Bug#979188: RFS: git-subrepo/0.4.3-1 [ITP] -- Alternative to git-submodule(1) and git-subtree(1)

2024-06-24 Thread Samo Pogačnik
Hi Daniel, i prepared another candidate for the 0.4.6-1 release ( https://salsa.debian.org/spog/git-subrepo/-/commit/f96eeedd0e96b6f2bbcc8c013909de5d5325cafe ), hoping it ticks all the boxes and more:) I made the PR upstream (https://github.com/ingydotnet/git-subrepo/pull/623) and added

Bug#979188: RFS: git-subrepo/0.4.3-1 [ITP] -- Alternative to git-submodule(1) and git-subtree(1)

2024-06-14 Thread Samo Pogačnik
patches if necessary. > > From a quick look it seems removing the `git config core.autocrlf input` > call in test/setup already gets us quite far but the way git subrepo finds > its libs needs adjustment too. > > Commit review below: > > > From: Samo Pogačnik > &g

Bug#979188: RFS: git-subrepo/0.4.3-1 [ITP] -- Alternative to git-submodule(1) and git-subtree(1)

2024-06-14 Thread Samo Pogačnik
t's not working and fix it > with more upstreamable patches if necessary. > > From a quick look it seems removing the `git config core.autocrlf input` > call in test/setup already gets us quite far but the way git subrepo finds > its libs needs adjustment too. > > Commi

Bug#979188: RFS: git-subrepo/0.4.3-1 [ITP] -- Alternative to git-submodule(1) and git-subtree(1)

2024-06-01 Thread Samo Pogačnik
Hi Daniel, Dne 28.05.2024 (tor) ob 19:23 +0200 je Daniel Gröber napisal(a): > I'm not super happy with the approach of putting git-subrepo.d inside > /usr/share/git-subrepo tbh. I might be able to let it pass but it seems > lintian found another issue that needs patching anyway so you may as well

Bug#979188: RFS: git-subrepo/0.4.3-1 [ITP] -- Alternative to git-submodule(1) and git-subtree(1)

2024-05-11 Thread Samo Pogačnik
Dne 06.05.2024 (pon) ob 15:02 +0200 je Daniel Gröber napisal(a): > > Hmm. I'm not sure I like the idea of abusing libexec in this > way. Technically speaking it's for "internal binaries that are not intended > to be executed directly by users or shell scripts" this is clearly not the > case here.

Bug#979188: RFS: git-subrepo/0.4.3-1 [ITP] -- Alternative to git-submodule(1) and git-subtree(1)

2024-05-07 Thread Samo Pogačnik
Hi Daniel, Dne 06.05.2024 (pon) ob 15:02 +0200 je Daniel Gröber napisal(a): > > To be clear force-push should never ever be done when collaborating on the > branche(s) with multiple people, except in the most dire of circumstances > and only if everyone involved is notified appropriately. I'll

Bug#979188: Maintaining git-subrepo in Debian?

2024-05-04 Thread Samo Pogačnik
Dne 01.05.2024 (sre) ob 23:09 +0200 je Samo Pogačnik napisal(a): > Hi Daniel, > > After installing our current 'git-subrepo' deb i noticed, that bash-completion > integration with git does not work. The git-subrepo's own bash completion > works, > after you've already typed t

Bug#979188: Maintaining git-subrepo in Debian?

2024-05-04 Thread Samo Pogačnik
Hi Daniel, After installing our current 'git-subrepo' deb i noticed, that bash-completion integration with git does not work. The git-subrepo's own bash completion works, after you've already typed the first two words 'git subrepo TAB TAB', but the initial recognition of the 'subrepo' sub-command

Bug#979188: Maintaining git-subrepo in Debian?

2024-05-04 Thread Samo Pogačnik
Dne 25.04.2024 (čet) ob 12:59 +0200 je Daniel Gröber napisal(a): > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 10:06:49PM +0200, Samo Pogačnik wrote: > > Ok, so i'll prepare merge request in salsa gitlab, after pushing my > > change in my working branch? > > So creating a MR is fine but it'

Bug#979188: Maintaining git-subrepo in Debian?

