El 30/8/24 a las 20:07, Andrea Pappacoda escribió:
The issue does not appear yet on Testing.
It happens in testing already:
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rbuild/trixie/i386/xbyak_7.05-1.rbuild.log.gz
(I've also triggered a rebuild for amd64, where I would expect it to fail as
Package: src:kannel
Version: 1.4.5-17
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
dh_update_aut
Package: src:urfkill
Version: 0.5.0-7.2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --with autorecon
Package: src:zope.i18nmessageid
Version: 6.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --bui
Package: src:xbyak
Version: 7.05-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --buildsystem=meson
Package: src:terminology
Version: 1.13.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
dh_updat
Package: src:tryton-server
Version: 6.0.49-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
/usr/lib/python3/di
Package: src:sogo
Version: 5.11.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
dh_update_autot
Package: src:sshguard
Version: 2.4.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
dh_update_au
Package: src:pyzbar
Version: 0.1.9-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with python3 --
Package: src:rl-accel
Version: 0.9.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
dpkg-buildpackage: info: host architecture amd
Package: src:python-ofxhome
Version: 0.3.3-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --with pyth
Package: src:python-libais
Version: 0.17+git.20190917.master.e464cf8-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules
Package: src:python-josepy
Version: 1.14.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with py
Package: src:python-libusb1
Version: 2.0.1+ds-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --with p
Package: src:python-isc-dhcp-leases
Version: 0.10.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:python-funcsigs
Version: 1.0.2-5
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh /usr/share/opens
Package: src:python-django-bootstrap-form
Version: 3.4-8
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh bina
Package: src:python-ciso8601
Version: 2.3.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with p
Package: src:pyramid-jinja2
Version: 2.7+dfsg-1.3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --with
Package: src:python-applicationinsights
Version: 0.11.10-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh bi
Package: src:python-bitcoinlib
Version: 0.11.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --wit
Package: src:powerline
Version: 2.8.3-6
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with sphinxd
Package: src:pyfastx
Version: 2.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --buildsystem py
Package: src:pycollada
Version: 0.7.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --buildsystem=py
Package: src:pdb-tools
Version: 2.5.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --buildsystem
Package: src:ovn
Version: 24.03.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with autoreconf,
Package: src:ocaml-merlin
Version: 5.1-502+ds-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with
Package: src:netavark
Version: 1.9.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --buildsystem c
Package: src:nauty
Version: 2.8.8+ds-5
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
dh_update_au
Package: src:manuel
Version: 1.12.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with python3,s
Package: src:lomiri-online-accounts
Version: 0.14-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:magic-wormhole
Version: 0.14.0-0.1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --with p
Package: src:keepass2
Version: 2.57+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --with=cli
Package: src:gstreamermm-1.0
Version: 1.10.0+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --
Package: src:jupyter-packaging
Version: 0.12.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --wit
Package: src:gmime
Version: 3.2.14+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with=gir
Package: src:gcc-avr
Version: 1:7.3.0+Atmel3.7.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh_testdir
AU
Package: src:fcitx5-m17n
Version: 5.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
dh_update
Package: src:flake8-quotes
Version: 3.4.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --buildsys
Package: src:factory-boy
Version: 2.11.1-8
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --buildsystem
Package: src:ephoto
Version: 1.6.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build
dh_update_autoto
Package: src:e17
Version: 0.26.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
dh_update_autoto
Package: src:django-guardian
Version: 2.4.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with p
Package: src:dbus-deviation
Version: 0.6.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --buildsyst
Package: src:datalad-container
Version: 1.2.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --with p
My use case is that sometimes I need to know in which date
some package stopped failing to build in testing because
an unknown build-dependency finally propagated to testing.
For that to happen I need either:
(A) Create a usr-merged buildd chroot of bookworm, then upgrade to the
desired trixie a
tags 1066413 + patch
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
fds/memfd.c:22:12: error: static declaration of ‘memfd_create’ follows
non-static declaration
22 | static int memfd_create(__unused__ const char *uname, __unused__
unsigned int flag)
|^~~~
Hello Gustavo.
