close 935148
thanks
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 08:59:03AM +0200, Ing. Branislav Staron wrote:
>Debian Buster was installed as RC. And apparmor reported too many AVC
>denials. Profile changes were made with aa-logprof.
I was too lazy to diff them, to be honest. Why did you think you
found 935182 1:6.3.0-1
thanks
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 08:47:00AM +0200, Gilles MOREL wrote:
> Actually, we were almost certain that the problem will be forwarded to the
> upstream, so we openned the bug on Document Fondation too.
Would have been nice to tell the upstream URL then in the report
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 03:44:36PM +1000, Trent W. Buck wrote:
> I still advocate solving only MY problem, with a simple change:
>
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=2;bug=929923;filename=929923.patch;msg=22
And I still say that it at least for en_GB is wrong. As said:
Hi,
sorry for dropping the ball on this.
On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 04:11:30PM +1000, Trent W. Buck wrote:
> I can dig out the contemporary th_en_US_v2.dat from
> snapshots.debian.org, and do a three-way diff between it,
> mythes-en-au, and current (LO6.3) mythes-en-us. That will show
>
retitle 935182 Concurrent file open on the same host results file deletion
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 06:30:06PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 04:52:52PM +0200, Gilles MOREL wrote:
> > Package: libreoffice-core
> > Version: 1:6.1.5-3+deb10u3
>
forwarded 935182 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127057
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 06:30:06PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> LO has lockinbg problems like this. This is nothing new. In fact, quick
> googling
> just gave me
> https://bugs.documentfo
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 04:52:52PM +0200, Gilles MOREL wrote:
> Package: libreoffice-core
> Version: 1:6.1.5-3+deb10u3
> Severity: grave
2 grave makes the package in question unusable by most or all users,
or causes data loss, or
introduces a security hole
tag 935148 + moreinfo
tag 935148 + unreproducible
thanks
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:01:49AM +0200, Branislav Staron wrote:
> Start-Date: 2019-08-19 07:56:26
> Commandline: apt-get upgrade
> Requested-By: branislav.staron (1903801450)
> Upgrade: libreoffice-wiki-publisher:amd64
tag 934779 + fixed-upstream
thanks
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 02:17:20PM +0300, Сергей Фёдоров wrote:
> It is recognized in version 6.3.0.2 rc, but now Version: 6.3.0.4 and that
> do something about it?
Huh, what? This was reported in 6.3.0 rc2 (= 6.3.0.2), and it isn't
fixed in 6.3.0 (= 6.3.0 rc4
forwarded 934779 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126254
tag 934779 + upstream
thanks
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 09:28:12PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > background color of window is black, so pale gray letters
> > are almost invisible on a black background
severity 94779 important
tag 934779 - moreinfo
tag 934779 + confirmed
reassign 934779 libreoffice-gtk2
retitle 934779 "About LibreOffice" window unreadable with gtk2
found 934779 1:6.3.0-2
thanks
[ please keep the bug CCed on discussions, otherwise this just ends up
in my personal inbox and is
tag 934779 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 09:51:33PM +0300, Сергей Фёдоров wrote:
> Debian Release: bullseye/sid
> APT prefers unstable
> APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
^
> Architecture:
notfound 934678 6.3.0.4
# according to upstream bug
found 934678 1:5.0.0~rc5-1
forwarded 934678 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104995
thanks
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 12:25:27PM +0300, Vangelis Skarmoutsos wrote:
>Package: libreoffice-writer
>Version: 6.3.0.4
Version:
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 11:24:20AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Are they using external liblangtag?
> (though the only locale-related patch I see in LOs code for liblangtag
> is to support ca_ES@valencia)
Looking at their .spec file
(https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libreoffice
Hi,
> Package: libreoffice-calc
Marked the bug affecting the versions you say below and fixed the title
(as it's not buster alone, as you say yourself)
Anyways:
Trying with 1:6.3.0-2 under GNOME (but the same symptoms are shown in
Xfce, too) in a Debian sid VM I get:
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 08:18:53PM +0300, Timur Irikovich Davletshin wrote:
> I believe bug is to be reopened again to fix dependencies. Package
Did so (and fixed it in git)
> libreoffice-mysql-connector does exist for LO 6.3 and to be upgraded
> automatically or it will cause problem upgrading
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 08:21:55PM +0300, Timur Irikovich Davletshin wrote:
> If it was optional I don't get why it was changed? As far I understand
> it does exist in repo for LO 6.3.
