for a manpage, the
NEWS file, and a Recommends in debian/control?
Thanks,
tony
[1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/grimripper
[2] https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/removals
[3] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=967729#12
get this fixed against 1.2 so
it is a candidate for stable-proposed-updates.
The expansion of $cmd in your version has the same impact as the eval
suggested in the bug report. My mistake, and thank you for the
correction.
Cheers,
tony
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 12:16:10AM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote:
> Control: tags -1 pending
> X-Debbugs-Cc: tmanc...@debian.org
>
> Tony, would you please upload a new version of the package including the
> following commit?
> https://salsa.debian.org/debi
robably okay for unstable, but I need to take a look at the reverse
dependencies before making the change. We could accommodate more users
if the header conditionally did the right thing for c++20.
Thank you,
tony
[1]
https://github.com/capnproto/capnproto/commit/4f8bf494bbe5491cd2ff3c809bf98
On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 12:07:49PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 03, 2023 at 08:39:38PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> > This bug is for coordination purposes. I am in the process of preparing
> > an upload of WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc2 to experimental, but I believe that it
>
g report. For the short-term, I'll apply the patch
since it's so simple. Longer-term, I'll coordinate with Tom (the
maintainer) on getting 1.0 into trixie.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
uld it build-dep on libbobcat-dev | (something always available)
and then in debian/rules detect the lack of libbobcat-dev and perform
the bootstrap by downloading the bobcat sources tarball?
Or something else?
In any case, we can a script to the icmake source to perform the
bootstrap once we have
rarily and use the aforementioned bootstrap mechanism would be very
> helpful for bootstrapping icmake on new architectures such as loong64.
Hi Adrian,
Oh, good catch! Thank you for reporting the bug. I will follow up.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
xie and sid. Bastien, are you planning on uploading a
patched 2.2 to bullseye and bookworm?
Thanks,
tony
On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 05:53:23PM +0200, Valentin Vidic wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 07:55:56PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> > Thank you for the bug report. My initial instinct is to use the same
> > unit file and service dependencies as upstream. Looking at the history
Package: mailman3
Version: 3.3.8-2~deb12u1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
A new installation of Mailman 3. Every minute I receive an email message saying
/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/django_q/conf.py:139: UserWarning: Retry and
timeout are misconfigured. Set retry larger than timeout,
Package: mailman3
Version: 3.3.8-2~deb12u1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
On a new installation I receive an email every minute with the following
message.
System check identified some issues:
WARNINGS:
django_mailman3.MailDomain: (models.W042) Auto-created primary key used when
not def
glx got removed from unstable and java-package is holding it
> back from being removed from testing. Raising the severity accordingly.
Hi Sebastian,
Thank you for the reminder. We've had an update sitting in the Salsa
repo, ready to go for a while now. I will upload today.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
cessitated the change at that time,
but we can now revert to the unit file patch?
Valentin, do you have any insight on this? Without a link to the
original bug, I'm unsure what regression reverting to the upstream unit
file dependencies might cause.
Cheers,
tony
[1]: https://github.com/openS
the openjdk packages, which are maintained by the
OpenJDK Team (distinct from the Debian Java Team), I'll wait to hear
from that team before uploading.
However, I believe your patch may also need to add an entry to the
jvm_archdir_map. [0] Is the mapping loong64=loong64?
Cheers,
tony
[0]
https:
On Sun, Sep 03, 2023 at 08:39:38PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> This bug is for coordination purposes. I am in the process of preparing
> an upload of WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc2 to experimental, but I believe that it
> may require an upload of hamlib 4.6 (which will also likely need to go
> to
).
The debian branch will be pushed to debian/experimental to follow DEP-14
(https://dep-team.pages.debian.net/deps/dep14/), and if the team is okay
with it, I propose switching from master -> debian/latest when the
package is ready for upload to unstable.
Cheers,
tony
as to why we want to stay
with debhelper 11.
Thanks!
tony
[1]
https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/gradle-debian-helper/-/commit/9417606c1ffaed9571045cb055f80350783c0555
[2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2021/05/msg00012.html
On Sun, Sep 03, 2023 at 05:33:36PM +1200, Vladimir Petko wrote:
>
kages. Since
> some extensions rely on this, might the package normalize-audio be included
> in the suggested packages like yt-dlp?
Good suggestion! I will include this in the next upload.