I see th
This creates some interesting problems, like upgrade tests failing.
Do you also get an unmerged system having the usr-is-merged package installed?
That would explain that upgrades do not work.
Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
And yes, upgrading these is not supported.
I don't see any good reason wh
Lee Garret wrote:
when creating a bookworm schroot e.g. with
sbuild-createchroot --merged-usr bookworm
/var/lib/schroot/schroots/bookworm-amd64-sbuild
http://localhost:3142/deb.debian.org/debian/
the resulting schroot has an unmerged /usr.
I'm doing this:
sbuild-createchroot --merged-usr boo
El 24/8/24 a las 19:29, Petter Reinholdtsen escribió:
I also tried with
export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=-all
Hi. As an experiment, I tried that and managed to remove all "proper-compiling"
errors.
The error which happens at the end is actually a linking error.
I suspect the b
olved parties
Thanks.--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+magit (2.99.0.git0957.ge8c7bd03-1+deb11u1) bullseye; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Make test failures non-fatal. Closes: #1070937.
+
+ -- Santiago Vila Sat, 24 Aug 2024 01:40:00 +0200
+
El 22/8/24 a las 16:44, Micha Lenk escribió:
On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 03:09:02 +0200 Santiago Vila wrote:
I can still reproduce this one. Please contact me if you need a VM
I'd like to take a look. Is bug #1074673 still reproducible on your VM?
For the record, I created a VM for you yest
severity 1074673 serious
tags 1074673 - moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
El 21/7/24 a las 20:59, Micha Lenk escribió:
amd64 builds are passing on Salsa CI
Yes, they are passing, but for a *different* version:
dpkg-buildpackage: info: source version 1.57-1+salsaci+20240721+93
This bug report wa
Package: src:python-rabbitair
Version: 0.0.8-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --build
reassign 1076905 libgpg-error-dev
affects 1076905 + src:poldi
found 1076905 1.49-2
fixed 1076905 1.50-3
thanks
Hello.
The configure error which I reported here does not
happen anymore, but the poldi version has not changed at all.
Therefore this seems to be (or was) a bug in one of
the build-de
Hi.
I went ahead and did the NMU, because the deadline was very
close and this was the last chance to fix it in bullseye.
But now that I got access to astro team in salsa (thanks!),
I've put the NMU changes in salsa (branch bullseye) so that
everything is in place.
Thanks a lot.
Hello.
I have made a NMU to fix this in *bullseye*.
(You probably received the Cc for the release.debian.org bug I filed).
The proposed diff which I sent in 2022-12 was not enough.
I had to do this as well:
override_dh_auto_install:
ifneq (,$(findstring libmlpost-ocaml-doc,$(shell dh_listpack
[ I would restore the metadata here, but the commands
I issued before didn't work... ]
El 22/8/24 a las 20:06, Adam D. Barratt escribió:
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Thu, 2024-08-22 at 14:28 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
This upload fixes FTBFS bug #991060, which is probably the
tags -1 - confirmed
tags -1 + moreinfo
thanks
El 22/8/24 a las 20:06, Adam D. Barratt escribió:
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Thu, 2024-08-22 at 14:28 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
This upload fixes FTBFS bug #991060, which is probably the last
remaining build failure due to a new imagemagick
If you want to change such a long-standing practice, you should *really* talk to
Release Managers, not to me.
Can you point me to a case where the release managers reverted or rejected such
a change to /etc/os-release? I'm especially interested in the arguments against
setting those machine-re
by Dennis Filder to override ImageMagick policy.
+Closes: #991060.
+
+ -- Santiago Vila Thu, 22 Aug 2024 14:00:00 +0200
+
mlpost (0.8.2-4) unstable; urgency=medium
* Add empty dh_dwz override to fix FTBFS
diff -Nru mlpost-0.8.2/debian/patches/0009-Override-ImageMagick-policy.patch
ml
000
+0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+healpix-java (3.60+ds-4+deb11u1) bullseye; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Fix FTBFS bug: rm: cannot remove 'images'. Closes: #1022373.
