Bug#844895: libapache-mod-musicindex: FTBFS: x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc: error: .specs: No such file or directory

forcemerge 844302 844895 stop Thanks for the noise. > Le 19 nov. 2016 à 07:44, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > > Source: libapache-mod-musicindex > Version: 1.4.1-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: stretch sid > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161118 qa-ftbfs >

Bug#844302: libapache-mod-musicindex: FTBFS: x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc: error: .specs: No such file or directory

> Le 14 nov. 2016 à 11:37, Chris Lamb a écrit : > > Source: libapache-mod-musicindex > Version: 1.4.1-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: fails to build from source > User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs > X-Debbugs-Cc:

Bug#830769: O: flashybrid

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Orphaning my packages following the removal of my key from the keyring.

Bug#830767: O: schedtool

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Orphaning my packages following the removal of my key from the keyring.

Bug#830768: O: libapache-mod-musicindex

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Orphaning my packages following the removal of my key from the keyring.

Bug#830765: O: uptimed

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Orphaning my packages following the removal of my key from the keyring.

Bug#830766: O: tagainijisho

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Orphaning my packages following the removal of my key from the keyring.

Bug#784890: flashybrid: Unable to Sync ramstore directories ...

> Le 9 juil. 2016 à 17:53, Andreas Beckmann a écrit : > > On Sun, 8 Nov 2015 11:24:34 +0100 Tim Weippert wrote: >> DM's not allowed to do an NMU Upload. Sorry, can't help. > >>> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 03:00:24PM +0200, Thibaut Varène wrote: For the

Bug#796612: flashybrid: diff for NMU version 0.18+nmu2

> Le 8 juil. 2016 à 16:03, Felipe Sateler a écrit : > > On 7 July 2016 at 19:12, Thibaut Varène wrote: >> >>> On 08 Jul 2016, at 01:01, Felipe Sateler wrote: >>> >>> Hi Thibaut, >>> >>> On 7 July 2016 at 18:41, Thibaut Varène

Bug#770179: sessionclean: sed: invalid option -- 'z'

Package: php5 Version: 5.4.35-0+deb7u1 Severity: normal unattended-upgrades upgraded php5 on my machine last night, and since then I receive the following email every 30 minutes: Cron root@ [ -x /usr/lib/php5/maxlifetime ] [ -x /usr/lib/php5/sessionclean ] [ -d /var/lib/php5 ]

Bug#564045: ITA flashybrid

subject 564045 ITA: flashybrid -- automates use of a flash disk as the root filesystem thanks Hi, I feel like adopting this package which I happen to use myself. Raise a hand if you object and/or there's something I should know before uploading :-) T-Bone -- Thibaut VARENE http

Bug#730744: Update

Just a quick update to confirm that rebuilding libapr1 with apr_cv_accept4=no did indeed fix the issue. HTH -- Thibaut VARENE http://hacks.slashdirt.org/

Bug#730702: flashybrid: Init script is loaded too late, prevents flashybrid from working

Package: flashybrid Version: 0.17 Severity: normal Tags: patch Flashybrid init script is loaded too late in the boot process, rendering the service unable to work since the underlying filesystem is already busy (with files open for writing) at the time flashybrid tries to run. Attached is a

Bug#730744: apache2 stopped working with [error] (38)Function not implemented: apr_socket_accept: (client socket)

Package: apache2.2-common Version: 2.2.22-13 Severity: normal I can't tell whether that's an apache2 or libc bug, here's the story: Apache suddenly stopped working (it was still working a week ago, and there was no configuration change on the system in the interval). I suspect the last

Bug#708307: e2fsprogs: fsck.ext3 on ia64 is linked to /usr/lib/libunwind, which can live on a different partition, breaking boot

On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Theodore Ts'o ty...@mit.edu wrote: On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 01:57:25AM +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote: Package: e2fsprogs Version: 1.42.5-1.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable #1) This looks to be ia64 specific. This is the output

Bug#708307: e2fsprogs: fsck.ext3 on ia64 is linked to /usr/lib/libunwind, which can live on a different partition, breaking boot

