found 1030885 2023.12.15a1+dfsg-1
thanks
Hi. This is happening again. This is from my single-cpu autobuilders:
Status: successful python-cogent_2023.2.12a1+dfsg-4_amd64-20231103T073256.300Z
Status: successful python-cogent_2023.2.12a1+dfsg-4_amd64-20231103T074016.344Z
Status: failed
El 4/7/24 a las 13:25, Bo YU escribió:
I think the issue was raised by adding `Rules-Requires-Root: no` in
previous upload but checking the root env during build. I am not sure
why to check it so please double check it.
Yes, that was the thing that triggered this problem.
In this case, this
ackage: error: debian/rules binary subprocess returned exit status 2From: Santiago Vila
Subject: Fix build with gcc-14
Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/1075395
--- a/sockets.c
+++ b/sockets.c
@@ -634,7 +634,7 @@
void GetPeerIp(int sock,char *ipfrom,char *hostfrom)
{
struct sockaddr_in from;
-si
El 3/7/24 a las 5:42, Vladimir Petko escribió:
I have done a rebuild of ssl-utils-clojure[1] and it failed to build
with default Java 21 against gettext 0.22.5-1.
Ok, I admit that I did not test this myself, but since you said
"updating the package to 0.22.4 also solves this issue", I assumed
retitle 1071769 golang-github-google-cel-go: FTBFS: FAIL:
TestTimestampGetDayOfMonth
thanks
I'm putting the test which failed in the subject to avoid confusion.
Thanks.
Ok, I've just fixed this myself in 0.12.5+ds-6 via team upload.
The problem was that tzdata is not build-essential. While some autobuilders
still have it installed by default, the default debootstrap in trixie/sid
does not install it anymore in the buildd profile, so it is just
a matter of time
found 1071769 0.12.5+ds-5
thanks
Hi.
For some reason, this is still happening in the current version, see attach.
It also fails in reproducible builds:
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/golang-github-google-cel-go.html
If you can't reproduce it, my offer for
retitle 1069495 wacomtablet: FTBFS: failing tests
thanks
[ Please always Cc: the bug submitter, the BTS does not forward messages sent
to the bug address to the bug submitter by default ].
El 28/6/24 a las 19:26, Marco Mattiolo escribió:
that looks more an issue with Qt (and xorg?). Is this
[ Please keep 1074...@bugs.debian.org in the CC ]
El 26/6/24 a las 19:01, publiccontact2020 escribió:
subsequently:
sudo systemctl enable motd-news.service
The unit files have no installation config (WantedBy=, RequiredBy=, UpheldBy=,
Also=, or Alias= settings in the [Install] section, and
Hello.
Some time ago I received this report from Vincent Lefevre regarding po-mode.
The problem seems not to be fixed in the current version.
I include below a summary of the issue. The full history may be found here:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1018950
Thanks.
tags 1018950 + bookworm
fixed 1018950 0.21-14
thanks
El 26/6/24 a las 3:12, Vincent Lefevre escribió:
With emacs-gtk 1:29.4+1-2 and gettext-el 0.22.5-1 in unstable,
I no longer see any issue, even after removing the .emacs.d/eln-cache
directory.
I've also tried with emacs-nox
Hello.
I'm officially forwarding this "upstream" to Helmut Grohne, since
he did the usr-merge changes in 13.3.
Please clarify: You reported this against base-files version 13.1ubuntu1,
we don't have a base-files with such version.
Are you using Debian, Ubuntu or Linux Mint?
While this change
Hi.
There was an update of po-mode in version 0.21-14, so I think this
is very likely to be fixed in such version (present in trixie and above).
Can you please confirm?
Thanks.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Santiago Ruano Rincón
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, team+freex...@tracker.debian.org
* Package name: opentelemetry
Version : 1.16.0
Upstream Contact: https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-cpp/issues
* URL
El 21/06/24 a las 10:32, Sebastian Ramacher escribió:
> Contro: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 2024-06-20 17:17:02 -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: tr
reopen 1070207
thanks
El 24/6/24 a las 11:35, Adrian Bunk escribió:
The autopkgtest caught that I botched it by breaking ABI,
attached are updates for the first and third patches with
the same changes but without breaking ABI.
