Package: sd
Version: 0.80.really.0.7.6-1+deb12u1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Please replace "defualts" in the package description with "defaults".
Thank you & greetings,
*
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.5
APT prefers stable-security
APT policy: (500, 'stable-security'), (500,
Package: secnet
Version: 0.6.7
Severity: minor
The secnet long description reads:
> secnet works well with userv-ipif (allowing it to run without needing root
> privilege) and hippotat (not currently in Debian)
However hippotat seems to be packaged:
it when
necessary, or send another bug report if something doe not fulfill your
needs.
Best regards, Georges.
On Fri, 22 Jul 2022 15:59:17 +0200 Tomas Pospisek wrote:
@Georges Khaznadar : what do you think about:
1. enabling debugging by default?
2. documenting `-x` ?
If Debian
Source: tracker
Version: 3.4.2-1
Severity: minor
Please update the project's homepage. The homepage that is declared in
the debian/control file, https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Tracker, leads
to a "This page does not exist yet" page. The project seems to have a
maintained and working homepage at
Source: notepadqq
Version: 2.0.0~beta1-4
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
The package's description should read gramatically ...
correctly:
Notepadqq is a text editor designed by developers, for developers.
instead of:
Notepadqq is a text editor designed from developers, for developers.
On Tue, 31 Oct 2023, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2023-10-31 Tomas Pospisek wrote:
[...]
PS: I'd prefer this bugreport to be open as long as the stable and
oldstable packages are still vulnerable...
Hello Thomas,
The Debian BTS does not use a simple open/close logic, it tracks which
Hi Salvatore,
thanks a lot for your reply (more below):
On Tue, 31 Oct 2023, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Hi Tomas,
On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 11:07:06AM +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
Hello Exim maintainers,
this ticket, asking for packages with fixes for CVE-2023-42117 and other
security
Hello Exim maintainers,
this ticket, asking for packages with fixes for CVE-2023-42117 and other
security relavant issues is closed.
However only a package for unstable has been released:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2023-42117
all other Debian releases (stable,
Instead of solely having a short description that says "$FOO is a $BAZ for
$BAR" where it's not immediately clear without particular knowledge what
$FOO and $BAR are, please add a short text, that explains what $FOO and
$BAR actually do. Something like:
"Xapp is an application that does .
On Mon, 26 Jun 2023, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
Il 26/06/2023 12:30, Tomas Pospisek ha scritto:
Instead of solely having a short description that says "$FOO is a $BAZ for
$BAR" where it's not immediately clear without particular knowledge what
$FOO and $BAR are, please add a
Since this seems to be a xserver problem, could you please reassign the
ticket to the correct xserver package?
*t
Hi Thorsten,
does the bug you described in https://bugs.debian.org/941966 still occur?
I.e.:
* do you still have that system?
* did you maybe upgrade it to a more recent bullseye kernel?
Greetings,
*t
Hi Cameron,
does the bug you described in https://bugs.debian.org/970819 still occur?
I.e.:
* do you still have that system?
* did you maybe upgrade it from Debian buster to bullseye?
Greetings,
*t
Hi Chris,
does the bug you described in https://bugs.debian.org/929077 still occur?
I.e.:
* do you still have that system?
* did you maybe upgrade it from Debian buster to bullseye?
Greetings,
*t
and I guess #1027483 can be closed as it is still open along with #1027430
?
On Wed, 25 Jan 2023, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
Woah guys, a new Debian stable kernel came my way and finally sound works
again consistently. Many, many, many thanks to you for bisecting, patching
and shipping the fix
Woah guys, a new Debian stable kernel came my way and finally sound works
again consistently. Many, many, many thanks to you for bisecting, patching
and shipping the fix. Muito, muito obrigado!
*t
Package: unattended-upgrades
Version: 2.8
Followup-For: Bug #989943
X-Debbugs-Cc: Michael Vogt
Hi,
I'm still seeing this problem in unattended-upgrades from Debian bullseye.
Thanks a lot for unattended-upgrades and the maintainance!!!
