The proposed patch does not seem to work for restart, e.g.
endon:~# /etc/init.d/apt-cacher start
Starting Apt-Cacher: apt-cacher.
endon:~# ps -ef | grep apt
www-data 4008 1 0 21:43 pts/500:00:00 /usr/bin/perl
/usr/sbin/apt-cacher -R 3 -d -p /var/run/apt-cacher.pid
root 4010 3287
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Paul Cager [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-04 14:48]:
Not yet. I'm afraid surreal life has caught up with me and the time
I can spend on my Debian work has reduced. Hopefully this is just
temporary, but I realise I'm rather neglecting some of my packages.
Any update
package: maven2
owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
Hi Alexander,
Thanks for your report. I'll investigate further later this week.
Cheers,
Paul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 481571 +confirmed
Thanks for the report. Yes, we need to add an explicit manifest.
Upstream's looks like:
Main-Class: org.w3c.tidy.Tidy
Name: org/w3c/tidy/Tidy.class
Java-Bean: True
Thanks,
Paul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Cager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: libservlet2.5-java
Version : 2.5
Upstream Author : Various
* URL : http://tomcat.apache.org
* License : Apache 2
Programming Lang: Java
Description : Version 2.5
=20024
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: build.xml
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Paul Cager (paulcager
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Cager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: plexus-compiler-javac
Version : 1.5.3
Upstream Author : Codehaus developers.
* URL : http://plexus.codehaus.org/
* License : MIT / Apache 2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Cager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: plexus-io
Version : 1.5.3
Upstream Author : Codehaus developers.
* URL : http://plexus.codehaus.org/
* License : Apache 2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description : Input
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Cager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: plexus-archiver
Version : 1.0-alpha-9
Upstream Author : Codehaus developers
* URL : plexus.codehaus.org
* License : Apache 2
Programming Lang: Java
Description : Plexus
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I no longer use the afnix package, and would like to offer it for
adoption.
The package is not in terribly good shape, I'm afraid, but
if you enjoy fixing things this is a good opportunity!
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
Michael Koch wrote:
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 10:33:32PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Package: cdk
Version: 1:1.0.2-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
...
This broken with the last javacc update. Teh Nom*.java classes
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Cager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: plexus-compiler-api
Version : 1.5.3
Upstream Author : Jason van Zyl and others
* URL : http://plexus.codehaus.org/
* License : MIT / Apache 2.0
Programming Lang: Java
It looks as though libcommons-cli-java needs to build-depend on
ant-optional.
I was surprised it didn't fail with pbuilder - does pbuilder still
install Recommends:?
I'll prepare a fix.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi,
(putting back Luk into the loop, mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] isn't
sufficient)
Paul Cager [EMAIL PROTECTED] (04/02/2008):
I intend to fix this bug along with the upload for the new upstream
version (probably within a week).
any news on that new upstream release
Thank you for your bug report, and I agree that it should be
severity=important. I'd prefer lenny to go out without Maven rather than
with this bug.
This problem (and http://bugs.debian.org/458895) happen because Debian's
version of Maven uses version 1.1 of Apache's commons-cli library, whereas
Michael Koch wrote:
If we can't work around this we will need to upload a commons-cli-1.0
package just for maven2. Would not be nice but a workaround.
Hi Michael,
It's good to have that option as a backup.
Currently commons-cli 1.1 silently discards all but the first instance
of any option
Hi Luk,
I intend to fix this bug along with the upload for the new upstream
version (probably within a week).
But if anyone wants to NMU it before that time, that's fine with me as well.
Thanks,
Paul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Package: msp-webserver
Version: 0.8.11-1
Severity: important
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.3
Your package fails to build with GCC 4.3. Version 4.3 has not been
released yet but I'm building with a snapshot in order to find errors
and give people an advance warning. In GCC 4.3,
Paul Cager wrote:
Mike Paul wrote:
Package: maven2
Version: 2.0.8-3
Followup-For: Bug #458895
[...]
It turns out that /usr/share/maven2/lib/commons-cli.jar is
the one that makes the difference: if I copy that jar into a
freshly-unpacked copy of Apache's Maven distribution, the problem
Mike Paul wrote:
Package: maven2
Version: 2.0.8-3
Followup-For: Bug #458895
[...]