Ok, will update the patches.
I think this deserves a reopen.
Písař .
+This is CVE-2024-0911.
+
+ -- Santiago Vila Sun, 23 Jun 2024 18:25:00 +0200
+
indent (2.2.12-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release. Closes: #916199.
diff -Nru
indent-2.2.12/debian/patches/02-restore-round-up-macro-and-adjust-initial-buffer-size.patch
indent-2.2.12
El 23/6/24 a las 14:33, Arthur de Jong escribió:
On Thu, 2024-05-23 at 13:36 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
Arthur: Would be ok for you if I fix this in bullseye via team
upload?
Please do, thanks.
I only have limited time available at the moment and have quite a big
backlog of issues to pick
upload.
+ [ Arthur de Jong ]
+ * Update Fødselsnummer test case for date in future. Closes: #1022311.
+
+ -- Santiago Vila Sun, 23 Jun 2024 15:35:00 +0200
+
python-stdnum (1.16-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream release:
diff -Nru python-stdnum-1.16/debian/patches/series
python
currently is kylin-process-manager. I have successfully
built it locally against libcgroup 3.1.0-1~exp1. I haven't tested it
though. I could share the kylin-process-manager build log if required.
Thanks you,
-- Santiago
Ben file:
title = "libcgroup";
is_affected = .depends ~ &
they usually
either fail or they don't.
Santiago, is khard still failing to build for you?
As of today (version 0.19.1-2 in unstable), yes, all the time.
Thanks.
.
As mentioned above, https://salsa.debian.org/debian/kpatch contains a
WIP branch that already builds. Test is needed, but we are working on
it.
Could you please tell us if you agree or object on adding us as
co-maintainers?
Best regards,
Santiago
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.5
APT prefers
s.debian.org/1070494).
Dimitri, are you still interested in maintaining kpatch? If you don't
object, we will try to package the latest version, look at the existing
bugs when it was removed, and try to reintroduce it. Any objection to
that?
Cheers,
-- Santiago
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Thanks for the report.
I'm going to see if I can package version 0.22.5, which fixes this and other
bugs.
The plan B, if it becomes too much complex, is to override with
DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_STRIP
and maybe also apply the proposed patch for Java 21 in Bug#1056293, but this
would be
only to gain
Hi. I'm reading the upstream NEWS file and found this:
* Greatly simplify the code by using PerlIO instead of messing up
with encodings manually.
* This is a very intrusive change, and even if all tests of our
comprehensive suite pass, I still expect issues with this on some
corner
Hello Martin.
Please disregard the severity aspect of this bug. The RC status
was just an artifact of a FTBFS bug being reassigned to another
package. I agree that it would have been better to downgrade at
the same time of doing the reassign.
Everything we ask (Helge and I) is that this is
severity 1072643 normal
reopen 1072643
thanks
Note: The commands from Helge did not work, I'm reopening as "normal".
Thanks.
tags 1014136 - moreinfo unreproducible
tags 1014136 + ftbfs
tags 1014136 + bookworm
severity 1014136 serious
retitle 1014136 golang-mongodb-mongo-driver: Tries to access Internet during
build
close 1014136 1.12.1+ds1-2
thanks
Hi.
This was 100% reproducible in bookworm when using the unshare
El 08/06/24 a las 01:53, Marco d'Itri escribió:
> On Jun 08, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
>
> > > For oldstable bullseye 11 ...
> > > I'm not spotting it yet on:
> > > https://release.debian.org/proposed-updates/oldstable.html
> > > But presumably that w
tags 1069052 + ftbfs
retitle 1069052 gertty: FTBFS with SQLAlchemy 2.x
severity 1069052 serious
thanks
Hello. This is what happens currently when trying to build the package in
unstable:
==
ERROR: gertty.search
update dns-root-data for buster LTS and the ELTS
releases. Is there any objection to push the changes to the dns-team
repository?
FTR, I've updated the debian/master and debian/bookworm branches. I can
do the same once the bullseye version gets available.
