Hi,
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 10:03:03AM +0200, Jérôme Bouat wrote:
> >Do you have libreoffice-wiki-publisher installed?
>
> yes I have, version 1.2.0+LibO5.2.7-1
OK, I believe it goes away when you remove it, though, please remove it
only after the required infomation ;)
> >To confirm, please s
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 05:37:48PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Control: tag -1 confirmed
>
> On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 03:19:22PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > See http://bugs.debian.org/876001. CVE classified as no-dsa (minor issue).
> >
> > Salvatore writes
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.53
Severity: normal
I get
E missing-build-dependency-for-dh_-command
dh_strip_nondeterminism => dh-strip-nondeterminism
for libreoffice on lintian.d.o (and afaicr also with some lintian when
ran on the actual source package built).
the explanation says:
The source
Source: fonttools
Version: 3.15.1-2
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
it looks like the "new" fonttools lost it's python2 module?
# dpkg -L fonttools | grep pyth | cut -d/ -f1-4 | sort | uniq
/usr/lib/python3
[1]
I don't see it mentioned in the changelog, though:
fonttools (3.15.1-2) unstabl
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 07:12:42PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> On 2017-09-18 18:30, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> >Source: open-vm-tools
> >From my buildlog(trying to build oath-toolkit with xmlsec 1.2.25
>
>
> uh, what has oath-toolkit to do with open-vm-tools?
Cut&#x
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 07:31:49PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 07:12:42PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> > On 2017-09-18 18:30, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > >Source: open-vm-tools
> > >From my buildlog(trying to build oath-toolkit wi
Source: open-vm-tools
Version: 2:10.1.10-2
Severity: serious
Dear Maintainer,
From my buildlog(trying to build oath-toolkit with xmlsec 1.2.25
using ratt):
[...]
libtool: compile: g++ -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"open-vm-tools\"
-DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"open-vm-tools\" -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"10.1.1
Source: oath-toolkit
Version: 2.6.1-1
Severity: serious
>From my buildlog (trying to build oath-toolkit with xmlsec 1.2.25
using ratt):
[...]
Selecting previously unselected package gtk-doc-tools.
Preparing to unpack .../49-gtk-doc-tools_1.26-1_all.deb ...
Unpacking gtk-doc-tools (1.26-1) ...
[.
tag 876021 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 03:19:20PM +0200, Jérôme wrote:
> I tried to launch Libreoffice Writer by the desktop menu entry, nothing
> happends. However, I successfully ran Calc, Impress and Draw.
Aha.
> Next, I opened a terminal and launched the "libreoffice" comm
hangelog 2016-09-12 22:58:36.0 +0200
+++ libwpd-0.10.1/debian/changelog 2017-09-17 13:20:30.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+libwpd (0.10.1-5+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=medium
+
+ * debian/patches/libwpd-tdf112269.diff: backport patch to fix
+CVE-2017-14226 (closes: #876001)
+
+ -
hangelog 2014-08-08 00:36:00.0 +0200
+++ libwpd-0.10.0/debian/changelog 2017-09-17 13:20:30.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+libwpd (0.10.0-2+deb8u1) jessie; urgency=medium
+
+ * debian/patches/libwpd-tdf112269.diff: backport patch to fix
+CVE-2017-14226 (closes: #876001)
+
+ -
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 03:08:19PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Sicne the point releases are approaching, can you shedule the fixes
> since already prepared in the next point release?
*sigh* :). Just that I need to build that again without -sa..
Bugs filed.
Regards,
Rene
Hi again,
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 01:59:20PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 10:47:06AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Source: libwpd
> > Version: 0.10.1-5
> > Severity: important
> > Tags: patch security upstream
> > Forwarded:
16-09-12 22:58:36.0 +0200
+++ libwpd-0.10.1/debian/changelog 2017-09-17 13:20:30.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+libwpd (0.10.1-5+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=medium
+
+ * debian/patches/libwpd-tdf112269.diff: backport patch to fix
+CVE-2017-14226 (closes: #876001)
+
+ -- Rene Enge
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 01:44:30AM +0200, Francesco wrote:
> I think there is something missing in the package: I saw in
No, I got confused at first too because I misremembered, but...