Package: e2fsprogs Version: 1.42.5-1.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable This bug affects wheezy. Trying to upgrade one of my ia64 boxes from squeeze to wheezy turned into a non-booting system because: Checking root file system...fsck from util-linux 2.20.1 fsck.ext3: error

Bug#698746: NMU for experimental

now. Sorry for the delayed answer, mail relay was down. I don't have any particular reason to upload a new version to sid just yet so feel free to push your NMU. Might as well bump standards version in the process ;) Thx -- Thibaut VARENE http://hacks.slashdirt.org/

Bug#698746: NMU for experimental

free to include it; it will be in the next release of libotr. It's clear that it was a bug, and that this patch is the correct fix. Thanks! Micah, I unfortunately don't have time to prepare an experimental upload now, so feel free to do it. Best -- Thibaut VARENE http://hacks.slashdirt.org/

Bug#698746: NMU for experimental

haven't applied this patch yet. Thanks -- Thibaut VARENE http://hacks.slashdirt.org/

Bug#698449: pidgin-otr: French translation does not properly report security status of a discussion

, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc -- Thibaut VARENE http://hacks.slashdirt.org/ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc

Bug#696097: libotr: stopped building libotr2-dev which is still used

, //mirabilos -- I want one of these. They cost 720 € though… good they don’t have the HD hole, which indicates 3½″ floppies with double capacity… still. A tad too much, atm. ‣ http://www.floppytable.com/floppytable-images-1.html -- Thibaut VARENE http://hacks.slashdirt.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#692327: libotr: Please provide libotr2

On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 03:04:21PM +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote: I thought that Wheezy having been frozen for quite some time, it was okay to upload new packages to unstable again. I'm sure we would've communicated that on d

Bug#692327: libotr: Please provide libotr2

On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 10:59:42 +0100 Thibaut VARENE vare...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 03:04:21PM +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote: I

Bug#692327: libotr: Please provide libotr2

I'm mistaken. -- Thibaut VARENE http://hacks.slashdirt.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#692327: libotr: Please provide libotr2

been sitting in experimental for quite a while, and upstream devs have been quite vocal about the transition 3) libotr5 can be installed alongside libotr2 kthxbye -- Thibaut VARENE http://hacks.slashdirt.org/

Bug#692327: libotr: Please provide libotr2

On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 11:58:12 +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote: severity 692327 important thanks On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs x...@debian.org wrote: Package: libotr, release.debian.org

Bug#692327: libotr: Please provide libotr2

On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs x...@debian.org wrote: On 05/11/12 10:58, Thibaut VARENE wrote: severity 692327 important thanks I don't see how this is a serious bug. Currently libotr2* are not build from any source package in sid. That means that any packages

Bug#686463: RM: lomoco/1.0beta1+1.0-5

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Dead upstream, orphaned. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP

Bug#686463: followup

Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk In that case, would it not make more sense to remove it from unstable? Sure, why not. Removing it from the upcoming stable distribution is really necessary anyway. -- Thibaut VARENE http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#563061: Same here

exactly the same problem here, there's apparently no other way to disable this stupid line than commenting out lines 129-132 in /usr/lib/grub-mkconfig_lib I have no idea why this line makes the boot fail. -- Thibaut VARENE http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#685664: libotr: Please package 4.0 branch in experimental

useol4pJWTFlVsavmchqU+JDWy/PPLpQMHOUeVz3qk73hsrZmJ3i+blFi3scF7nE vU8kiBvr7Kv6gEK80juz6Sxk7q4XPSD75n0qqHkgGt9i/RoxxDsHUtVGr0jwELOt sPTnm0xQYYq7bf3sQJwH1lMPS+vqhbM+ccyygmbolAXMowGAZ+J2pWF+anlNUPlP gygfIBBNr4dJRuO93dh4 =twCB -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Thibaut VARENE http://www.parisc