Cheers,
-- Santiago (wearing the LTS/ELTS hat)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: src:python-skbio
Version: 0.5.9-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with
Package: src:rust-shared-child
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:rust-alacritty
Version: 0.12.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
Install main build dependencies
Package: src:node-multiparty
Version: 4.2.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:node-eventsource
Version: 2.0.2+~1.1.10-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh
Package: src:lomiri-download-manager
Version: 0.1.3-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs patch
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh
Package: src:node-follow-redirects
Version: 1.15.6+~1.14.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh
Package: src:freefilesync
Version: 13.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:ikiwiki
Version: 3.20200202.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:eslint
Version: 6.4.0~dfsg+~6.1.9-11
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
(Adding this note to the cloned bug)
Note: If you take a look at the FTBFS bugs I reported yesterday:
https://people.debian.org/~sanvila/build-logs/202406/?C=M;O=A
you can see that several of them are also a consequence of this change in po4a.
So, I fully support that this kind of behaviour
El 4/6/24 a las 23:29, Adrian Bunk escribió:
Control: tags 1070207 + patch
Control: tags 1070207 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for dcmtk (versioned as 3.6.7-13.1) and uploaded
it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it.
I've just made a team upload
Package: src:smb2www
Version: 980804-45
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh "build" --with
Package: src:uglifyjs
Version: 2.8.29-8
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:pppconfig
Version: 2.3.28
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh_testdir
po4a
Package: src:python-django-test-migrations
Version: 1.3.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh
Package: src:node-uuid
Version: 8.3.2+~8.3.3-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:node-stream-shift
Version: 1.0.1+~1.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh
Package: src:node-read-package-json
Version: 5.0.2+~2.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh
Package: src:node-mock-fs
Version: 5.1.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:node-parse-json
Version: 5.2.0+~cs5.1.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh
Package: src:node-json-parse-better-errors
Version: 1.0.2+~cs3.3.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules
Package: src:node-globby
Version: 13.1.3+~cs16.25.40-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh
Package: src:mapproxy
Version: 2.0.2+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:node-decompress-response
Version: 6.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh
Package: src:node-chownr
Version: 2.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:goobox
Version: 3.6.0-11
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build
Package: src:lomiri-history-service
Version: 0.5-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:appmenu-gtk-module
Version: 24.02-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:androguard
Version: 3.4.0~a1-14
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
reopen 1065387
tags 1065387 ftbfs
thanks
Hello. Currently this package FTBFS in this way:
stderr:
Package systemd was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `systemd.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
Package 'systemd', required by
in
https://salsa.debian.org/helmutg/bootstrap-usrmerge-demo.
Andrew, Aurelien, Chris, Matthias, Santiago: Any objections?
For base-files, please use branch "wip-202406" here:
git clone https://salsa.debian.org/sanvila/base-files-not-yet/
(I've just made such branch the default)
Package: src:shc
Version: 4.0.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs patch
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
Install main build dependencies (apt-based
Package: src:python-tld
Version: 0.13-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with
Package: src:pysdl2
Version: 0.9.16+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs patch
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
Install main build dependencies
Hello.
Instead of patch-2.txt and patch-3.txt, the following more simple patch
would also fix the issue (I've tested it on single-cpu systems and also
on m6a.large instances from AWS, which have 1 core and two threads).
(Suggested by Drew Parsons in Bug#1071722, which is similar to this one).
El 31/5/24 a las 13:41, xiao sheng wen(肖盛文) escribió:
Hi Santiago,
Would you report a new bug about this FTBFS on arm64 arch?
As Bug#1071336 is closed now.
Well, don't worry, it was not my intention to mix two problems in
the same report, only to make you aware of the build failure
El 31/5/24 a las 13:21, Drew Parsons escribió:
Source: adios4dolfinx
Followup-For: Bug #1071722
Santiago, could you try running with
export OMPI_MCA_rmaps_base_oversubscribe=true
added to the top of debian/rules?
That seems to work.
And also it works again on single-cpu systems
(where
I fixed bug in salsa:
https://salsa.debian.org/atzlinux-guest/psensor/-/commit/8da335a77089e65b265f09e39732bc60005c6f15
Reuploaded:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/psensor/
Thanks a lot. I built it in my test machine (only once) and
now it didn't fail.
Now you might want to look at this:
Hi.
The new release still FTBFS in AWS machines of type m6a.large
and r6a.large. See attach.