> mysql-connector extension there is a path that looks like
> /usr/lib/libreoffice/share/extensions/mysql-conn
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 04:40:12PM -0500, william l-k wrote:
>Sorry, I have another message I'm composing. I did try the following:
>/usr/lib/jvm/jdk-8-oracle-x64/jre
>/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre
>/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre
>The problem still occurs with any
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:46:57PM -0500, william l-k wrote:
> As stated in the subject heading, report builder is working in 1:5.4.1-2 from
> libreoffice.org.
There is no "deb for 1:5.4.1-2 from www.libreoffice.org".
> The deb package was missing the mysql connector extension, and the one f
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 11:15:35AM -0500, william l-k wrote:
> libreoffice-report-builder will not run in base. Critical reports built using
>
> this tool cannot now be run. This occurred after the most recent upgrade to
> the
> debian testing branch.
Please define "would not run". Crash? No
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 04:09:27PM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> It seems that under wayland, the windows are now grouped under the one
> "LibreOffice" icon (independent of the type of window)
>
> This is already way better, but not 100% the same behavior compared to X
> where I believe
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 07:54:21AM +0200, Stefan Weil wrote:
> The license issue with JSON in libpoco was fixed recently, see
> https://github.com/pocoproject/poco/issues/1614#issuecomment-327629217.
Only if the poco got released with that - so we'd need to wait for poco 2.0.
But yeah, inter
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 08:07:12PM +0100, Chris West wrote:
> getPeer() has been removed. The use here looks horrible, and exactly why
> getPeer() was removed:
>
> /*
> Here's the really disguisting hack.
> We have to get to the peer because TextComponent will refuse to
> let us
severity 875269 grave
reassign 875269 src:linux
forcemerge 865866 875269
thanks
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 01:57:15PM +0700, DocTom wrote:
> I upgraded from Debian 8 Jessie to Debian 9 Stretch and the problem was
> immediate. I used LO Base for 2 years with the same hardware, and the Debian 8
> Jess
On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 07:37:03PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> Will libreoffice/1:5.4.1-1 (currently in unstable and testing) break,
> if I upgrade coinor-libcoinutils3v5 from version 2.9.15-4 to version
> 2.10.14+repack1-1 ?
The fix for LO is: rebuild coinmp. It works without rebuilding LO.
T
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 06:31:54AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 02:13:25AM +0300, Lior Kaplan wrote:
> >Translation of Albanian is currently at 60-65%, would be nice to have a
> >l10n package as upstream already provides them
>
> Hmm
tag 874196 + upstream
forwarded 874196 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108406
found 874196 1:5.4.0~beta2-1
thanks
On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 09:17:56AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> It seems that LO picks up images_helpimg.zip instead of images_galaxy.zip (as
> it shoul
tag 874196 + moreinfo
tag 874196 + confirmed
# no need for mentioning version in the ssubject, that's what Version:
# and version tracking is for..
retitle 874196 libreoffice: Icons and other images missing from UI
found 874196 1:5.4.1-1
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 05:12:29PM -0700, Peter Eckersl
Hi Lior,
On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 02:13:25AM +0300, Lior Kaplan wrote:
>Translation of Albanian is currently at 60-65%, would be nice to have a
>l10n package as upstream already provides them
Hmm. 60-65% is quite low. Normally I'd put the threshold at 80-90%...
I'd more consider it a b
tag 874163 + sid
thanks
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 10:45:52PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > --- Please enter the report below this line. ---
> > # LANG=C apt install libreoffice-kde
> > Reading package lists... Done
> > Building dependency tree
> > Reading stat
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:12:15PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Another possibility, which arguably is nicer for other non-Debian places
> as well, would be to get upstream of libreoffice-dictionaries to budle a
> newer version of that dictionary.