Just as a dummy to upgrade to the new libreoffice-sdbc-mysql so that it
doesn't get lost in a upgrade.
in 6.1
tag 933835 + pending
thanks
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 07:17:40PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 07:54:21PM +0300, Timur Irikovich Davletshin wrote:
> > I was wrong, problem is not in atk*. I rolled back snapshot of buster
> > to it's original
reopen 933835
retitle 933835 libreoffice not start with fatal exception signal 11 when old
libreoffice-mysql-connector is installed
severity 933835 serious
thanks
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 07:54:21PM +0300, Timur Irikovich Davletshin wrote:
> I was wrong, problem is not in atk*. I rolled back
reopen 933835
retitle 933835 libreoffice not start with fatal exception signal 11 with old
libreoffice-mysql-connector installed
thanks
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 07:54:21PM +0300, Timur Irikovich Davletshin wrote:
> I was wrong, problem is not in atk*. I rolled back snapshot of buster
> to it's
close 933835
thanks
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 07:36:59PM +0300, Timur Irikovich Davletshin wrote:
> My complain was not about LO 6.3 in Debian Testing but about LO 6.3
Aha.
> from Buster backports. Well except me we have original reporter of this
> bug. Let's wait for him.
Which is - as I said -
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 06:03:09PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > If some version dependencies are wrong (it seems to be the case)...
>
> That's what you say. But why does it start on my laptop with busters atk
> then?
> And buster-backports' build is - of course - built a
reopen 933835
retitle 933835 too lax atk dependency? - libreoffice not start with fatal
exception signal 11
thanks
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 06:49:42PM +0300, Timur Irikovich Davletshin wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 10:30:50 +0200 Rene Engelhard
> wrote:
> > dependency informati
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 07:51:55AM +0300, Timur Irikovich Davletshin wrote:
> I believe this bug should be reopened.
Not sure.
> Right version of atk library is not in the dependencies of this build.
OK, but that would be a bug in atk that they are not giving us correct
dependency
On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 11:11:13AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> I think I saw this more or less exact backgtrace once when someone using
> siduction reported
> it to me via IRC.
>
> The cause here was siductions live system using overlayfs (and apparmor)
(Or on a not-updated De
tag 933835 + moreinfo
tag 933835 + unreproducible
tag 933835 - a11y
severity 933835 important
thanks
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 09:59:51AM +0200, sanskryt wrote:
> Package: libreoffice
> Version: 1:6.3.0~rc2-1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: a11y
> Justification: renders package unusable
No. It
Hi again,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 12:04:58AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 04:00:04PM -0500, william l-k wrote:
> >have linked sub-forms from two seperate tables for entering related data.
> >One of the databases started out as a l
[ please always keep the bug CCed so that the discussion gets recorded.
]
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 04:00:04PM -0500, william l-k wrote:
>The database is mariadb. Two database entry forms are now affected. Both
>have linked sub-forms from two seperate tables for entering related data.
>
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 03:20:20PM -0500, william l-k wrote:
> The pop up says that there is a problem with my SQL statement for MariaDB
> server version near ':link_from_ID)' at line one. But this isn't from a query
> I
MariaDB?
This sounds like
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 11:06:16PM +0200, Yvan Masson wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 09:17:05PM +0200, Yvan Masson wrote:
> > > > So apt install libreoffice would have shown that. But yes, tasksel
> > > > wouldn't have shown it.
> > > >
> > > That is exactly `apt show libreoffice` that
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 09:17:05PM +0200, Yvan Masson wrote:
> > So apt install libreoffice would have shown that. But yes, tasksel
> > wouldn't have shown it.
> >
> That is exactly `apt show libreoffice` that gave me the answer :-)
> The point is that not everybody has the abilities to use
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 05:34:41PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Could you make libreoffice (or another package like task-desktop) recommends
> > libreoffice-gnome?
>
> As shown above, task-desktop recommends task-gnome-desktop which already
> does what you want.
An
severity 933271 wishlist
thanks
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 05:16:31PM +0200, Yvan Masson wrote:
> LibreOffice is not able to read/write to GVFS mounts (GIO) if
> libreoffice-gnome is not installed. If I am not wrong, libreoffice-gnome is
> installed automatically only in the following cases
close 912140 1:6.2.0~rc1-1
thanks
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 09:51:40PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 07:11:03PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > But so we can remove --package $DPKG_MAINTSCRIPT_PACKAGE without a risk
> &
severity 931033 serious
severity 931034 serious
thanks
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 07:34:38PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> see also https://bugs.debian.org/932323
which now happened. Thus the packages are uninstallable -> serious
Regards,
Rene
reopen 931034
reopen 931033
thanks
Hi,
sigh. (This happens if you do it in a hurry because you normally do not
have time for this right now.)
