Bug#833328: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#833328: Bug#833328: openssl does not start on x86_64: version `OPENSSL_1.0.1s' not found

2016-08-03 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 10:48:42PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2016-08-03 17:06:22 [+0200], Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > You're using openssl from stable but libssl1.0.0 from backports. > > > > It's rather annoying, but I wasn't sure how to deal with it. I &

Bug#832456: elfutils: improve handling of DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck

2016-08-03 Thread Kurt Roeckx
ase let > us/upstream know. I already changed my mind to keep it as it currently is. But Maybe we should have an option to test x32 on x86_64. And I guess there are some other things that could be tested too. Kurt

Bug#833328: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#833328: openssl does not start on x86_64: version `OPENSSL_1.0.1s' not found

2016-08-03 Thread Kurt Roeckx
ure how to deal with it. I guess I should add a Breaks in the backports version. In any case you also need to upgrade the openssl binary package to the version from backports. Kurt

Bug#806654: libtool: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A

2016-08-01 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 08:31:02PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 07:36:55PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > > On Mon, 25 Jul 2016, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > > > The error you get is a testsuite failure. It outputs this to > > > stderr: > &

Bug#833156: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#833156: Bug#833156: openssl: Please enable s390x asm optimisations

2016-08-01 Thread Kurt Roeckx
t planned upload to unstable is the experimental version. So it > shouldn't end up in testing. I'm just wondering if we should do this for: - Stable (Does 1.0.1 also have the assembler?) - Backports Kurt

Bug#461461: [pkg-ntp-maintainers] Bug#461461: This bug is still present -- change to systemd did not fix it!

2016-08-01 Thread Kurt Roeckx
e pools. You can set the maximum higher using "tos maxclock XX". I was under the impression that when using "server" and getting a permanent DNS error it would give up on it but that with a temporary error it will retry. And that with pool it keeps retrying, but I'm not sure about that. Anyway, that it's a temporary or permanent error depends on what glibc returns, and I've been trying to get that fixed for years. Kurt

Bug#461461: [pkg-ntp-maintainers] Bug#461461: This bug is still present -- change to systemd did not fix it!

2016-08-01 Thread Kurt Roeckx
om journalctl that shows the problem in jessie: It's even saying that ntpdate is running before networking is even started. That makes no sense at all, and I have no idea what's starting it, but the only thing I know that should run it is /etc/network/if-up.d/ntpdate It seems to me that we get called too early. Kurt

Bug#833136: [pkg-ntp-maintainers] Bug#833136: ntpdate has the same problem as ntp in Bug#461461. ntpdate starts before dhcpclient finishes

2016-08-01 Thread Kurt Roeckx
he clock. ntpdate only gets called when the network is up, it does not get started during boot. Kurt

Bug#461461: [pkg-ntp-maintainers] Bug#461461: This bug is still present -- change to systemd did not fix it!

2016-08-01 Thread Kurt Roeckx
roblem with DNS, the peers should always be there. Kurt

Bug#831510: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#831510: gnupg2: Deletes pub keyring

2016-07-31 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 12:58:52PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Control: tags 831510 + unreproducible help > > Hi Kurt-- > > On Sat 2016-07-16 14:07:44 -0400, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > I was running --refresh-keys, I pressed ^C, I tried to start it > > again,

Bug#832477: pu: libtool

2016-07-30 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 01:40:17PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > Control: tag -1 confirmed > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 23:28:14 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > Package: release.debian.org > > Tags: jessie > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > >

Bug#832874: libtool: version format change causes many FTBFS

2016-07-29 Thread Kurt Roeckx
t became: > libtoolize (GNU libtool) 2.4.6 Debian-2.4.6-1 I was under the impression that we've been doing that for a long time, but it seems only --help showed that before. I'll probably revert it. Kurt

Bug#832456: elfutils: improve handling of DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck

2016-07-27 Thread Kurt Roeckx
iarch tests on all arches and remove the gcc-multilib Depends completly. Kurt

Bug#832456: elfutils: improve handling of DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck

2016-07-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 06:25:16AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: > Hi Kurt, > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 08:36:41PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > This all looks fine. I'm just wondering why gcc-multilib is a > > problem in your case since it was already any-amd64. I'm also

Bug#832477: pu: libtool

2016-07-25 Thread Kurt Roeckx
using the same version. So I see 2 solutions: - We binNMU it on both i386 and amd64 - I upload a new version with no changes Kurt

Bug#832456: elfutils: improve handling of DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck

2016-07-25 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 08:18:45PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: > Source: elfutils > Version: 0.166-2 > Severity: minor > Tags: patch > User: helm...@debian.org > Usertags: rebootstrap > > Hi Kurt, > > Thank you for applying my cross build patch from #818099. Thi

Bug#806654: libtool: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A

2016-07-25 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 07:36:55PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jul 2016, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > The error you get is a testsuite failure. It outputs this to > > stderr: > > ERROR: ld.so: object 'libfakeroot-sysv.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be > >

Bug#806654: libtool: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A

2016-07-25 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 04:47:12PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > [ Cc:ing Matthias, as he did the last NMUs for this package ] > > On Mon, 25 Jul 2016, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > I can't reproduce this. [...] > > Indeed, the error you quoted does not happen anymore, but t

Bug#806654: libtool: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (@include: could not find version.texi)

2016-07-25 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 12:39:27AM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > retitle 806654 libtool: FTBFS in stretch when built with "dpkg-buildpackage > -A" > thanks > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 12:18:09AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > > libtool.texi:

Bug#806654: libtool: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (@include: could not find version.texi)

2016-07-24 Thread Kurt Roeckx
I can't reproduce this. This might have been fixed in 2.4.6-0.1 with: * Build-depend on texinfo needed by bootstrap. So we should probably just close this. Kurt

Bug#832267: uupdate: convert .sig to .asc

2016-07-23 Thread Kurt Roeckx
to work, but then you have an "BEGIN PGP ARMORED FILE" instead of "BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE" file. But --verify seems to be happy with that anyway. And so you you also make sure that it's them symlinked with the correct filename so that dpkg-buildpackage picks it up? Kurt

Bug#829272: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#829272: Fwd: [openssl.org #4602] Missing accessors

2016-07-21 Thread Kurt Roeckx
now. > The flag is certainly needed in the case of non-RFC3820 proxies, also > known as legacy proxies. Unfortunately these are still very widely used > (majority of the proxies actually) and hence our code must be able to > handle them correctly. Is there a way to recoginize those non-RFC3820 proxies? Kurt

Bug#829272: Missing accessors

2016-07-21 Thread Kurt Roeckx via RT
now. > The flag is certainly needed in the case of non-RFC3820 proxies, also > known as legacy proxies. Unfortunately these are still very widely used > (majority of the proxies actually) and hence our code must be able to > handle them correctly. Is there a way to recoginize those n

Bug#831528: [pkg-ntp-maintainers] Bug#831528: ntptime program gives warning when attempting to prelink

2016-07-17 Thread Kurt Roeckx
enerating this by default. I would argue that it's a bug in prelink that it can't deal with it. Kurt

Bug#831510: gnupg2: Deletes pub keyring

2016-07-16 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: gnupg2 Version: 2.1.11-7 Severity: important Hi, I was running --refresh-keys, I pressed ^C, I tried to start it again, and I get: gpg: signal Interrupt caught ... exiting kurt@intrepid:~$ gpg2 --refresh-keys gpg: keybox '/home/kurt/.gnupg/pubring.kbx' created And of course my

Bug#831232: jitsi: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: libjitsi, libjitsi-jni, libphonenumber6-java

2016-07-14 Thread Kurt Roeckx
is not > > installable > > Depends: libphonenumber6-java but it is > > not installable > > E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. > > apt-get failed. That's of course exactly the same reason why it can't be installed. Kurt

Bug#828254: bro: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-07-13 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 06:48:58PM +0200, Hilko Bengen wrote: > control: tag -1 help > control: tag -1 moreinfo > > Hi Kurt, > > I have prepared a patch that allows most of bro to build with OpenSSL > 1.1. There are still some issues that I haven't been able to figu

Bug#829272: [openssl.org #4602] Missing accessors

2016-07-07 Thread Kurt Roeckx
s easy and quick, but... > > So, if someone else wants to have a go at this and can make something > sensible, > please be my guest. Me, I'm backing off from this particular idea. Mattias, Can you explain why this is needed, what the code is trying to do? Kurt

Bug#818485: elfutils: FTBFS on mips and mipsel

2016-07-07 Thread Kurt Roeckx
erly filling in mips_reloc.def will go a long way and shouldn't be that hard. But I'm really lacking time, and will probably upload it with that patch. Kurt

Bug#829704: Voting for TC Chair

2016-07-05 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 04:12:38PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > I think this needs either an FD or NOTA option. Never mind, 6.1.7 says there is no default. Kurt

