouk wrote:
> > > > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CP
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 12:01:36PM +0200, Arie Skliarouk wrote:
> > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+
> > > COMMAND
> > > 4588 arie 23 0 930m 754m 60m D 81 64.7 0:28.48 java
> >
> > Hmm, no I have a much leaner memory usage here. Is the package
> > eclipse-
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 11:43:50AM +0200, Arie Skliarouk wrote:
> >
> > Have you tried executing /usr/lib/eclipse/eclipse?
> >
>
> When I start /usr/lib/eclipse/eclipse, it complains on out-of-memory
>
> # /usr/lib/eclipse/eclipse
> GC Warning: Out of Memory! Returning NIL!
>
> In separate wind
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 11:21:55PM +0200, Arie Skliarouk wrote:
> I have the same problem.
> If I launch the command line manually (not using eclipse shell script), then
> eclipse starts properly:
>
> /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/java -Djava.library.path=/usr/lib/jni -
> Dgnu.gcj.precompiled.db.path=
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 11:21:55PM +0200, Arie Skliarouk wrote:
> I have the same problem.
> If I launch the command line manually (not using eclipse shell script), then
> eclipse starts properly:
>
> /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/java -Djava.library.path=/usr/lib/jni -
> Dgnu.gcj.precompiled.db.path=
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 04:22:52AM +0100, Rene Wunderlich wrote:
>
> 1. ubuntu users have the same problem
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eclipse/+bug/109583
>
> 2. i found this bug fix from Arnold Daniels and it work for me
> http://blog.adaniels.nl/?p=14
>
>
>
> $sudo apt-get --
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 11:20:11AM +0100, Anders Boström wrote:
> Package: gcjwebplugin
> Version: 2:0.96.1-1
> Severity: important
>
> I can't get the plugin to work in iceweasel at all. No single applet
> I've tried work. I just get a pop-up window asking me to trust the
> applet, and after clic
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 12:17:20AM +, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> Package: gjdoc
> Version: 0.7.8-6
> Severity: important
>
>
> Building libmatthew-java on alpha fails because gjdoc fails with an
> illegal instruction. Buildd log at:
>
>
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=libmatthew-
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 04:06:57PM -0500, Greg Harris wrote:
> I can also confirm this bug and that the patch (which has the file
> ordering to diff reversed) from Arne Böttger fixes the issue.
tomcat5 doesn't exist in unstable anymore. It got superseeded by
tomcat5.5. tomcat5.5. dont uses catalin
tag 450184 pending
thanks
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 08:37:11AM +0100, Marcus Better wrote:
> Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > The debian/watch file of your package on the unstable distribution fails to
> > report upstream's version.
>
> Apparently they moved the downloads to Sourceforge.
I updated the
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 03:48:31PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > It blocked during the testcases. I have no idea why. The last testcases
> > to be executed were:
> > [junit] Testcase: setOpenCallCountTwice took 0.045 sec
> >
tag 460364 pending
thanks
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 10:49:27AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > [javac] 2. ERROR in
> /build/user/eclipse-3.2.2/source-tree/plugins/org.eclipse.team.cvs.ssh2/src/org/eclipse/team/internal/ccvs/ssh2/CVSSSH2PreferencePage.java
> (at line 877)
> > [javac]
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 05:08:15PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: bouncycastle
> Version: 1.38-1
> Severity: important
>
>
> bouncycastle fails to build from source on m68k. The default on m68k is
> now gcj-4.2, maybe it's time to change the build-deps?
bouncycastle does not depend o
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 05:13:18PM +, David Pashley wrote:
> package tomcat5.5
> tag 418826 +patch
> thanks
>
> I've included a patch, which will change the directory to the temp
> directory before starting the daemon.
Looks good. Applying to SVN. Thanks.
Cheers,
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Package: libjogl-java
Version: 1.1.1~rc7-2
Severity: normal
FTBFS on all buildds. Problem is that some Build-Depends are in
Build-Depends-Indep which are not installed on the buildds.
A patch is attached.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 12:28:48PM +0100, Deller, Helge wrote:
> This is probably the same problem as in ecj Bug#459563
I think both are issues in GCJ. Ant itself is only bytecode. So no
native calls (except when ant-gcj and ant-optional-gcj are installed but
I think these are empty on hppa anyway
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 09:06:03AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > reopen 459437
> Bug#459437: liblucene-java: Missing dependency when using liblucene
> Bug reopened, originator not changed.