*t
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.5
APT
On Thu, 3 Nov 2022, Marcos Talau wrote:
Control: tags 998950 + patch
Control: tags 998950 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for mailsync (versioned as 5.2.7-3.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Many, many thanks
see previous email in this bugreport for context
Hello Nicolas and Libre Office maintainers,
(Not sure what's going on, I'm submitting this bug report for the third
time since for unknown reason it doesn't make it into the BTS)
My Libre Office Impress is not displaying some icons - see attached
screenshot that I will send in the next email.
Hi bug reporters and Libre Office maintainers,
there's a number of bugs related to Icon rendering that seem to be simlar
or identical. Herewith I'm posting to them to crosslink them.
I have however *not* looked at them in depth. Here are the bug reports:
Package: hcloud-cli
Version: 1.13.0-2+b6
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: Thorsten Alteholz
Hi,
thanks for packaging hcloud-cli. I'd be glad if a more recent hcloud-cli
version would be available in Debian, specifically one > 1.16, because
that version supports the `--label` flag on server
- debian/patches:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=2;bug=887035;filename=log-to-stdout-when-in-foreground;msg=25
Best regards, Georges.
Tomas Pospisek a écrit :
Package: cron
Version: 3.0pl1-137
Followup-For: Bug #887035
X-Debbugs-Cc: Georges Khaznadar
If anybody wan
Hello Georges,
On Fri, 22 Jul 2022, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
Would it seem reasonable, for your needs, to find two separate binary
packages in Debian, "cron" and let us say, "cron-debug"? Both package
would be built from the same source, the first one with no special
build parameter, the
Package: cron
Version: 3.0pl1-137
Followup-For: Bug #887035
X-Debbugs-Cc: Georges Khaznadar
If anybody wants to use Greek's patch (see [1] and [2]) then I'm attaching my
version of it adapted to cron 3.0pl1-137 (the version in Debian bullseye).
It comes in two parts: one is the patch and one is
Package: cron
Version: 3.0pl1-137
Followup-For: Bug #887035
X-Debbugs-Cc: Greek , Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
, Georges Khaznadar
Instead of patching cron, an easy way to get cron output to stdout is
to:
* rebuild it with debugging enabled:
$ apt-get source cron
$ apt-get
On 02.04.22 03:46, Josenilson Ferreira da Silva wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Josenilson Ferreira da Silva
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, nilsonfsi...@hotmail.com
* Package name: cargo-strip
Version : 0.2.2
Upstream Author : Guillaume Valadon
*
I wrote:
Wi-Fi stops working after upgrading from -12- to
linux-image-5.10.0-13-amd64 (iwlwifi: probe of :00:14.3 failed with
error -110))
So in order to get more debug info, I set `loglevel=3` in grub in the
kernel command line.
That changed two things:
* now while booting I get to
Package: src:linux
Version: 5.10.106-1
Severity: important
Dear Kernel maintainers and other Debian users that maybe have the same problem,
After upgrading from linux-image-5.10.0-12-amd64 to linux-image-5.10.0-13-amd64
the iwlwifi is unable to initialise the Intel Corporation Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (rev
Package: terminology
Version: 1.9.0-2
Severity: minor
When starting terminology I see:
```
ERR<148513>:elementary ../src/lib/elementary/efl_ui_focus_manager_calc.c:1529
_efl_ui_focus_manager_calc_efl_ui_focus_manager_manager_focus_set() Could not
fetch a node located at 0x4004529e
## Copy
Package: podman
Followup-For: Bug #978650
X-Debbugs-Cc: Antonio Terceiro , Reinhard Tartler
, Andrej Shadura
Debian's podman isn't able to resolve short names out of the box.
It seems however that upstream is (I have not verified that - I'm
infering that from looking at an example [1]).
Hi Noah and ticket participants,
I've been recently getting the
Cannot open file
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.004002/updates_spamassassin_org/1896304.tar.gz: No such
file or directory at /usr/bin/sa-update line 1600.
error from cron.
Since you wrote:
I believe that the fix from
Hi Detlev,
On Mon, 27 Dec 2021, detlev schmidtke wrote:
and I do not agree that this is a sole kernel problem
fstrim --verbose
should report something, anything
* there still isn't a text only output (as opposed to an image) of what
you are seeing in the bugreport. So people that get
Hi nst0022,
I have reassigned your bugreport to the correct package, namely
util-linux.