Bug#685664: libotr: Please package 4.0 branch in experimental

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Ian Goldberg i...@cs.uwaterloo.ca wrote: On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 06:05:18PM +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote: In NEW queue. I'll see if I have time to deal with pidgin-otr later on. Please do not package libotr 4 yet. The release candidate is not working properly

Bug#684140: unblock: libotr/3.2.1-1

:12.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +libotr (3.2.1-1) unstable; urgency=high + + * Fix potential buffer overflow in base64 routines (Closes: #684121) + + -- Thibaut VARENE vare...@debian.org Tue, 07 Aug 2012 12:24:15 +0200 + libotr (3.2.0-4) unstable; urgency=low * lintian cleanup: diff -Nru

Bug#684121: libotr2: Buffer overflows in libotr

suggests: ii libotr2-bin 3.2.0-4 -- no debconf information -- Thibaut VARENE http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#682617: O: lomoco

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Moving on with #669614, it's time to orphan this package. Note to release manager: I don't think it should be part of wheezy, feel free to remove it from testing. HTH T-Bone -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Bug#680419: uptimed: dpkg cannot configure uptimed

this is not a typical use case of the software and since it doesn't affect the normal upgrade path, I'm downgrading this bug to normal. Thanks -- Thibaut VARENE http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Bug#671034: [ia64] linux fails to load INIT (Still affects 3.2.19-1)

On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Thibaut VARENE vare...@debian.org wrote: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote: Thibaut VARENE wrote: Sadly I don't have testing points between Squeeze's kernel (which works) and the first kernel with which I reported

Bug#671034: [ia64] linux fails to load INIT (Still affects 3.2.19-1)

On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote: Thibaut VARENE wrote: Sadly I don't have testing points between Squeeze's kernel (which works) and the first kernel with which I reported the issue... For concreteness: do you mean that 2.6.32-45 works or some earlier

Bug#671034: Still affects 3.2.19-1

Package: linux-image-3.2.0-2-mckinley Version: 3.2.19-1 -- Thibaut VARENE http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#671034: [ia64] linux fails to load INIT (Still affects 3.2.19-1)

On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 1:51 AM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote: severity 671034 important quit Hi Thibaut, Thibaut VARENE wrote: [Subject: Bug#671034: Still affects 3.2.19-1] Please keep in mind that these appear as emails in a crowded inbox, so the subject line can be a good

Bug#674860: uptimed: General update after the debconf review process

On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote: Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org): Dear Debian maintainer, On Monday, May 28, 2012, I sent you a notification about the beginning of a review action on debconf templates for uptimed. Then, I sent you

Bug#674860: [BTS#674860] templates://uptimed/{uprecords-cgi.templates,uptimed.templates} : Final update for English review

On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote: Quoting Thibaut VARENE (vare...@debian.org): And I misread the patch. Scratch that. Sorry ;P So, in short, I can go ahead with the translation update round, right? Yes. -- Thibaut VARENE http://www.parisc

Bug#674860: [BTS#674860] templates://uptimed/{uprecords-cgi.templates,uptimed.templates} : Final update for English review

this will happen (use higher values if you want to avoid disk activity, - for example on a laptop). 60 seconds should be a reasonable default. + for instance on a laptop). In the Description, the suggested value should match the default value of 600. Thanks. -- Thibaut VARENE http://www.parisc

Bug#674860: [BTS#674860] templates://uptimed/{uprecords-cgi.templates,uptimed.templates} : Final update for English review

On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Thibaut VARENE vare...@debian.org wrote: On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote: Dear Debian maintainer, On Monday, May 28, 2012, I notified you of the beginning of a review process concerning debconf templates

Bug#674624: uprecords-cgi: fails to install with DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive

tags 674624 patch pending thanks On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 4:49 AM, Andreas Beckmann deb...@abeckmann.de wrote: Package: uprecords-cgi Followup-For: Bug #674624 Fix is trivial as I expected. Patch attached. Thanks, I'll prepare a new upload soon. -- Thibaut VARENE http://www.parisc

Bug#657922: closed by Thibaut VARENE vare...@debian.org (Bug#657922: fixed in uptimed 1:0.3.17-1)

unit file It has been closed by Thibaut VARENE vare...@debian.org. Their explanation is attached below along with your original report. If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate message then please contact Thibaut VARENE vare...@debian.org

Bug#674624: uprecords-cgi: fails to install with DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive

even look at the postinst script) cheers, Andreas -- Thibaut VARENE http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#673154: CVE-2012-2369: Format string security vulnerability

On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 07:20:37AM -0700, Thibaut VARÈNE wrote: I've no idea how to fix this in stable and I'm currently in vacation with limited Internet access... I'll take care of it (I wish you'd asked for help

Bug#673118: tagainijisho: should not check for new version by default

 tagainijisho-dic-en  0.9.2-3 tagainijisho recommends no packages. tagainijisho suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- Thibaut VARENE http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe

Bug#672721: tagainijisho: circular package dependency

No. On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org wrote: Hi, I have a second thought.  In stead of the original patch, I propose attached alternative. Whoever install KDE library have enough disk space and usually wish to have full features of package as default without

Bug#672718: tagainijisho: some part of GUI is too small to display its content

 libsqlite3-0         3.7.11-3 ii  libstdc++6           4.7.0-8 ii  tagainijisho-common  0.9.4-1 ii  tagainijisho-dic-en  0.9.4-1 tagainijisho recommends no packages. tagainijisho suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- Thibaut VARENE http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet

Bug#672728: tagainijisho: tagaini jisho doesn't warn when preferred dictionary language isn't installed

Package: tagainijisho Version: 0.9.4-1 Severity: minor Tags: upstream When selecting a different dictionary language (or if GUI language isn't english), Tagaini Jisho doesn't warn the user if said language isn't installed. -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.4 APT prefers stable APT

Bug#672731: override: tagainijisho*:education/extra

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal REQUEST: please change the override section for the following packages to 'education': tagainijisho-common tagainijisho-dic-de tagainijisho-dic-en tagainijisho-dic-es tagainijisho-dic-fr tagainijisho-dic-ru tagainijisho RATIONALE: Tagaini Jisho is a

Bug#672718: tagainijisho: some part of GUI is too small to display its content

tags 672718 - moreinfo unreproducible + upstream confirmed thanks I finally hit that bug. Steps to reproduce: In Preferences, select a different GUI language (e.g. French). Restart TJ, open Preferences. Dropdown menu is now very small. Apparently it scales to the height of the flag, and the

Bug#666834: Test rebuild of your package libapache-mod-musicindex

Hi, On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Arno Töll a...@debian.org wrote: tags 666834 + patch thanks Hi Thibaut, you will find attached below a patch porting your module to Apache2 2.4. Please test it and consider its inclusion. Note, I hardly tried more than compiling and loading the module.

Bug#666834: Test rebuild of your package libapache-mod-musicindex

built with hardening build flags now        in order to satisfy the hardening release goal [2]. A trivial        fix comes over that problem. [1] http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/developer/new_api_2_4.html [2] http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/SecurityHardeningBuildFlags -- Thibaut VARENE

Bug#666834: Test rebuild of your package libapache-mod-musicindex

On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Arno Töll a...@debian.org wrote: Hi, On 05.05.2012 19:44, Thibaut VARENE wrote: I don't get it: I thought Apache 2.4 wasn't scheduled for Wheezy? what makes you think that? We definitively want to have 2.4 in Wheezy. However, the final decision might come

Bug#671031: reportbug: ignore proxy settings

On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org wrote: reassign 671031 python-debianbts forcemerge 659013 671031 thanks Hello, On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Thibaut VARENE vare...@debian.org wrote: Ignores proxy settings ($http_proxy and/or --proxy/--http_proxy) when

Bug#671031: reportbug: ignore proxy settings

Package: reportbug Version: 6.3.1 Severity: normal Ignores proxy settings ($http_proxy and/or --proxy/--http_proxy) when querying the BTS for source reports. Running netstat in parallel with reportbug shows direct attempt at contacting busoni.debian.org. -- Package-specific info: ** Environment

Bug#671034: linux-image-3.2.0-2-mckinley: fails to load INIT

Package: linux-2.6 Version: 3.2.16-1 Severity: normal Stops short of loading INIT: Loading.: Debian GNU/Linux Starting: Debian GNU/Linux ELILO v3.12 for EFI/IA-64 .. Uncompressing Linux... done Loading file \EFI\debian\initrd.img...done [0.00]

Bug#669614: RFA: lomoco

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Lomoco is essentially dead upstream, and I don't use it anymore. At this point I do not think it should be part of wheezy. Unless someone steps up to take over maintainership, I intend to orphan it by the end of May. HTH T-Bone -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#650109: uptimed: kFreeBSD not detected as *BSD during build

a new upstream release. HTH -- Thibaut VARENE http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#667627: libapache-mod-musicindex: Dropping the apache2-dev virtual package

On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Arno Töll a...@debian.org wrote: Hi Thibaut, Hi Arno, On 07.04.2012 11:24, Thibaut VARENE wrote: False positive and -EWTF? My package build-deps on: apache2-dev | apache2-threaded-dev buildds do not resolve A | B build-dependencies. They look at the first

Bug#516382: [2.6.22 - 2.6.23 regression] [alpha] tg3: incoming ssh fails with Corrupted MAC on input

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote: Thibaut VARENE wrote: I don't really have time to play with it nowadays, but if somebody wants to try it out I can probably arrange for remote access. I'd be happy to try if there's some kind of remote interface

Bug#516382: [2.6.22 - 2.6.23 regression] [alpha] tg3: incoming ssh fails with Corrupted MAC on input

to play with it nowadays, but if somebody wants to try it out I can probably arrange for remote access. Cheers, T-Bone -- Thibaut VARENE http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#575461: finch: ability to use OTR-encryption

On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Howard Chu h...@highlandsun.com wrote: Thibaut VARENE wrote: On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Howard Chuh...@highlandsun.com  wrote: Just fyi, all of my pidgin/finch patches have been merged upstream. They're targeted at a 3.0.0 release though, so

Bug#575461: finch: ability to use OTR-encryption

maintainers... I can only merge patches that apply to pidgin-otr, and I'd rather do so with the approval of upstream maintainers... HTH -- Thibaut VARENE http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe

Bug#654830: uprecords: Shows duplicated entry and impossible values

 libuptimed0            1:0.3.16-3.2 uptimed recommends no packages. uptimed suggests no packages. -- debconf information:  uptimed/mail/do_mail: Never  uptimed/mail/address: root@localhost  uptimed/mail/milestones_info:  uptimed/maxrecords: 50  uptimed/interval: 60 -- Thibaut VARENE

Bug#575461: finch: ability to use OTR-encryption

in the links above. --  -- Howard Chu  CTO, Symas Corp.           http://www.symas.com  Director, Highland Sun     http://highlandsun.com/hyc/  Chief Architect, OpenLDAP  http://www.openldap.org/project/ -- Thibaut VARENE http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#648948: uptimed: FTBFS on hurd-i386: add support for GNU

On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Svante Signell svante.sign...@telia.com wrote: On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 14:15 +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote: On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Svante Signell svante.sign...@telia.com wrote: On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 12:06 +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote: Replying

Bug#633671: [buildd-tools-devel] Bug#633671: Bug#633671: Bug#633671: schroot behaves differently depending on cwd

On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote: On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 07:43:08PM +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote: On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote: tags 63367 + fixed-upstream pending thanks On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:08:13PM

Bug#650109: uptimed: kFreeBSD not detected as *BSD during build

suggests no packages. -- debconf information excluded -- Thibaut VARENE http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#633671: [buildd-tools-devel] Bug#633671: Bug#633671: schroot behaves differently depending on cwd

On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote: tags 63367 + fixed-upstream pending thanks On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:08:13PM +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote: On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote: The thing is that the error message

Bug#648948: uptimed: FTBFS on hurd-i386: add support for GNU

Replying to myself as I mistyped the bug forward address ;P On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Thibaut VARENE vare...@debian.org wrote: severity 648948 normal thanks Thanks for your patch, I've forwarded it upstream for review and inclusion. Please note that adding support for a new

Bug#648948: uptimed: FTBFS on hurd-i386: add support for GNU

On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Svante Signell svante.sign...@telia.com wrote: On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 12:06 +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote: Replying to myself as I mistyped the bug forward address ;P On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Thibaut VARENE vare...@debian.org wrote: severity 648948

Bug#515653: database corruption detection patch works

Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de wrote: Am Montag, 31. Oktober 2011 schrieb Thibaut VARENE: Hi Radek, Hi Thibaut, Not that I particularly bitch about who did what, but I think it's good practice to credit the right people. The patch you merged in [1] was developped by me (Thibaut VARENE t-b

Bug#515653: database corruption detection patch works

in the CREDITS file now. Sorry again and keep up the good work! Radek P. On 10/31/2011 09:42 PM, Thibaut VARENE wrote: Hi Radek, Not that I particularly bitch about who did what, but I think it's good practice to credit the right people. The patch you merged in [1] was developped by me

Bug#515653: database corruption detection patch works

Hi Radek, Not that I particularly bitch about who did what, but I think it's good practice to credit the right people. The patch you merged in [1] was developped by me (Thibaut VARENE t-b...@parisc-linux.org), and tested by Martin. I shall mention that I still consider it a dirty hack (see [2

Bug#586788: Not fixed

found 586788 6.10.58+dfsg-3 notfixed 586788 6.10.58+dfsg-3 thanks Hi, I can confirm this bug still affects 6.10.58+dfsg-3. A fix is proposed here: http://boincstats.com/forum/forum_thread.php?id=5912nowrap=true#96768 HTH T-Bone -- Thibaut VARENE http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet

Bug#636687: pending NMU for uptimed

On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Andreas Henriksson andr...@fatal.se wrote: Hello! Hi Since there's been no reply for some weeks (and the last upload was a NMU as well), I'll assume you're very busy at the moment so I've prepared another NMU. I am ;-) Go for it. Thanks -- Thibaut VARENE

Bug#633671: [buildd-tools-devel] Bug#633671: schroot behaves differently depending on cwd

On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 08:41:53PM +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote: While debugging the old 'create-chroot.sh' script from pkern that was having hickups, I finally realized that schroot behaves apparently inconsistently

Bug#633777: sbuild: virtual dependency resolver broken?

Package: sbuild Version: 0.60.0-2squeeze1 Severity: normal Hi, it's me again ;P I've recently discovered that some of my packages stopped building because of the following error: Checking for source dependency conflicts... E: Package 'libjpeg-dev' has no installation candidate libjpeg-dev is a

Bug#633777: [buildd-tools-devel] Bug#633777: sbuild: virtual dependency resolver broken?

On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote: On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 05:38:16PM +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote: In any case, the fact is it breaks the virtual resolver for packages with multiple providers (i've tested that when there's only one provider

Bug#633777: [buildd-tools-devel] Bug#633777: sbuild: virtual dependency resolver broken?

On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote: On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 06:28:53PM +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote: Well, given the lack of documentation, especially on upgrade process, and my previous experience with generally painful upgrades from version to version

Bug#628568: external images should be provided by the package

for the /musicindex URI, and check whether the images are present in that folder or not. If interested you can check out send_foot() at the bottom of html.c for details. This module was written with extreme portability in mind, and has almost nothing hardcoded. HTH -- Thibaut VARENE http

Bug#633671: schroot behaves differently depending on cwd

Package: schroot Version: 1.4.19-1+squeeze1 Severity: normal While debugging the old 'create-chroot.sh' script from pkern that was having hickups, I finally realized that schroot behaves apparently inconsistently depending on the cwd: This works: buildd@envy:~$ schroot -c sid-ia64-sbuild -u

