Bug#1007905: transition: icu

2022-04-28 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2022-04-27 15:18:16 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 07:30:56PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Control: tags -1 = confirmed > > Control: forwarded -1 > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-icu.html > > > > Hi > > > > On 2022-04-13 17:24:20 +0200, László

Bug#1007905: transition: icu

2022-04-27 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 07:30:56PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 = confirmed > Control: forwarded -1 > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-icu.html > > Hi > > On 2022-04-13 17:24:20 +0200, László Böszörményi wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 2:36 PM Jeremy

Bug#1007905: transition: icu

2022-04-23 Thread GCS
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 7:30 PM Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 = confirmed > Control: forwarded -1 > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-icu.html > > On 2022-04-13 17:24:20 +0200, László Böszörményi wrote: > > LibreOffice self-testing, especially its break iterator

Bug#1007905: transition: icu

2022-04-22 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 = confirmed Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-icu.html Hi On 2022-04-13 17:24:20 +0200, László Böszörményi wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 2:36 PM Jeremy Bicha > wrote: > > mozjs78 and mozjs91 now no longer have an ICU dependency in

Bug#1007905: transition: icu

2022-04-15 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 15.04.22 um 08:57 schrieb László Böszörményi (GCS): On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 8:48 AM Rene Engelhard wrote: Am 13.04.22 um 17:52 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Am 13.04.22 um 17:24 schrieb László Böszörményi (GCS): LibreOffice self-testing, especially its break iterator test fails for the Lao

Bug#1007905: transition: icu

2022-04-15 Thread GCS
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 8:48 AM Rene Engelhard wrote: > Am 13.04.22 um 17:52 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > > Am 13.04.22 um 17:24 schrieb László Böszörményi (GCS): > >> LibreOffice self-testing, especially its break iterator test fails for > >> the Lao language. > > > >

Bug#1007905: transition: icu

2022-04-15 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi again, Am 13.04.22 um 17:52 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Am 13.04.22 um 17:24 schrieb László Böszörményi (GCS): LibreOffice self-testing, especially its break iterator test fails for the Lao language.

Bug#1007905: transition: icu

2022-04-13 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 13.04.22 um 17:24 schrieb László Böszörményi (GCS): LibreOffice self-testing, especially its break iterator test fails for the Lao language. https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=263961306ede0656ebb7904034a2172615ce81d0 We could backport the needed stuff to 7.3.

Bug#1007905: transition: icu

2022-04-13 Thread GCS
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 2:36 PM Jeremy Bicha wrote: > mozjs78 and mozjs91 now no longer have an ICU dependency in Unstable. > > 0ad was fixed also. Thanks. Did the rebuild locally on i386 and amd64; started with the ICU 71.1 RC release and finished with the final release if that matters. Only

Bug#1007905: transition: icu

2022-04-13 Thread Jeremy Bicha
mozjs78 and mozjs91 now no longer have an ICU dependency in Unstable. 0ad was fixed also. Thanks, Jeremy Bicha

Bug#1007905: transition: icu

2022-03-23 Thread Jeremy Bicha
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 10:53 AM Simon McVittie wrote: > On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 at 06:50:34 +0100, László Böszörményi wrote: > > As noted, mozjs78 and 0ad FTBFS in my pbuilder setups. > > That's interesting, 0ad built fine for me against 70.1 on a porterbox > (i386 on barriere) - and its vendored

Bug#1007905: transition: icu

2022-03-23 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 at 09:28:49 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 06:05:38PM +, Simon McVittie wrote: > > Obviously all these copies of essentially the same codebase are quite > > unfortunate, but mozjs and ICU seem to be sufficiently tightly-coupled > > that perhaps using

Bug#1007905: transition: icu

2022-03-20 Thread GCS
On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 8:28 AM Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 06:05:38PM +, Simon McVittie wrote: > > Obviously all these copies of essentially the same codebase are quite > > unfortunate, but mozjs and ICU seem to be sufficiently tightly-coupled > > that perhaps using its

Bug#1007905: transition: icu

2022-03-19 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 06:05:38PM +, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 at 17:38:43 +0100, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: >... > Obviously all these copies of essentially the same codebase are quite > unfortunate, but mozjs and ICU seem to be sufficiently tightly-coupled > that

Bug#1007905: transition: icu

2022-03-19 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 12:47:50AM +, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 at 17:38:43 +0100, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > > At this point I remember only two packages that FTBFS > > with ICU 70.1 and I couldn't fix those. One is mozjs78 and the other > > is 0ad. > > mozjs78 has

Bug#1007905: transition: icu

2022-03-18 Thread Simon McVittie
On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 at 17:38:43 +0100, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > At this point I remember only two packages that FTBFS > with ICU 70.1 and I couldn't fix those. One is mozjs78 and the other > is 0ad. mozjs78 has unit tests that assume the vendored ICU will be used. I'm trying to adapt

Bug#1007905: transition: icu

2022-03-18 Thread Simon McVittie
On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 at 17:38:43 +0100, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > At this point I remember only two packages that FTBFS > with ICU 70.1 and I couldn't fix those. One is mozjs78 and the other > is 0ad. I think Ubuntu has already done this transition, so they might have patches. 0ad bundles

Bug#1007905: transition: icu

2022-03-18 Thread Jérémy Lal
Le ven. 18 mars 2022 à 18:26, László Böszörményi (GCS) a écrit : > On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 5:38 PM László Böszörményi (GCS) > wrote: > > I didn't file those bugs, but started patching those and filed only > > when succeeded. At this point I remember only two packages that FTBFS > > with ICU

Bug#1007905: transition: icu

2022-03-18 Thread Matthias Klose
On 18.03.22 17:38, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: Hi all, On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 1:42 PM Sebastian Ramacher wrote: On 2022-03-18 13:06:13, Jérémy Lal wrote: FYI same here, i had to fallback to nodejs 14 instead of 16 because of that. Last time I asked, icu maintainer had issues fixing icu

Bug#1007905: transition: icu

2022-03-18 Thread GCS
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 5:38 PM László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > I didn't file those bugs, but started patching those and filed only > when succeeded. At this point I remember only two packages that FTBFS > with ICU 70.1 and I couldn't fix those. One is mozjs78 and the other > is 0ad. I had

Bug#1007905: transition: icu

2022-03-18 Thread GCS
Hi all, On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 1:42 PM Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2022-03-18 13:06:13, Jérémy Lal wrote: > > FYI same here, i had to fallback to nodejs 14 instead of 16 because of that. > > Last time I asked, icu maintainer had issues fixing icu reverse > > build-dependencies. > > He

Bug#1007905: transition: icu

2022-03-18 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2022-03-18 13:06:13, Jérémy Lal wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 12:51 PM Simon McVittie wrote: > > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gtk-gn...@lists.debian.org,

Bug#1007905: transition: icu

2022-03-18 Thread Jérémy Lal
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 12:51 PM Simon McVittie wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gtk-gn...@lists.debian.org, i...@packages.debian.org > Forwarded:

Bug#1007905: transition: icu

2022-03-18 Thread Simon McVittie
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gtk-gn...@lists.debian.org, i...@packages.debian.org Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-icu.html Tags: moreinfo icu has a new upstream