Of course they shouldn't have been closed...
Regards,
Rene
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: important
Hi,
please remove
$ rmadison -s unstable libreoffice-kde libreoffice-pdfimport
libreoffice-ogltrans
libreoffice-kde | 1:6.1.5-3 | unstable | all
libreoffice-ogltrans | 1:6.1.5-3 | unstable | all
libreoffice-pdfimport | 1:6.1.5-3
Source: debian-parl
Version: 1.9.18
Severity: important
Hi,
I seriously don't get why a metapackage for "parliamentary work" needs
to depend on libreoffice-ogltrans. Probably just because it includes
the presentation class of boxer-data and that includes it :/
This needs go away. See the eact
ans into -impress
-- Rene Engelhard Sun, 30 Dec 2018 15:25:38 +
(and
libreoffice (1:6.2.0~rc2-1) experimental; urgency=medium
* New upstream release candidate
- belarussian -> belarusian (closes: #917795)
* debian/patches/m68k-fix-parameter-type.patch: as name says,
thanks John Paul
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 01:22:02PM +1000, Trent W. Buck wrote:
> This part isn't important, but I'll address it for the record.
>
> 1. My original problem is "Australian English users cannot click Tools >
> Thesaurus".
>
> 2. One fix is "apt-get install mythes-en-au" (note "AU" not
tag 929923 - wontfix
retitle 929923 mythes-en-us: add symlinks for en_AU etc.
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 12:51:44PM +1000, Trent W. Buck wrote:
> Do you agree so far?
Yes
> The solution
>
> I think on non-Debian, LibreOffice knows that en_* should use
> th_en_US_v2 because
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 10:04:02PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> $ apt-cache show mythes-en-us
> Package: mythes-en-us
> Source: libreoffice-dictionaries
Sorry, edited and sent too fast. This is the key point here. This mythes
dict is *exactly* what gets shipped in LibreOffice its
tag 929923 + wontfix
thanks
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 07:21:47PM +1000, Trent W. Buck wrote:
> Package: mythes-en-us
> Version: 1:5.2.5-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi Rene et al.
>
> My users are in en_AU.UTF-8 locale.
> They reported that Tools > Thesaurus doesn't work with mythes-en-us
Hi,
I am sorry for Stephanes premature bug closings.
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 05:08:32PM +0200, Oliver Sander wrote:
> > This kind of bug is not specific to Debian. I recommend you register on the
> > bugtracker of LO and follow it.
>
> This is indeed what I did before filing the Debian report.
Hi,
On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 10:36:06AM -0700, Francois Marier wrote:
> I was unable to print using CUPS before installing cups-bsd.
And how did you print from other stuff? That also needs lpr. Especially
on text-console machines, which is this is for.
> Since muttprint requires lpr to print
Hi,
On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 01:59:46PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > From what I understand bug#926009 is a regression in that version.
> > There's no explanation that I can see for that change, no associated
^
> > bug, and it doesn't
reassigm 928228 src:libreoffice
severity 928228 wishlist
retitle 928228 please package "my" l10n
thanks
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 11:14:20AM +0100, Marcus Tomlinson wrote:
> Package: libreoffice
> Version: 1:6.2.3~rc2-1
> Severity: normal
Definitely not. It's a wish for a new package -> wishlist
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 10:05:30AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> OK, thanks. Please go ahead.
Uploaded, thanks.
Regards,
Rene
tag 926199 - moreinfo
thanks
Hi Adam,
On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 09:23:10PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-04-01 at 21:43 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > now that https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=911925
> > is finally fixed in stretch-p-u I think i
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:32:31PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> this is now 1:5.2.7-1+deb9u7 given the Reiwa fix...
>
> New diff will follow.
Here it is:
diff -Nru libreoffice-5.2.7/debian/changelog libreoffice-5.2.7/debian/changelog
--- libreoffice-5.2.7/debian/changelog 2019-04
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:31:06PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> diff -Nru libreoffice-6.1.5/debian/changelog
> libreoffice-6.1.5/debian/changelog
> --- libreoffice-6.1.5/debian/changelog2019-04-03 13:19:34.0
> +0200
> +++ libreoffice-6.1.5/debian/changelog
retitle 926199 stretch-pu: package libreoffice/1:5.2.7-1+deb9u7
thanks
Hi,
this is now 1:5.2.7-1+deb9u7 given the Reiwa fix...