Bug#633671: [buildd-tools-devel] Bug#633671: schroot behaves differently depending on cwd

 computed for the session. OK. You might want to mark this bug as wontfix, it might serve as some documentation in websearches ;-) Thanks T-Bone -- Thibaut VARENE http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Bug#633671: [buildd-tools-devel] Bug#633671: schroot behaves differently depending on cwd

On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote: On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 09:50:22PM +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote: On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote: The reason we don't implement a fallback is because it would make the behaviour

Bug#633509: [buildd-tools-devel] Bug#633509: Bug#633509: E: /etc/buildd/wanna-build.conf: Errors found in configuration file:

need to get some of the scripts from buildd.debian.org to make it usable. Yeah well, I'll stick to my 2006 version from neuro, at least it works. Why ship broken packages? It's detrimental to the users... -- Thibaut VARENE http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian

Bug#633509: [buildd-tools-devel] Bug#633509: Bug#633509: E: /etc/buildd/wanna-build.conf: Errors found in configuration file:

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote: On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:19:57AM +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote: On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote: On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 09:27:42AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: Thibaut, am

Bug#633464: Can't locate object method fixup_pkgv via package Sbuild::Build at /usr/bin/sbuild line 166.

Package: sbuild Version: 0.60.0-2squeeze1 Severity: normal It seems sbuild and libsbuild-perl 0.60.0-2squeeze1 are out of sync: /usr/bin/sbuild requires fixup_pkgv() which isn't part of the /usr/share/perl5/Sbuild/Build.pm shipped with libsbuild-perl anymore. Renders sbuild unusable in my

Bug#633464: [buildd-tools-devel] Bug#633464: Can't locate object method fixup_pkgv via package Sbuild::Build at /usr/bin/sbuild line 166.

On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote: tags 633464 + confirmed severity 633464 serious thanks On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 04:09:29PM +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote: Package: sbuild Version: 0.60.0-2squeeze1 Severity: normal It seems sbuild and libsbuild-perl

Bug#633509: E: /etc/buildd/wanna-build.conf: Errors found in configuration file:

Package: wanna-build Version: 0.60.0-2squeeze1 Severity: normal Still trying to upgrade my old buildd setup to something a little more current, I'm running into interesting issues. On this machine, after installing wanna-build and leaving it with its default configuration, simply running

Bug#619674: libotr: please wipe out dependency_libs from .la files (Policy 10.2)

On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Andreas Metzler ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org wrote: On 2011-03-29 Thibaut VARENE vare...@debian.org wrote: tags 619674 pending thanks Hi Steve, Thanks for the patch, will apply on next upload. [...] Hello, Any idea when this might happen? libotr is one

Bug#619674: libotr: please wipe out dependency_libs from .la files (Policy 10.2)

On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Andreas Metzler ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org wrote: On 2011-06-18 Thibaut VARENE vare...@debian.org wrote: On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Andreas Metzler ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org wrote: [...] Well, I'm currently unable to do an upload atm, but if you feel

Bug#515653: fsync() based test version

on starting it. If by configuration you mean its database, then you're wrong. The database (and backup) is written every UPDATE_INTERVAL seconds. -- Thibaut VARENE http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe

Bug#515653: how to recover lost uptime record by calculating manually

be testing with fsync() everywhere, cause I want to fix that truncated file issue *at the cause*. When it then still does not work as expected, I at least now, that the file is truncated even due to use of fsync() and can then file a linux kernel bug report. Have fun. -- Thibaut VARENE http

Bug#515653: different way of saving needed

to upstream, as I am *not* uptimed's developer. -- Thibaut VARENE http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#622565: still ships rules files in /etc/udev/

Hi, I'm considering orphaning this package which is mostly abandoned upstream. If you feel like taking over, now would be a good time to do so ;-) Cheers On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 3:13 AM, Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it wrote: Package: lomoco Severity: important Please move all rules files to

Bug#619674: libotr: please wipe out dependency_libs from .la files (Policy 10.2)

OS Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com                                     vor...@debian.org -- Thibaut VARENE http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet

  1   2   3   4   5   >