>
> Just file a bug in
> https://bugs.docu
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 06:20:16PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> libreoffice, likely caused by ENOSPC.
For this bugs sake: builds fine.
Regards,
Rene
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 07:09:26AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Thanks for the report, though I wonder why it only breaks now.
libreoffice (1:5.3.1-1) experimental; urgency=medium
* New upstream release
* debian/rules, debian/libreoffice-dev-doc.links, debian/lo*.in:
install
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 02:16:57AM +0200, Linus Lüssing wrote:
> I noticed, that running "$ libreoffice -h" crashed, too. However,
Can confirm...
> that one only fails with the very first line ("terminate called
> after..."). The "Fatal exception" and stack trace is missing
> on the command
reassign 873443 libreoffice-core
found 873443 1:5.4.0-1
thanks
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 09:16:25PM +0200, linus.luess...@c0d3.blue wrote:
> The device I'm using is armhf/armv7 based: An Odroid U3 featuring
> a Samsung Exynos 4412 ARM processor which includes a Mali-400 MP VG/3D
> GPU.
... whi
On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 01:59:04PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> for coinmp and libreoffice (5.4.1 release will be next week) if we uploaded
> coinmp 1.8.3 to unstable...
Now uploaded coinmp 1.8.3-2 to unstable.
Let's see.
Test succeeds at least.
Still I believe that this should be
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 01:26:30PM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
> thanks for the bug report and sorry for inconvenience. Upstream did
> not change the SO-version, so I decided not to do it explicitly and
> request transition. Looks like the changes were minimal.
>
> If the coinmp-recompilation
Package: coinor-libcoinutils3v5
Version: 2.10.14+repack1-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
LOs unit tests fail (don't get confused by the name, also tests the CoinMP
based solver) since the last updates in sid:
build CUT] sccomp_lpsolver
S=/data/rene/Debian/Pakete/LibreOffice/libreoffice/libreoffice-5.4.1
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 06:47:10PM +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> This has been fixed upstream. Please cherry-pick
> https://github.com/miloyip/rapidjson/commit/fe19b7b6016d446722621fb407738209d1a911e8
> If you want to be nice to private backporters, please cherry-pick
> the follow-up commit
> htt
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 01:59:24PM +0200, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
>Hi!
>
>Il 21/ago/2017 09:33, "Christian Marillat" <[1]maril...@debian.org> ha
>scritto:
>> [...]
>> This version is required by the new mkvtoolnix 15.0.0 source.
>
>No, it's not; please see [1].
checking
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 06:19:42PM +0200, Kamil Jonca wrote:
> 1. Open Writer or Calc window
> 2. Open emacs or xterm window, write some random text.
> 3.Select this text (but DON'T use Ctrl-Insert or sth)
> 4. change focus to Calc or Writer window
> 5. push middle mouse button
looks like https
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 06:19:42PM +0200, Kamil Jonca wrote:
> 1. Open Writer or Calc window
So if this affected also Writer, why is this assigned against libreoffice-calc?
> 2. Open emacs or xterm window, write some random text.
> 3.Select this text (but DON'T use Ctrl-Insert or sth)
> 4.
notfound 870757 5.3.5.2-2
found 870757 1:5.3.5~rc1-1
tag 870757 + moreinfo
tag 870757 + unreproducible
thhanks
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 09:26:53PM +0200, phobos wrote:
> Package: libreoffice5.3-writer
This is not a Debian package.
> Version: 5.3.5.2-2
And this is not a version which was in
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 08:59:09PM +0200, ba...@jastra.netprojekt.pl wrote:
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> libreoffice : Depends: libreoffice-base but it is not going to be installed
>Depends: libreoffice-calc but it is not going to be installed
>
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 08:18:46PM +0200, ba...@jastra.netprojekt.pl wrote:
> Dnia Mon, 31 Jul 2017 20:14:14 +0200 napisales[as]:
>
> > tag 870297 + moreinfo
>
> Good Afternoon,
>
> Should I try to translate Polish system messages?