Please when filing a bug report, assign the bug to the correct package in
the first place, otherwise:
* you'll be generating triage work for others
* your bug report won't be seen by the maintainers and
Package: network-manager-openconnect
Version: 1.2.6-1
Followup-For: Bug #1001461
When I try to a VPN connection by executing `nm-connection-editor`,
after pressing the button "Create..." I see in the console:
** (nm-connection-editor:27682): WARNING **: 15:31:07.165: Could not load
editor
Package: network-manager-openconnect
Version: 1.2.6-1
Severity: important
Hi,
after installing network-manager-openconnect there's no VPN tab in the
configuration dialog and so I can't enter the VPN gateway address
anywhere to set up the VPN connection.
I did restart NM via
sudo systemctl
On 06.12.21 20:43, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
On Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 07:58:17PM +0300, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote:
So what's happening with chromium in both sid and stable? I saw on d-release
that it was removed from testing (#998676 and #998732), with a discussion
about ending security support for
Rustam wrote on 12 Oct 2021:
Hi Guillem,
Any news on the proposed patch?
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=892664#49
Can it be merged already? ;)
Ubuntu packages are already using zstd compression. So tools like
Mainline don't work on Debian any more, see e.g.
On Thu, 18 Nov 2021, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 11/17/21 11:01 AM, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
Our instructions on Secure Boot [1] are a bit scatterbrained and do not
specify precisely where the key should exist at.
I was the one who wrote them, after *A LOT* of research about it on the
internet
On Wed, 17 Nov 2021, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
I would edit those [wiki] instruction so that they create the key at the
same location Ubuntu has its MOK keys. However I would prefer not to
collide with some tools or automation or scripts that do the same at the
same place.
[...]
[1] https
(Thomas I hope you don't mind I put you in the Cc)
Leif Lindholm wrote:
Currently, if dkms is installed, shim-signed prompts to disable
kernel/module verification on next boot on some trigger events - to
ensure the system will successfully boot (something, not necessarily
untampered with)
s,
On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 11:18:39AM +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
Package: firefox-esr
Version: 78.15.0esr-1~deb11u1
Severity: normal
Tags: security
X-Debbugs-Cc: secur...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Dear Firefox maintainers,
I note that Mozillas Security Advisory mfsa2021-49 [1] has bee
Package: firefox-esr
Version: 78.15.0esr-1~deb11u1
Severity: normal
Tags: security
X-Debbugs-Cc: secur...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Dear Firefox maintainers,
I note that Mozillas Security Advisory mfsa2021-49 [1] has been
released on 2021-11-02 thus nearly two weeks ago and contains a
Hi,
I'm running Debian bullseye and have firefox 78.15.0esr-1~deb11u1 from
bullseye-security, but packages.debian.org is still showing
78.14.0esr-1~deb11u1 as the firefox-esr version available in Debian
bullseye [1].
So the patch of Rhonda D'Vine, did not have an effect on at least the info
Hi Flávio,
Is it this URL https://www.folha.uol.com.br/ you are referring to? It
works for me (firefox 78.15.0esr-1~deb11u1), I have no blurred font.
Would you mind sending a screenshot (not to me but to the bugreport
(989...@bugs.debian.org)?
*t
An alternative approach could be that an `apt update` would trigger an
`extrepo update`.
I don't know enough about apt hooks etc. to be able to say if that would
be feasible or - in case such a mechanism isn't available today - if
apt's maintainers would be in favor of it?
Installing a
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=993488#16 contains a
"wontfix + close" but no rationale. Which leaves the original reporter
with a large "?" I guess.
I am guessing that the reason for the "wontfix" is "that's just how Unix
works unfortunately" aka "that's a Unix design bug"?
Dear ImageMagick Packaging Team,
Short version: is it safe today to reenable PDF/PS conversion again these
days?
Long version:
Today I was affected by the problem reported in [1], notably:
convert: attempt to perform an operation not allowed by the security
policy `PDF' @
So I'm not sure what to do about this ticket.
The current situation is:
* we have backports.org - which does *not* belong to Debian
* when accessing it, some variations of the URL get forwarded to
https://backports.debian.org/ and some break in various way
My opinion on this is: let's let
wrote:
tags 992348 wontfix
thanks
On 8/17/21 5:35 PM, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
tldr: would it be possible to re-enable the ruby-mapscript package
build?