2024-05-04 Thread Samo Pogačnik
Hi Daniel, Dne 24.04.2024 (sre) ob 17:33 +0200 je Daniel Gröber napisal(a): > I'll push the repo there and give you access, you just have to adjust the > Vcs-* fields and get those changes to me in a way that I actually want to > accept them ;P > > FYI: I'm not being obtuse, I could ofc. just

Bug#979188: Maintaining git-subrepo in Debian?

2024-05-04 Thread Samo Pogačnik
;what changed since the last version" in the end, not a blow > by blow of the git changes we used to get there. It's a judgement call tho. > > + > + [ Samo Pogačnik ] > + * Updated debian/control info > > Needs to be a lot more specifict than that. In d/changelog you're ta

Bug#979188: Maintaining git-subrepo in Debian?

2024-05-04 Thread Samo Pogačnik
Hi Daniel, Dne 18.03.2024 (pon) ob 13:55 +0100 je Daniel Gröber napisal(a): > > A good place to start is https://wiki.debian.org/Packaging > > If you prefer a talk format there's Lucas' (excellent) tutorial > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/packaging-tutorial/packaging-tutorial.en.pdf > I

Bug#979188: Maintaining git-subrepo in Debian?

2024-05-04 Thread Samo Pogačnik
Dne 11.03.2024 (pon) ob 20:18 +0100 je Daniel Gröber napisal(a): > Hi Samo, > > wouldn't you know it I've become a DD before I got a response to the > git-subrepo ITP/RFS ;) I also completely forgot about it until I needed it > just now. > > Are you still interested in maintaining git-subrepo in

Bug#979188: Maintaining git-subrepo in Debian?

2024-05-04 Thread Samo Pogačnik
Hi Daniel, I prepared a new git-subrepo in salsa as a fork of your project ( https://salsa.debian.org/spog/git-subrepo). Then i updated upstream and prepared a new 'debian/sid' branch. Would you be so kind to take a look at it and comment on what should be changed/fixed and how to proceed.

Bug#979188: Maintaining git-subrepo in Debian?

2024-05-04 Thread Samo Pogačnik
Hi Daniel, Dne 24.03.2024 (ned) ob 17:46 +0100 je Daniel Gröber napisal(a): > For building I use debuild or git-buildpackage+sbuild depending on context. > > I create chroots for sbuild with a wrapper script around > sbuild-createchroot using btrfs-snapshots for efficiency. > > To keep working

Bug#979188: Maintaining git-subrepo in Debian?

2024-05-04 Thread Samo Pogačnik
Hi Daniel, just a quick update. Dne 01.04.2024 (pon) ob 23:07 +0200 je Daniel Gröber napisal(a): > > Anyway gbp has reasonably good documentation, maybe you haven't seen it yet: > http://honk.sigxcpu.org/projects/git-buildpackage/manual-html/gbp.intro.html > (note the navigation buttons in the

Bug#979188: Maintaining git-subrepo in Debian?

2024-05-04 Thread Samo Pogačnik
Hi Daniel, Dne 31.03.2024 (ned) ob 16:01 +0200 je Daniel Gröber napisal(a): > > You removed the (Closes Bug#) ITP reference from d/changelog. It's policy > to close that but with the first upload, so you have to keep it. > Fixed (even salsa pipeline is happy:). > Workflow wise I don't see why

Bug#962385: RFS: git-subrepo/0.4.1~2 [ITP] -- GIT Submodule alternative

2020-06-07 Thread Samo Pogačnik
brepo work when run in a worktree * Simplify finding subrepos * Ask git to find the .gitrepo files * Doc: fix sentence repetition * Fix typos * Fixed typo * Travis CI not checking out a branch. Regards, -- Samo Pogačnik

Bug#962349: RFS: git-subrepo/0.4.1~2 -- GIT Submodule alternative

2020-06-06 Thread Samo Pogačnik
brepo work when run in a worktree * Simplify finding subrepos * Ask git to find the .gitrepo files * Doc: fix sentence repetition * Fix typos * Fixed typo * Travis CI not checking out a branch. Regards, -- Samo Pogačnik

Bug#962321: RFS: git-subrepo/0.4.1~2 -- GIT Submodule alternative

2020-06-06 Thread Samo Pogačnik
t versions * Make subrepo work when run in a worktree * Simplify finding subrepos * Ask git to find the .gitrepo files * Doc: fix sentence repetition * Fix typos * Fixed typo * Travis CI not checking out a branch. Regards, -- Samo Pogačnik