Bug#996154: syncevolution is marked for autoremoval from testing

2021-12-20 Thread Patrick Ohly
Debian testing autoremoval watch writes: > syncevolution 2.0.0-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2021-12-27 > > It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: > 996154: libopenobex2-dev: openobex-target-release.cmake forces static linking > https://bugs.debian.org/996154 If libopen

Bug#897258: syncevolution: Please drop Build-Depends on gconf

2018-05-08 Thread Patrick Ohly
ll mentions it is an oversight. > By the way, I had a problem building syncevolution. It complained that > it couldn't find test/dbus-server-sync.py as requested by > debian/syncevolution-dbus.examples . That issue is unrelated to this > gconf bug. This must be a Debian packaging

Bug#854941: sync-ui: fails to do anything

2017-02-22 Thread Patrick Ohly
ware of other changes/additions of this kind in the > 1.5.2 release? No, I think that was it. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the

Bug#854941: sync-ui: fails to do anything

2017-02-19 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 15:07 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Tue, 2017-02-14 at 22:47 +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: > > Checked that. Seems not to be supported. > > Bummer. Do you know how car integration works? Does the car deal with > the phone over Bluetooth (pairing and all), or

Bug#854941: sync-ui: fails to do anything

2017-02-15 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Tue, 2017-02-14 at 22:47 +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: > Hallo, > * Patrick Ohly [Sun, Feb 12 2017, 02:24:17PM]: > > On Sun, 2017-02-12 at 11:27 +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: > > > Package: sync-ui > > > Version: 1.5.2-1 > > > Severity: important > > >

Bug#854941: sync-ui: fails to do anything

2017-02-12 Thread Patrick Ohly
ooth; the manpage is overcomplicated, > it apparently wants some config file, and there is no clue where to get > a SIMPLE EXAMPLE FOR A SIMPLE DATA EXCHANGE WITH A SIMPLE PHONE. No need to shout. Instead have a look at "Command-line synchronization" at https://syncevolution.org/wiki/sync-

Bug#837154: davical: backslash escaping sometimes broken in vCard

2016-09-09 Thread Patrick Ohly
Package: davical Version: 1.1.4-3 Severity: normal Dear DAViCal maintainers, I've recently updated the SyncEvolution test setup such that it runs tests against DAVICal 1.1.4-3 from Debian Testing and noticed a problem that I had not seen before: when storing certain vCards on the server and retri

Bug#824426: FTBFS against libical2

2016-05-17 Thread Patrick Ohly
r seems to be missing from the libical2.symbols > for some reason so might need fixes on the libical side to be properly > exported That scary code is needed only when compiling upstream binaries that must work with different EDS versions. For Debian it might be enough to just call the a

Bug#747780: syncevolution: FTBFS: error: akonadi.pc not found

2014-05-11 Thread Patrick Ohly
+10,7 @@ AKONADIFOUND=yes if ! test "$KDEPIM_CFLAGS"; then KDEPIM_CFLAGS="-I`kde4-config --path include` -I`kde4-config --path include`/KDE" if test "$QMAKE"; then - KDEPIM_CFLAGS="$KDEPIM_CFLAGS -I`$QMAKE -query QT_INSTALL_HEADERS`" + KDEPIM_CFLAGS="

Bug#736357: syncevolution: tmp file vulnerability

2014-01-22 Thread Patrick Ohly
ll. I can put any fix into 1.4. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matt

Bug#682520: KDE integration for syncevolution

2014-01-13 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 11:06 +0100, Tino Keitel wrote: > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 17:52:09 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-11-15 at 21:16 +0100, Tino Keitel wrote: > > > as it turns out, providing separate packages for Gnome and KDE is not a > > > big dea

Bug#682520: KDE integration for syncevolution

2013-11-25 Thread Patrick Ohly
er reference. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. -- To U

Bug#682280: sync-ui does not remember the default service

2012-08-14 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 09:36 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > I double-checked. Debian's syncevo-dbus-server does use GIO D-Bus; what > I saw must have been an indirect call to libdbus (happens later, via > gvfs). > > > I think I got the same > > issue with 1.2.99.4

Bug#599247: syncevolution: Syncing with horde3 - always only slow-sync possible

2012-08-13 Thread Patrick Ohly
de bug to me: http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/10008 Thomas, can you reassign this bug to the Debian Horde maintainers with information about your installed Horde version? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the s

Bug#682280: sync-ui does not remember the default service

2012-08-13 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Sat, 2012-08-11 at 21:34 +0200, Tino Keitel wrote: > On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 20:47:18 +0200, Tino Keitel wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 17:50:04 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > Tino, can you check whether your upcoming update fixes th

Bug#682280: sync-ui does not remember the default service

2012-08-06 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 15:50 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 15:25 +0200, Thomas Maass wrote: > > I mean, that I have set up a sync service. If I start > > sync-ui after login, there is no service active. > > Then I do nothing else, than closing sync-ui

Bug#682280: sync-ui does not remember the default service

2012-08-06 Thread Patrick Ohly
GetSessions failed: No such interface `org.syncevolution.Server' on object at path /org/syncevolution/Server I'll investigate further. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make

Bug#682280: sync-ui does not remember the default service

2012-08-06 Thread Patrick Ohly
I reboot, the problem is present > again. Can you describe the problem in more detail? What do you mean with "configured, but not selected"? Do you mean the "No service or device selected" message in the main window? You are not doing anything other than starting and quitting

Bug#682688: syncevolution: doesn't stop syncing

2012-07-29 Thread Patrick Ohly
og.html for such a session. If you don't interrupt, does the sync finish normally? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue,

Bug#682520: syncevolution: Please provide syncevolution-kde

2012-07-23 Thread Patrick Ohly
granularity one could in theory split out some files (syncevo-dbus-server + syncevo-dbus-helper, syncevolution command line) but I am not sure whether that is worth the extra effort. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee

Bug#679657: syncevolution-libs: syncevo-local-sync missing

2012-07-05 Thread Patrick Ohly
ry itself, independent of D-Bus or the command line. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on beha

Bug#679657: syncevolution-libs: syncevo-local-sync missing

2012-07-02 Thread Patrick Ohly
the bug actually is (I'm not sure if it affects all kinds of syncs > or just *DAV or whatever) and coordinate with the release team. I have some more bug fixes coming in 1.2.99.2 (tagged and in final testing phase). One of them is a fix for a regression on 1.2.99.1; I hope that these kind of

Bug#675288: syncevolution: Broken by update to evolution 3.4

2012-05-31 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 09:39 -0400, Andreas Kloeckner wrote: > Patrick Ohly writes: > > What does the following command say? > > > > SYNCEVOLUTION_DEBUG=1 syncevolution --daemon=no --print-databases > > "--print-databases" says "invalid parameter"

Bug#675288: syncevolution: Broken by update to evolution 3.4

2012-05-31 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 08:44 -0400, Andreas Kloeckner wrote: > Patrick Ohly writes: > > Could it be that your EDS databases are currently still empty after a > > fresh install? For a long time, SyncEvolution has not asked EDS to > > create database when opening when the dat

Bug#675288: syncevolution: Broken by update to evolution 3.4

2012-05-31 Thread Patrick Ohly
e failed in some cases. This problem affected users who had never created anything locally and wanted to use SyncEvolution to migrate their data. Now that works without having to create dummy entries first. As a workaround you need to create dummy data via Evolution. -- Best Regards, Patri

Bug#675288: syncevolution: Broken by update to evolution 3.4

2012-05-30 Thread Patrick Ohly
(tentative) timeline? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.

Bug#662917: libdb5.1: uninitialized memory read: __log_put + __ham_add_el

2012-03-07 Thread Patrick Ohly
libc6 2.13-26 ii multiarch-support 2.13-26 libdb5.1 recommends no packages. libdb5.1 suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- patrick.o...@gmx.de http://www.estamos.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#648647: gnucash: Crash when editing scheduled transaction

2011-11-27 Thread Patrick Ohly
r version of GTK+ and confirm this? I upgraded to 2.24.8-2 and the problem disappeared. -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- patrick.o...@gmx.de http://www.estamos.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#649471: gdb: internal error + abort: addr_string_to_sals: Assertion `sals.nelts == 1' failed

2011-11-21 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 10:07 +, Hector Oron wrote: > Hello Patrick, > > 2011/11/21 Patrick Ohly : > > Package: gdb > > Version: 7.3-1+b1 > > Severity: important > > > /build/buildd-gdb_7.3-1+b1-amd64-guQjni/gdb-7.3/gdb/breakpoint.c:11006: > > inte

Bug#649471: gdb: internal error + abort: addr_string_to_sals: Assertion `sals.nelts == 1' failed

2011-11-21 Thread Patrick Ohly
Package: gdb Version: 7.3-1+b1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? Run gdb on SyncEvolution (compiled from source in my case). Set a breakpoint in SyncEvo::Exception::handle(). Run so that an exception is thrown. * What exactly did you do (or not do) that