Thanks!
tony
Hi Matthias,
On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 07:19:15AM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 07:04:05PM +1200, Vladimir Petko wrote:
> > The debhelper-compat was intentionally set to >=11 in order to
> > support backports.
>
> Thank you for the reminder. I can
2]?
Thank you,
tony
[0] https://packages.debian.org/source/buster-backports/debhelper
[1] https://packages.debian.org/source/oldoldstable-backports/debhelper
[2] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianReleases
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
before_dh_strip_nondeterminism:
find debian/ -type f -name jtreg.jar -print0 | xargs -0tr chmod u+w
execute_after_dh_strip_nondeterminism:
find debian/ -type f -name jtreg.jar -print0 | xargs -0tr chmod u-w
diffoscope no longer reports differences between the built and rebuilt jar.
I intend to make a few more packaging changes before the upload, but you
can consider this bug pending.
Thanks,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
here are any concerns. The build-dep
on libtestng7-java in this upload will require introducing testng7 [1]
to old-old-stable (buster) if we need the updated jtreg6 there.
Also, I believe the patch you provided addresses of Debian #1036065 and
#1036066 [2,3] too. Can you confirm?
Thank you,
ton
eps before I
realized that the source repo contains 6.2+1 [1] (not 6.1+2), which
hasn't been uploaded.
Are there any considerations or concerns about going ahead with an
upload of 6.2+1? As I said, I was able to build openjdk-11, -17, and
-19 with that version.
Thanks,
tony
[1]
https
Hello Elias,
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 10:41:02PM +0200, Elias Oltmanns wrote:
> Am 21. Juli 2023 um 08:08 schrieb tony mancill:
> [...]
>
> Contacting archive.org and asking for license clarification might be an
> option. I am not sure whether I would hold my breath, but it see
les fail with the following
> error:
>
> org.herac.tuxguitar.action.TGActionException:
> org/apache/commons/compress/archivers/zip/ZipArchiveInputStream
Hello Jérôme,
Thank you for the bug report and for providing a repro case.
More soon,
tony
any upstream
changes to those tests would require updating the patch(es).
Let me know if you have any thoughts on this. Otherwise, I will follow
up once I have a chance to look through the test resources in more
detail.
Thank you,
tony
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/libjwat-java
[2] http
armhf (#1021894 [4]) to
propagate to testing, since several developers commented on that bug
having consequences for other packages, and I expect there to be quite a
few more openjfx users on arm64 than on mipsel. (But please adjust the
severity if you deem it necessary.)
Cheers,
tony
[1]
https
On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 01:46:02PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> I intend to build and upload in the next few days, but you are welcome
> to NMU if you would prefer.
Uploaded as 11.0.11+1-3.1. (The version number was a slight mistake on
my part; I meant to remove the NMU suffix in the cha
Hi Wookey,
Thank you for the investigation and the patch!
I intend to build and upload in the next few days, but you are welcome
to NMU if you would prefer.
Cheers,
tony
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 02:28:14PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> Source: openjfx
> Followup-For: Bug #1021894
>
> I w
if we really think we need it.
Thank you,
tony
[1]
https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/jansi/-/commit/7f186cd4fc22308d7769db8eeeca26b560b81b1a
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> Problem is that the init-script is using /usr/sbin/pure-ftpd-wrapper
> for the startup.
> This wrappers ignores the file /etc/pure-ftpd/pure-ftpd.conf.
Maybe it makes more sense to use systemd service unit to launch
pure-ftpd, as in bug 1039336, and in the service unit just point to the
conf
On Sat, Jun 03, 2023 at 12:58:17PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Jun 2023 21:40:10 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > While this is not a build failure, it does mean building the package has a
> > dependency on software outside of main, which I believe is a serious policy
> > violatio
y file has been modified on the systems where the
failure is occurring? (Just a guess...) If so, could someone share the
file from a system where the bug manifests?
Thanks,
tony
mentioned in those release notes.
Regards
Tony
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
wide-scale breakage,
we can revisit the issue (and modify policy if needed). Otherwise, I
intend to address any minor breakage on a package-by-package basis to
comply with policy, and invite others to as well.
Thank you to all for the discussion and help on this long-standing
issue.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Elias,
Thank you for your work to update jhove.
I will review the patches and help with the upload, although not until
after the bookworm release (which is just over a week away).
Cheers,
tony
On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 04:23:33PM +0200, Elias Oltmanns wrote:
> Hi there,
>
>
On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 10:18:50PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: tony mancill
> > In any event, I think the change is good and am planning to upload,
> > provided there are no concerns from the Debian Hams.
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> Christoph
Thank you Christoph.
e
interest of full disclosure, I also couldn't reproduce the piuparts
failure with 0.8.1-2. (Perhaps you could share the invocation you used
to identify the problem?)
In any event, I think the change is good and am planning to upload,
provided there are no concerns from the Debian Hams.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
overloading the software after a too long time.
> A reasonable range solved the problem.
Hi Matthieu,
Thank you for following up with the solution to the problem.
I will close the bug report.
Cheers,
tony KG7IEL
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
u for your consideration. If it's too late for the freeze, this
can be addressed in bookworm-pu.
Thank you,
tony
unblock groovy/2.4.21-8
diff -Nru groovy-2.4.21/debian/changelog groovy-2.4.21/debian/changelog
--- groovy-2.4.21/debian/changelog 2022-10-16 21:02:21.0 -0700
+++ groov
.1-java.
(https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1020429)
I will add the missing dependency.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: pullseq
Version: 1.0.2-3
Severity: important
pullseq hangs on arm64 (including its autopkgtest).
See https://github.com/bcthomas/pullseq/issues/10 for more information.
Filing a bug for visibility. I will upload a fix momentarily.
Cheers,
tony
!
tony
unblock libitext-java/2.1.7-14
diff -Nru libitext-java-2.1.7/debian/changelog
libitext-java-2.1.7/debian/changelog
--- libitext-java-2.1.7/debian/changelog2022-05-03 13:18:43.0
-0700
+++ libitext-java-2.1.7/debian/changelog2023-03-22 19:59:21.0
-0700
@@ -1,3
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 12:05:26PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 2023-03-28 05:28, tony mancill a écrit :
>
> > The upload is ready. Any concerns?
> >
> > $ reverse-depends libitext-rups-java
> > No reverse dependencies found
> >
> > $ reverse-de
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 07:37:48AM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> However, given the low popcon count and the brokenness of the package,
> that may be the best path. If there are users of libitext-rups-java who
> think otherwise, now would be the time to speak up.
>
> ...
>
Hi Jorge,
On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 10:45:32PM -0400, Jorge Moraleda wrote:
> Hello Tony,
>
> I propose that we either reduce the severity, ignore the bug for the
> > bookworm release cycle, or remove only the libitext-rups-java binary
> > package from bookworm.
> >
and impacts multiple reverse
dependencies. And we're in the midst of the freeze for the bookwork
release [3].
I propose that we either reduce the severity, ignore the bug for the
bookworm release cycle, or remove only the libitext-rups-java binary
package from bookworm.
Thank you,
tony
[0]
apper scripts are provided as part of the package and the
package supports python3, can this bug be closed?
Thank you,
tony
Source: csvkit
Version: 1.0.7-1
Severity: wishlist
There is a new upstream release of csvkit available.
This bug is for tracking purposes. I plan to update the package on
behalf of the Debian Science Team and upload to experimental soon.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello Pierre,
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 10:23:53PM +0100, Pierre Gruet wrote:
> Hi tony,
>
> On Sun, 12 Feb 2023 10:15:35 -0800 tony mancill wrote:
> >
> > Okay, first the good news. There are upstream tags for 2.4.0. I have
> > started working on adapting the sequenc
,
tony
Other packages that recommend fastqc:
bcbio
med-bio
med-cloud
python3-seqcluster
trim-galore
ugene
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Mar 04, 2023 at 11:37:38AM -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> > > Revised 05-fix-compile-warnings patch attached.
> > >
> > > —
> > > Mike Quin
> > > <05-fix-compile-warnings>
>
> So I think their deletion in the prior patch was inadver
ue in an unused
variable.
So I think their deletion in the prior patch was inadvertent and the
patch is good. I can commit and upload if that's helpful.
Cheers,
tony
$ interdiff -p1 debian/patches/05-fix-compile-warnings
/tmp/05-fix-compile-warnings
diff -u b/src/ibm.c fbb-7.011/src/ibm.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 11:13:35PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 shrinksafe
> Control: severity -1 serious
>
> I uploaded a new version of rhino a while ago and it seems this bug is still
> relevant. I have rebuilt dojo with rhino 1.7.14 and all shrinksafe tests pass.
> Howe
On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 11:36:46AM -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 08:03:06AM +0100, Alexandre Rossi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > I'm +1 for the change, but at this point I propose we wait for bookworm
> > > to release. I'm not sure wh
d, and so I can go ahead and upload
the patched 1.4 version and mark CVE-2023-24998 as complete?
Thanks,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 08:40:34PM -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 10:18:27AM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 09:52:37PM +0200, Thomas Perl wrote:
> > > This seems to be the following upstream bug:
> > > https://github.com
;s interesting that I don't see updates to Wayland, GNOME, or xauth
around this time that explain the change.
As a work-around, until we track down what has changed and how to fix
it, this gets cssh and the examples in libx11-protocol-perl working
again on my system, which is also GNOME on
ow about an upload to experimental?
>
> An upload to experimental would be great.
I will do this as soon once the FTBFS is addressed [1].
Cheers,
tony
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1028727
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 09:11:49AM -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 09:30:43AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> > Bdale Garbee writes:
> >
> > > I'll talk to openrocket upstream about it and see if I can't get some
> > > clarification a
the standards version
- update the debhelper dependency
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 08:14:31PM +, James Addison wrote:
> Source: openjfx
> Followup-For: Bug #1026962
>
> Could the following build-related scripting be something to do with it?
>
> -
> https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/openjfx/-/blob/debian/11.0.11+1-1.1/modules/javafx.web/src/main/n
ng, but it seems late in the
release cycle for this change. How about an upload to experimental?
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 09:30:43AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> Bdale Garbee writes:
>
> > I'll talk to openrocket upstream about it and see if I can't get some
> > clarification about what we actually need and a pointer to the relevant
> > source code.
>
> I just got a pointer to
>
> https
ution to Debian!
Cheers,
tony
On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 11:12:15PM +0100, Alexandre Rossi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > The update looks good to me and a rebuild of rdeps with ratt was
> > successful. Or more precisely, was successful for the packages that
> > also build against 5.12.1. So I have just uploaded to the archive.
>
> Thanks
On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 11:35:30PM +0100, David Prévot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 09:17:02PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff a écrit :
> > Source: nekohtml
> […]
> > The following vulnerability was published for nekohtml.
> >
> > CVE-2022-24839[0]:
>
> I prepared an upload (new upstream r
t them in the commit history,
I can revert that commit and merge from your fork.
Thank you for your work!
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 08:45:55PM +0100, Helmar Gerloni wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> sorry for causing so much work with tuxguitar, and thanks for your efforts!
>
> Do you think it would make sense to merge all the tuxguitar* packages into
> one package tuxguitar with arch-any? Mayb
/
I will take a look. Thank you for contribution to Debian!
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Helmar,
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 08:45:55PM +0100, Helmar Gerloni wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> sorry for causing so much work with tuxguitar, and thanks for your efforts!
No worries at all! You've done a lot of work on the package, so we will
get it ironed out in time for the rele
guitar-alsa.poms
>
> dpkg-buildpackage works. Maybe this could be a workaround?
Thanks! I will give that a try.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 05:48:21PM -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> Package: tuxguitar
> Version: 1.5.6+dfsg1-3
> Severity: important
>
> The build system doesn't correctly build the arch-any packages when only
> the arch specific targets are invoked.
In the interest of g
Package: tuxguitar
Version: 1.5.6+dfsg1-3
Severity: important
The build system doesn't correctly build the arch-any packages when only
the arch specific targets are invoked.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 11:59:07AM -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> Package: tuxguitar
> Version: 1.5.6+dfsg1-1
> Severity: important
>
> tuxguitar is FTBFS on multiple architectures:
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=tuxguitar&ver=1.5.6%2Bdfsg1-1
>
&g
Package: tuxguitar
Version: 1.5.6+dfsg1-1
Severity: important
tuxguitar is FTBFS on multiple architectures:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=tuxguitar&ver=1.5.6%2Bdfsg1-1
We should either address the FTBFS or limit the build architectures in
the next upload.
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 08:33:07AM -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 10:02:55PM +0100, Helmar Gerloni wrote:
> > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2023/01/msg5.html
> > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2023/01/msg00097.html
> > Rober
n take a look and upload it?
> If there is anything more I can do, just let me know.
Hello Helmar,
I am reviewing the updated package now and will either sponsor an upload
if everything looks good or provide feedback.
Thank you!
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 09:26:03AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 12:28:06PM -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 04:03:17PM +0100, Carsten Pfeiffer wrote:
> > > Package: openjdk-11-jdk
> > > Version: 11.0.16+8-1~deb
.
I am willing to perform the rebuild and upload of 11.0.17 against
bullseye, either a team upload or as an NMU. Would that be acceptable
to the OpenJDK Team and the Security Team?
Thank you,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 01:49:59PM +0100, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> sorry for the late reply.
>
> * Christian Weiske [2022-03-14 17:47]:
> > This problem still exists.
> > I cannot transfer money to an N26 bank account, because jameica complains
> > that
> > the bank does no
several forks on Github, including
https://github.com/mathomatic/mathomatic, but I don't see any recent
activity there.
Regards,
tony
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 10:09:36AM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 2023-01-08 18:17, tony mancill a écrit :
>
> > I believe we need to patch/upgrade maven-javadoc-plugin or restore the
> > missing method to doxia.
>
> Sorry for the trouble, I'm working on it bu
Package: libmaven-javadoc-plugin-java
Version: 3.0.1-4
Severity: important
Since the recent update of doxia [1], we are seeing build failures in
unstable of packages that depend on libmaven-javadoc-plugin-java. The
error signature is:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:mave
On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 05:24:30PM -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> $ reverse-depends -b -l libcommons-vfs-java
> commons-configuration
> commons-configuration2
> ivy
> mondrian
> sbt-ivy
Bah, this should have been:
$ reverse-depends -l -b libcommons-vfs-java-doc
commons-con
es fairly quickly.
For context, cleaning up these -doc packages is something that members
of the Java Team have proposed in the past. Now is the time...
Thanks,
tony
$ reverse-depends -b -l libcommons-vfs-java
commons-configuration
commons-configuration2
ivy
mondrian
sbt-ivy
$ reverse-depends
On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 05:25:40PM -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 08:22:43PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Source: openjfx
> > Version: 11.0.11+0-1.1
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: ftbfs
> > Justification: fails to build from sour
loning the repo and building with git-buildpackage:
$ git clone https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/jetty9.git
$ cd jetty9
$ gbp buildpackage
Thus, the package builds from source and shouldn't have a FTBFS bug filed
against it. Please provide additional information about the build
fa
On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 08:57:36PM +, Ben Morris wrote:
> Package: gpodder
> Version: 3.11.0-4
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> /usr/share/applications/gpodder.desktop contains the following line:
>
> Exec=usr/bin/gpodder
Thank you Ben!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 07:55:52PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Hello tony,
>
>
> Am Dienstag, dem 27.12.2022 um 08:40 -0800 schrieb tony mancill:
> > On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 09:02:16PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > Source: libcommons-net-java
> >
On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 09:02:16PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Source: libcommons-net-java
> Version: 3.6-1
> Severity: important
> Tags: security upstream
> Forwarded: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-711
> X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
>
I see that the
s it sufficient to leave it
as-as?
Thank you,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 08:23:00PM -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 03:15:58PM +0100, Thomas Uhle wrote:
> > Package: librxtx-java
> > Version: 2.2pre2+dfsg1-2
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Dear maintainers,
> >
> > according to Git
uot;${Runtime.runtime.availableProcessors()}")
I will have a look to try to determine where the value of 64 is coming
from. We can clamp the value if need be.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 06:32:07PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: apache-directory-api
> Version: 1.0.0-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
The FTBFS is due to the recent upload of mina2
}
>396 else {
>397 croak(
>398 App::ClusterSSH::Exception::Config->throw(
>399 error => $self->loc(
>400 'Unable to write [_1]: [_2]' . $/,
>401
Hi Pierre,
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 07:31:30AM +0100, Pierre Gruet wrote:
> Hi tony,
>
> Le 21/12/2022 à 22:58, tony mancill a écrit :
> > On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 11:45:54PM +0100, Pierre Gruet wrote:
> > > Control: retitle -1 Please make liblog4j2-java depend on j
etter to remove junit-bom from log4j pom.
I don't believe we actually need junit5 at runtime for log4j2, so
packages depending on liblog4j2-java should not have to install junit5.
Any concerns with taking that approach and addressing the bug by
adjusting the pom shipped with liblog4j2-java
mport to the "local" Record class, which has been the one
> imported up until now.
>
> With this patch in place, the package builds successfully again on Debian
> Sid.
Thank you for the patch! Applied and uploaded.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
101 - 200 of 2444 matches
Mail list logo