No, you should make apt print english.
export LANG=C
> I am u
tag 870297 + moreinfo
tag 870297 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 07:57:11PM +0200, ba...@jastra.netprojekt.pl wrote:
> I have installed some programs, which I hoped could help me to contact my
> tablet with Android. They resulted uninstalling my Libre Office.
Then your syst
tag 870278 + buster
tag 870278 + sid
thanks
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 03:50:56PM +0200, Alex ARNAUD wrote:
> Forwarded: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1170242
I am confused, what would Forwarded: to a *Mozilla* bug help? :)
> I've tested on Debian 8.8 with Orca 3.24, LibreOffice
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 10:53:14AM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> > *shrugs*, Do I read that right that everything boils down to cppunit
> > using clang and that one build-dependig on ocaml for whatever reason?
> > This is hilarious.
>
> It's actually doxygen that uses libclang. Otherwise,
tag 870070 - moreinfo
reassign 870070 src:linux
forcemerge 865303 870070
thanks
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 07:14:04PM +0200, Carmelo C wrote:
>"gdb --args /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice.bin --writer"
>"run"
>"bt full"
Thread 1 "soffice.bin" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentatio
Hi,
even with
> Sorry, I meant to file this against cppunit, not subunit.
from your reassign this bug report is weird.
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 06:43:40PM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> The subunit source package's Build-Depends on doxygen creates a
> circular dependency which makes it difficul
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 03:23:46PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> https://lwn.net/Articles/727206/
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=865303
> and "friends" merged to it.
> https://lwn.net/Articles/727703/ (ttbok unforunatel subscriber-only by now.)
A
On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 02:29:38PM +0200, Carmelo C wrote:
>Attached...
Useless, afaics. libreoffice is a shell script which runs an other shell script
(soffice) which runs the real office. You always need -f to strace here.
Anyway, as said in my initial reply: gdb backtrace please:
https://
severity 870070 grave
tag 870070 - security
tag 870070 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 02:19:04PM +0200, Carmelo C wrote:
>Package: libreoffice-writer
>Version: 1:5.2.7-1
>Severity: critical
No? How does it break your whole system?
See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Devel
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 02:16:11PM +0200, ch...@musicchris.de wrote:
> > It was wrecked before already ;)
>
> That is, if you're not meaning to say that using nvidia-driver instead of
> nouveau is wrecking the system... :o)
I am meaning exactly that. :)
> >> Bottom line is, using Nouveau d
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 01:39:34PM +0200, ch...@musicchris.de wrote:
> Well, that wrecked my whole system!
It was wrecked before already ;)
> Bottom line is, using Nouveau driver "repaired" LibreOffice! It works like a
> charm. Unfortunately I need the nvidia-driver...
No need to rush, I a
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 12:51:40PM +0100, Antonio Marcos López Alonso wrote:
> Package: libreoffice
> Version: 1:5.3.5~rc1-3
>
> Attaching "glxinfo" and backtrace, just in case. No NVIDIA involved.
Good, you didn't mention a X Error printed on the console. Anyways,
so it's NOT this bug since the
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:41:06PM +0100, Antonio Marcos López Alonso wrote:
> Package: libreoffice
> Version: 1:5.3.4-4
>
> Metooing here.
>
> Just updated LO and things started to go wrong: opening a document leads to a
"Just"? To 5.3.4-4? That one was obsoleted sincd 6 days by 5.3.5 rc1. Whi
tag 869874 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:03:43PM +0200, chris_blues wrote:
> Severity: grave
>
> > Justification: renders pack
reassign 869649 src:linux
severity 869649 grave
forcemerge 865303 869649
thanks
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 10:19:35AM +, Alessandro Chiominto wrote:
>>> Works for me in stable (see below) and I *do* have gnome installed.
>The issue is SPECIFIC of the «superobsolete» i386 architecture
found 869649 1:5.2.7-1
tag 869649 + moreinfo
tag 869649 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 04:57:19PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:33:33AM +, Alessandro Chiominto wrote:
> > Package: libreoffice-gnomeVersion: any
If you would have send this in a val
severity 869613 grave
reassign 869613 src:linux
forcemerge 865866 869613
affects 869613 libreoffice-writer
thanks
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 11:23:33PM -0400, Aaron Valdes wrote:
> Thread 1 "soffice.bin" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0xa72a8975 in _expand_stack_to(unsigned char
tag 869613 + moreinfo
tag 869613 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 04:12:01PM -0400, Aaron Valdes wrote:
> Package: libreoffice-gtk2
> Version: 1:5.2.7-1
>
> This is happening on my Dell Latitude D505.
Hmm. i386?
> When trying to launch libreoffice, the word processor does no
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 09:19:43PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/How_to_debug
> (which is also trivially findable by googling for "libreoffice gdb backtrace")
I am sorry, that of course was nonsense. I meant _th
tag 868349 + upstream
found 868349 1:5.3.4-1
thanks
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 02:00:17PM -0500, jtl wrote:
> Just one more thing to add.
>
> Did try Version: 5.3.4.2 as a flatpak and the bug still persisted.
Too bad 5.3.4/5.3.5 is a dead end too, given 5.4.0 will be uploaded next
week and th
reassign 869161 src:linux
severity 865303 grave
forcemerge 865303 869161
affects 869161 libreoffice-base
thanks
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 10:00:15AM +0200, thierry wrote:
> I have just upgraded from Jessie to Stretch and libreoffice-base always
> crashes when creating a new file or opening a f
tag 868855 + fixed-upstream
thanks
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 04:32:33PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> That said, according to qa.d.o 2.3.0 is out since July, 3, which has different
> cppunit fixes, didn't look at the issues whether it is these, but..
Yes, it is:
configure
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 03:42:07PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> diff -Nru softhsm2-2.2.0/debian/patches/cppuniit-pkg-config.diff
> softhsm2-2.2.0/debian/patches/cppuniit-pkg-config.diff
> --- softhsm2-2.2.0/debian/patches/cppuniit-pkg-config.diff1970-01-01
> 01:00:00.000
thsm2-2.2.0/debian/changelog softhsm2-2.2.0/debian/changelog
--- softhsm2-2.2.0/debian/changelog 2017-02-12 15:12:33.0 +0100
+++ softhsm2-2.2.0/debian/changelog 2017-07-19 15:30:41.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+softhsm2 (2.2.0-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+
-dep
+(closes: #862133)
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard Tue, 11 Jul 2017 00:42:20 +0200
+
gnuradio (3.7.10.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* update to v3.7.10.1-24-gea2aeca
diff -Nru gnuradio-3.7.10.1/debian/control gnuradio-3.7.10.1/debian/control
--- gnuradio-3.7.10.1/debian/control2016-07-07
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 07:34:11AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > X-Error: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes)
> > Major opcode: 154
> > Minor opcode: 5
> > Resource ID: 0x4800019
> > Serial No:242 (242)
> > These errors
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 07:29:06AM +0200, nicolas.patr...@gmail.com wrote:
> Le 16/07/2017 21:19:44, Rene Engelhard a écrit :
>
> > That was not the question. I simply don't care wether other stuff does
> > work width it. Every stuff has it's own quirks and LO uses
On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 09:00:20PM +0200, nicolas.patr...@gmail.com wrote:
> Le 16/07/2017 20:43:28, Rene Engelhard a écrit :
>
> > Oh, no. nvidia. Does it also happen with drivers actually in Debian?
>
> I can run minetest fine, that uses the nvidia driver.
That was not the
On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 08:02:18PM +0200, nicolas.patr...@gmail.com wrote:
> Le 16/07/2017 16:04:00, Rene Engelhard a écrit :
>
> > This was a strace of the bash, not of LO..
> > You would have needed -f or -ff...
>
> > But I asked about a backtrace from gdb, not
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 04:04:00PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> This was a strace of the bash, not of LO..
> You would have needed -f or -ff...
>
> But I asked about a backtrace from gdb, not about a strace..
Thinking about it, maybe both would be helpful. But as said, you
Hi,
This was a strace of the bash, not of LO..
You would have needed -f or -ff...
But I asked about a backtrace from gdb, not about a strace..
Regards,
Rene
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 16. Juli 2017 um 15:24 Uhr
> Von: nicolas.patr...@gmail.com
> An: "Rene Engelhard"
> Cc:
tag 868507 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 10:33:22AM +0200, Nicolas Patrois wrote:
> Package: libreoffice-writer
> Version: 1:5.3.4-4
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> LO crashes after the last upgrade:
You you mean after the 5.2.7->5.3.4-4 update?
> X-Error: BadMa
tag 868349 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 01:20:25PM -0500, jtl wrote:
> create sheet with more them one row
> add conditional formatting so that a couple of cell will be colored
> insert a new row
> copy from a row that is colored into new row
> close Calc
> reopen Calc
> the form
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 01:34:41PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 08:10:08AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > It seems that not all of these are actually affected. Most are, but the
> > things including google breakpad for their crash reporter stuff h
retitle 867209 libreoffice: Letter wizard can't find wizard templates when Wiki
Publisher installed
thanks
thanks
Hi,
I did a strace now. Seeing some very much ENOENT etc. for __pycache__ which
clobber the
output but are expected (no cache, no permission to write there( I stumbled
upon
6636
tag 862125 + fixed-upstream
thanks
Hi,
Gianfranco just told me:
"2017-07-10 - libfilezilla 0.10.0 released
New features:
Added fz::percent_encode and fz::percent_encode
Added fz::uri and fz::query_string
Added fz::less_insensitive_ascii for case-insensitive strings in maps
Bugfixes and minor c
severity 867095 serious
severity 867099 serious
thanks
Hi,
"Packages must autobuild without failure on all architectures on which they are
supported."
has been in the RC policy since ever.
missing or unfulldillable build-dependencies are RC since ever. And also
on arch all, we live in times of
Hi,
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:25:38PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> the following trivial patch fixes this:
[...]
Of course you also need (just noticed now, my bad):
diff -Nru libfilezilla-0.9.0/debian/control libfilezilla-0.9.0/debian/control
--- libfilezilla-0.9.0/debian/control 2017
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
please remove src:cppunit1.13.
Was originally intended as a compatibity measure for gnuradio and ola,
but the release team thinks they should - if the can't be adapted -
disable the testsuite.
See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=8626
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 05:44:22PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 10/07/17 16:50, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > a status update:
>
> Thanks, it all sounds good now, please go ahead.
OK; uploaded.
> >> retitle 862133 sr
severity 862135 serious
severity 862134 serious
severity 862133 serious
severity 862132 serious
severity 862131 serious
severity 862130 serious
severity 862129 serious
severity 862128 serious
severity 862127 serious
severity 862126 serious
severity 862125 serious
thanks
Hi,
cppunit 1.14 is now in
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 02:19:48PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> I just ACCEPTed cppunit1.13 from NEW but noticed it was missing
> attribution in debian/copyright for at least:
>
> src/msvc6/testrunner/DynamicWindow/SizeCBar.cpp
> src/msvc6/testrunner/DynamicWindow/SizeCBar.h
> src/msvc6/tes
Hi,
a status update:
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 11:07:12PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> retitle 862135 src:zookeeper: FTBFS with cppunit 1.14
> AM_PATH_CPPUNIT/cppunit-config removed)
Fixed.
> retitle 862134 src:drumgizmo: FTBFS with cppunit 1.14
> (AM_PATH_CPPUNIT/cppunit-co
Hi,
What does that have to to with #775652?