While possible, I'd rather not.
Extended explication: requiring a packaged version of ruby-mapscript
on Ubuntu 20.04 I today basically reverted
Source: mapserver
Version: 7.6.4-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi Debian GIS maintainers, hi Bas!
tldr: would it be possible to re-enable the ruby-mapscript package
build?
Extended explication: requiring a packaged version of ruby-mapscript
on Ubuntu 20.04 I today basically reverted commits [1] and [2]
reassign 991853 ftp.debian.org
thanks
the archive.debian.org certificate problem seems to rather concern the
ftp.debian.org pseudo package & DDs, thus I'm reassigning to it.
Thanks a lot for the explanation Carsten!
*t
On Thu, 15 Jul 2021, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
Hello Tomas,
Am 12.07.21 um 11:07 schrieb Tomas Pospisek:
If I'd like to get rid of ~/.icedove and only have a standard
~/.thunderbird directory - which I am assuming is possible - then what
would
see also #990807
Package: thunderbird
Version: 1:78.11.0-2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: Carsten Schoenert , Paul Menzel
I'd like to describe my problem, which is related to #950941.
I have copyied over ~/thunderbird from my old laptop. Now when
I start thunderbird, it start's normally. However at next start
or the kernel team?
Thanks and greets to all of you!
*t
On Mon, 28 Jun 2021, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 28.06.21 um 14:52 schrieb Tomas Pospisek:
Package: systemd
Version: 247.3-5
Severity: wishlist
Tags: security
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team
Hi,
TLDR:
$ sudo sysctl
Package: systemd
Version: 247.3-5
Severity: wishlist
Tags: security
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team
Hi,
TLDR:
$ sudo sysctl kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled
kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled = 0
please disable unprivileged BPF by default, it seems that it
is not safe to be allowed
Argh, that should of course be:
--- /usr/bin/unattended-upgrade.orig2021-06-18 09:46:37.434386824 +0200
+++ /usr/bin/unattended-upgrade 2021-06-18 09:47:03.958639111 +0200
@@ -1353,11 +1353,12 @@
when = apt_pkg.config.find(
"Unattended-Upgrade::Automatic-Reboot-Time", "now")
On Thu, 17 Jun 2021, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
With respect to "unattended-upgrades blocking other cron.daily scripts via
shutdown -r" I reflected:
Now what would a "correct" or "better" behavior be?
I suggest to trigger an asynchronous shutdown, that is *not*
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/debianutils/-/merge_requests/8
Hi Clint,
here's the corresponding pull request:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/debianutils/-/merge_requests/7
please pull :-) !
Thanks!
*t
On Mon, 14 Jun 2021, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
Hello Clint!
On Sun, 13 Jun 2021, Clint Adams wrote:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 11:46:31AM +0200, Tomas
With respect to "unattended-upgrades blocking other cron.daily scripts via
shutdown -r" I reflected:
Now what would a "correct" or "better" behavior be?
I suggest to trigger an asynchronous shutdown, that is *not*
to wait for `shutdown -r $TIME` to come back so that whatever
daily menial taks
Package: unattended-upgrades
Version: 1.11.2
Severity: normal
Hi!
There are several systems where I get
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 06:00:17 +0200
From: Cron Daemon
Subject: Cron test -x /usr/sbin/anacron || ( cd / && run-parts
--report /etc/cron.daily )
Hello Clint!
On Sun, 13 Jun 2021, Clint Adams wrote:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 11:46:31AM +0200, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
thanks for maintaining debianutils. Is there any reason Christoph Biedl's
patch to add a --debug flag doesn't get applied? It does look like being
useful?
I have no memory
Package: debianutils
Version: 4.11.2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
See attached patch
Thanks for maintaining debuanutils!
*t
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.9
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (503, 'stable'), (501, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Package: debianutils
Version: 4.11.2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.9
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (503, 'stable'), (501, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-14-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Kernel
Hi,
thanks for maintaining debianutils. Is there any reason Christoph Biedl's
patch to add a --debug flag doesn't get applied? It does look like being
useful?
?
Greetings & thanks,
*t
Danke für die Triage Moritz!