I still recommend that you address this bug if you plan to make
a new upload. If you need a machine to reproduce the failure,
please contact me privately.
Thanks.
psensor_1.2.1-1_amd64.build.gz
El 30/5/24 a las 15:24, xiao sheng wen(肖盛文) escribió:
I'm ITS psensor package, it's upload to mentor.d.n now.
https://mentors.debian.net/package/psensor/
In my opinion, if you are going to make a new upload
to become the new maintainer, then you should really
address this bug.
Thanks.
reopen 1071336
thanks
El 30/5/24 a las 11:15, xiao sheng wen(肖盛文) escribió:
psensor can build success now:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=psensor=amd64=1.1.5-1.4%2Bb1=1710303742=0
No, that was 78 days ago.
The build failure started to happen recently, this is my build
owner 1072146 !
thanks
El 29/5/24 a las 8:35, Jochen Sprickerhof escribió:
libexplain fails to build in sbuild+unshare now used on some of the
buildd:
PATH=`pwd`/bin:$PATH /bin/sh test/04/t0462a.sh
1c1
< kill(pid = 42, sig = SIGTERM) failed, Operation not permitted (EPERM)
---
kill(pid = 42
Package: src:starjava-datanode
Version: 1.0+2023.01.18-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh
Package: src:rust-bytecodec
Version: 0.4.15-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:rust-bytecheck
Version: 0.6.11-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:python-peachpy
Version: 0.0~git20211013.257881e-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules
Package: src:puddletag
Version: 2.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --with
Package: src:py-libzfs
Version: 0.0+git20240117.143b624-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh
Package: src:behave
Version: 1.2.6-5
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --with
Package: src:plotsauce
Version: 0~0.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:metakernel
Version: 0.30.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:octave-financial
Version: 0.5.3-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:swiftlang
Version: 5.6.3-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:geary
Version: 46.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:android-platform-art
Version: 14.0.0+r15-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh
Package: src:python-awkward
Version: 2.6.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
Your package tries to access Internet during build, which is not allowed.
I discovered this by building the package in 2028, as the SSL certificate
for https://pypi.org is perceived in such case as
found 851877 2.1.1-1
severity 851877 serious
fixed 851877 1.20-1
thanks
Hello.
I have been unable to reproduce this (even randomly) for
a long time. Because I don't keep failed build logs for bullseye,
bookworm or trixie, I'm marking this as fixed in the bullseye
version.
On the other hand,
In such bug I proposed to run mpi with true and skip
the tests if it fails.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1057556#34
Maybe a similar idea would work here as well.
We can try that. As you suggested in the other bug, it might be quirk of
openmpi we're facing.
openmpi
tags 1019303 + ftbfs
thanks
Additionally, the package currently FTBFS with this error:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
librm0 : Depends: libgssdp-1.2-0 (>= 0.12.0) but it is not installable
Depends: libgupnp-1.2-1 (>= 0.18.0) but it is not installable
tags 1056435 + ftbfs
thanks
A similar error happens when trying to build the package from source:
dpkg-buildpackage
-
Command: dpkg-buildpackage --sanitize-env -us -uc -b -rfakeroot
dpkg-buildpackage: info: source package ponyorm
dpkg-buildpackage: info: source version
tags 1032975 + ftbfs
thanks
Currently, this package FTBFS in unstable in this way:
dpkg-buildpackage
-
Command: dpkg-buildpackage --sanitize-env -us -uc -b -rfakeroot
dpkg-buildpackage: info: source package igdiscover
dpkg-buildpackage: info: source version 0.11-4
Package: src:xraylarch
Version: 0.9.74+ds1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
Install main build dependencies
Package: src:ypy
Version: 0.7.0~a1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
Install main build dependencies (apt-based
Package: src:umatrix
Version: 1.4.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
Install main build dependencies
Package: src:tree-style-tab
Version: 3.5.20-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
Install main build dependencies
Package: src:tinyjsd
Version: 1.2+git1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
Install main build dependencies (apt-based
Package: src:stackview
Version: 0.7.4-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
Install main build dependencies (apt-based
Package: src:sagetex
Version: 3.6.1+ds-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
Install main build dependencies (apt-based
1 - 100 of 7317 matches
Mail list logo