That one is abot the menus of LO itself. Not menu entries for LO.
please, a bit more caution when replying to bugs
Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:20:47AM -0300, Dario Andres Susman wrote:
> I've just updated to latest on the stable branch and libreoffice
[ ALWAYS CC the bug so that stuff is recorded there. Private mail doesn't }}
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 09, 2017 at 09:20:44PM +0200, Alberto wrote:
> * I don't know the led status at the moment
??
> but system work fine without trouble thinking
Yes, obviously you didn't think when apt wanted to remove li
[ Ah, I missed you already reassigned it back. Nevermind. ]
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 09, 2017 at 05:57:00PM +, Viktor Jägersküpper wrote:
> At last I tested a laptop with jessie and
> LibreOffice 1:4.3.3-2+deb8u2 again with the steps as before, but the
> printer was listed in LibreOffice and the GNOME
Hi.,
On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 09:27:00PM +, Viktor Jägersküpper wrote:
> With version 2.2.3-2 of CUPS Libreoffice shows my printer and the
> printer is listed in the printer section of the GNOME control center,
> after the upgrade to version 2.2.4-1 of CUPS the printer does not appear
> in both
tag 867805 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 09, 2017 at 06:29:24PM +0200, Alberto wrote:
> *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
>
>* What led up to the situation?
>* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
> ineffective)?
On Sat, Jul 08, 2017 at 11:44:18AM +0200, thomas wrote:
> Package: libreoffice-writer
> Version: 1:5.2.7-1
> Followup-For: Bug #819534
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
>
>* What led up to the situation?
> Starting libreof
tag 867209 + confirmed
found 867209 1:5.4.0~beta2-1
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 09:48:22PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> I clickety clack
> File -> Wizards -> Letter
>
> and nothing happens. Except for the console where I read:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 01:17:28PM +0200, jEsuSdA 8) wrote:
> I think you can mark this bug as closed.
> I'm using LO new version without problems. ;)
"LO new version" means? So I can mark it as fixed in that version.
Regards,
Rene
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 03:26:48PM +0200, Simon Kainz wrote:
> the same for
>
> libreoffice-writer1:5.2.7-1
>
> fresh i386 install of stretch inside virtualbox.
>
> I managed to create a gdb log, please see the attachment.
Aha. So this one is NOT AT ALL #820
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 01:59:58PM +0200, Frédéric MASSOT wrote:
> I have just seen the bug report 865303.
>
> I rebooted from kernel 4.9.0-3-686-pae to 4.9.0-2-686-pae and I have no
> problem with Writer.
Hmm, OK. so it's that shit.
(BTw, you don't need to reboot into -2-, just downgrade -3
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 12:13:38AM +0200, guillaume jaouen wrote:
> ##
> This is a minimal netinst stretch and the default java packages :
I haven't asked which Java packages you have installed. I have asked which
[ didn't get your mail since it only was sent to n...@bugs.debian.org,
which just gets to the maintainer - you :) ]
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 08:58:36AM -0700, John Belmonte wrote:
>I did update my key recently so expect I can still upload. Nonetheless it
>would be good for the distrib
tag 865866 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 02:24:48PM +0200, guillaume jaouen wrote:
> Package: libreoffice-writer
> Version: 1:5.2.7-1
> Severity: important
> Tags: upstream
[...]
>
>* What led up to the situation?
> Start libreoffice writer on a normal user account "l
tag 865859 + moreinfo
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 12:52:10PM +0200, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> this reports a somewhat unspecific regression: this version renders much
and how does this report help to trickly that?
> slower than version 5.2.7, may it be impress, writer, or calc.
> Most noticeab
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:09:43PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> It basically boils down just to
>
> $ cat debdiff | filterdiff -i '*debian*'
> diff -Nru xmlsec1-1.2.23/debian/changelog xmlsec1-1.2.24/debian/changelog
> --- xmlsec1-1.2.23/debian/changelog 2016
1001 - 1100 of 5621 matches
Mail list logo