*t
On Sat, 24 Apr 2021, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the src:linux package:
#711054: synaptics touchpad becomes unusable under load
It has been closed by j...@debian.org.
On 22.04.21 04:04, clay stan wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: clay stan
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: dpa-ext-gnomekeyring
Version : 5.0.4
Upstream Author : linuxdeepin
* URL :
On 22.04.21 05:21, clay stan wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: clay stan
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: dtkcommon
Version : 5.5.2
Upstream Author : linuxdeepin
* URL : https://github.com/linuxdeepin/dtkcommon
License
I had checked that my installer had 5.10.0 and if your assessement is
right then my installer must have been a daily build. Thanks a lot Roland
for keeping the finger on this issue!
*t
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021, Roland Clobus wrote:
reopen 986506
thanks
On 14/04/2021 08:58, Tomas Pospisek wrote
In #740499 Chris Bainbridge writes that:
[...] but firmware-7.4.0-amd64-netinst.iso does not contain
Broadcom firmware (at least not b43).
I can see that there are firmware packages for Broadcom b43 in contrib:
https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=bullseye=all=any=names=firmware-b
Could
Hi William,
if you still have access to the hardware it would be nice if you could
test whether the coming Debian bullseye installer still fails with it - I
assume this should have been fixed in the meanwhile - so this bug report
could be closed?
Thanks,
*t
nal Message
On Mar 14, 2021, 8:02 AM, Tomas Pospisek < t...@sourcepole.ch> wrote:
Hi Scott,
On 13.03.21 22:28, Scott C. MacCallum wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org <http://www.debian.org>
> URL: https://wiki.debian.org/UnattendedUpgrades
<https://wiki.debia
Hi Scott,
On 13.03.21 22:28, Scott C. MacCallum wrote:
Package: www.debian.org
URL: https://wiki.debian.org/UnattendedUpgrades
Forbidden
You are not allowed to access this!
On the other hand I *am* allowed to access it. So there must be
something that's different between me and you. I
On Fri, 26 Feb 2021, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote:
El jue., 25 feb. 2021 12:52, Tomas Pospisek escribió:
Javier,
seeing that you do not seem to have been working on cron for a few years
would it be OK with you if I posted something along these lines to
debian-devel
:+1 ! Thank you!
*t
On Tue, 2 Mar 2021, Aloïs Micard wrote:
Hello Tomas,
As far as I can see "manage" is about as specific as the word "do": srcode
lets you do "something" with your codebase. Now what is it **exactly** that
srcode is offering? Could you please describe that both in the
Hi Alois,
you write:
Package name: srcode
Description : Tool that help developers to manage their codebase in
an effective & productive way.
srcode is a tool that help developers to manage their codebase in an
effective & productive way.
this description however is arguably
:+1 thanks Javier!
On Fri, 26 Feb 2021, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote:
Dear Tomas,
El jue., 25 feb. 2021 12:52, Tomas Pospisek escribió:
Javier,
seeing that you do not seem to have been working on cron for a few years
would it be OK with you if I posted something along
tner wrote:
On 2021-02-23 09:03, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
On Mon, 22 Feb 2021, Christian Kastner wrote:
Oh, this is news indeed. I think Javier hasn't been working on for the
last 3 years [1]? So I'd say you Christian have been cron's defacto
maintainer?
While possibly so, I must note that effec
On Mon, 22 Feb 2021, Christian Kastner wrote:
On 21.02.21 15:46, Laurent Combe wrote:
near 3 years i report this issue
i joined a patch
and after all that time nothing, not even a "confirmed" tag.
very disappointing. What can I do to help this issue be accepted more quickly ?
I can't speak
, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
Hi Laurent,
let me start by saying the gentlemen above are probably working on cron in
their free time. They do not owe anybody anything. So I think you can be
disapointed, but saying so will probably not have a positive impact. Maybe it
will on the contrary drain them
Hi Laurent,
let me start by saying the gentlemen above are probably working on cron in
their free time. They do not owe anybody anything. So I think you can be
disapointed, but saying so will probably not have a positive impact. Maybe
it will on the contrary drain them.
That said, thanks
Source: debian-policy
Version: 4.5.1.0
Severity: wishlist
In Julian Andres Klode's blog I've [1] glimpsed:
> New features
> [...]