+
+ -- Santiago Vila Thu, 22 Aug 2024 12:05:00 +0200
+
healpix-java (3.60+ds-4) unstable; urgenc
* Drop decnet support to fix FTBFS bug. Closes: #1028795.
+
+ -- Santiago Vila Thu, 22 Aug 2024 03:32:00 +0200
+
trinity (1.9+git20200331.4d2343bd18c7b-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* [c24aa6] Make the build verbose by default.
diff -Nru
trinity-1.9+git20200331.4d2343bd18c7b/debi
Ok, I believe the attached trivial patch should be enough.
(i.e. change "rm -r" to "rm -rf")
When I apply the patch, diffoscope reports that the package
"libhealpix-java" is essentially the same, as this minor difference
does not really count:
│ │ │ ├── META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
│ │ │ │ @@ -1,4 +1,4
Ok, I naively believed that 3.60+ds-4 could be reuploaded as 3.60+ds-4+deb11u1
for bullseye, but the tools do not seem to behave the same:
jh_build
warning: [options] bootstrap class path not set in conjunction with -source 7
1 warning
Creating destination directory: "debian/_jh_build.javadoc/api
tags 1022373 - sid
tags 1022373 + bullseye
forcemerge 1022373 1070931
thanks
Hi. I'd like to fix this for bullseye, mainly because the failure
happens in the build stage. I'd say this is against DFSG.
I'll prepare an upload and will file the bug against release.debian.org,
but I would prefer thi
loses: #1024730.
+This is required to be able to remove dnprogs from bullseye,
+since it's obsolete and it does not build from source.
+ Thanks to Santiago Vila for preparing this.
+
+ -- Martina Ferrari Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:30:00 +0200
+
net-tools (1.60+git20181103.0eebece-1) unst
El 21/8/24 a las 19:16, Santiago Vila escribió:
Ok, I'm going to send the bug against release.debian.org based on the exact
debdiff
I sent before. Stay tuned.
Correction: I'm going to take the debdiff from salsa.
Thanks.
El 21/8/24 a las 19:00, Martina Ferrari escribió:
I'm attaching a trivial patch against the version currently in *bullseye*.
Thanks! I have just applied it to git.
Ok, I'm going to send the bug against release.debian.org based on the exact
debdiff
I sent before. Stay tuned.
Thanks.
tags 1028795 + patch
thanks
Hi. We are still in time to fix this for bullseye.
Here is a patch, taken from the upstream git repo.
Thanks.diff -Nru trinity-1.9+git20200331.4d2343bd18c7b/debian/changelog
trinity-1.9+git20200331.4d2343bd18c7b/debian/changelog
--- trinity-1.9+git20200331.4d2343bd18
El 20/8/24 a las 16:17, Alessandro Astone escribió:
Attaching a debdiff that partially addresses this problem.
I looked at the debdiff. Would not be better and more straightforward
to just do "recode latin1.. man/pppconfig.add.fr" ?
The package is 3.0 (native) so we don't even need a patch for
reassign 1079088 emacs
severity 1079088 normal
thanks
El 20/8/24 a las 2:10, Vincent Lefevre escribió:
Package: diffutils
Version: 1:3.10-1
Severity: important
Affects: emacs-gtk
Forwarded: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=72723
I've just reported the following bug upstream:
-
Note: I've unarchived this bug and proposed a trivial patch:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024730
Hopefully there will be another release.debian.org request
soon for net-tools to complement this one.
Thanks.
tags 1024730 + bullseye
thanks
Hi. I'm "reopening" this because we should try to fix it in bullseye as well.
Currently, dnprogs FTBFS in bullseye (#1070960) and I've asked
it to be removed for the next (and last) point release (#1079021).
But we can't do that as far as net-tools continues to bu
Unfortunately it's not that simple:
Checking reverse dependencies...
# Broken Build-Depends:
net-tools: libdnet-dev
Hi. Additional tests indicate that such build-dependency
is not really used to build the package.