Bug#829704: Voting for TC Chair

2016-07-05 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Armstrong > C: Keith Packard > D: Didier Raboud > E: Tollef Fog Heen > F: Sam Hartman > G: Phil Hands > H: Margarita Manterola > ===END=== I think this needs either an FD or NOTA option. Kurt

Bug#828454: nmap: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-07-04 Thread Kurt Roeckx
ith asn1_name */ } } > @@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ static int parse_ssl_cert(lua_State *L, X509 *cert) > >pubkey = X509_get_pubkey(cert); >lua_newtable(L); > - pkey_type = EVP_PKEY_type(pubkey->type); > + pkey_type = EVP_PKEY_type(EVP_PKEY_base_id(pubkey)); That should just be pkey_type = EVP_PKEY_base_id(pubkey); Kurt

Bug#828362: Acknowledgement (kannel-sqlbox: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0)

2016-07-03 Thread Kurt Roeckx
retitle 828362 kannel-sqlbox: FTBFS: Kannel gwlib is required severity 828362 serious thanks It's failing with: checking for cfg_create in -lgwlib... no configure: error: Kannel gwlib is required! Kurt

Bug#828245: Acknowledgement (balsa: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0)

2016-07-03 Thread Kurt Roeckx
unblock 827061 by 828245 thanks After upstream changes it no longer FTBFS: https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-07-02/successful/balsa_2.4.12-3_amd64-20160702-2206 It just has some warnings about deprecated functions you might want to address, or you could just close it. Kurt

Bug#829465: haskell-blogliterately: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-07-03 Thread Kurt Roeckx
. There is a libssl-dev package available in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#829452: alex: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-07-03 Thread Kurt Roeckx
in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828254: bro: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-07-02 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 06:48:58PM +0200, Hilko Bengen wrote: > control: tag -1 help > control: tag -1 moreinfo > > Hi Kurt, > > I have prepared a patch that allows most of bro to build with OpenSSL > 1.1. There are still some issues that I haven't been able to figu

Bug#828232: amanda: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-07-02 Thread Kurt Roeckx
en I find some time. Kurt

Bug#829108: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#829108: libssl-dev: HMAC_Init_ex incompatible change (possibly doc bug)

2016-07-02 Thread Kurt Roeckx
mp; md != ctx->md && (key == NULL || len < 0)) > return 0; Forwarded upstream. Kurt

Bug#829272: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#829272: Missing accessors

2016-07-02 Thread Kurt Roeckx
e due too > structures having been made opaque. In many cases accessors already > exists, but definitely not for all. I forwarded this upstream. Kurt

Bug#828540: sendmail: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-07-01 Thread Kurt Roeckx
tually on the release team's list of key source packages. The errors there should be easy to solve, you just need to know which functions to use. Kurt

Bug#828422: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Fwd: Bug#828422: links2: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-28 Thread Kurt Roeckx
y forgot to add no-ssl2-method to the config call so those methods exist again, peopl call it again, and I can't remove them without an other soname change. Kurt

Bug#828232: amanda: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-27 Thread Kurt Roeckx
say? > I will prepare a new package for the new upstream version amanda 3.3.9. In > case there is the need of a fast NMU because of this bug, please go head. There is no need to have it fixed really fast. It would be nice that it was fixed before I upload it to unstable in which case it would just need a binNMU. Kurt

Bug#828483: osslsigncode: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-27 Thread Kurt Roeckx
need help I suggest you ask on openssl-us...@openssl.org, I don't know enough details to help. Kurt

Bug#828522: QT4 and OpenSSL 1.1.0: [was Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0]

2016-06-27 Thread Kurt Roeckx
also mentioned that, although for Qt 5. So this is even > more complicated than what I first assumed. > > CC-ing Kurt here to both let him know and maybe sugest something. > > Thanks Gert for looking into this! >From what I understand, you don't need to the the thread callback

Bug#828483: osslsigncode: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-27 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 10:31:13PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 10:15:44PM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote: > > On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 22:07:28 +0200, Stephen Kitt <sk...@debian.org> wrote: > > > On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 12:23:30 +0200, Kurt Roeckx <k...@roeck

Bug#828614: yara: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-27 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 05:37:19PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > 1. CRYPTO_LOCK is no longer defined, apparently because some locking > >functions have been removed: > > > >- CRYPTO_num_locks() > >- CRYPTO_set_id_callback() > &

Bug#828614: yara: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-27 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 04:26:42PM +0200, Hilko Bengen wrote: > * Kurt Roeckx: > > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 12:46:26AM +0200, Hilko Bengen wrote: > >> control: tag -1 moreinfo > >> > >> Hi Kurt, > >> > >> I was able