New diff will follow.
Regards,
Rene
-04-03 13:19:34.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+libreoffice (1:6.1.5-3) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * debian/patches/jp-JP-Reiwa.diff: Introduce next Japanese gengou
+era 'Reiwa', from libreoffice-6-1 branch
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard Wed, 03 Apr 2019 13:19:34 +0200
+
libreoffice (1:6.1.5-2
+deb9u6) stable; urgency=medium
+
+ * debian/patches/jp-JP-Reiwa.diff: Introduce next Japanese gengou
+ era 'Reiwa', from libreoffice-6-1 branch
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard Thu, 11 Apr 2019 21:48:53 +0200
+
libreoffice (1:5.2.7-1+deb9u5) stretch-security; urgency=high
* debian/patches
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 10:48:52PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 09:08:19PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > Just for info, from IRC #debian-release today:
> >
> > [21:03:39] <_rene_> elbrus: I think you are right (ENOSPC on my rpi
> &g
-casing for openjdk-8 and -9 from old "stack clash
+ fix broken on i386" days preventing removal openjdk-8
+ (closes: #926281)
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard Wed, 03 Apr 2019 13:19:34 +0200
+
libreoffice (1:6.1.5-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream release
@@ -66,6 +83,8 @@
2019 at 07:41:19AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 11:44:27PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Indeed, after adding "Debian" as a copy of "Oracle Corporation" javaldx
> > works again.
>
> I retract that, no idea what I did when testing
reassign 926009 src:libreoffice,src:openjdk-11
retitle 926009 openjdk-11 breaks libreoffice autopkgtests
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 11:44:27PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Indeed, after adding "Debian" as a copy of "Oracle Corporation" javaldx
> works again
retitle 926009 new "Debian" as java.vendor breaks libreoffice
reassign 926009 src:openjdk-11
thanks
Hi,
> > so maybe some backports for libreoffice are needed? is that fixed in 6.2.x?
>
> I don't even know yet what needs to be changed... That said, I actually
> first noticed this the day before
clone 925321 -1
reassign -1 src:libreoffice
severity -1 important
retitle -1 obsolete openjdk-8 dependency
block 925321 by -1
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 09:08:19PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Just for info, from IRC #debian-release today:
>
> [21:03:39] <_rene_> elbrus: I think you are
enjdk-8-jre-headless (= 8u181-b13-2~deb9u1)
+ (closes: 913641#) and build-conflict against it
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard Wed, 23 Jan 2019 18:51:09 +0100
+
libreoffice (1:5.2.7-1+deb9u5) stretch-security; urgency=high
* debian/patches/disableClassPathURLCheck.diff: add workaround to
diff -Nru libr
[ initally sent it to the wrong bug... ]
Hi,
ah, so it seems this is fixed in openjdk-8 from stable-security
now since
https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2019/msg00054.html
See e.g.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=911925#144 ff.
and the security team confirms
Hi,
ah, so it seems this is fixed in openjdk-8 from stable-security
now since
https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2019/msg00054.html
See e.g.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=911925#144 ff.
and the security team confirms this.
Regards,
Rene
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 06:41:07PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> *shrugs*. So another
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=913641 where this
> isn't fixed in (current) stable even after months after it was fixed
> for other suites?
>
> It has a build w
# so let's assign it back to both until this is sorted out..
reassign -1 src:libreoffice, src:openjdk-11
thanks
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 01:40:09AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 src:libreoffice
>
> > IMHO correctly so, some of the changes are so far away from the
> >
reassign 926009 src:openjdk-11
thanks
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 10:32:04AM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Currently this regression is blocking the migration of openjdk-11 to
> testing [1].
IMHO correctly so, some of the changes are so far away from the freeze
policy..
In any case, "normal"
severity 924087 minor
notfound 924087 0.2+ds-0+nmu1build2
found 924087 0.2+ds-0+nmu1
thanks
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 09, 2019 at 03:08:04PM +0200, Eliran Gonen wrote:
> In the first line it looks like “ do draw “ should have been “ to draw “.
