I WANT to rename the interfaces.
I can create 70-persistent-net.rules manually, then it works perfectly.
But
And it is how it is supposed to work
Says who?
Not the man page for sure.
The functionality was there in squeeze. Could you point me to a changelog
entry that describes when
On Jul 20, Simon Lodal sim...@parknet.dk wrote:
No this is a bug. Why should interface renaming not work in virtual
machines?
Because their names are already stable.
You missed the point.
I WANT to rename the interfaces.
I can create 70-persistent-net.rules manually, then it works
No this is a bug. Why should interface renaming not work in virtual machines?
I have the same problem. For various reasons we have always renamed our
network interfaces to e0, e1, etc, both in physical and virtual machines
(kvm). What is wwrong with that?
Package: distcc
Version: 2.18.3-4.1
Severity: normal
distccd runs as user distcc, but apparently it uses /root/tmp as working dir.
I use /root permissions 0700. So this prevents distcc from running, and even
from installing cleanly.
# /etc/init.d/distcc start
Starting Distributed Compiler
4 matches
Mail list logo