It turns out that /usr/share/maven2/lib/commons-cli.jar is
the one that makes the difference: if I copy that jar into a
freshly-unpacked copy of Apache's Maven distribution, the problem
occurs there too.
Valliet Emmanuel wrote:
Package: maven2
Version: 2.0.8-3
Severity: normal
Hi,
I installed the maven2 debian package, and tried to make an empty j2ee
package using the artifacts, and it failed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/devel/java/sources$ mvn -e archetype:create
Anibal Avelar wrote:
The patch that I previously sent seems wrong. I confused the order.
Basically is to change the line inside debian/rules:
-dh_shlibdeps debian/tmp/usr/bin/*
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=debian/afnix/usr/lib/afnix:$$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
dh_shlibdeps debian/tmp/usr/bin/*
On Mon, December 3, 2007 01:48, Amelia A Lewis wrote:
[. . .]
Note that the first
attempt to invoke eclipse:eclipse used this command line (as advised
in hudson build notes):
mvn -o -DdownloadSources=true eclipse:eclipse
Yes, they advise offline mode. It appears that this may create the
Package: maven2
Version: 2.0.7-2
Severity: wishlist
2.0.8 was released on 27-Nov-07
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Amelia A Lewis wrote:
Package: maven2
Version: 2.0.7-2
Severity: normal
Command and results:
(ydhegar)amyzing:/pub/projects/hudson/hudson$ mvn -e -DdownloadSources=true
eclipse:eclipse
+ Error stacktraces are turned on.
[ SNIPPED: project information (it's for hudson, if you care) ]
Amelia A Lewis wrote:
I'm not sure that I understand the problem correctly. Debian has
packaged Maven, but not any of its plugins - so the plugins should be
downloaded normally (i.e. in the same way as a non-Debian Maven
installation). Is this not the case?
Doesn't seem to work, for me.
Package: libplexus-utils
Severity: wishlist
The new upstream release of Maven2 requires a more up-to-date version of
libplexus-utils.
Current Debian Version: 1:1.4.1-1
Current Upstream: plexus-utils-1.4.8
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
tags 449188 +confirmed
thanks
Thanks for the report. org/apache/maven/wagon/providers/ssh/knownhost/
is present in upstream's wagon-ssh-common-1.0-beta-2.jar but not in
Debian's. I'll fix it and check for other missing packages.
Thanks,
Paul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
tags 445006 +pending
thanks
The fix I previously suggested for this bug would not work with
java-gcj, due to the different ways the Java packages are set up in the
alternatives system. E.g.
/usr/bin/java - /etc/alternatives/java -
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-sun/jre/bin/java
/usr/bin/java -
Michael Koch wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 06:37:55PM +0200, Krzysztof Sobolewski wrote:
Package: maven2
Version: 2.0.7-1
Severity: normal
I have two Java packages installed: sun-java5-jre and sun-java6-jre.
The latter is selected as /usr/bin/java by update-java-alternatives.
Now when
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 21/08/07 at 22:24 +0100, Paul Cager wrote:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
tags 432540 + pending
tags 305325 + pending
tags 433350 + pending
tags 434316 + pending
Hi,
This has been pending for more than a month. Is your
On Mon, September 10, 2007 13:27, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Hi Maintainer,
rejected, sorry, the package name is too generic. (Yes, I know its
upstreams name. :() ).
--
bye Joerg
Hi Joerg,
Thanks for your email.
I'll ask upstream if they would be happy for MyServer to enter Debian with
a
Just to document the resolution of the Paul Hsieh derivative license:
upstream have removed this code, and used a different (free) implementation.
I believe the work is now DFSG-free.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Using locations:
/usr/share/checkstyle/dtd
/usr/share/checkstyle/xsl
seems to fit in with what other packages do.
Unless anyone can think of better locations, that's what I'll implement.