Bug#648647: gnucash: Crash when editing scheduled transaction

2011-11-13 Thread Patrick Ohly
On So, 2011-11-13 at 22:51 +0100, Micha Lenk wrote: > Hi Patrick, > > thank you for your feedback on the Gnucash package. > > Am 13.11.2011 19:43, schrieb Patrick Ohly: > >* What was the outcome of this action? > > > > A segfault in libgtk. Stack backtr

Bug#648647: gnucash: Crash when editing scheduled transaction

2011-11-13 Thread Patrick Ohly
Package: gnucash Version: 1:2.4.8-1 Dear Maintainer, *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? Open an existing scheduled transaction, hit "Okay" without making any changes. Not sure whether it is related, but just in case: I run gnu

Bug#645223: schroot: 15killprocs has a race condition when killing processes

2011-10-13 Thread Patrick Ohly
Package: schroot Invoking /bin/kill on processes fails if the process already quit by itself while the schroot shutdown runs. Because of "set -e" this causes the whole shutdown to fail. I have seen this occasionally in a nightly testing setup involving a D-Bus session: when the D-Bus daemon stops

Bug#645102: syncevolution: time of recurring events changes

2011-10-12 Thread Patrick Ohly
raction between events. This month we are also safely back to standard, non-daylight saving time. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the

Bug#623216: [Evolution] Bug#623216: evolution-data-server: EDS libs < 2.32 not compatible with EDS >= 2.32

2011-04-18 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Mo, 2011-04-18 at 18:15 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On lun., 2011-04-18 at 18:05 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > Basically the apps (SyncEvolution or Evolution) can't and shouldn't know > > whether libecal1.2-7 and libecal1.2-8 are installable in parallel. Same &g

Bug#623216: [Evolution] Bug#623216: evolution-data-server: EDS libs < 2.32 not compatible with EDS >= 2.32

2011-04-18 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Mo, 2011-04-18 at 17:50 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On lun., 2011-04-18 at 17:46 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > How is that going to help a user who has Evolution and SyncEvolution > > installed on Squeeze and then does a partial update of just Evolution > > with

Bug#623216: [Evolution] Bug#623216: evolution-data-server: EDS libs < 2.32 not compatible with EDS >= 2.32

2011-04-18 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Mo, 2011-04-18 at 17:28 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On lun., 2011-04-18 at 16:45 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > That's the Debian Squeeze SyncEvolution .deb. It correctly depends on > > libecal1.2-7 because that is what it was compiled against. > > Yes, that&

Bug#623216: [Evolution] Bug#623216: evolution-data-server: EDS libs < 2.32 not compatible with EDS >= 2.32

2011-04-18 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Mo, 2011-04-18 at 16:24 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On lun., 2011-04-18 at 16:18 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > Agreed, EDS 2.32 already installs the new libs. But the old libs > > remain > > installed even though they no longer work. > > > >

Bug#623216: [Evolution] Bug#623216: evolution-data-server: EDS libs < 2.32 not compatible with EDS >= 2.32

2011-04-18 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Mo, 2011-04-18 at 15:18 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On lun., 2011-04-18 at 14:37 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > I suggest that EDS 2.32 should have a "conflicts with EDS libs < 2.32" > > to prevent such inconsistent system installations. > > Well

Bug#623216: evolution-data-server: EDS libs < 2.32 not compatible with EDS >= 2.32

2011-04-18 Thread Patrick Ohly
Package: evolution-data-server Version: 2010-1 Severity: important Evolution changed is file layout in release 2.32. The corresponding gconf keys are getting rewritten when starting Evolution 2.32.x for the first time. If the older libecal/libebook libraries are still installed, they become u

Bug#615263: advice for syncevolution in Debian testing/unstable

2011-03-12 Thread Patrick Ohly
ugh about the current state, then I could release 1.1.99.4 as a release candidate soonish (within a week or two), with automatic migration enabled, and that could go into unstable/testing. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an emplo

Bug#615263: syncevolution: FTBFS due to gcc-4.4 / linker changes

2011-03-06 Thread Patrick Ohly
SyncEvolution) libsmltk.so is an extra dependency of libsynthesissdk.a. Anyway, I suggest you fix it with a distro patch as you suggested, then please send it my way and I'll look at some of the other scenarios. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion

Bug#615263: syncevolution: FTBFS due to gcc-4.4 / linker changes

2011-03-03 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Do, 2011-03-03 at 12:25 +, David Bremner wrote: > On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 14:25:54 +0100, Patrick Ohly > wrote: > > > > You are right, the libsynthesis-sdk.pc file needs to list libsmltk as > > library it depends upon. There's no libsmltk.pc at the moment. Cr