When I build the package with and without it, the resulting .deb
packages are es
El 19/8/24 a las 7:39, Adam D. Barratt escribió:
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo
On Mon, 2024-08-19 at 02:25 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
I believe this package (dnprogs) should be removed from bullseye
in the next (and last) upcoming point release.
- Main reason: Packages in bullseye must build in
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
X-Debbugs-Cc: sanv...@debian.org
Dear Release Managers:
I believe this package (dnprogs) should be removed from bullseye
in the next (and last) upcoming point release.
- Main reason: Packages
Package: src:symfony
Version: 5.4.23+dfsg-1+deb12u2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 6.4.7+dfsg-1
Tags: ftbfs bookworm
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
Package: src:science.js
Version: 1.9.3+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.9.3+dfsg-4
Tags: ftbfs bookworm
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
Package: src:nvda2speechd
Version: 0.1-6
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.1-9
Tags: ftbfs bookworm
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
(Note: This one is apparently not related with Internet access or the unshare
backend)
-
Package: src:node-y-websocket
Version: 1.4.5-4
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.4.5-5
Tags: ftbfs bookworm
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
de
Package: src:node-ytdl-core
Version: 4.11.2+dfsg+~cs4.10.8-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 4.11.2+dfsg+~cs4.10.8-2
Tags: ftbfs bookworm
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
Package: src:node-tap
Version: 16.3.2+ds1+~cs50.8.16-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 16.3.7+ds1+~cs50.9.19-7
Tags: ftbfs bookworm
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
--
Package: src:node-y-protocols
Version: 1.0.5-6
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.0.6-1
Tags: ftbfs bookworm
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
de
Package: src:node-rollup-plugin-node-polyfills
Version: 0.2.1+dfsg+~0.11.0-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.2.1+dfsg+~0.11.0-3
Tags: ftbfs bookworm
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
---
Package: src:node-rollup
Version: 3.15.0-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 3.29.4-3
Tags: ftbfs bookworm
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
debia
Package: src:node-resolve
Version: 1.22.1+~cs5.31.10-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.22.8+~cs5.34.15-2
Tags: ftbfs bookworm
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
--
Package: src:node-regexpp
Version: 3.2.0-4
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 3.2.0-5
Tags: ftbfs bookworm
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian
Package: src:node-redis
Version: 4.5.1+~1.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 4.5.1+~1.1.2-2
Tags: ftbfs bookworm
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[
Package: src:node-recast
Version: 0.21.1-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.23.4-2
Tags: ftbfs bookworm
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
debia
Package: src:node-js-sdsl
Version: 4.1.4-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 4.1.4-3
Tags: ftbfs bookworm
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian
Package: src:node-mdn-browser-compat-data
Version: 5.2.20+~3.33.0-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 5.5.28+~4.8.0-2
Tags: ftbfs bookworm
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
-
Package: src:node-jest
Version: 29.3.1~ds1+~cs70.48.25-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 29.6.2~ds1+~cs73.45.28-5
Tags: ftbfs bookworm
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
---
Package: src:node-jschardet
Version: 3.0.0+dfsg+~1.4.0-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 3.0.0+dfsg+~1.4.0-3
Tags: ftbfs bookworm
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
Package: src:node-fstream-ignore
Version: 1.0.5-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
(Note: The package also FTBFS in trixie with a failure rate of 50% in my tests).
Package: src:node-es-module-lexer
Version: 1.1.0+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.1.0+dfsg-3
Tags: ftbfs bookworm
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
Package: src:diffoscope
Version: 240
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 274
Tags: ftbfs bookworm
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules bin
Package: src:node-csstype
Version: 3.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 3.1.3-1
Tags: ftbfs bookworm
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian
tags 1037435 + ftbfs
thanks
Hi. Please consider an upload for bookworm. Packages must
not access Internet during build. This fails when using
the unshare backend, which is already being used by
the buildds in an almost round-robin way.
Thanks.
601 - 700 of 4653 matches
Mail list logo