Yup. When there ever will be an upload of textdraw again (I
On Sat, Mar 09, 2019 at 08:46:16PM -0300, Filipe Mosca wrote:
>Hi !! Sorry for the delay. I was not notified by your answer.
Then you need to fix your mail filter to not reject valid mails ;-)
>The problem still persists. I tried to install a flatpak but the same
>occurs.
Aha, that
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 09:58:52AM +0100, Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote:
> > And send where? Upstrem? Where we have a different build config than
> > them? (Let alone think about external libraries). Do we really want our
> > LO to "phone home" on a crash? Do we want to set up a web service for
> >
tag 992925 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 10:47:48PM +0100, Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote:
> I would love to have the LO crash tracker in Debian, so that I could use Deb
> packages to report bugs with a good trace. Would it be
> possible?
And send where? Upstrem? Where we have a
tag 922764 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 01:04:16PM +0100, Wim Bertels wrote:
> U can use copy/paste between calc and base to create a database table form
> calc data.
Please don't use "U", ther's no real saving here compared to "You" and
it just looks bad.
> I tested this
retitle 911859 libreoffice-base: " is no SQL conform identifier" if
containing non-SQL-92-allowed
characters
thanks
Hi,
sorry for the late answer.
On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 12:06:12PM +, John Talbut wrote:
> I found that the setting:
> "Use SQL-92 naming constraints"
> in Edit > Database >
severity 922370 minor
tag 922370 + unreproducible
tag 922370 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
[ somehow never appeared in my mailbox... ]
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 02:46:50AM -0300, Filipe Mosca wrote:
> After installed upgrade from debian strecth to debian buster/testing.
> When i openned the new instaled
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 08:06:13AM +0700, Andika Triwidada wrote:
> Recent translation activities preceeding upstream 6.2 release has pushed
> LibreOffice Indonesian Help translation to reach around 90%.
>
> Afterward, most new help translation to 6.2 was backported to 6.1.
>
> We would
On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 01:37:32PM +, Toni Mueller wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 11:03:21AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Neither do I, but do you really attempt to use 3840x2160 and are suprised
> > this is small on
> > a 15"?
>
> I don't "r
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 10:29:11PM +, Toni Mueller wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 07:41:58PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > screen #0:
> > dimensions:1920x1080 pixels (290x170 millimeters)
> > resolution:168x161 dots per inch
> > depths (7):
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 08:39:28AM +, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > At leat in my GNOME here on my new laptop this is quite small on
> > 1920x1080 but not unbearable even with my eyes..
>
> I have a 15" laptop and 294 dpi. But I noticed something else, that the
> resolution is set to 96x96,
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 10:37:38PM +, Toni wrote:
> on my HIDPI display, most UI elements, and especially the file dialogue,
> are too small. I tried setting environment variables, as suggested in
> the Arch wiki, but to no avail (I tried both GTK3 and QT settings).
This is pretty subjective,
forwarded 920859 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123077
thanks
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 01:48:43AM +0100, Michael Weghorn wrote:
> On 30/01/2019 22.34, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Upstream says:
> >
> > 14:44 < _rene_> bubli:
> >
found 920859 1:6.2.0~rc2-1
tag 920859 + confirmed
tag 920859 + upstream
forwarded 920859 Michael Weghorn
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 10:22:28PM +0100, Helmar Gerloni wrote:
> LibreOffice crashes when minimizing the file save dialog. Steps to reproduce:
>
> 1. Start LibreOffice
> 2. File
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 09:12:58PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Jup, replacing python3 with python3.6 makes this work
>
> For some reason the problem seems to be 32bit-only now:
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/lightproof.html
Not really. Still fails
Am 26. Januar 2019 18:05:07 MEZ schrieb Andreas Beckmann :
>On 2019-01-26 17:51, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>> (...)
>> Would like to avoid that, though; there's nothing arch-dep in this
>> package.
>
>The alternative is to put your own transition code in the maintainer
&g
Am 26. Januar 2019 17:58:13 MEZ schrieb Andreas Beckmann :
>On 2019-01-26 17:25, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>> the package changed any (well, arch-specific) to all (transitional
>package), maybe
>> that confuses dpkg-maintscript-helper? Any suggestion to get out of
>this?
>
Hi again,
On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 05:25:14PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Preparing to unpack .../11-libreoffice-mysql-connector_6.2.0~rc3-1_all.deb ...
> dpkg-query: no packages found matching libreoffice-mysql-connector:all
> dpkg-query: package 'libreoffice-mysql-connector' is not
tag 919298 - pending
thanks
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 07:35:53PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
> 'sid' to 'experimental'.