Bug#615263: syncevolution: FTBFS due to gcc-4.4 / linker changes

2011-03-01 Thread Patrick Ohly
as library it depends upon. There's no libsmltk.pc at the moment. Creating one and listing it under "Requires" might be the cleanest solution, but perhaps adding -lsmltk to "Libs" in libsynthesis-sdk.pc is good enough? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message

Bug#615263: syncevolution: FTBFS due to gcc-4.4 / linker changes

2011-02-28 Thread Patrick Ohly
r command line > /usr/lib64/libsmltk.so.0: could not read symbols: Invalid operation > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > make[5]: *** [syncevolution] Error 1 Does it help to add libsynthesissdk_la_LIBADD = libsmltk.la to src/Makefile.am and src/Makefile.am.in (the latter is the file that is in the gi

Bug#599247: Syncing with horde3 - always only slow-sync possible

2010-12-12 Thread Patrick Ohly
1.2 or 1.3. If you can pin the solution to a specific change in libsynthesis, then I would back-port it to the version of libsynthesis in SyncEvolution 1.1.x. I looked through the changes, but saw nothing relevant. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion onl

Bug#604840: syncevolution: Build failure on s390

2010-11-24 Thread Patrick Ohly
it surprised that sysync::memSize is not the same as size_t, but anyway, the attached patch should translate between the two. Please review carefully (not tested). Can someone confirm that it compiles on s390? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion o

Bug#582376: advice for syncevolution in squeeze

2010-11-08 Thread Patrick Ohly
On So, 2010-11-07 at 22:05 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 22:39 -0300, David Bremner wrote: > > On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 13:46:58 +0200, Patrick Ohly > > wrote: > > > > > If 1.0 + bug fixes is not acceptable for Debian Squeeze, then I suggest >

Bug#582376: advice for syncevolution in squeeze

2010-10-24 Thread Patrick Ohly
backport of SyncEvolution. FWIW, I still think that 1.0 + bug fixes is the better choice for Squeeze. It has been in use for a while now and arguably is better than beta 2, with no known regressions whatsoever. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opini

Bug#596105: syncevolution: Memory error syncing calendar

2010-10-22 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Do, 2010-09-09 at 11:22 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > The invalid memory usage occurs inside the Perl interpreter, not > SyncEvolution. You can invoke the "synccompare" script directly to > reproduce the problem. It takes two parameters, the old and new database > dump. I&

Bug#582376: advice for syncevolution in squeeze

2010-10-10 Thread Patrick Ohly
that we consider as the stable one. > I suppose the diff between upstream versions is pretty enormous, but > there are a lot of bugs fixed. Well, we don't stand still ;-} -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee o

Bug#582376: Bug#599247: syncevolution: Syncing with horde3 - always only slow-sync possible

2010-10-06 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 14:29 +0100, David Bremner wrote: > On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 14:06:41 +0200, Patrick Ohly > wrote: > > I moved this discussion to the "please upgrade syncevolution" bug. Eh, how? ;-) The reply was still for 582376, the one about Horde. I'll reply

Bug#599247: syncevolution: Syncing with horde3 - always only slow-sync possible

2010-10-06 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 12:44 +0100, David Bremner wrote: > On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 13:23:06 +0200, Patrick Ohly > wrote: > > > > What would be easier to get included: another 1.0.x bug fix update > > (which I hadn't intend to prepare in favor of releasing 1.1) or 1.1?

Bug#599247: syncevolution: Syncing with horde3 - always only slow-sync possible

2010-10-06 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 11:41 +0100, David Bremner wrote: > On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 09:21:30 +0200, Patrick Ohly > wrote: > > > > > I doubt that this depends on the version of SyncEvolution. > > > > But you can try that yourself. Please add > > deb http://d

Bug#599247: syncevolution: Syncing with horde3 - always only slow-sync possible

2010-10-06 Thread Patrick Ohly
7;ll find the reason why it always uses that. I suspect that the server asks for it, in which case you'll have to look into the server's logs and ask the Horde developers. That Horde duplicates items on slow syncs is also a server problem. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The conten

Bug#596105: syncevolution: Memory error syncing calendar

2010-09-09 Thread Patrick Ohly
lution/scheduleworld-2010-03-27-22-01/calendar.after David, is there a way for me to get CCed on Debian bug reports for SyncEvolution? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no w

Bug#585400: openshot: no transitions and effects because of translation bug

2010-06-21 Thread Patrick Ohly
1.1.3-1Help manual for OpenShot Video Edi openshot suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- patrick.o...@gmx.de http://www.estamos.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#573265: Please package syncevo-http-server.py

2010-03-14 Thread Patrick Ohly
ckages was lack of documentation and uncertain demand for it. There's still no proper documentation, but the demand seems to exist. -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- patrick.o...@gmx.de http://www.estamos.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Bug#565720: libsynthesis0: timezone support: use libical (build-dependency)

2010-01-18 Thread Patrick Ohly
o make sure the transition is smooth. New libsynthesis should work with the older SyncEvolution, but I never tested that. SyncEvolution 1.0 alpha is definitely experimental. We are preparing a 1.0 beta, due end of the month/beginning of next. That might be better for unstable. -- Bye, Patrick

Bug#565720: libsynthesis0: timezone support: use libical (build-dependency)

2010-01-18 Thread Patrick Ohly
Package: libsynthesis0 Severity: important *** Please type your report below this line *** libsynthesis can use libical to improve timezone support. In Debian and Ubuntu, the package was compiled without libical, which caused problems that went away when installing the same version of the softwar

Bug#544862: libsynthesis: FTBFS on alpha

2009-09-03 Thread Patrick Ohly
e git.moblin.org master branch which should fix this "fails to build" error: commit 9b655d57709a6354d29129d236361c7a2533b3b3 Author: Patrick Ohly Date: Thu Sep 3 14:37:13 2009 +0200 TDebugLoggerBase::DebugOpenBlock: fixed build failure on Alpha CPU architecture The code

Bug#404942: syncevolution packaging update

2009-08-04 Thread Patrick Ohly
archives that often. In SyncEvolution I prefer to avoid doing that myself by bundling the source. -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- patrick.o...@gmx.de http://www.estamos.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#537346: libical0: ICAL_ERRORS_ARE_FATAL should be off, crashes Evolution

2009-07-17 Thread Patrick Ohly
Package: libical0 Version: 0.43-2 Severity: grave Justification: causes non-serious data loss With ICAL_ERRORS_ARE_FATAL=true, the default in CMakeLists.txt in 0.43, the resulting libical will abort if it detects errors. Evolution triggers such error situations, leading to crashes of Evolution Dat

Bug#404942: Status?

2009-05-14 Thread Patrick Ohly
l-licensed LGPLv2.1/3.0. Regarding packaging: I still consider 0.8.1 the current stable version. 0.9 beta 1 works, but we still have to redo lots of interoperability testing (and add some: vCalendar 1.0 now also works). -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- patrick.o...@gmx.de http://www.estamos.de/ --

Bug#404942: Work restarted

2008-11-15 Thread Patrick Ohly
myself: http://github.com/pohly/funambol-cpp-client-api/tree/master This is the Funambol library that ships with SyncEvolution release tar balls. -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.estamos.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsu

Bug#395417: evolution-data-server: importing .vcf replaces line breaks with literal \n in NOTE

2006-10-29 Thread Patrick Ohly
t; (base 64), or normal 8 bit characters. > Are line-breaks allowed then? Folding is always allowed, the standard even says that it "should" be used. I'm not sure I have really answered your questions, please don't hesitate to ask for clarifications :-/ -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.estamos.de/

Bug#395416: evolution-data-server: E-D-S 1.6.3 and 1.8.1 crash due to thread race condition

2006-10-29 Thread Patrick Ohly
it, the SyncEvolution 0.4 tar ball [1] contains all sources that you need. Compile it normally, then follow the instructions in "HACKING" to set up testing. You can skip the parts about configuring two sources, one should be enough and you don't need a SyncML server either. -- B

Bug#395417: evolution-data-server: importing .vcf replaces line breaks with literal \n in NOTE

2006-10-26 Thread Patrick Ohly
Package: evolution-data-server Version: 1.8.1-2 Severity: important Tags: experimental, patch As discussed on the Evolution hackers mailing list under the subject "automated testing of Evolution data server with SyncEvolution" I am filing this issue as a reminder that I have a patch available fo

Bug#395416: evolution-data-server: E-D-S 1.6.3 and 1.8.1 crash due to thread race condition

2006-10-26 Thread Patrick Ohly
Package: evolution-data-server Version: 1.6.3-1 Severity: grave Tags: patch Justification: causes non-serious data loss As discussed on the Evolution hackers mailing list under the subject "automated testing of Evolution data server with SyncEvolution" I am filing this issue as a reminder that I