ebci's
sources.list is coming from.
I didn't check the autopkgtest code yet, but I trust your assessment
it's not lxc-templates. Let's assign to autopkgtest for further checking
Paul
PS: this reply was triggered by bug 1071185
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
': No such process
Creating group 'gnome-remote-desktop' with GID 987.
The failure lines were printed in red.
Kind regards,
Paul
On Fri, 2024-05-10 at 14:49 +, Chris Lamb wrote:
> * Use "xz --list" to supplement the output when comparing .xz archives;
> essential when some underlying metadata differs. (Closes: #1069329)
> * Actually append the xz --list after the container differences, as it
>
Package: osc
Version: 0.182.1-1
Severity: normal
Usertags: warnings
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Upgrading osc gives Python 3.12 warnings,
the fix for this is to use raw strings:
https://docs.python.org/3/library/re.html#raw-string-notation
Preparing to unpack
your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=nbd
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
on
reproducible-builds [1]?
Paul
[1]
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/gpaw.html
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=prettytable
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=sqlmodel
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 12:10 +0100, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
> how-can-i-help: should detect that is run by unattended-upgrades & skip
> Possible solution: skip execution if STDIN is not a TTY.
I filter and then read my unattended-upgrades mails, so
this would break my normal usage of
to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=audit
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=eclib
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=praat
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=ukui-power-manager
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=ruby-parslet
OpenPGP_signature.asc
, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=q2-feature-table
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=tiktoken
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=click
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: tags -1 pending
Hi,
On 06-04-2024 9:58 p.m., Paul Gevers wrote:
Anyways, it looks like we could just lower the timeout to 1 second and
hope were fine for some time to come.
No. 1 second is *too short* for the PodmanRunner.test_copy_timeout test
on salsa. So I'll just disable
hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=libcbor
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
to be properly binNMU'ed. Hence, I will
shortly do a no-changes source-only upload to DELAYED/15, closing this
bug. Please let me know if I should delay or cancel that upload.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package
the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=snapraid
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=camelot-py
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=unattended-upgrades
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=multiqc
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
sues that need to be
sorted
out upstream first [1].
Thanks,
Adrian
> [1] https://github.com/OSInside/kiwi/issues/2548
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
with the latest version in stable-security
should solve the problem.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
exists, the former not.
Is this requirement newly enforced by britney?
No.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
5
days:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/britney2/-/blob/master/britney2/policies/autopkgtest.py?ref_type=heads#L138
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 23:39:14 + IvanAbs wrote:
> On 2024-04-17 several of my servers running Debian 10 received an
> update for the tzdata package via Debian unattended-upgrade. However,
> this update resulted in corruption of files within the
> /usr/share/zoneinfo directory.
I, too,
eam release in Debian.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
GB total (starting off with 990 MB used),
so your test has 24 GB to use (including installing test dependencies).
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
rocess). Having said that, maybe we will be ready next week.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
this
to src:tracker.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
, if the build dependency is available in unstable,
helping the maintainer of your Build-Depends to enable migration to
testing is a great way to solve the issue. If your build dependency is
gone from unstable and testing, you'll have to fix the build process
in some other way.
Paul
Note: this bug
,
helping the maintainer of your Build-Depends to enable migration to
testing is a great way to solve the issue. If your build dependency is
gone from unstable and testing, you'll have to fix the build process
in some other way.
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks
,
helping the maintainer of your Build-Depends to enable migration to
testing is a great way to solve the issue. If your build dependency is
gone from unstable and testing, you'll have to fix the build process
in some other way.
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using
to solve the issue. If your build dependency is
gone from unstable and testing, you'll have to fix the build process
in some other way.
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https
/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2019/07/msg2.html
https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/rapiddisk/unstable/amd64/46311856/
134s Failed command:
134s make -j64 KERNELRELEASE=6.7.12-rt-amd64 -C
/lib/modules/6.7.12-rt-amd64/build
M=/var/lib/dkms/rapiddisk
have to fix the build process
in some other way.
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/latest/amd64.html
On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 20:24:38 +0200 Michael Weghorn wrote:
> Note: The file 'dev_README.txt' in the sources describes how to build the
> extension, but this probably cannot be followed as is, since it involves
> installing packages via "npm" in the first step (which is not in line with
> Debian's
On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 14:47:24 + Phil Morrell wrote:
> Would be nice to see this packaged, since the native part is already
> available, under the affects package name. Note, I'm not even using this
> under KDE, it works perfectly fine under XFCE.
As I mentioned in #965386, this is easy to add
isn't RC.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Fri, 2024-05-03 at 13:35 +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> I wonder why no QA tool reported this?
As implied by the usertags I used, the adequate tool found it:
http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/log/2013/02/23/inadequate-software/
In addition, piuparts has a test for broken symlinks too, and as
well
Package: fracatux
Version: 1.5.2~rc0-1
Severity: minor
The Homepage for fracatux currently points to a URL that has a
JavaScript based redirect to this URL, which has fracatux info:
https://educajou.forge.apps.education.fr/fracatux/
Please update the Homepage for fracatux to the new URL.