Please CC the according bug when reopening bug
retitle 452750 ITP: icedtea -- icedtea: Java runtime based on OpenJDK
owner 452750 !
thanks
Taking over this RFP.
Cheers,
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 09:36:45AM +1100, Greg Wilkins wrote:
>
> While Jetty can run on a 1.4 JVM, perhaps in debian it may just be
> simpler to build it only run with 1.5 and later.
The bug reporter is a very special situation as we wants to run jetty on
an arm architecture which is not support
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 11:39:05PM +0100, Marcel Ammerlaan wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 12:15:13AM +0100, marcel wrote:
> >> Package: jetty
> >> Version: 5.1.14-1
> >> Severity: important
> >>
> >> The JspServlet contained in libtomcat5.5-java is compiled with Java 1.5
> >> (class version 49.0
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 02:32:25PM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> Package: liblucene-java
> Version: 1.4.3.dfsg-1.2
> Severity: normal
>
> I am using liblucene with pyblosxom. I get the following error:
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> org.apache.lucene.util.Arra
found 413295 2:0.96.1-1
thanks
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 02:41:45AM +0200, Timo Lindfors wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Can you please retry with the current classpath 0.96.1-1 in unstable? I
> > think all issues should be fixed. The ac
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 01:18:43AM +, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Source: kaffe
> Version: 2:1.1.8-3
> Severity: minor
> Usertags: dehs-no-upstream
>
> Hello maintainer,
>
> The debian/watch file of your package on the unstable distribution fails to
> report upstream's version.
> Uscan's messa
tag 451258 upstream
forwarded 451258 http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37579
thanks
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 01:04:41AM +0100, Michalis Kamburelis wrote:
> Michael Koch wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 01:09:10PM +0100, Michalis Kamburelis wrote:
> >> The same p
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 10:29:47AM +0100, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> Package: libjfreechart-java
> Version: 1.0.9-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hello,
>
> Unfortunately, unlike what is said in the changelog,
> libjfreechart-java does not work with free JVM available. As I proof,
> I joined a test
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 10:09:44PM +0200, Laurent Fousse wrote:
> Hello,
>
> * Michael Koch [2007-07-14]:
> > I tag this bug now as "unreproducible" because I cant reproduce it and
> > "help" to make others aware this bug needs more input from other
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 01:56:40PM +0100, Torsten Werner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what is the state of packaging the new upstream version?
Greg Folkert from Jetty upstream did some packaging work and included it
in the upstream release. Main problem is that it needs Maven2 for
building and this is not ye
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 01:09:10PM +0100, Michalis Kamburelis wrote:
> The same problem occurs with footnotes in orderedlist, for a test just try
>
>
> Third footnote from ordered list
> Third footnote.
>
>
Was this fixed with the fop 0.94 update? Can you still reproduce this?
Cheers
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 01:14:07PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: jaxme
> version: 0.5.2+dfsg-2
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080103 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.41
Severity: wishlist
In tomcat5.5 we have the problem that a script in /etc/cron.daily is not
executed because the script name contained a ".". Then run-parts ignores
that file. It would be nice if lintian could check this dir (and others)
for sich files and give a
severity 458606 normal
thanks
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 11:03:49AM +0800, Jivan Amara wrote:
> Package: eclipse
> Version: 3.2.1-6
> Severity: grave
> File: /usr/bin/eclipse
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> This bug started for me after installing and removing two UML editors
> that in
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 12:15:13AM +0100, marcel wrote:
> Package: jetty
> Version: 5.1.14-1
> Severity: important
>
> The JspServlet contained in libtomcat5.5-java is compiled with Java 1.5
> (class version 49.0)
> which will not run on a java 1.4 runtime which should be enough to run Jetty.
Th
Hello Matti,
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 03:44:28AM +0200, Matti Lindell wrote:
> Package: tomcat5.5
> Version: 5.5.25-4
> Severity: minor
>
> In debian/tomcat5.5.postinst there seems to be unnecessary symlink call
> "ln -sf /etc/tomcat5.5 /var/lib/tomcat5.5/conf" which is already done in
> debian
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 05:14:12AM +0200, Matti Lindell wrote:
> Package: tomcat5.5
> Version: 5.5.25-4
> Severity: wishlist
>
> tomcat5.5 should have alternate depends on java2-compiler instead of
> java2-runtime as JDK is required for running a tomcat instance.
>
> Installing tomcat5.5 without
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 10:14:51AM +0100, Vera Mickael wrote:
>
>
> Michael Koch a écrit :
> > On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 03:40:30PM +0100, Vera Mickael wrote:
> >> Package: tomcat5.5
> >> Version: 5.5.20-2
> >> Severity: important
> >>
> >
forwarded 351551 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla//show_bug.cgi?id=26108
thanks
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 06:15:20PM +, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> Not sure wether this is a true bug, or just incompatibility with Sun JVM
> 1.5.0 and kaffe:
>
> When I run a CDK based test suite [1], the "OpenSource J
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 10:05:52PM +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 09:44:05PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> > Package: libsaxon-java
> > Version: 1:6.5.5-1.1
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > I would like to ask you, if you could/would be so k
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 09:44:05PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Package: libsaxon-java
> Version: 1:6.5.5-1.1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> I would like to ask you, if you could/would be so kind to provide a
> package with native code for GCJ/GIJ. This would help me a lot to speed
> up the building o
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 03:40:30PM +0100, Vera Mickael wrote:
> Package: tomcat5.5
> Version: 5.5.20-2
> Severity: important
>
>
> The script should warn the user that has no rights for this
> operation.
>
> As you may notice I use my own jdk package but I don't think
> this has an effect on t
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 09:01:56AM +0100, Jan-Pascal van Best wrote:
> Package: lucene2
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Please enable contrib/db/bdb-je.
>
> Reporting this as a wishlist bug because there is now an ITP for bdb-je
libbdb-je-java is now in the archive. Jan-Pascal, can you please take
care
Version: 3.3.0+0728-5
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 08:59:08PM -0300, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> Package: ecj
> Version: 3.3.0+0728-2
> Severity: normal
>
>
> When using ecj in a hybrid etch/lenny system I got:
>
> /usr/bin/ecj: line 25: /usr/bin/gij-4.2: No existe el fichero o el
> directorio
> /usr/bi
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 12:37:45AM +0530, Varun Hiremath wrote:
> Hi Nico,
>
> On Sat, 22 Dec, 2007 at 07:46:12PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> > Hi Varun,
> > * Varun Hiremath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-22 19:12]:
> > > On Sat, 22 Dec, 2007 at 04:29:31PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > >
reassign 457254 junit4
thanks
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 02:29:57AM +, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Package: junit
> Version: 4.3.1-2
>
> The "junit4" binary package does not "Depend:" on anything, let alone
> anything Java-related.
>
> In comparison, the "junit" (ie. 3.x series) package depends on:
> "
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 02:51:15PM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> package freeguide
> severity 456447 normal
> tag 456447 confirmed
> thanks
>
> Freeguide does not yet work with the GNU Java interpreter. I suspect
> the bugs you plan on filing will simply boil down to "does not work
> with GNU Java
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 12:07:44AM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 at 00:53:28 +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 08:40:43PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > > Michael: how would you recommend proceeding with this? Should I bother
> >
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 11:45:41PM +0100, Steffen Joeris wrote:
> Hi
>
> There have been two more CVEs[0][1] for jetty:
>
> CVE-2007-5613:
>
> Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Dump Servlet in Mortbay Jetty
> before 6.1.6rc1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or
>
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 02:48:00PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 12:55:26AM +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 02:40:20AM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
>
> >> http://people.alioth.debian.org/~smcv-guest/gnash-0.81~rc070818-2.1-r
Hello Simon,
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 08:40:43PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Michael: how would you recommend proceeding with this? Should I bother
> asking for a sponsored-NMU of a known-broken package in the hope that it's
> xmms2's fault, should I add the Recommends, should I file a separate
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 02:40:20AM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > (I'm a new maintainer doing RC bug squashing; Michael Koch, Cc'd, is my AM.)
> >
> > I attach a proposed NMU interdiff for this bug, and for a FTBFS with recent
> > dpkg-shlibdeps which I dis
201 - 300 of 828 matches
Mail list logo