> The Protected field is now supported. It replaces the previous Important
> field and is like Essential, but only for installed packages (some minor
> more
See also the related feature request/patch in bugs.debian.org/898177 i.e.
allowing to set MAILFROM
Related feature request:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=929959
aka "please support /etc/mailname".
* Closes: #898177
+
+ -- Tomas Pospisek Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:28:04 +0100
+
cron (3.0pl1-136) unstable; urgency=medium
* Convert package to source format 3.0 (quilt). Finally.
diff -u -r --new-file cron_3.0pl1-136.debian/patches/features/Add-MAILFROM-environment-variable.patch cron_3.0pl1-136.1.debi
Cool, thanks (-: <3 !
*t
On Mon, 8 Feb 2021, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Hi
Am 25.11.20 um 09:54 schrieb Tomas Pospisek:
Source: pnopaste
Version: 1.7.4
Severity: wishlist
Having "pastes" with monotonically increasing numbers allows an
"attacker" to discover all pastes by
Thanks a lot Bernhard that makes sense!
*t
On Fri, 15 Jan 2021, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the linphone package:
#694101: immediate segfault without config file
It has been closed by Bernhard Schmidt .
On 06.01.21 23:42, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jelmer Vernooij
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, breezy-c...@googlegroups.com
* Package name: qbrz
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : RJL situp and qbzr authors
* URL :
? Because maybe I or passers by
could then install your build and help testing whatever workaround comes
out of [1]?
I will contact the security team now to discuss the update.
+1 !!!
Thanks a lot!
*t
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=977870
Am 28.12.20 um 12:37 schrieb Tomas
Hi Jan Luca,
are you working on or respectively are you planing to do the stable build?
(I am not sure if I would be able to get access to a powerful enough
machine to do the build and get up to speed within reasonable time on how
to build chromium and on how to do it efficiently so that I do
erlying_type::type,
Am 23.12.20 um 12:13 schrieb Tomas Pospisek:
Hi all,
now that sid has seen an update of Chromium to v87 (hooray and thanks
everybody!) does anybody know it there's activity or plans towards
updating chromium in Debian stable?
Chromium from sid is not installable in Debian sta
Hi all,
now that sid has seen an update of Chromium to v87 (hooray and thanks
everybody!) does anybody know it there's activity or plans towards
updating chromium in Debian stable?
Chromium from sid is not installable in Debian stable due to
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.29)
whereas stable has
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
Go to
https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=Client+sent+an+HTTP+request+to+an+HTTPS+server
select first link
https://codesearch.debian.net/show?file=gcc-10_10.2.1-1%2Fgcc-10.2.0%2Flibgo%2Fgo%2Fnet%2Fhttp%2Fserver.go=1798
get a 404 with a list of 12
Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote on Mon, 30 Nov:
On 11/30/20 7:56 PM, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
There is no 3.0.3 package for postgis for focal on pdgd for amd64:
The Debian BTS is not appropriate for this issue, use the
pgsql-pkg-deb...@postgresql.org mailing list, or
https://redmine.postgresql.org
Source: postgis
Version: 3.0.3
Severity: normal
There is no 3.0.3 package for postgis for focal on pdgd for amd64:
http://apt.postgresql.org/pub/repos/apt/dists/focal-pgdg/main/binary-amd64/Packages
Weirdly enough it apparently *was* built for non-Intel/AMD
architectures but not for amd64:
Source: pnopaste
Version: 1.7.4
Severity: wishlist
Having "pastes" with monotonically increasing numbers allows an
"attacker" to discover all pastes by simply counting through
them from 0 on.
Assigning UUIDs to pastes would make that computationally
impossible.
Something like
Package: pnopaste-cli
Version: 1.7-4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi Patrick,
could you please enable proxy settings detection?
After the line:
my $Agent = LWP:UserAgent->new;
add the line:
$Agent->env_proxy;
that's it. Now pnopaste-cli will recognize:
http_proxy=...
The chromium-driver will apparently try to use /usr/bin/google-chrome
*first*, no matter what. It even ignores the search $PATH.
So if one does not intend to delete /usr/bin/google-chrome, then one work
around is to binary patch /usr/bin/chromedriver:
1. install a binary editor, such as bvi
1 - 100 of 790 matches
Mail list logo