Thanks,
Paul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Package: checkstyle
Severity: wishlist
Release 4.3
Fixed Bugs:
* The StrictDuplicateCode check didn't report correct results when multiple
duplicate code regions were overlapping. (bug 1564465)
* Fixed NPE in FallThrough check (bug 1472228)
* Fixed typo in Command Line example
Michael Koch wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 12:08:49PM +, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
BUILD FAILED
/build/user/checkstyle-4.1+dfsg/build.xml:220: Javadoc returned 5
at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Javadoc.execute (Javadoc.java:2077)
at org.apache.tools.ant.UnknownElement.execute
tags + pending
thanks
That was a rather silly mistake - will not build properly on non-i3x6
arches. I have prepared a new package which I will ask my sponsor to
review.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, June 16, 2007 11:27 am, Paul Cager wrote:
Hi Jason,
I'm intending to package plexus-velocity for the Debian distribution,
but noticed that the source files do not have any license information
within them.
Would it be possible to fix it? Can I help in any way?
Thanks,
Paul
i
On Tue, June 19, 2007 1:02 am, Paul Cager wrote:
Hi Jason,
Sorry to bother you again, but you are also listed as the Project Lead
for Doxia.
I'm intending to package Doxia for the Debian distribution,
but noticed that some source files do not have any copyright or license
information
On Mon, July 2, 2007 3:59 pm, Paul Cager wrote:
On Tue, June 19, 2007 1:02 am, Paul Cager wrote:
I'm intending to package Doxia for the Debian distribution,
but noticed that some source files do not have any copyright or license
information within them.
These files have no copyright
Jason van Zyl wrote:
It's all ASL licensed if not marked as such.
On 2 Jul 07, at 8:06 AM 2 Jul 07, Paul Cager wrote:
On Sat, June 16, 2007 11:27 am, Paul Cager wrote:
Hi Jason,
I'm intending to package plexus-velocity for the Debian distribution,
but noticed that the source files do
I'm packaging a couple of Java libraries where the source files do not
have any license declarations. This is being fixed in upstream's svn
repository.
I still want to package upstream's latest *release* rather than the head
of svn, so is it OK just to explain the situation in
On Fri, June 29, 2007 9:44 am, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Paul Cager [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-06-03 23:49]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
tags 424547 + pending
Any chance to get this fixed package uploaded within the next few
days? We're preparing to move
Hi Jason,
Sorry to bother you again, but you are also listed as the Project Lead
for Doxia.
I'm intending to package Doxia for the Debian distribution,
but noticed that some source files do not have any copyright or license
information within them.
Would it be possible to fix this? As before
Hi Jason,
I'm intending to package plexus-velocity for the Debian distribution,
but noticed that the source files do not have any license information
within them.
Would it be possible to fix it? Can I help in any way?
Thanks,
Paul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Michael Koch wrote:
plexus-i18n depends on maven-ant-helper which has some issue:
debian/copyright: Copyright holder should be Author
debian/copyright: copyright with year is missing
I have changed it to use the dh_make template (and also added a license
declaration to the Java file).
Christian Perrier wrote:
Description : Plexus internationalisation package.
Required for maven2 packaging
Shouldn't this be named plexus-l10n instad? Most of the time «-i18n» is
the wrong names for those packages that are actually localization ones,
which include translations and such.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Cager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: maven-ant-helper
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Trygve Laugstøl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-java/trunk/maven-ant-helper
* License : Apache
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Cager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: plexus-i18n
Version : 1.0-beta-6
Upstream Author : Plexus Developers
* URL : http://plexus.codehaus.org
* License : Apache
Programming Lang: Java
Description : Plexus
Ben Finney wrote:
Paul Cager [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Copyright (C) 2005, 2006 The MyServer Team
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
tags 389887 + moreinfo
thanks
Regarding your Debian bug report:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=389887
I am not sure if I understand the problem you are reporting. If you want
to include a Jar on your classpath you must user the filename of the Jar
itself, not just the owning
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Cager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: plexus-component-factories
Version : svn
Upstream Author : Plexus Authors
* URL : http://plexus.codehaus.org
* License : Apache
Programming Lang: Java
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Cager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: plexus-compiler
Version : svn
Upstream Author : Plexus Authors
* URL : http://plexus.codehaus.org
* License : Apache
Programming Lang: Java
Description : Interface
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Cager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: plexus-velocity
Version : svn
Upstream Author : Plexus Authors
* URL : http://plexus.codehaus.org
* License : Apache
Programming Lang: Java
Description : The Plexus
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Cager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: plexus-digest
Version : svn
Upstream Author : Plexus Developers
* URL : http://plexus.codehaus.org
* License : Apache
Programming Lang: Java
Description : a component
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Cager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: modello
Version : latest
Upstream Author : Brett Porter ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* URL : http://modello.codehaus.org
* License : http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Cager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: commons-openpgp
Version : svn 533437
Upstream Author : Brett Porter, Stefan Bodewig
* URL : http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/openpgp/index.html
* License : Apache V2
This happens because the default URL for the help file is /index.html
(in default.properties). This will obviously not work.
I'll attempt to improve the situation when I package the new upstream
version (2.6).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
I found it quite difficult to locate this information on javassh.org's
web site.
The command line required is of the form:
java -jar jta26.jar -plugins Status,Socket,SSH,Terminal hostname 22
(or you can use an equivalent config file).
I'll update the package's description and README when I
Hi Trygve,
A couple of days ago on #debian-java you kindly offered to help if I hit
any problems with the packaging of Plexus for Maven2. Would you have time
for a couple of questions about plexus-container-default?
**
amaury darsch wrote:
Hello Paul,
I looked into the patch and it looks to me like a hack. I would rather prefer
to add a new platform that corresponds to kFreeBsd. This will be a one hour
work but I cannot test it. The release 1.5.0 might come by mid April. I could
add this new platform
Michael Koch wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 11:29:35PM +0100, Paul Cager wrote:
The maven2 distribution contains about 7 wagon jars (wagon-file,
wagon-http-shared etc). What would be the best way to package this:
A) Seven source packages (and hence seven binary packages).
B) One source
Marcus Better wrote:
Paul Cager wrote:
The maven2 distribution contains about 7 wagon jars (wagon-file,
wagon-http-shared etc). What would be the best way to package this:
I suggest one source file and several binary packages. This is because
(a) the top-level svn directory has a project
The maven2 distribution contains about 7 wagon jars (wagon-file,
wagon-http-shared etc). What would be the best way to package this:
A) Seven source packages (and hence seven binary packages).
B) One source package generating seven binary packages.
C) One source package generating one
retitle 407659 ITA: micro-proxy -- really small HTTP/HTTPS proxy
owner 407659 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
I'm adopting this package because I would not like to see it dropped from
the archive. A small, self-contained program like this is a good way to
learn about proxies.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Hi Cyril,
Thanks very much for your bug report about AFNIX on GNU/kFreeBSD. I'll
incorporate your patch in my next upload (and send it to upstream).
Thanks again,
Paul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: slf4j
Version : 1.3.0
Upstream Author :
* URL : http://www.slf4j.org/
* License : permissive X11 type license
Programming Lang: Java
Description : The Simple Logging Facade for Java (SLF4J) is a simple
Aldous,
I am interested in a Debian version of the forehead Java library, and I
noticed your ITP for it
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=344112).
I was just wondering how it was going, and if you had an idea of when it
is likely to be completed? Or, if you no longer have the
EspeonEefi wrote:
reopen 353586
severity 353586 minor
thanks
I can reproduce this error using the attached very simple build.xml and
HelloWorld java program. Indeed, ant by default still automatically
adds /usr/share/ant/lib/ant-bootstrap.jar to the classpath. Note, though
that the
Michael Koch wrote:
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 01:35:12AM +, Paul Cager wrote:
Currently:
Depends: java-gcj-compat | java-virtual-machine, java-gcj-compat |
java1-runtime | java2-runtime, libxerces2-java
Recommends: ant-optional, jikes | java-compiler
Should ant Depend or Suggest
Currently:
Depends: java-gcj-compat | java-virtual-machine, java-gcj-compat |
java1-runtime | java2-runtime, libxerces2-java
Recommends: ant-optional, jikes | java-compiler
Should ant Depend or Suggest the compiler packages? I'd say Depend, but
I suppose its not an absolute dependency - you
Could I have some advice about the best way to fix this one please? Here's
a summary:
* The obsolete package aleph is supserseded by afnix.
* I've requested the removal of aleph from unstable (bug #389163).
* There is already another RC bug against aleph, as it conflicts with
tetex-bin.
I didn't
Frank Küster wrote:
Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Add this to afnix:
Conflicts: aleph
Replaces: aleph
This should make it possible to have always one of them installed and
make afnix replace aleph on dist-upgrades.
Isn't
Provides: aleph
also needed?
Regards, Frank
package aleph
reassign 389163 ftp.debian.org
retitle -1 Request removal of Aleph.
noowner -1
thanks
Please can aleph be removed from unstable.
Aleph has been replaced by AFNIX which entered the incoming queue today.
Please see #379564 for further information, and a request from Mohammed
Adnène
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: imagefilters-java
Version : 2.0.235
Upstream Author : Jerry Huxtable
* URL : http://www.jhlabs.com/ip/filters/index.html
* License : Apache 2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description : manipulation and
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: jtb
Version : 1.3.2
Upstream Author : Wanjun Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] and others
* URL : http://compilers.cs.ucla.edu/jtb/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Java
Description : a syntax tree builder for
Hi,
In CVS, bootstrap/javacc.jar has all of the old COM.sun.labs classes
within it (instead of the org.javacc ones). This causes a slight problem
with the packaging of JavaCC I am doing for Debian, as the Sun classes
do not have a free license.
How would people feel if I were to replace CVS's
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: javatar
Version : 2.5
Upstream Author : Tim Endres [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.trustice.com/java/tar/index.shtml
* License : Public Domain
Programming Lang: Java
Description :
This Java library
)
From: Paul Cager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Norbert,
Sorry - I'm not sure if my previous email got through OK. Please would you
have a look at the message below?
Thanks,
Paul
Original Message
Subject: Your Debian Bug Report re Java2html
From
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Julien,
I'm interested in version 0.10 of ajaxterm, as it allows me to specify the
screen size (Cols-x-Rows). I had a look at your package [1] and wondered
if I could make a couple of suggestions to support this changeable screen
size?
In
, or (more
likely) I'm just plain confused.
Anyway, sorry for the confusion!
Thanks,
Paul
Julien Valroff wrote:
package ajaxterm
forwarded 400501 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
Le vendredi 05 janvier 2007 à 13:17 +, Paul Cager a écrit :
Julien,
Hi Paul,
I'm interested in version 0.10
The authors of JavaCC have now re-licensed the JavaCC code under a pure
BSD license (http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.html). This
should clear up the doubts some organisations have had regarding the
Nuclear and Weapons clauses in the original license, and the export
restrictions
Frank Küster wrote:
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why is it better than to drop aleph? If a package is way outdated, and
RC buggy, and also aleph is practically unchanged since Sarge, I think
that is still grounds for a removal.
I haven't investigated about aleph. I just thought
Frank Küster wrote:
severity 389163 serious
thanks
Dear release team,
I just noticed
, Etch RC policy:
|
|
| Packages must not install programs in the default PATH with
| different functionality with the same file name, even if they
| Conflict:.
`
We've got
This sounds like a good idea - it will also list id3tool as an option when
someone does an apt-cache search on mp3. I'll expand the description when
id3tools is next uploaded.
Original Message
Subject: Re: Your java2hml program
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 13:43:38 +0100
From: Florian Schintke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Paul Cager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
in principle I am still interested in the java2html program, but
actually I have
The website listed in the copyright file
(http://kitsumi.cowspiracy.org/id3tool/index.html) is no longer correct.
The new website is http://nekohako.xware.cx/id3tool/index.html.
Upstream has a new release:
* fixed broken getopt string (should close debian bug #280180)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
2006 17:42:28 -0600
From: Tom Marble [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Paul Cager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Simon Phipps [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul:
I'm fairly familiar with debian-legal and you are right
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've had a look at the new upstream release (4.0), and it's still not
clear if it is DFSG compliant.
The website[1] explicitly states that the license is Berkeley Software
Distribution (BSD) License.
In an answer to a query the author (Sreenivas
As I'm interested in BCEL I thought I would do a little further
investigation of this problem.
Of the 3 URLS given above,
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
is the most useful - it identifies the failing line of code in BCEL. The
following URL gives the change made by the BCEL
I noticed that Yann Dirson has now created a jargs package, so that is
half of this bug fixed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
91 matches
Mail list logo