>
> >From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
>
> Preparing to unpack
>
unmerge 920020
reopen 920020
notfixed 920020 1:6.1.5~rc1-1
reassign 920020 openjdk-11-jre-headless
thanks
Am 24. Januar 2019 16:53:57 MEZ schrieb Amr Ibrahim
:
>Package: writer2latex
>
>Please update to version 1.6.1, and please update the watch file to
>keep
>track of upstream.
>
>Version history:
>https://sourceforge.net/p/writer2latex/code/HEAD/tree/branches/stable1.6/source/distro/History.txt
>
reassign 902331 src:libreoffice
block 902331 by 919883
found 902331 1:6.1.5~rc1-1
notfound 902331 1:6.1.4-1
severity 902331 serious
retitle 902331 uninstallable - arch-indep parts missing
thanks
See #919883. The arch independent parts failed to build so are not available.
Ask the openjdk people
reassign 919968 openjdk-11-jdk-headless
merge 919883 919968
thanks
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 08:28:16AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> ...
> [build BIN] ucbhelper
> S=/<> && I=$S/instdir && W=$S/workdir && mkdir -p
> $W/Module/nonl10n/ && touch $W/Module/nonl10n/ucbhelper
> javadoc: error - The
On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 08:07:26PM -0500, Logan Rosen wrote:
> In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:
>
> * d/t/control: Update dependency to libixion-0.14-0.
Which is incomplete. Note the find in the test itself, without what it
won't remove the lib and thus test
tag 918679 + unreproducible
tag 918679 + moreinfo
retitle 918679: libreoffice: error while loading shared libraries: libreglo.so
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 11:34:42AM +0100, Christoph Terasa wrote:
> I installed the latest version 6.1.4 of libreoffice from buster. When
> trying to to
severity 918499 serious
tag 918499 - unreproducible
tag 918499 - moreinfo
tag 918499 + confirmed
tag 918499 + pending
thanks
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 09:20:12PM +0700, Tunggul Arif Siswoyo wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 20:46:28 +0700 Tunggul Arif Siswoyo
> wrote:
>
> [skip]
>
> I think it
On Sun, Jan 06, 2019 at 08:21:36PM -0500, David Zelinsky wrote:
> > No, you didn't.
>
> Yes, I did. If you think something may have gone wrong with it, then
> you might tell me that. But if you think I'm lying, you're wrong.
I just said you didn't do a upgrade _recently_ because, see
below -
tag 918499 + moreinfo
tag 918499 + unreproducible
severity 918499 important
thanks
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 06, 2019 at 01:46:09PM -0500, David Zelinsky wrote:
> Package: libreoffice
> Version: 1:6.1.3-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
Sorry, but not every problem one person
clone 916846 -1
fixed 916846 1:6.1.4-2
reassign -1 libreoffice-impress
severity -1 important
retitle -1 [libreoffice-impress] Blank screen with OpenGL transitions
found -1 1:6.1.4-2
thanks
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 07:08:13PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Maybe we should just stop shipp
retitle 917686 lightproof: FTBFS: "zipfile is empty" with python 3.7 ("Key
Error")
thanks
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 12:37:55PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 10:43:37PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Relevant part (hopefully
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 10:43:37PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Relevant part (hopefully):
[...]
Unfortunately not. This is the relevant part:
for cfg in `find src -name "*.cfg"`; do \
python3 make.py $cfg; \
done
make.py:37: DeprecationWarning: The SafeConfigParser class has been
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 04:50:51PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I noticed /usr/share/icons/hicolor/512x512/apps contains svg files,
> seemingly all belonging to libreoffice.
>
> Example: /usr/share/icons/hicolor/512x512/apps/libreoffice-calc.svg
>
> That directory is meant only for
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 10:04:34PM +0300, Alexander Kernozhitsky wrote:
> > So it probably some system library at fault. Or some integration, though
> > apparently it happens with both gtk3 and "gen"... In both cases that is
> > still a upstream bug (, too).
>
> Please read the upstream bug
found 916846 1:6.0.1-1
tag 916846 + confirmed
thanks
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 04:51:58PM +0300, Alexander Kernozhitsky wrote:
> Package: libreoffice-ogltrans
[...]
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
Sigh. And "just" becaus it's in an own package and that packages
601 - 700 of 5578 matches
Mail list logo