--
> let's exclude it from bookworm (and remove entirely eventually)?
>
> sounds good
Unfortunately I missed that xorg-dev depends on libdmx-dev, so this will have to
wait until after the Bookworm release.
Let's make a bug for xorg-dev then. I'm *assuming* it's no longer needed.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: onionshare-cli
Version: 2.6.2-1
Severity: normal
Usertags: warnings
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Upgrading onionshare-cli gives Python 3.12 warnings,
the right way to fix this is to use raw strings:
r am I missing something?
I am raising severity to serious then so that it can be autoremoved from
testing.
This package is a key package (because of debian-installer), so it can't
be autoremoved.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Wed, 2024-05-01 at 11:48 +0200, Gerhard Rieger wrote:
> Socat is not able to do this, and there is currently no plan to
> implement this feature.
>
> However, due to the repeated requests, a script socat-mux.sh has been
> written and released with Socat 1.8.0.0 that is able to provide
>
On Wed, 2024-05-01 at 23:36 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [John Paul Adrian Glaubitz 2020-05-10]
> > I would like to adopt this package. There is a new upstream available and
> > the
> > repository has been moved to Github with some recent activ
Package: lintian
Severity: wishlist
For manual pages generated by tools like help2man that run binaries to
get usage statements for conversion to manual page format, please check
that the manual pages do not contain common text indicating that the
executable or script was not able to run
Package: jbig2
Version: 0.29-2.1
Severity: normal
Usertags: help2man
The jbig2 manual page is broken. Looks like it was generated via
help2man using the binary in the build tree but without using
LD_LIBRARY_PATH so the binary could not find libraries it uses,
so jbig2 could not start, so it
Package: python3-pyasn
Version: 1.6.1-3+b4
Severity: normal
Usertags: warnings
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
When installing pyasn I get a syntax warning with Python 3.12,
the fix would be to use raw strings with Python regexes:
Package: socat
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: so...@dest-unreach.org
Forwarded: so...@dest-unreach.org
socat does not appear to have a way to send data to multiple clients of
a listening socket, which would be useful to proxy data from overloaded
servers to multiple local clients.
For example:
fan of teaching britney2 about
autodep8 internal details.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
the problem at hand.
Perhaps you can spot what's wrong with this setup s.t. it does not
trigger as intended.
I hope it's clear now. Related, for future reference, we also have the
hint-testsuite-triggers [1] restriction in autopkgtest.
Paul
[1]
https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autopkgtest
there's an *test* dependency relation with linux, this will be tested.
Current regressions can be seen here:
https://release.debian.org/proposed-updates/stable.html, look for "c-i".
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
pp to display
> the intended look.
No, this is by design. The upstream developers have decided to make the user
interface as minimalistic
as possible. I'm not such a fan of the new design either, but that's just how
it looks now.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Dev
test setup for migration is a bit weird and getting it
right shouldn't be the responsibility of the test [1].
Paul
[1]
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/AutopkgtestBestPractices
(under "Don't").
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ensiveness of the guide.
We could add a statement that while more tools exist. All automated
testing of upgrades that I know of use apt-get, so that's the obvious
choice. aptitude doesn't get as much testing.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: onboard
Version: 1.4.1-6
Severity: normal
File: /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/Onboard/Appearance.py
Usertags: warnings
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
The recent upgrade of onboard triggers Python 3.12 syntax warnings,
the correct fix is to use Python's "raw"
Package: thermald
Version: 2.5.7-2
Severity: normal
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: obsolete-conffile adequate
The recent upgrade did not deal with obsolete conffiles properly.
Please use the dpkg-maintscript-helper support provided by
dh_installdeb to remove these obsolete conffiles
.
Don't hesitate to reach out if you need help and some more information
from our infrastructure.
Paul
e.g.
https://ci.debian.net/packages/n/netplan.io/testing/s390x/45071647/
272s ==
272s ERROR: test_rename_interfaces
(__main__
unless apt-pinning asks explicitly for
versions from the source suite.
Paul
[1] https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/AutopkgtestBestPractices
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
and I have adjusted the font size to something
bigger than the default).
See attachment for clarity.
Paul
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 6.6.15-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; P
Package: libntlm0
Version: 1.8-2
Severity: normal
File: /usr/share/doc/libntlm0/README
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: adequate broken-symlink
libntlm0 1.8-2 introduced a broken symlink:
/usr/share/doc/libntlm0/README -> README.md
This appears to be because upstream switched
/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=3Dslurm-wlm
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/arm64/s/slurm-wlm/45786802/log.gz
96s Unpacking slurm-wlm-mysql-plugin (23.11.4-1.4) ...
96s dpkg: error processing archive
/tmp/apt-dpkg-install-zn5wp3/17
g file images...
EE: FAIL
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
package.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
confident).
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
are considered RC in testing, but because machine-isolation
support by ci.debian.net is new I have not marked this bug as serious (yet).
More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be
found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https
-isolation
support by ci.debian.net is new I have not marked this bug as serious (yet).
More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be
found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2019/07
(yet).
More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be
found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2019/07/msg2.html
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/f
at you mean?). I have triggered the test manually, so for now the
lights are green. Because those expire, I have added a hint to ignore
the failure of the old version in testing.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
by ci.debian.net is new I have not marked this bug as serious (yet).
More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be
found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2019/07/msg2.html
https
by ci.debian.net is new I have not marked this bug as serious (yet).
More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be
found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2019/07/msg2.html
support by ci.debian.net is new I have not marked this bug as serious (yet).
More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be
found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2019/07
systemd-timesyncd by default.
In autopkgtest context, recommends are not installed (to avoid issues
where recommends are (sometimes) not installable). If your test needs
it, you'll need to Depends on it explicitly in your test stanza.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
are considered RC in testing, but because machine-isolation
support by ci.debian.net is new I have not marked this bug as serious (yet).
More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be
found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1
please investigate the situation and
reassign the bug to the right package?
More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=3Dopenssl
https
be
found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2019/07/msg2.html
https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/daemontools/testing/amd64/45702934/
98s autopkgtest [11:07:03]: test daemontools-run-systemd
, but because machine-isolation
support by ci.debian.net is new I have not marked this bug as serious (yet).
More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be
found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian
by ci.debian.net is new I have not marked this bug as serious (yet).
More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be
found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2019/07/msg2.html
Hi,
On 18-04-2024 10:25 p.m., Paul Gevers wrote:
I'll hopefully do the changes tomorrow. (RL work is a bit busy at the
moment.)
The test ran. Unfortunately zfs-test-suite-1 failed.
https://ci.debian.net/packages/z/zfs-linux/unstable/amd64/45683824/
4089s Results Summary
4089s PASS 681
Hi,
On Sun, 7 Apr 2024 11:54:35 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
153s crash: /usr/lib/debug/boot/vmlinux-6.6.15-amd64: no.gnu_debuglink section
153s 153s crash: /usr/lib/debug/boot/vmlinux-6.6.15-amd64: no
debugging
data available
Interestingly the test passes in unstable, stable and oldstable. So
mentioning that parts of lo are expected to not work on
armel due to java being broken. Probably the best way forward is to
request binary removal on armel.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: diffoscope
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: Sam James
When comparing two XZ compressed files that decompress to identical
data, please compare the metadata before comparing compressed data.
The xz --list option can be used for this, from the manual page:
Print information about
es/z/zfs-linux/unstable/amd64/45540021/
I'll hopefully do the changes tomorrow. (RL work is a bit busy at the
moment.)
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
The *binary* removal request was proper, I think a -D/--do-close snuck
into dak rm (easy thing to do here), which we usually only do with
source removals.
I've sent a control message, I'll get these reopened. Sorry about that.
paultag
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 9:57 AM Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>
We managed to solve this bug upstream.
https://gitlab.com/sane-project/backends/-/issues/742
Paul
Package: isenkram-cli
Version: 0.56
Severity: normal
Usertags: warnings
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
I got some upgrade warnings that were likely caused by Python 3.12:
Preconfiguring packages ...
Preparing to unpack .../isenkram-cli_0.56_all.deb ...
kages one after another to fix these issues.
Thanks,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
using paramiko.
I have never heard of paramiko.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
this, so please help me
get it into an useful shape if you have ideas on how to improve it and
even speak up if you think I'm doing it "wrong". Feel totally free to
add more issues if you spot something's missing. Ideally I very much
don't do this alone.
Paul
[1] https://salsa.deb
/cdbs/1/class/hlibrary.mk:158: build-ghc-stamp] Error 25
dpkg-buildpackage: error: fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch subprocess returned
exit status 2
Adrian
> [1]
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=haskell-splitmix=powerpc=0.1.0.5-1%2Bb1=1713046430=0
--
.''`. John Paul
like a value we could very
reasonably support. I'll configure our setup for that.
I would have aron to review & upload a new version, then we can test on
debci infra and see whether it solves the problem.
Ack.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
, you'll have to fix the build process
in some other way.
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/latest/amd64.html
have to fix the build process
in some other way.
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/latest/amd64.html
ize-env -us -uc -rfakeroot -S
> > -
> >
> > dpkg-buildpackage: info: source package virtualjaguar
> > dpkg-buildpackage: info: source version 2.1.3-2
> > dpkg-buildpackage: info: source distribution unstable
> > dpkg-buildpackage: info: s
^
> > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> > make[2]: *** [Makefile:58: obj/cpustbl.o] Error 1
Thanks for the bug report! The attached patch fixes the problem for me. I'm
going to upload
an updated packages soon which will also include fixes for #1038585 [1].
Adrian
&g
Package: litecli
Version: 1.10.1-1
Severity: normal
Usertags: warnings
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
A recent upgrade gave me these warnings, likely caused by Python 3.12:
Preparing to unpack .../litecli_1.10.1-1_all.deb ...
Unpacking litecli (1.10.1-1) over
301 - 400 of 27161 matches
Mail list logo