Bug#827054: jessie-pu: package openssl/1.0.1t-1+deb8u3

2016-06-27 Thread Kurt Roeckx
I guess I should just keep the SSLv2 symbols. I assume you don't have a problem with the other change? Kurt

Bug#822961: [pkg-ntp-maintainers] Bug#822961: logcheck file for ntp

2016-06-27 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 11:31:13AM +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > Hi Kurt, > any new on integrating this. > I thought dropping the one line we agreed could be done on you applying it. > Did you wait for me to create a line for the leap second thing or are you > waiting on me for

Bug#828614: yara: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-27 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 12:46:26AM +0200, Hilko Bengen wrote: > control: tag -1 moreinfo > > Hi Kurt, > > I was able to get the yara build fixed by applying this simple patch: > > - const char* sig_alg = > OBJ_nid2ln(OBJ_obj2nid(cert->sig_alg->algorithm))

Bug#828457: nodejs: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-27 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 12:23:04AM +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote: > 2016-06-26 20:24 GMT+02:00 Kurt Roeckx <k...@roeckx.be>: > > > On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 06:53:42PM +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote: > > > > > > I'm on it, and after a couple things i could solve, i need a

Bug#828483: osslsigncode: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 10:15:44PM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 22:07:28 +0200, Stephen Kitt <sk...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 12:23:30 +0200, Kurt Roeckx <k...@roeckx.be> wrote: > > > If you have problems making things

Bug#828478: [PATCH] ovs-pki: Use SHA-512 message digest when available.

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
t a/AUTHORS b/AUTHORS > index 704ba40..a893330 100644 > --- a/AUTHORS > +++ b/AUTHORS > @@ -367,6 +367,7 @@ Konstantin Khorenko khore...@openvz.org > Kris zhang zhang.k...@gmail.com > Krishna Miriyalakris...@nicira.com > Krishna Mohan Elluruelluru

Bug#828457: nodejs: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
would get the size at compile time which might be a different one than the one at runtime. Kurt

Bug#828509: postgis: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 06:03:15PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > Control: tags -1 unreproducible moreinfo > > Hi Kurt, > > Thanks for your work on OpenSSL. > > On 06/26/2016 12:23 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a re

Bug#828618: zeroinstall-injector: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
block 828618 by 828462 thanks On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 03:15:30PM +0100, Thomas Leonard wrote: > > I don't mind. I guess blocks might be better, to remind me to test it > when the ocaml-ssl bug is fixed. So I've set that.

Bug#828476: open-vm-tools: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 02:05:15PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > Hi Kurt, > > I've forwarded the issue to the vmware guys. Do you have an ETA of 1.1.0 > in unstable? Not yet. The upstream release is currently aiming for the 7th of July, but it will also depend on the release team. Kurt

Bug#828618: zeroinstall-injector: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 12:20:33PM +0100, Thomas Leonard wrote: > On 26 June 2016 at 11:24, Kurt Roeckx <k...@roeckx.be> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using > > OpenSSL this package fail to build.

Bug#828615: yate: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
available in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828618: zeroinstall-injector: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
. There is a libssl-dev package available in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828614: yara: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
available in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828620: zorp: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828619: znc: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828616: yubico-piv-tool: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
-dev package available in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828617: zeroc-ice: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
package available in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828613: yapet: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828607: xml-security-c: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
package available in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828612: yadifa: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
available in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828605: xchat-gnome: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
information. There is a libssl-dev package available in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828609: xmms2: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
available in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828611: xymon: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
available in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828608: xmltooling: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
available in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828604: xca: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828610: xrdp: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828606: xmlsec1: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
available in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828603: wvstreams: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
available in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828593: virtualbox: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
-dev package available in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828597: webauth: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
available in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828599: wget: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828602: wrk: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828595: voms: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828592: vboot-utils: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
-dev package available in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828598: webcit: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
available in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828601: wpa: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828596: vtun: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
available in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828600: witty: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
available in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828594: virtuoso-opensource: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
. There is a libssl-dev package available in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828588: utopia-documents: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
. There is a libssl-dev package available in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828591: validns: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828587: urweb: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
package available in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828585: unworkable: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
available in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828589: uw-imap: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
package available in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828590: uwsgi: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
available in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828586: up-imapproxy: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
package available in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828584: unbound: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
available in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828583: uhub: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828582: uget: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828576: tor: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

Bug#828581: turnserver: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
available in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >